4.1 PID control

PID control is a fundamental technique in robotics and bioinspired systems. It uses proportional, integral, and derivative terms to regulate processes, providing stable and precise control for tasks like motor control and position regulation.

PID controllers minimize errors between desired setpoints and measured outputs. By combining immediate correction, accumulated error elimination, and future error anticipation, PID control offers robust performance across various operating conditions in robotic applications.

Fundamentals of PID control

• PID control forms the backbone of feedback control systems in robotics and bioinspired systems, providing precise and stable regulation of various processes
• Implements a closed-loop control mechanism that continuously calculates an error value and applies corrections to minimize deviations from desired setpoints
• Widely used in robotic systems for tasks such as motor control, position regulation, and trajectory following

Definition and purpose

Top images from around the web for Definition and purpose

• 

  Proportional–integral–derivative controller - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  PID controller - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Proportional–integral–derivative controller - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Proportional–integral–derivative controller - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  PID controller - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Definition and purpose

• 

  Proportional–integral–derivative controller - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  PID controller - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Proportional–integral–derivative controller - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Proportional–integral–derivative controller - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  PID controller - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller combines three control actions to generate a control signal
• Aims to minimize the error between a measured process variable and a desired setpoint
• Provides robust performance across a wide range of operating conditions
• Adapts to changing system dynamics and disturbances

Components: P, I, and D

• Proportional (P) term responds to present error, providing immediate correction
• Integral (I) term addresses accumulated past errors, eliminating steady-state offset
• Derivative (D) term anticipates future errors based on the rate of change
• Each component contributes uniquely to the overall control performance
• Combined action of P, I, and D terms results in improved system stability and responsiveness

Block diagram representation

• Consists of a forward path with the PID controller and a feedback loop
• Error signal generated by comparing setpoint to measured output
• PID controller processes error signal to produce control output
• Plant or process being controlled receives the control signal
• Feedback path closes the loop, enabling continuous error correction
• Summing junction combines setpoint and feedback signals

Proportional control

• Proportional control serves as the foundation of PID systems, providing immediate response to errors
• Plays a crucial role in robotic applications requiring quick reactions to changes in the environment
• Forms the basis for more complex control strategies in bioinspired systems

Concept and function

• Generates a control output directly proportional to the current error
• Control action increases as the error grows larger
• Provides a fast initial response to deviations from the setpoint
• Mathematically expressed as $u(t) = K_p e(t)$, where $K_p$ is the proportional gain
• Reduces but does not eliminate steady-state error in most systems

Proportional gain tuning

• Higher $K_p$ values result in larger control actions and faster system response
• Excessive proportional gain can lead to system instability and oscillations
• Insufficient gain may result in sluggish response and large steady-state errors
• Optimal gain balances response speed with stability considerations
• Tuning often starts with a low gain value and gradually increases until desired performance achieved

Steady-state error

• Residual error that persists after the system reaches equilibrium
• Occurs because proportional control alone cannot eliminate offset for certain system types
• Inversely proportional to the gain $K_p$ for Type 0 systems
• Can be reduced but not eliminated by increasing the proportional gain
• Often necessitates the addition of integral control to achieve zero steady-state error

Integral control

• Integral control complements proportional action by eliminating steady-state errors in robotic systems
• Crucial for maintaining precise positioning in robotic manipulators and autonomous navigation
• Enhances the overall accuracy and reliability of bioinspired control systems

Purpose and implementation

• Accumulates past errors over time to generate a control action
• Eliminates steady-state error by applying a control signal proportional to the integral of the error
• Mathematically expressed as $u(t) = K_i \int_0^t e(\tau) d\tau$, where $K_i$ is the integral gain
• Slow-acting compared to proportional control but effective in achieving zero offset
• Particularly useful for systems with constant disturbances or load changes

Integral windup

• Occurs when the integral term accumulates a large error during periods of actuator saturation
• Results in excessive overshoot and delayed system recovery
• Can cause instability and poor performance in robotic systems
• More pronounced in systems with slow dynamics or large time constants
• Requires implementation of anti-windup mechanisms to mitigate negative effects

