6.6 Decision making under uncertainty

Decision-making under uncertainty is a critical aspect of robotics and bioinspired systems. It enables robots to navigate complex, dynamic environments and make informed choices when faced with incomplete information or unpredictable outcomes.

This topic explores various frameworks and methods for handling uncertainty, including Markov decision processes, probabilistic planning, and reinforcement learning. By understanding these approaches, we can develop more adaptive and robust robotic systems that mimic natural decision-making processes.

Fundamentals of uncertainty

• Uncertainty plays a crucial role in robotics and bioinspired systems, affecting decision-making processes and system performance
• Understanding uncertainty enables the development of more robust and adaptive robotic systems that can operate effectively in dynamic environments
• Bioinspired approaches often leverage natural mechanisms for handling uncertainty, providing insights for artificial decision-making systems

Types of uncertainty

Top images from around the web for Types of uncertainty

• 

  Uncertainty in risk engineering: concepts View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Immersive Data Comprehension: Visualizing Uncertainty in Measurable Models ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Uncertainpy: A Python Toolbox for Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Uncertainty in risk engineering: concepts View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Immersive Data Comprehension: Visualizing Uncertainty in Measurable Models ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Types of uncertainty

• 

  Uncertainty in risk engineering: concepts View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Immersive Data Comprehension: Visualizing Uncertainty in Measurable Models ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Uncertainpy: A Python Toolbox for Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Uncertainty in risk engineering: concepts View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Immersive Data Comprehension: Visualizing Uncertainty in Measurable Models ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Aleatory uncertainty arises from inherent randomness in a system or process
• Epistemic uncertainty stems from lack of knowledge or incomplete information
• Ontological uncertainty relates to ambiguity in the definition or categorization of concepts
• Measurement uncertainty occurs due to limitations in sensors or data collection methods

Probabilistic reasoning basics

• Probability theory provides a mathematical framework for quantifying and reasoning about uncertainty
• Bayes' theorem forms the foundation for updating beliefs based on new evidence
• Conditional probability expresses the likelihood of an event given the occurrence of another event
• Joint probability distributions represent the probability of multiple events occurring simultaneously
• Marginal probability calculates the probability of an event regardless of other variables

Stochastic processes overview

• Stochastic processes model systems that evolve randomly over time
• Markov chains represent sequences of events where the probability of each event depends only on the state of the previous event
• Poisson processes model the occurrence of random events at a constant average rate
• Brownian motion describes the random movement of particles suspended in a fluid
• Gaussian processes provide a flexible framework for modeling uncertain functions

Decision-making frameworks

• Decision-making frameworks in robotics and bioinspired systems provide structured approaches for handling uncertainty
• These frameworks enable robots to make informed choices in complex, dynamic environments
• Bioinspired decision-making often draws inspiration from natural systems to develop more adaptive and robust artificial decision-makers

Markov decision processes

• MDPs model sequential decision-making problems in fully observable environments
• States represent the current situation of the system or agent
• Actions are choices available to the decision-maker at each state
• Transition probabilities define the likelihood of moving between states given an action
• Rewards quantify the desirability of state-action pairs
• Optimal policies maximize expected cumulative rewards over time

Partially observable MDPs

• POMDPs extend MDPs to handle partially observable environments
• Observations provide incomplete or noisy information about the true state
• Belief states represent probability distributions over possible states
• Action selection considers both immediate rewards and information gathering
• POMDP solvers use techniques like value iteration or point-based methods
• Applications include robot navigation in uncertain environments and assistive technologies

Bayesian decision theory

• Bayesian decision theory combines probability theory with utility theory for decision-making
• Prior probabilities represent initial beliefs about the state of the world
• Likelihood functions quantify the probability of observations given different states
• Posterior probabilities update beliefs based on new evidence using Bayes' theorem
• Decision rules map beliefs to actions that maximize expected utility
• Loss functions quantify the consequences of different decision outcomes

Probabilistic planning methods

• Probabilistic planning methods enable robots to generate and execute plans in uncertain environments
• These methods are crucial for developing adaptive and robust robotic systems
• Bioinspired approaches often incorporate probabilistic planning to mimic natural decision-making processes

Monte Carlo methods

• Monte Carlo methods use random sampling to solve complex probabilistic problems
• Monte Carlo tree search explores decision trees by random sampling and backpropagation
• Importance sampling techniques reduce variance in Monte Carlo estimates
• Particle filters use Monte Carlo methods for state estimation in dynamic systems
• Applications include robot localization and path planning under uncertainty

