Quantifiers are powerful tools in first-order logic, allowing us to express statements about all or some elements in a domain. They come in two flavors: universal () for "all" and existential () for "some."

Negating quantifiers flips their meaning, turning "all" into "some not" and "some" into "none." This property is crucial for understanding logical relationships and constructing valid arguments in first-order logic.

Quantifiers

Universal and Existential Quantifiers

Top images from around the web for Universal and Existential Quantifiers
Top images from around the web for Universal and Existential Quantifiers
  • \forall expresses that a formula holds for all values of a variable
    • Formally, xP(x)\forall x P(x) means that P(x)P(x) is true for every possible value of xx in the domain
    • Can be read as "for all", "for every", or "for each" (xN,x0\forall x \in \mathbb{N}, x \geq 0 reads "for all natural numbers xx, xx is greater than or equal to 00")
  • \exists expresses that a formula holds for at least one value of a variable
    • Formally, xP(x)\exists x P(x) means that there exists at least one value of xx in the domain for which P(x)P(x) is true
    • Can be read as "there exists", "for some", or "there is at least one" (xR,x2=4\exists x \in \mathbb{R}, x^2 = 4 reads "there exists a real number xx such that xx squared equals 44")

Quantifier Negation

  • Negation of a universally quantified formula xP(x)\forall x P(x) is equivalent to an existentially quantified negation of the formula x¬P(x)\exists x \neg P(x)
    • ¬(xP(x))x¬P(x)\neg(\forall x P(x)) \equiv \exists x \neg P(x) (reads "not for all xx, P(x)P(x)" is equivalent to "there exists an xx such that not P(x)P(x)")
    • Example: ¬(xN,x>0)xN,x0\neg(\forall x \in \mathbb{N}, x > 0) \equiv \exists x \in \mathbb{N}, x \leq 0 (reads "not all natural numbers are greater than 00" is equivalent to "there exists a natural number less than or equal to 00")
  • Negation of an existentially quantified formula xP(x)\exists x P(x) is equivalent to a universally quantified negation of the formula x¬P(x)\forall x \neg P(x)
    • ¬(xP(x))x¬P(x)\neg(\exists x P(x)) \equiv \forall x \neg P(x) (reads "there does not exist an xx such that P(x)P(x)" is equivalent to "for all xx, not P(x)P(x)")
    • Example: ¬(xZ,x2=2)xZ,x22\neg(\exists x \in \mathbb{Z}, x^2 = 2) \equiv \forall x \in \mathbb{Z}, x^2 \neq 2 (reads "there does not exist an integer xx such that xx squared equals 22" is equivalent to "for all integers xx, xx squared does not equal 22")

Quantifier Transformations

Quantifier Distribution and Elimination

  • Quantifier distribution refers to the rules for distributing quantifiers over logical connectives
    • x(P(x)Q(x))(xP(x))(xQ(x))\forall x (P(x) \land Q(x)) \equiv (\forall x P(x)) \land (\forall x Q(x)) (universal quantifier distributes over conjunction)
    • x(P(x)Q(x))(xP(x))(xQ(x))\exists x (P(x) \lor Q(x)) \equiv (\exists x P(x)) \lor (\exists x Q(x)) (existential quantifier distributes over disjunction)
    • However, x(P(x)Q(x))≢(xP(x))(xQ(x))\forall x (P(x) \lor Q(x)) \not\equiv (\forall x P(x)) \lor (\forall x Q(x)) and x(P(x)Q(x))≢(xP(x))(xQ(x))\exists x (P(x) \land Q(x)) \not\equiv (\exists x P(x)) \land (\exists x Q(x))
  • Quantifier elimination is the process of removing quantifiers from a formula while preserving its satisfiability
    • One approach is to replace the quantified variable with a constant that satisfies the formula, if such a constant exists
    • Example: x(x>0y(y>xy>1))\exists x (x > 0 \land \forall y (y > x \to y > 1)) can be simplified to x(x>0x<1)\exists x (x > 0 \land x < 1) by eliminating the universal quantifier

Prenex Normal Form and Skolemization

  • Prenex normal form is a formula where all quantifiers appear at the beginning, followed by a quantifier-free matrix
    • Any formula can be converted to prenex normal form by applying quantifier distribution and renaming variables to avoid name clashes
    • Example: xy(P(x)Q(y))\forall x \exists y (P(x) \lor Q(y)) is in prenex normal form, while (xP(x))(yQ(y))(\forall x P(x)) \lor (\exists y Q(y)) is not
  • Skolemization is a process of eliminating existential quantifiers from a formula in prenex normal form
    • Each existentially quantified variable is replaced by a Skolem function that depends on the universally quantified variables preceding it
    • The resulting formula is satisfiable if and only if the original formula is satisfiable
    • Example: xyP(x,y)\forall x \exists y P(x, y) can be Skolemized to xP(x,f(x))\forall x P(x, f(x)), where ff is a Skolem function

Key Terms to Review (16)

