5.5 Electoral systems
6 min read•august 20, 2024
Electoral systems are the rules that determine how votes translate into political power. They shape representation, party systems, and governance, with key distinctions between majoritarian and proportional approaches. The choice of system has far-reaching consequences for a country's political landscape.
Different systems impact political representation, voting behavior, and democratic stability. Factors like socioeconomic characteristics, geographic patterns, and district boundaries interact with electoral systems to influence outcomes. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing elections and political trends.
Types of electoral systems
- Electoral systems are the sets of rules that determine how votes are translated into seats in legislatures or positions in government
- The choice of electoral system has significant implications for political representation, party systems, and governance
- Key distinctions include majoritarian vs proportional systems, as well as variations in ballot structure and electoral formulas
Majoritarian vs proportional systems
Top images from around the web for Majoritarian vs proportional systems
UK 2010 election: What if the d'Hondt electoral system had… | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
Why we need Proportional Representation | An infographic sho… | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
UK 2010 election: What if proportional representation had … | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
UK 2010 election: What if the d'Hondt electoral system had… | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
Why we need Proportional Representation | An infographic sho… | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Majoritarian vs proportional systems
UK 2010 election: What if the d'Hondt electoral system had… | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
Why we need Proportional Representation | An infographic sho… | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
UK 2010 election: What if proportional representation had … | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
UK 2010 election: What if the d'Hondt electoral system had… | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
Why we need Proportional Representation | An infographic sho… | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Majoritarian systems (, two-round) tend to favor larger parties and produce more stable single-party governments
- systems (party-list PR, single transferable vote) allocate seats in proportion to vote share, enabling smaller parties to gain representation
- Proportional systems are more likely to result in coalition governments and require post-election bargaining to form a government
First-past-the-post voting
- Plurality/majority system used in countries like the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada
- Candidate with the most votes in a single-member district is elected, even without an absolute majority
- Tends to produce two-party systems and manufactured majorities, as smaller parties struggle to gain representation
Two-round systems
- If no candidate receives an absolute majority in the first round, a second round is held between the top two candidates (France)
- Encourages strategic voting and alliance formation between the first and second rounds
- Can still disadvantage smaller parties if they fail to advance to the second round
Mixed electoral systems
- Combine elements of both majoritarian and proportional systems (Germany, New Zealand)
- Usually feature single-member districts elected by plurality alongside proportional party lists
- Aim to balance local representation with proportionality and enable smaller parties to gain seats
Impacts on political representation
- Electoral systems shape the composition of legislatures and the nature of political representation
- Different systems can lead to varying levels of proportionality, minority representation, and government stability
- The choice of electoral system has far-reaching consequences for a country's political landscape
Seat allocation in legislatures
- Proportional systems tend to produce legislatures that more closely mirror the distribution of votes cast
- Majoritarian systems often result in disproportional seat allocations, with large parties winning more seats than their vote share would suggest
- The (D'Hondt, Sainte-Laguë) and also influence proportionality
Minority group representation
- Proportional systems with lower electoral thresholds can facilitate the representation of ethnic, linguistic, or religious minorities
- Single-member districts may dilute minority voting power, unless minorites are geographically concentrated
- Some countries use reserved seats or affirmative to ensure minority representation
Coalition government formation
- Proportional systems often necessitate post-election coalition formation, as single parties rarely win outright majorities
- Coalition building can lead to more consensual decision-making but may also result in political instability if coalitions are fragile
- Majoritarian systems are more likely to produce single-party governments, which can be more decisive but less representative
Influences on voting behavior
- Electoral systems interact with other factors to shape voting behavior and electoral outcomes
- Socioeconomic characteristics, geographic patterns, and district boundaries can all play a role
- Understanding these influences is crucial for analyzing election results and predicting future trends
Socioeconomic factors
- Class, education, income, religion and other demographic variables are often strong predictors of voting behavior
- Lower-income voters may favor parties that prioritize redistribution and social welfare
- Higher-education voters may prioritize issues like environmental protection or social liberalism
Geographic distribution of voters
- Urban-rural divides, regional identities, and local economic conditions can all shape voting patterns
- Parties may develop strongholds in particular regions (Labour in Northern England, Republicans in the rural South)
- Electoral systems that use geographic districts are particularly sensitive to spatial voting patterns
Role of electoral districts
- District magnitude (number of seats per district) affects the proportionality and inclusiveness of representation