Anti-windup techniques

• Conditional integration stops integrating when the control output saturates
• Back-calculation adjusts the integral term based on the difference between saturated and unsaturated outputs
• Integral clamping limits the integral term to a predefined range
• Tracking mode switches the controller to a different algorithm during saturation
• Proper implementation of anti-windup improves system stability and transient response

Derivative control

• Derivative control enhances the dynamic response and stability of robotic control systems
• Particularly useful in applications requiring fast reaction times and precise motion control
• Improves the overall performance of bioinspired systems by anticipating future error trends

Role in PID systems

• Responds to the rate of change of the error signal
• Provides a predictive element to the control action
• Improves system damping and reduces overshoot
• Mathematically expressed as $u(t) = K_d \frac{de(t)}{dt}$, where $K_d$ is the derivative gain
• Enhances stability by counteracting rapid changes in the error signal

Noise sensitivity

• Amplifies high-frequency noise in the measured signal
• Can lead to erratic control actions and actuator wear in robotic systems
• Requires careful implementation of noise filtering techniques
• Low-pass filters often used to attenuate high-frequency components
• Trade-off between noise rejection and control responsiveness must be considered

Derivative kick

• Sudden spike in the control output when the setpoint changes abruptly
• Caused by the derivative of the error signal becoming very large
• Can result in undesirable system behavior and mechanical stress in robotic actuators
• Mitigated by applying derivative action to the process variable instead of the error signal
• Setpoint filtering techniques can also help reduce the impact of derivative kick

PID tuning methods

• PID tuning optimizes controller performance for specific robotic and bioinspired systems
• Crucial for achieving desired response characteristics and stability in various operating conditions
• Balances multiple performance criteria such as rise time, overshoot, and settling time

Manual tuning

• Iterative process of adjusting PID gains based on observed system response
• Typically starts with P control, then adds I and D terms as needed
• Requires expertise and understanding of the system dynamics
• Can be time-consuming but provides insight into system behavior
• Often used for fine-tuning after initial parameter estimates from other methods

Ziegler-Nichols method

• Systematic approach for determining initial PID parameters
• Ultimate gain method involves increasing proportional gain until sustained oscillations occur
• Quarter amplitude decay method uses step response characteristics
• Provides a starting point for further fine-tuning
• May result in aggressive control actions and significant overshoot

Cohen-Coon method

• Designed for processes with significant time delay
• Uses the process reaction curve to estimate system parameters
• Provides good disturbance rejection for lag-dominant processes
• Generally results in faster closed-loop response compared to Ziegler-Nichols
• May lead to poor robustness and stability in some systems

Advanced PID concepts

• Advanced PID techniques enhance the capabilities of standard PID control in complex robotic systems
• Improve performance in challenging scenarios encountered in bioinspired control applications
• Adapt control strategies to varying operating conditions and system nonlinearities

Feedforward control

• Anticipates and compensates for known disturbances or setpoint changes
• Combines with feedback PID control to improve overall system response
• Requires a model of the system dynamics or disturbance characteristics
• Particularly effective in robotic systems with predictable external influences
• Can significantly reduce the workload on the feedback controller

Cascade control

• Utilizes multiple nested control loops to improve performance
• Inner loop controls a faster process variable, while outer loop manages slower dynamics
• Enhances disturbance rejection and setpoint tracking in complex systems
• Commonly used in robotic manipulators with multiple joints or degrees of freedom
• Requires careful tuning of both inner and outer loop controllers

Gain scheduling

• Adapts controller parameters based on operating conditions or system states
• Improves performance across a wide range of operating points
• Particularly useful for nonlinear systems or those with varying dynamics
• Implements multiple linear controllers for different operating regions
• Requires smooth transitions between different parameter sets to avoid instability

PID variations

• PID variations tailor control strategies to specific requirements of robotic and bioinspired systems
• Address limitations of standard PID control in certain applications
• Optimize performance by selectively using or modifying PID components

PI vs PID control

• PI control eliminates steady-state error without the noise sensitivity of derivative action
• Suitable for processes with significant measurement noise or where rapid response not critical
• PID provides faster response and better disturbance rejection in most cases
• PI often preferred in flow control applications or systems with slow dynamics
• PID excels in position control and applications requiring precise tracking

