3.4 Applications of Prospect Theory in Economics
4 min read•july 31, 2024
revolutionizes our understanding of economic decision-making. It explains why we're more upset about losing 50. This theory challenges traditional models by showing how our choices often deviate from what's considered "rational."
From consumer behavior to finance, labor economics, and public policy, Prospect Theory has far-reaching applications. It helps us understand why we hold onto losing stocks, why pay cuts hurt more than raises help, and how framing health messages can change behaviors. This knowledge is crucial for anyone studying economics or psychology.
Prospect theory for consumer behavior
Value function and loss aversion
Top images from around the web for Value function and loss aversion
Endowment effect - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
What is the Prospect Theory? - The Upstream Boat View original
Is this image relevant?
Behavioural Finance: A Re-Examination of Prospect Theory View original
Is this image relevant?
Endowment effect - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
What is the Prospect Theory? - The Upstream Boat View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Value function and loss aversion
Endowment effect - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
What is the Prospect Theory? - The Upstream Boat View original
Is this image relevant?
Behavioural Finance: A Re-Examination of Prospect Theory View original
Is this image relevant?
Endowment effect - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
What is the Prospect Theory? - The Upstream Boat View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Prospect theory explains decision-making under risk and uncertainty, deviating from rational choice models
- demonstrates risk aversion for gains and risk-seeking for losses
- suggests losses impact decisions more than equivalent gains
- leads consumers to overvalue owned items
- Influences pricing and marketing decisions
- Example: People demand more to give up a coffee mug they own than they would pay to acquire it
Framing effects and marketing strategies
- Presentation of choices significantly influences consumer decision-making
- Example: Framing a discount as "Save 5" can impact effectiveness
- Pricing strategies leverage prospect theory insights
- Decoy pricing introduces a third option to make the target option more attractive
- Anchoring uses an initial price point to influence perceptions of value
- Marketing often emphasizes potential losses from not purchasing
- Example: "Don't miss out on this limited-time offer!"
- explains preference for guaranteed but lower value options
- Example: Consumers choosing a sure 100 off
Prospect theory in finance
Investment behavior and decision-making
- Challenges traditional in finance
- explains different risk attitudes for small vs large gains/losses
- Example: Investors may be risk-averse for small gains but risk-seeking for large losses
- causes investors to hold losing stocks too long and sell winners too quickly
- Impacts overall portfolio performance
- Example: An investor keeping a stock that has dropped 20% hoping it will recover
- Explains suboptimal decisions during market volatility
- Example: Panic selling during market crashes, buying at market peaks
Implications for financial models and products
- Asset pricing models may need adjustments to account for behavioral biases
- Non-linear preferences described by prospect theory challenge assumptions of traditional models
- Informs design of financial products and services
- Structured products can be tailored to align with investors' loss aversion
- Insurance policies can be framed to emphasize protection against potential losses
- Certainty effect influences portfolio allocation decisions
- Investors may prefer lower but guaranteed returns over higher potential but uncertain gains
- Example: Choosing bonds over stocks despite lower long-term expected returns
Prospect theory in labor economics
Wage perceptions and job satisfaction
- Workers more sensitive to wage cuts than equivalent increases
- Influences labor supply decisions and wage negotiations
- Example: A 5% pay cut has a larger impact on job satisfaction than a 5% raise
- Reference points affect job satisfaction and productivity
- Past wages or peer comparisons contribute to wage rigidity
- Example: An employee feeling underpaid after learning a coworker's salary
- Endowment effect reduces job mobility
- Employees overvalue current jobs, leading to potentially inefficient labor market outcomes
- Example: Staying in a familiar job despite better opportunities elsewhere
Job search and employment decisions
- Risk attitudes differ when facing potential gains (job offers) vs losses (unemployment)
- Example: Being more willing to take risks when facing unemployment
- Framing of compensation packages influences job acceptance and motivation
- Emphasizing bonuses vs base salary can impact perceived value
- Example: A job offer with a lower base salary but higher potential bonuses may be less attractive
- Prospect theory explains retirement decision patterns
- Tendency to retire at specific age milestones (60, 65) may not align with traditional economic models
- Job search strategies influenced by decision-making under uncertainty