- Smaller districts tend to favor larger parties, while larger districts enable greater diversity of representation
- District boundaries can be manipulated through gerrymandering to advantage particular parties or groups
Gerrymandering and redistricting
- Gerrymandering involves drawing district boundaries to advantage one party or group over others
- Redistricting processes vary widely between countries and can be a source of political controversy
- Legal challenges and reforms have sought to combat gerrymandering and ensure fair representation
Methods of manipulating boundaries
- : Splitting opposition voters across multiple districts to dilute their voting power
- : Concentrating opposition voters into a small number of districts to limit their seat share
- : Adding a diverse area to a district to complicate its political profile and make it more competitive
Partisan vs racial gerrymandering
- aims to benefit a particular political party, often by exploiting geographic voting patterns
- targets specific racial or ethnic groups, either by diluting or concentrating their voting power
- In the US, racial gerrymandering is subject to stricter judicial scrutiny under the Voting Rights Act
Legal challenges and reforms
- Courts have grappled with the constitutionality of partisan gerrymandering and the standards for proving discrimination
- Some states have adopted redistricting commissions or algorithmic approaches to limit political influence
- Proportional systems with multi-member districts are less vulnerable to gerrymandering than single-member districts
Electoral systems and democracy
- The choice of electoral system has important implications for the functioning and stability of democratic governments
- Different systems can affect voter participation, government accountability, and the legitimacy of electoral outcomes
- Comparative research explores the relationship between electoral institutions and democratic performance
Relationship to political stability
- Majoritarian systems are often associated with greater government stability and decisiveness
- Proportional systems may be more prone to fragmentation and instability, particularly in deeply divided societies
- Consociational approaches using proportional representation can help manage conflict in plural societies
Effects on voter turnout
- Proportional systems tend to have higher than majoritarian systems
- Voters may be more motivated to participate when their votes are more likely to translate into representation
- Compulsory voting laws can also significantly boost turnout, regardless of the electoral system
Implications for accountability
- Clarity of responsibility is often higher in majoritarian systems, as voters can more easily identify the governing party
- Proportional systems may diffuse accountability across multiple parties in a
- Electoral systems also interact with other institutional features (term limits, recall mechanisms) to shape accountability
Global variations in electoral systems
- Countries around the world employ a wide variety of electoral systems, reflecting their unique political histories and contexts
- Regional patterns and trends can be identified, but there is also significant diversity within regions
- Comparative analysis highlights the importance of local factors in shaping electoral system choice and performance
Regional patterns and trends
- Plurality systems are common in former British colonies and the English-speaking Caribbean
- Proportional representation is widespread in Latin America, continental Europe, and much of Africa
- Mixed systems have been adopted in several post-communist states in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union
Historical origins and evolution
- Many electoral systems were inherited from colonial powers or imposed by occupying forces
- Some countries have undergone major electoral reforms in response to changing political circumstances (New Zealand, Japan)
- The choice of electoral system is often shaped by the balance of power among competing political factions
Comparative case studies
- The United States and United Kingdom illustrate the effects of plurality systems in promoting two-party competition
- Germany and New Zealand demonstrate how mixed systems can balance local representation and national proportionality
- South Africa and Lebanon highlight the use of proportional systems to manage ethnic and sectarian divisions
Key Terms to Review (32)
Absentee voting: Absentee voting is a process that allows individuals to cast their ballots in an election without being physically present at their designated polling place, typically because they are away from their registered voting location on Election Day. This practice is essential for ensuring that those unable to attend in person, such as military personnel, students studying abroad, or those with disabilities, can still participate in the democratic process. Absentee voting often requires advance application and may involve mail-in ballots or early voting options.
Arend Lijphart: Arend Lijphart is a renowned political scientist known for his work on comparative politics and electoral systems, particularly focusing on consociationalism and the design of electoral frameworks. His theories emphasize how different electoral systems can influence political stability and representation in divided societies. Lijphart's analysis helps to understand the impact of electoral design on governance and the functioning of democracies.
Ballot design: Ballot design refers to the layout and format of a ballot used in elections, which includes how candidates and measures are presented to voters. Effective ballot design is crucial as it impacts voter comprehension, accessibility, and overall participation in the electoral process. A well-designed ballot can help prevent errors and ensure that voters can easily navigate their choices, which is vital for the integrity of electoral systems.
Coalition government: A coalition government is a type of political system in which multiple political parties come together to form a governing body, usually because no single party has gained an outright majority in the election. This arrangement often reflects the need for collaboration and compromise among various political factions to ensure effective governance, especially in systems with proportional representation where parties may have similar levels of support.
