14.3 Linear logic and substructural logics
3 min read•august 7, 2024
and shake up traditional logic by treating propositions as consumable resources. This fresh approach allows for more precise reasoning about resource usage, making it super useful in computer science and programming.
These logics introduce new connectives and rules that capture resource-sensitive properties. They've found applications in areas like memory management, quantum computing, and program verification, showing how proof theory can tackle real-world problems.
Linear Logic and Substructural Logics
Overview of Linear Logic
Top images from around the web for Overview of Linear Logic
De Finettian Logics of Indicative Conditionals Part II: Proof Theory and Algebraic Semantics ... View original
Is this image relevant?
A Decidable Linear Logic for Speech Translation - ACL Anthology View original
Is this image relevant?
Learning and Evaluation/Logic models - Meta View original
Is this image relevant?
De Finettian Logics of Indicative Conditionals Part II: Proof Theory and Algebraic Semantics ... View original
Is this image relevant?
A Decidable Linear Logic for Speech Translation - ACL Anthology View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Overview of Linear Logic
De Finettian Logics of Indicative Conditionals Part II: Proof Theory and Algebraic Semantics ... View original
Is this image relevant?
A Decidable Linear Logic for Speech Translation - ACL Anthology View original
Is this image relevant?
Learning and Evaluation/Logic models - Meta View original
Is this image relevant?
De Finettian Logics of Indicative Conditionals Part II: Proof Theory and Algebraic Semantics ... View original
Is this image relevant?
A Decidable Linear Logic for Speech Translation - ACL Anthology View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Linear logic is a substructural logic developed by in 1987
- Differs from classical logic by treating propositions as resources that are consumed when used
- Provides a more fine-grained analysis of proofs and computation
- Allows for reasoning about resource-sensitive properties (memory usage, time complexity)
Substructural Logics and Resource Sensitivity
- Substructural logics are logical systems that lack or restrict some of the structural rules of classical logic (weakening, contraction, exchange)
- is a key feature of substructural logics
- Propositions are treated as resources that are consumed when used in a proof
- Allows for more precise reasoning about resource usage and allocation
- Resource interpretation of linear logic
- Each proposition represents a single-use resource
- Proofs correspond to processes that consume and produce resources
Connectives in Linear Logic
Multiplicative Connectives
- () and disjunction ()
- represents the simultaneous availability of resources and
- represents a choice between resources and
- ()
- represents a process that consumes to produce
- : (unit) and (bottom)
Additive Connectives
- () and disjunction ()
- represents a choice between resources and , but only one is used
- represents the availability of either resource or
- Additive constants: (top) and (zero)
Exponentials
- Exponential modalities: (of course) and (why not)
- allows for unlimited duplication and discarding of the resource
- allows for unlimited duplication of the resource , but not discarding
- reintroduce some of the structural rules in a controlled manner
- Allows for embedding of classical logic within linear logic
Proof Systems for Linear Logic
Sequent Calculus for Linear Logic
- is a proof system that operates on sequents of the form
- and are multisets of formulas
- Intuitive reading: consuming the resources in produces the resources in
- Inference rules for each connective and exponential
- Rules for multiplicative and additive connectives reflect their resource interpretation
- Rules for exponentials allow for controlled use of structural rules
Proof Nets
- are a graphical representation of proofs in linear logic
- Provide a more abstract and parallel view of proofs compared to sequent calculus
- Correctness criteria for proof nets (acyclicity and connectedness)
- Ensures that proof nets correspond to valid proofs in linear logic
- Cut elimination in proof nets corresponds to the execution of proofs as processes
Other Substructural Logics
Relevance Logic
- requires that the antecedent and consequent of an implication are relevant to each other
- Rejects the principle of explosion () and the principle of monotonicity ( implies )
- Applications in computer science (type systems, information retrieval)
Affine Logic
- is a variant of linear logic that allows for discarding of resources, but not duplication
- Obtained by adding the weakening rule to linear logic
- Used in the study of quantum computation and quantum information theory
Bunched Implications
- (BI) is a substructural logic that combines intuitionistic logic with a multiplicative conjunction
- Provides a logical foundation for reasoning about resource composition and separation
- Applications in program verification (separation logic) and computer security (access control)
Key Terms to Review (23)
Additive conjunction: Additive conjunction is a connective in linear logic that combines propositions in a way that allows for both to be true simultaneously, emphasizing a form of coexistence rather than a traditional logical 'and'. This logical operation differs from the classical conjunction as it does not impose restrictions like resource consumption. In additive conjunction, the focus is on the simultaneous availability of both components rather than their cumulative effect.