- Example: Accepting a less desirable job offer to avoid the uncertainty of continued searching
Prospect theory for public policy
Health and safety interventions
- Public health campaigns leverage loss aversion to encourage healthier behaviors
- Example: Emphasizing years of life lost due to smoking rather than years gained by quitting
- Disaster preparedness policies informed by risk perception insights
- Example: Framing evacuation orders in terms of potential losses to increase compliance
- Nudge strategies in behavioral economics guide choice architectures
- Promote desired outcomes while preserving individual freedom
- Example: Placing healthier food options at eye level in cafeterias
Economic and environmental policy design
- Tax policy design considers how individuals perceive and respond to different structures
- Example: Framing tax credits as avoiding a loss rather than gaining a benefit
- Social welfare programs improved by considering reference points and loss aversion
- Example: Gradually reducing benefits as income increases to avoid perceived sudden losses
- Environmental policies leverage prospect theory insights
- Help policymakers understand responses to different types of environmental risks
- Example: Framing carbon taxes as avoiding future losses rather than immediate costs
- Framing effects applied to improve policy communications
- Increase public support for various initiatives
- Example: Presenting budget allocations in terms of percentage of total budget rather than absolute amounts
Key Terms to Review (20)
Amos Tversky: Amos Tversky was a pioneering cognitive psychologist known for his groundbreaking work in decision-making and behavioral economics, particularly in collaboration with Daniel Kahneman. His research highlighted how people often deviate from traditional economic theories and rationality due to cognitive biases, which has reshaped our understanding of human decision-making processes.
Bounded rationality: Bounded rationality refers to the concept that individuals make decisions based on limited information and cognitive limitations, rather than striving for complete rationality. This means that while people aim to make the best choices, they often rely on heuristics and simplified models, leading to decisions that may be satisfactory but not necessarily optimal.
Certainty Effect: The certainty effect refers to the phenomenon where individuals disproportionately favor certain outcomes over probable ones, even when the expected utility is lower. This behavior highlights a key difference in decision-making between rational choice models and actual human behavior, revealing how people often make choices based on perceived certainty rather than statistical probabilities.
Daniel Kahneman: Daniel Kahneman is a renowned psychologist known for his work in behavioral economics, particularly in understanding how psychological factors influence economic decision-making. His research challenges traditional economic theories by highlighting the cognitive biases and heuristics that impact people's choices, ultimately reshaping the way we think about rationality in economics.
Default Options: Default options are pre-set choices that take effect if individuals do not actively make a different choice. These options play a significant role in guiding decision-making by making certain choices easier and more accessible, thereby influencing behavior without restricting freedom of choice. Understanding default options is crucial as they can impact economic behaviors, health decisions, environmental conservation efforts, savings rates, and retirement planning.
Diminishing Sensitivity: Diminishing sensitivity refers to the psychological phenomenon where individuals experience a decreasing emotional response to changes in wealth or outcomes as they move further from a reference point. This means that as gains or losses increase, the perceived impact of those changes on a person’s utility or satisfaction becomes less significant. It plays a crucial role in understanding how people make decisions, particularly when contrasting theories like expected utility and prospect theory.
Disposition Effect: The disposition effect is a behavioral finance phenomenon where investors are more likely to sell assets that have increased in value while holding onto assets that have decreased in value. This tendency reflects emotional biases in decision-making, often leading to suboptimal investment choices and impacting overall portfolio performance.
Endowment Effect: The endowment effect is a cognitive bias where individuals value an item more highly simply because they own it. This phenomenon impacts how people make economic decisions, leading to irrational behaviors that deviate from traditional economic theories.
Expected Utility Theory: Expected utility theory is a foundational concept in economics and decision-making that describes how individuals make choices under uncertainty by calculating the expected outcomes of different actions and assigning values to them. This theory assumes that people evaluate risky options based on their expected utility, which is derived from the probabilities of potential outcomes and their respective utilities. By comparing these expected utilities, individuals can choose the option that maximizes their perceived satisfaction or benefit.