Particle filters

• Particle filters estimate the state of a system using a set of weighted samples (particles)
• Prediction step propagates particles based on a motion model
• Update step adjusts particle weights based on sensor measurements
• Resampling eliminates low-weight particles and duplicates high-weight ones
• Effective for non-linear and non-Gaussian estimation problems
• Used in robot localization, object tracking, and SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping)

Hidden Markov models

• HMMs model systems with hidden states that generate observable outputs
• States represent unobservable conditions of the system
• Observations are visible outputs generated by the hidden states
• Transition probabilities define how hidden states evolve over time
• Emission probabilities relate hidden states to observations
• Algorithms like Viterbi and forward-backward enable state inference and parameter learning
• Applications include speech recognition, gesture recognition, and biological sequence analysis

Learning under uncertainty

• Learning under uncertainty is essential for developing adaptive robotic systems
• These techniques enable robots to improve their decision-making capabilities through experience
• Bioinspired learning approaches often draw inspiration from natural learning processes

Reinforcement learning basics

• Reinforcement learning (RL) involves learning optimal behaviors through interaction with an environment
• Agents learn to maximize cumulative rewards over time
• Exploration-exploitation trade-off balances discovering new information and exploiting known rewards
• Value functions estimate the expected return from a state or state-action pair
• Policy functions map states to actions
• Model-free RL learns directly from experience without building an explicit environment model
• Model-based RL builds and uses an environment model for planning and decision-making

Q-learning vs SARSA

• Q-learning is an off-policy temporal difference learning algorithm
  • Updates Q-values based on the maximum future Q-value
  • Tends to learn optimal policies even with exploratory behavior
  • May be more sensitive to initial conditions and hyperparameters
• SARSA (State-Action-Reward-State-Action) is an on-policy temporal difference learning algorithm
  • Updates Q-values based on the actual next action taken
  • Learns the policy that is actually being followed during training
  • Often more stable in stochastic environments
• Both algorithms use the Bellman equation to update value estimates
• Q-learning may converge faster to optimal policies in deterministic environments
• SARSA may be safer in some scenarios as it accounts for exploration during learning

Policy gradient methods

• Policy gradient methods directly optimize the policy function
• Gradient ascent updates the policy parameters to maximize expected returns
• REINFORCE algorithm uses Monte Carlo estimates of policy gradients
• Actor-Critic methods combine value function approximation with policy optimization
• Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO) constrains policy updates to improve stability
• Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) simplifies TRPO while maintaining performance
• Applications include continuous control tasks and robotics

Multi-agent decision making

• Multi-agent decision making extends single-agent approaches to scenarios involving multiple interacting agents
• These techniques are crucial for developing collaborative robotic systems and understanding emergent behaviors
• Bioinspired multi-agent systems often draw inspiration from social insects and other collective animal behaviors

Game theory fundamentals

• Game theory provides a mathematical framework for analyzing strategic interactions
• Players represent decision-makers with potentially conflicting objectives
• Strategies define possible actions or choices available to players
• Payoffs quantify the outcomes for each player given a set of strategies
• Nash equilibrium represents a stable state where no player can unilaterally improve their outcome
• Dominant strategies are optimal regardless of other players' actions
• Applications include resource allocation, auction design, and conflict resolution in multi-robot systems

Cooperative vs competitive scenarios

• Cooperative scenarios involve agents working together towards a common goal
  • Team formation algorithms optimize group composition for specific tasks
  • Task allocation methods distribute work efficiently among team members
  • Consensus algorithms enable decentralized agreement on shared information
• Competitive scenarios involve agents with conflicting objectives
  • Zero-sum games model situations where one agent's gain is another's loss
  • Mechanism design creates rules that incentivize desired behaviors
  • Adversarial learning improves robustness against strategic opponents
• Mixed scenarios combine elements of cooperation and competition
  • Coalition formation balances individual and group interests
  • Negotiation protocols enable agents to reach mutually beneficial agreements
  • Market-based approaches use economic principles to allocate resources and tasks

Decentralized decision making

• Decentralized decision making distributes control among multiple agents without central coordination
• Distributed optimization techniques solve global problems using local information
• Swarm intelligence algorithms draw inspiration from collective behaviors in nature
• Consensus protocols enable agreement on shared information or decisions
• Decentralized POMDPs extend single-agent POMDPs to multi-agent settings
• Communication strategies balance information sharing and bandwidth constraints
• Applications include multi-robot exploration, distributed sensor networks, and traffic management