PD vs PID control

• PD control offers improved transient response without steady-state error elimination
• Useful in systems where steady-state accuracy not critical or achieved through other means
• PID provides zero steady-state error for step inputs in Type 1 and higher systems
• PD often used in robotic manipulator joint control for fast, stable response
• PID preferred in applications requiring both dynamic performance and steady-state accuracy

Two-degree-of-freedom PID

• Separates setpoint tracking and disturbance rejection functions
• Allows independent tuning of reference tracking and regulatory control
• Improves overall system performance by optimizing both aspects simultaneously
• Reduces overshoot in setpoint changes without sacrificing disturbance rejection
• Particularly beneficial in robotic systems with frequent setpoint changes and external disturbances

Digital implementation

• Digital implementation of PID control enables advanced features and flexibility in robotic systems
• Allows for easy integration with other digital components and sensors in bioinspired applications
• Provides opportunities for adaptive control and real-time parameter optimization

Discretization methods

• Convert continuous-time PID equations to discrete-time equivalents
• Forward Euler method provides simple approximation but may introduce instability
• Backward Euler method offers improved stability but introduces delay
• Trapezoidal (Tustin) method balances accuracy and stability
• Matched pole-zero method preserves the frequency response of the continuous controller

Sampling time considerations

• Proper selection of sampling time crucial for digital PID performance
• Too slow sampling can lead to poor control and aliasing effects
• Excessively fast sampling increases computational load and noise sensitivity
• Rule of thumb suggests sampling 4-10 times faster than the system's rise time
• Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem sets the theoretical lower bound for sampling frequency

Anti-aliasing filters

• Low-pass filters applied to analog signals before analog-to-digital conversion
• Prevent high-frequency components from aliasing into the controller bandwidth
• Typically set cutoff frequency at half the sampling frequency (Nyquist frequency)
• Butterworth filters often used for their maximally flat passband
• Proper filter design balances noise rejection with minimal phase delay

PID in robotics applications

• PID control forms the foundation for numerous control tasks in robotics and bioinspired systems
• Provides reliable and adaptable control solutions for a wide range of robotic applications
• Integrates with higher-level control strategies to achieve complex behaviors and tasks

Motion control systems

• PID controllers regulate velocity and position of robotic joints and actuators
• Cascaded PID loops often used for precise control of robot arm movements
• Integral action compensates for gravity and other constant disturbances
• Derivative term improves stability and reduces overshoot in rapid movements
• Gain scheduling may be employed to handle varying loads and inertias

Autonomous navigation

• PID control governs steering and speed in mobile robot navigation
• Helps maintain desired trajectories and avoid obstacles
• Integral term compensates for wheel slippage and uneven terrain
• Derivative action improves responsiveness to sudden direction changes
• Often combined with path planning algorithms for complete navigation solutions

Robotic manipulators

• PID controllers manage individual joint positions in robotic arms
• Coordinate multiple PID loops for end-effector positioning in Cartesian space
• Integral action counteracts gravitational effects and payload variations
• Derivative control dampens oscillations and improves stability
• Feedforward terms often added to compensate for known dynamics and improve tracking

Limitations and alternatives

• Understanding PID limitations informs the selection of appropriate control strategies for complex robotic systems
• Alternative control methods address scenarios where standard PID control may be insufficient
• Advanced control techniques often build upon or complement PID principles in bioinspired applications

Nonlinear systems challenges

• PID control assumes linear system behavior, leading to suboptimal performance in highly nonlinear systems
• Gain scheduling or adaptive PID can partially address nonlinearity issues
• Performance degradation occurs when operating far from the tuning point
• Coupling between control loops in multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) systems can cause instability
• Model-based nonlinear control methods may be necessary for highly nonlinear robotic systems

Model predictive control

• Utilizes a system model to predict future behavior and optimize control actions
• Handles constraints on inputs, states, and outputs explicitly
• Well-suited for MIMO systems and processes with significant time delays
• Computationally intensive but increasingly feasible with modern hardware
• Particularly effective in robotic applications with complex dynamics and multiple objectives

Adaptive control strategies

• Automatically adjust controller parameters based on observed system behavior
• Cope with changing system dynamics, wear, and varying operating conditions
• Self-tuning regulators estimate system parameters and update controller settings
• Model reference adaptive control adjusts the control law to match a desired reference model
• Particularly useful in robotic systems operating in uncertain or changing environments