Coalition government formation: Coalition government formation refers to the process by which multiple political parties come together to create a government, usually in systems where no single party gains an outright majority. This often happens in proportional representation electoral systems, where diverse parties must negotiate and collaborate to govern effectively. Coalition governments can lead to increased stability and representation, but they can also result in compromises that dilute party agendas.
Cracking: Cracking is a strategic tactic used in gerrymandering that involves dispersing a particular group of voters across multiple electoral districts to dilute their voting power. This technique aims to prevent the group from gaining a majority in any one district, thus weakening their overall influence in elections. By spreading these voters thinly across many districts, political parties can manipulate electoral outcomes to favor their interests, significantly impacting representation and the overall functioning of electoral systems.
District magnitude: District magnitude refers to the number of representatives elected from a particular electoral district in a legislative body. It is a key factor in determining how votes are translated into seats and can significantly influence the electoral system's proportionality and representation. Larger district magnitudes generally lead to greater proportionality, allowing for more parties to gain representation, while smaller magnitudes tend to favor majoritarian outcomes.
Duverger's Law: Duverger's Law states that in electoral systems using single-member districts with plurality voting, a two-party system tends to emerge. This principle highlights how the mechanics of electoral systems can shape political party landscapes, influencing the number of viable parties and their competitiveness in elections.
Electoral commission: An electoral commission is an independent body that oversees the administration of elections, ensuring they are conducted fairly and transparently. These commissions are responsible for setting election rules, managing the voting process, and counting votes, often aiming to maintain public confidence in the electoral system. Their functions include regulating political parties, monitoring campaign financing, and providing education to voters about their rights and responsibilities.
Electoral formula: An electoral formula is a mathematical equation or set of rules used to convert votes into seats in a legislative body. This formula plays a crucial role in determining how well different political parties or candidates can translate their share of the vote into actual representation, influencing both the dynamics of electoral competition and the overall political landscape.
Electoral Participation: Electoral participation refers to the various ways in which citizens engage in the electoral process, including voting, campaigning, and advocating for candidates or issues. This concept is crucial in understanding how effectively a democracy functions, as higher levels of participation often lead to more representative governance and accountability. Electoral participation can be influenced by several factors, including electoral systems, voter registration processes, and socio-economic conditions.
Electoral threshold: An electoral threshold is the minimum percentage of votes that a political party must receive in an election to gain representation in a legislative body. This mechanism is used in various electoral systems to limit the number of parties that can gain seats, ensuring that only those with a substantial level of support are represented, which can promote political stability and effective governance.
First-past-the-post: First-past-the-post is an electoral system where the candidate with the most votes in a single-member district wins, without requiring an absolute majority. This system is often associated with winner-takes-all elections, leading to clear outcomes but also raising questions about representation and voter participation.
Geographic distribution of voters: The geographic distribution of voters refers to how voters are spread across different regions and locations within a political entity, impacting election outcomes and representation. This distribution plays a crucial role in determining electoral strategies, influencing the design of electoral districts, and shaping political campaigns. Understanding where voters reside helps political parties and candidates target their messages effectively to win support in key areas.
Gerrymandering: Gerrymandering is the manipulation of electoral district boundaries to favor one political party or group over another. This practice can significantly impact voter representation and outcomes in elections, as it can lead to skewed districts that dilute the influence of certain demographics while enhancing the power of others. It intertwines with voter turnout and electoral systems by determining how votes translate into seats in legislative bodies.
Majoritarianism: Majoritarianism is a political theory that emphasizes the importance of majority rule in decision-making processes. This concept is often connected to democratic systems where policies and laws are determined by a simple majority of voters, reflecting the principle that the preferences of the majority should guide governance while still maintaining a minimal regard for minority rights.
Median Voter Theorem: The median voter theorem is a political theory that suggests in a majority rule voting system, the candidate or policy that receives the most votes will be the one that is closest to the preferences of the median voter. This theory assumes that voters are distributed along a single-dimensional spectrum of preferences and that the median voter's preference will ultimately determine electoral outcomes, especially in competitive elections.
Minority group representation: Minority group representation refers to the inclusion and active participation of minority groups in political processes, ensuring their voices and interests are acknowledged in decision-making. This concept is crucial in understanding how different electoral systems impact the political landscape, as well as how they influence the dynamics of power and representation within a society.
Mixed electoral systems: Mixed electoral systems combine elements of both proportional representation and majoritarian electoral systems to elect representatives. This approach aims to balance the benefits of both systems, ensuring that voters have the opportunity to express their preferences while also encouraging stable governance through majoritarian outcomes.