Robotic applications

• Robotic applications of decision-making under uncertainty span various domains and tasks
• These applications demonstrate the practical importance of uncertainty handling in real-world robotic systems
• Bioinspired approaches often provide novel solutions to challenging robotic problems

Autonomous navigation

• Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) estimates robot pose and environment structure
• Path planning algorithms generate collision-free trajectories in uncertain environments
• Obstacle avoidance techniques react to unexpected obstacles during motion
• Exploration strategies balance gathering new information and exploiting known areas
• Multi-robot coordination enables efficient coverage and mapping of large environments
• Semantic mapping incorporates high-level understanding of the environment for improved navigation

Manipulation under uncertainty

• Grasp planning considers object pose uncertainty and sensor noise
• Visual servoing uses visual feedback to guide robotic manipulators
• Force control strategies adapt to uncertain object properties and contact dynamics
• Learning from demonstration enables robots to acquire manipulation skills from human examples
• Active perception integrates sensing actions with manipulation to reduce uncertainty
• Robust motion planning generates trajectories that account for kinematic and dynamic uncertainties

Human-robot interaction challenges

• Intent recognition infers human goals and preferences from observed behaviors
• Adaptive assistance tailors robot behavior to individual user needs and capabilities
• Social navigation enables robots to move naturally in human-populated environments
• Gesture and speech recognition handle variability in human communication
• Safety considerations ensure robot actions do not endanger nearby humans
• Trust building develops and maintains human trust in robotic systems over time

Bioinspired approaches

• Bioinspired approaches to decision-making under uncertainty draw inspiration from natural systems
• These techniques often lead to more adaptive and robust robotic decision-making systems
• Studying biological decision-making processes provides insights for developing artificial systems

Neural basis of decision making

• Drift-diffusion models capture evidence accumulation in perceptual decision-making
• Winner-take-all networks implement competitive selection among alternatives
• Attractor dynamics model decision-making as transitions between stable states
• Neuromodulation influences decision-making by adjusting neural network parameters
• Predictive coding frameworks explain perception and decision-making as hierarchical inference
• Reservoir computing models capture temporal dynamics in neural decision processes

Swarm intelligence

• Ant colony optimization uses pheromone-inspired communication for path finding
• Particle swarm optimization mimics flocking behaviors for global optimization
• Artificial bee colony algorithms model foraging behaviors for distributed search
• Firefly algorithms use bioluminescence-inspired mechanisms for optimization
• Fish school algorithms simulate collective behaviors for multi-agent coordination
• Applications include multi-robot task allocation, distributed sensing, and collective transport

Evolutionary algorithms for decisions

• Genetic algorithms evolve populations of candidate solutions through selection and recombination
• Evolutionary strategies optimize continuous parameters using self-adaptive mutation
• Genetic programming evolves computer programs or decision trees
• Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms handle problems with conflicting objectives
• Coevolutionary algorithms model competitive or cooperative interactions between evolving populations
• Applications include policy optimization, adaptive control, and complex system design

Performance evaluation

• Performance evaluation is crucial for assessing and improving decision-making algorithms
• These techniques enable comparison between different approaches and guide algorithm development
• Bioinspired evaluation methods often consider factors like adaptability and robustness

Metrics for decision quality

• Expected utility measures the average outcome of a decision policy
• Regret quantifies the difference between chosen actions and optimal actions
• Sample efficiency evaluates learning speed in terms of required experiences
• Computational complexity assesses the scalability of decision algorithms
• Consistency measures how well decisions align with stated preferences or axioms
• Interpretability evaluates the ease of understanding and explaining decision processes

Robustness vs optimality

• Robustness measures performance across a range of uncertain conditions
• Optimality focuses on achieving the best possible performance under specific assumptions
• Sensitivity analysis quantifies how small changes in inputs affect decision outcomes
• Risk-averse decision-making prioritizes avoiding worst-case scenarios
• Satisficing approaches seek satisfactory solutions rather than optimal ones
• Multi-criteria decision analysis balances multiple, potentially conflicting objectives

Benchmarking decision algorithms

• Standardized environments (OpenAI Gym, MuJoCo) provide consistent testing platforms
• Real-world robotics challenges (RoboCup, DARPA challenges) assess performance in complex scenarios
• Cross-validation techniques evaluate generalization to unseen data
• Ablation studies isolate the impact of individual components or features
• Comparative studies assess relative performance across multiple algorithms
• Long-term studies evaluate algorithm performance over extended periods and changing conditions