: The symbol ∀ represents the universal quantifier in logic and mathematics, denoting that a statement applies to all elements of a specified set. It is used to express statements such as 'for all x' or 'for every element x', which implies that whatever follows the quantifier holds true for every instance within the domain. This quantifier is crucial for formulating general propositions and is foundational in defining logical relationships.
∀x p(x): The notation ∀x p(x) signifies the universal quantification of a predicate p over all elements x in a given domain. This expression asserts that the predicate p holds true for every possible value of x, effectively indicating that no exceptions exist within the specified universe. Understanding this concept is essential as it lays the groundwork for formal reasoning and logical deductions in mathematical proofs.
: The symbol ∃ represents the existential quantifier in mathematical logic, used to assert that there exists at least one element in a given set that satisfies a particular property. This quantifier is fundamental in the language of predicate logic and plays a crucial role in forming statements about existence, enabling mathematicians to express concepts involving 'there exists' or 'there is at least one'. The use of ∃ allows for more expressive statements, distinguishing between general properties and those that are specifically tied to at least one instance within a domain.
∃y q(y): The notation ∃y q(y) represents an existential quantifier in logic, indicating that there exists at least one element 'y' in a given domain for which the predicate q(y) holds true. This concept is crucial in understanding how statements can assert the existence of certain properties or elements without specifying exactly which ones, linking directly to logical reasoning and proofs.
Distribution of Quantifiers: The distribution of quantifiers refers to how quantifiers, like 'for all' ($$ orall$$) and 'there exists' ($$ hereexists$$), interact with each other in logical statements. This interaction is crucial in determining the truth values of complex statements and affects how we interpret logical expressions. Understanding this distribution helps in analyzing the validity of arguments and constructing logical proofs.
Existential Generalization: Existential generalization is a logical rule that allows one to infer that if a certain property holds for a specific object, then there exists at least one object for which that property holds. This process is essential in the context of quantifiers and their properties, particularly when transitioning from statements about individual elements to statements about collections or classes of elements.
Existential Quantifier: The existential quantifier is a symbol used in logic that indicates the existence of at least one element in a given domain that satisfies a particular property. It is usually denoted by the symbol $$\exists$$, and is crucial in formulating statements about existence within first-order logic, connecting it to the syntax and structure of logical expressions, the properties of quantifiers, proof systems that incorporate existential claims, and comparisons with higher-order logics.
For all integers n: The phrase 'for all integers n' signifies a universal quantification that asserts a statement holds true for every integer in the set of all integers. This expression is foundational in mathematical logic and proof theory, as it helps formulate general statements and theorems about integer properties. It introduces the concept of quantifiers, which are crucial for defining the scope of variables in logical statements.
Gödel's Completeness Theorem: Gödel's Completeness Theorem states that in first-order logic, every logically valid formula can be proven using a formal proof system. This theorem establishes a connection between semantic truth (truth in every model) and syntactic provability (provable from axioms), showing that if a statement is true in every model, then there is a formal proof of that statement within the system. It plays a significant role in understanding the foundational aspects of mathematical logic and formal systems.
Negation of Quantifiers: The negation of quantifiers is a logical operation that alters the truth value of statements involving quantifiers like 'for all' ($$ orall$$) and 'there exists' ($$ herefore$$). This operation is crucial for understanding how to accurately express the opposite of a statement, particularly in formal logic, as it helps in converting universal claims into existential ones and vice versa. Mastery of negating quantifiers aids in the exploration of logical arguments and proofs, which are foundational to reasoning in mathematics and computer science.
Nested Quantifiers: Nested quantifiers refer to the use of multiple quantifiers in a logical expression, where one quantifier is placed inside the scope of another. This structure is crucial for expressing more complex relationships between elements in sets or domains, allowing for precise mathematical statements about multiple variables. Understanding nested quantifiers is essential for grasping how properties can be universally or existentially quantified across different levels.
Scope of a quantifier: The scope of a quantifier refers to the part of a logical statement or expression in which the quantifier applies, determining the variables that it influences. This concept is crucial for understanding how the meaning of quantified statements can change depending on where the quantifier appears within a logical formula, influencing interpretations in both formal and informal logic.
Skolem's Lemma: Skolem's Lemma states that if a formula in first-order logic is valid, then it remains valid even after all existential quantifiers are replaced by Skolem functions or constants. This concept connects deeply with the properties of quantifiers, particularly in how existential statements can be transformed while preserving truth in a logical system, reflecting on the nature of proofs and the interpretation of logical formulas.
There exists an x such that: The phrase 'there exists an x such that' is a mathematical expression used to indicate the existence of at least one element in a given set for which a certain property holds true. It connects directly to quantifiers in logic, specifically the existential quantifier, often denoted as $$\exists$$, which asserts that a statement is true for some element, without specifying which one. This concept is fundamental in forming logical statements and proofs, allowing mathematicians to express the existence of solutions or particular cases that satisfy specific conditions.
Universal Instantiation: Universal instantiation is a logical rule that allows one to infer that a property or statement that holds for all members of a particular set also holds for any specific member of that set. This concept is central to understanding how quantifiers function, particularly in expressing generality and making specific deductions from universal claims.
Universal Quantifier: The universal quantifier is a symbol used in logic to denote that a property or condition holds for all elements within a specific domain. It is typically represented by the symbol '$$\forall$$' and plays a crucial role in expressing statements that are true for every member of a particular set. Understanding this concept is essential for grasping the syntax and formation rules of first-order logic, as well as exploring quantifiers, proof systems, and comparisons with higher-order logics.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.