Framing effect: The framing effect refers to the phenomenon where people's decisions are influenced by how information is presented or 'framed,' rather than just by the information itself. This can significantly alter perceptions and choices, impacting economic decisions, as different presentations can lead to different interpretations and outcomes.
Gambling behavior: Gambling behavior refers to the patterns and actions individuals exhibit when engaging in games of chance or betting activities, often driven by the desire for financial gain or entertainment. This behavior can be influenced by various psychological, emotional, and social factors, leading to different levels of risk-taking and decision-making. Understanding gambling behavior is essential for analyzing how individuals perceive potential outcomes and weigh risks versus rewards, particularly within the framework of economic decision-making.
Insurance purchasing: Insurance purchasing refers to the process of acquiring insurance coverage to protect against potential financial losses or risks. This behavior is influenced by individual perceptions of risk and the potential benefits of insuring against uncertain events, often analyzed through the lens of Prospect Theory, which highlights how people value gains and losses differently based on perceived probabilities and outcomes.
Loss Aversion: Loss aversion refers to the psychological phenomenon where people prefer to avoid losses rather than acquire equivalent gains, implying that the pain of losing is psychologically more impactful than the pleasure of gaining. This concept connects deeply with how individuals make economic decisions, influencing behaviors across various contexts such as risk-taking, investment choices, and consumer behavior.
Nudging: Nudging is a concept in behavioral economics that involves subtly influencing individuals' choices and behaviors without restricting their freedom to choose. It leverages insights from psychology to design environments, or 'choice architectures,' that can lead to better decision-making outcomes, promoting healthier, more sustainable, or financially beneficial behaviors. By framing options and presenting information in a particular way, nudges can help individuals make decisions that align with their long-term interests.
Overweighting small probabilities: Overweighting small probabilities refers to the tendency of individuals to assign excessive weight or importance to events that have a low probability of occurring, often leading to irrational decision-making. This phenomenon is particularly relevant in understanding how people perceive risk and make choices under uncertainty, as it can distort their evaluation of outcomes and influence their overall risk attitudes.
Prospect Theory: Prospect theory is a behavioral economic theory that describes how individuals evaluate potential losses and gains when making decisions under risk. It highlights the way people perceive gains and losses differently, leading to decisions that often deviate from expected utility theory, particularly emphasizing the impact of loss aversion and reference points in their choices.
Reference Dependence: Reference dependence is a principle in behavioral economics where individuals evaluate outcomes relative to a specific reference point rather than in absolute terms. This concept is crucial for understanding how people perceive gains and losses, as it implies that individuals' decisions are influenced by their current situation, expectations, and prior experiences. It connects deeply to the idea of how choices are framed and the psychological impact of potential losses versus gains, revealing the underlying mechanisms that drive economic decision-making.
S-shaped value function: The S-shaped value function is a core concept in prospect theory that illustrates how individuals perceive gains and losses, characterized by a concave curve for gains and a convex curve for losses. This means that people experience diminishing sensitivity to gains and increasing sensitivity to losses, which affects their decision-making under uncertainty. It highlights how individuals tend to value potential losses more heavily than equivalent gains, leading to risk-averse behavior when it comes to gains and risk-seeking behavior when facing losses.
Status Quo Bias: Status quo bias is a cognitive bias that leads individuals to prefer the current state of affairs and resist change, even when alternatives may offer better outcomes. This bias often stems from a fear of loss or uncertainty and can significantly impact decision-making in various economic contexts.
Value Function: The value function is a core component of Prospect Theory, representing how individuals evaluate potential gains and losses relative to a reference point rather than in absolute terms. It highlights that people perceive losses more intensely than gains of the same size, illustrating the concept of loss aversion. This function plays a crucial role in understanding economic behaviors, especially when comparing traditional Expected Utility Theory, which assumes individuals make decisions based purely on expected outcomes without considering reference points.