Packing: Packing refers to a gerrymandering technique where voters who support a particular political party are concentrated into a single electoral district to minimize their influence in other districts. This strategy aims to ensure that the party can win by overwhelming margins in fewer districts, effectively diluting their overall power across a larger area. Packing is a crucial tactic in manipulating electoral outcomes and can significantly impact the representation of different groups within electoral systems.
Partisan gerrymandering: Partisan gerrymandering is the practice of drawing electoral district boundaries in a way that advantages one political party over others. This manipulation can skew election results, entrench political power, and minimize competition by concentrating or dispersing voters based on their political affiliations. The impact of partisan gerrymandering is profound, as it can influence the balance of power in legislative bodies and undermine the principle of fair representation.
Polling station: A polling station is a designated location where voters go to cast their ballots during an election. These stations are set up to ensure the voting process is organized, secure, and accessible to all eligible voters. They often include voting booths, ballot boxes, and staff to assist voters, playing a crucial role in the democratic process and electoral systems.
Proportional Representation: Proportional representation is an electoral system in which parties gain seats in the legislature in proportion to the number of votes they receive. This system aims to reflect the diverse views of the electorate more accurately than winner-takes-all systems, thereby influencing voter turnout and engagement. By allowing smaller parties a chance to gain representation, it encourages broader political participation and can lead to coalitions, enhancing democratic representation.
Racial gerrymandering: Racial gerrymandering is the practice of drawing electoral district boundaries in a way that intentionally dilutes or enhances the voting power of specific racial or ethnic groups. This manipulation affects the representation of these groups in legislative bodies, which can lead to underrepresentation or overrepresentation based on racial demographics. It connects deeply to the processes of redistricting and the design of electoral systems that influence political outcomes and community representation.
Ranked-choice voting: Ranked-choice voting is an electoral system where voters rank candidates in order of preference rather than choosing just one. This method allows for more nuanced voter preferences and aims to ensure that the winning candidate has broad support, which can positively affect voter turnout by making elections feel more inclusive and representative. It impacts electoral systems by changing how votes are counted and can lead to different outcomes compared to traditional voting methods.
Referendum: A referendum is a direct vote in which an entire electorate is invited to vote on a particular proposal and can result in the adoption of new laws or policies. This process allows citizens to directly influence decision-making on significant issues, often concerning constitutional amendments, changes in governance, or critical social policies. It reflects the democratic principle of allowing voters to express their preferences on specific legislative matters.
Role of electoral districts: Electoral districts are geographical areas that are defined for the purpose of electing representatives in a legislative body. They play a crucial role in determining how votes are translated into political power and influence, affecting representation at various levels of government, such as local, state, and national. The design and boundaries of these districts can significantly impact electoral outcomes and the overall fairness of the electoral process.
Socioeconomic factors: Socioeconomic factors are the social and economic experiences and realities that influence an individual's or a group's status in society. These factors can include income level, education, occupation, and wealth, which collectively shape opportunities, access to resources, and overall quality of life. In the context of electoral systems, socioeconomic factors play a crucial role in determining voter behavior, electoral outcomes, and the representation of different groups within the political landscape.
Tacking: Tacking is a strategic maneuver used in electoral systems where a candidate aligns themselves with popular or relevant issues to broaden their appeal and increase voter support. This approach often involves shifting positions or incorporating various policy elements from other parties or movements to capture a larger voter base. Tacking can significantly influence election outcomes by allowing candidates to adapt their platforms in response to changing public sentiments.
Two-round systems: Two-round systems are electoral systems used to elect representatives in which a second round of voting occurs if no candidate achieves a required threshold of votes in the first round. This system is designed to ensure that the elected candidate has broader support, often leading to a more consensus-driven outcome, which can be particularly beneficial in diverse societies.
Voter turnout: Voter turnout refers to the percentage of eligible voters who participate in an election. High voter turnout is often associated with greater civic engagement and reflects the public's interest in the political process, while low turnout can indicate disenfranchisement or apathy. Understanding voter turnout is essential to analyzing electoral systems, the dynamics of swing states, and the overall health of a democracy.
William H. Riker: William H. Riker was an influential American political scientist known for his work on electoral systems, particularly the theory of strategic voting and the role of institutions in political outcomes. His ideas have shaped the understanding of how electoral rules affect party systems and voter behavior, emphasizing the importance of analyzing the strategic interactions among political actors.