Additive disjunction: Additive disjunction is a type of logical operator used in linear logic that signifies a choice between alternatives where the resources associated with each alternative are consumed upon making the choice. In contrast to classical logic's disjunction, which allows for the possibility of both options being true, additive disjunction emphasizes that only one option can be valid at any time, thus introducing a resource-sensitive aspect to logical reasoning.
Affine logic: Affine logic is a substructural logic that allows for the use of resources in a way that does not require their duplication or disposal, meaning that formulas can be used once but not more than that. This logic arises from linear logic, where the focus is on how propositions relate to resources, but it relaxes the restrictions found in linear logic by allowing weaker structural rules. The key feature of affine logic is its treatment of resources, emphasizing a balance between strict usage and availability.
Bunched Implications: Bunched implications are a key concept in linear logic that allow for a combination of both additive and multiplicative reasoning in the context of implications. These implications, represented as 'A & B ⊸ C', signify that when both A and B are available, they can jointly lead to C, demonstrating how resources can be shared or consumed. This concept is crucial in understanding how linear logic differs from classical logic by managing resource usage and enabling more nuanced reasoning about implications.
Categorical semantics: Categorical semantics is a branch of mathematical logic that interprets logical systems using category theory, providing a framework to understand different logics through the lens of objects and morphisms. This perspective allows for a more generalized view of how various logical systems relate to each other, particularly in the context of linear logic and substructural logics, which often challenge traditional assumptions about resource usage and structural rules.
Exponentials: Exponentials in linear logic refer to a special type of resource management that allows for the use of resources in a controlled manner. They are represented using the exponential modality, which distinguishes between resources that can be reused and those that cannot, thus providing a framework for reasoning about resource consumption and distribution. This concept connects with the broader themes of substructural logics, where the manipulation of structural rules is crucial for understanding how resources are handled in logical systems.
Full linear logic: Full linear logic is a refined form of linear logic that includes both multiplicative and additive connectives, allowing for a more expressive framework in reasoning about resources. It emphasizes the management of resources in logical deductions, differentiating between when resources can be duplicated or discarded. This makes full linear logic particularly relevant in contexts where resource constraints and usage are critical.
Game semantics: Game semantics is a framework for understanding the meaning of logical expressions through interactive games between a verifier and a refuter. This approach connects logical systems to computational interpretations, revealing insights about how propositions can be understood as strategies in these games. In the context of linear logic and substructural logics, game semantics allows for a nuanced analysis of resource usage and interaction between propositions.
Jean-Yves Girard: Jean-Yves Girard is a prominent French logician known for his groundbreaking work in proof theory and the development of linear logic, which is a type of substructural logic. His contributions have significantly influenced the way we understand resource sensitivity in logical systems, where the use of resources becomes a core consideration in deductions and proofs. Girard's ideas challenge traditional notions of logical inference and open new avenues for understanding computation and semantics.
Linear Logic: Linear logic is a type of substructural logic that emphasizes the use of resources, allowing for a more nuanced approach to reasoning about implications and propositions. Unlike classical logic, where assumptions can be reused freely, linear logic treats propositions as resources that can be consumed or transformed, leading to a more careful and deliberate reasoning process. This approach has significant implications for areas such as computer science, particularly in resource management and programming languages.
Models of linear logic: Models of linear logic are mathematical structures that help to understand the semantics of linear logic, which is a type of substructural logic that emphasizes resource usage and the relationships between propositions. These models provide a way to interpret the rules and connectives of linear logic, revealing how resources can be consumed or transformed through logical operations. By studying these models, one gains insight into how linear logic differs from classical logic in handling propositions as resources rather than mere truth values.
Multiplicative conjunction: Multiplicative conjunction is a connective in linear logic that represents a type of conjunction where the components can be consumed in a way that reflects the resources involved in the process. Unlike classical conjunction, which allows for unrestricted duplication of resources, multiplicative conjunction emphasizes the idea of using resources in a linear fashion, meaning that once they are utilized, they cannot be reused. This concept is crucial for understanding how linear logic distinguishes between different types of resource management and interactions.
Multiplicative Constants: Multiplicative constants are specific values or factors that can be used to scale formulas and expressions within the framework of linear logic and substructural logics. These constants play a vital role in adjusting the strength or intensity of resources, reflecting the non-standard treatment of multiplicative structures compared to classical logic. They allow for a nuanced representation of how resources can be combined or transformed, influencing the overall logical operations and conclusions drawn within these systems.
Multiplicative Implication: Multiplicative implication is a connective in linear logic that represents a type of conditional relationship, indicating that the truth of one proposition guarantees the truth of another, while emphasizing resource sensitivity. In this framework, it reflects the idea that resources consumed in proving one statement can affect the ability to prove another, aligning with the principles of substructural logics where the usual structural rules (like weakening and contraction) may not apply. This leads to a unique perspective on how implications operate in a resource-aware environment.
Par: In the context of linear logic and substructural logics, 'par' (short for parallel conjunction) is a connective that allows for the simultaneous combination of propositions, representing resources that can be used independently. This operation highlights the non-additive nature of resources in linear logic, contrasting with traditional logics where resources are treated as unlimited. Understanding 'par' is essential for grasping how linear logic redefines logical connectives to reflect resource management.
Proof Nets: Proof nets are a graphical representation of proofs in linear logic that capture the essential structure of the proof while abstracting away from syntactic details. They emphasize the flow of resources and the connectivity of formulas, which is vital for understanding the substructural nature of linear logic. By providing a way to visualize proofs, proof nets allow for more intuitive reasoning about resource management and enable simplifications in proof strategies.
Proof theory and concurrency: Proof theory and concurrency explores the relationship between formal proofs and concurrent computations, focusing on how proofs can be structured to reflect the behaviors of systems that operate simultaneously. This area of study investigates how traditional logical systems can adapt to account for concurrency, allowing for the representation and verification of processes that may run in parallel, which is particularly relevant in programming and distributed systems.
Relevance Logic: Relevance logic is a type of non-classical logic that emphasizes the relationship between the premises and the conclusion in an argument. Unlike classical logic, where a conclusion can follow from irrelevant premises, relevance logic requires that there be a meaningful connection, ensuring that the premises are relevant to the conclusion. This approach aims to avoid paradoxes and counterintuitive results found in classical systems by focusing on the necessity of relevance in inferential reasoning.
Resource sensitivity: Resource sensitivity refers to the property of a logical system where the use of resources, such as propositions or proofs, is closely monitored and managed. In certain logics, particularly linear logic, this idea emphasizes that resources cannot simply be duplicated or discarded without consequences, which distinguishes it from classical logics. This careful handling of resources allows for a more nuanced understanding of computation and reasoning, leading to significant implications in fields like computer science and linguistics.
Sequent Calculus: Sequent calculus is a formal proof system designed for deriving sequents, which express the validity of implications between formulas in logic. It serves as a key framework for studying proof theory, enabling structured reasoning about logical statements and their relationships, particularly in first-order logic and intuitionistic logic.
Subexponential: Subexponential refers to growth rates that are slower than exponential growth, which is characterized by the rate of change being proportional to the current value. In the context of linear logic and substructural logics, subexponential types are crucial because they allow for the control of resource usage and provide a framework for analyzing the efficiency of proofs and computations.
Substructural logics: Substructural logics are a class of non-classical logics that alter or eliminate some structural rules present in classical logic, such as weakening, contraction, and exchange. These logics focus on the relationships between propositions and the resources needed for logical reasoning, emphasizing how these relationships can affect the outcome of arguments. Substructural logics include various systems like linear logic, which restricts how resources can be used in proofs, highlighting the importance of resource management in reasoning.
Tensor product: The tensor product is a mathematical operation that combines two vector spaces into a new, larger vector space, capturing the relationships between their elements. It is a fundamental concept in linear algebra and plays a crucial role in areas like representation theory and quantum mechanics, emphasizing how vectors from different spaces can interact in a unified way.