10.2 Factors influencing police use of force decisions

5 min readaugust 9, 2024

Police use of force decisions are complex, influenced by multiple factors. Suspect behavior, officer perception, and situational context all play crucial roles. Understanding these elements helps explain why force is used and how it can be minimized.

Training, policies, and community expectations shape force decisions. Officers must balance safety concerns with . Recognizing the interplay of these factors is key to improving police-community interactions and reducing unnecessary force.

Suspect Factors

Resistance and Threat Assessment

Top images from around the web for Resistance and Threat Assessment
Top images from around the web for Resistance and Threat Assessment
  • Suspect resistance ranges from passive noncompliance to active aggression
    • Passive resistance involves refusing to follow commands without physical action
    • Active resistance includes physical actions to avoid control (pulling away, pushing)
    • Aggressive resistance involves attempts to harm officers (punching, kicking)
  • evaluates potential danger posed by suspect
    • Officers consider suspect's size, strength, and apparent physical capabilities
    • Presence of weapons or objects that could be used as weapons increases perceived threat
    • Suspect's verbal threats or aggressive body language factor into assessment
  • Suspect's proximity to officers or bystanders influences use of force decisions
    • Closer proximity may require quicker action or higher level of force
  • Suspect's apparent mental state or intoxication level affects threat perception
    • Erratic behavior or apparent drug influence may increase perceived unpredictability

Implicit Bias and Demographic Factors

  • Implicit bias refers to unconscious attitudes or stereotypes affecting decisions
    • Can influence officers' threat perception based on suspect's race, age, or gender
    • May lead to quicker escalation of force with certain demographic groups
  • Suspect's age impacts force decisions
    • Younger suspects often perceived as more physically capable or aggressive
    • Elderly suspects generally viewed as less threatening, requiring less force
  • Gender of suspect plays role in use of force considerations
    • Male suspects statistically more likely to face higher levels of force
    • Female suspects often perceived as less physically threatening
  • Suspect's apparent socioeconomic status may unconsciously influence officer decisions
    • Clothing, speech patterns, or location can affect initial threat assessment

Officer Factors

Perception and Decision-Making

  • Officer perception shapes interpretation of suspect behavior and environment
    • Previous experiences with similar situations influence threat assessment
    • Cognitive biases (confirmation bias, anchoring) can affect decision-making
  • Time pressure impacts force decisions
    • Split-second judgments often required in rapidly evolving situations
    • Limited time for information processing may lead to reliance on heuristics
  • Stress and physiological arousal affect officer perception
    • Increased heart rate and adrenaline can alter sensory perception (tunnel vision)
    • Stress may impair cognitive functions, leading to potential overreaction

Officer Characteristics and Background

  • Physical characteristics of officers influence force decisions
    • Size and strength disparities between officer and suspect affect tactics
    • Officer's age and fitness level impact confidence in physical control techniques
  • Gender of officer can play role in use of force dynamics
    • Female officers statistically less likely to use higher levels of force
    • Gender pairing of officer and suspect may influence interaction
  • Officer's personal background and experiences shape approach to policing
    • Cultural background may affect communication style with diverse populations
    • Military experience can influence tactical mindset and force preferences
  • Officer's emotional state and personal stressors impact decision-making
    • Fatigue from long shifts or personal issues may lower stress tolerance
    • Recent traumatic experiences can heighten threat perception

Training and Experience

  • Level and quality of training significantly impact use of force decisions
    • De-escalation training reduces reliance on physical force options
    • Scenario-based training improves decision-making under stress
  • Frequency of force encounters affects officer comfort with various techniques
    • Officers in high-crime areas may become desensitized to using force
    • Lack of regular force encounters may lead to hesitation or overreaction
  • Specialized training in mental health or crisis intervention influences approach
    • Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) training emphasizes verbal de-escalation
    • Knowledge of mental health issues can lead to more patient, less forceful responses
  • Years of experience shape officer's confidence and decision-making
    • Rookie officers may rely more heavily on formal policies and procedures
    • Veteran officers often develop intuitive decision-making based on past encounters

Contextual Factors

Immediate Situational Dynamics

  • Nature of the call or reason for police contact affects force decisions
    • Violent crime calls may predispose officers to higher force readiness
    • Routine traffic stops typically begin with lower force expectations
  • Presence of weapons or potential weapons in the environment
    • Visible firearms or edged weapons dramatically increase force likelihood
    • Common objects (tools, household items) may be perceived as potential weapons
  • Number of suspects involved impacts officer tactics and force options
    • Multiple suspects increase perceived threat and may require quicker action
    • Outnumbered officers more likely to rely on tools (TASER, OC spray) over hands-on techniques
  • Bystander presence influences officer decision-making
    • Crowd hostility may increase officer stress and likelihood of force use
    • Concern for bystander safety may lead to quicker force application to control situation

Environmental and Temporal Factors

  • Physical environment shapes tactical options and force decisions
    • Confined spaces (vehicles, small rooms) limit less-lethal force options
    • Open areas may increase reliance on distance weapons (TASER, bean bag rounds)
  • Lighting conditions affect threat assessment and force choices
    • Low light increases uncertainty and may lead to quicker force escalation
    • Bright lights or glare can impair officer vision, influencing tactical approach
  • Weather conditions impact both officer and suspect capabilities
    • Rain or snow may make less-lethal options like TASER less effective
    • Extreme heat or cold can affect physical performance and decision-making
  • Time of day correlates with different policing challenges
    • Late-night encounters more likely to involve intoxicated individuals
    • Daytime calls often occur in more populated areas, increasing bystander considerations

Organizational and Community Factors

  • Departmental policies and procedures guide use of force decision-making
    • Use of force continuums provide framework for appropriate force levels
    • Mandatory reporting requirements may influence officer force choices
  • shapes attitudes towards use of force
    • Emphasis on may promote de-escalation techniques
    • "Warrior" mentality in some departments can lead to more aggressive approaches
  • Community expectations and historical
    • Areas with tense police-community relations may see quicker escalation
    • Community oversight or consent decrees can impact officer force decisions
  • Media scrutiny and public perception of police use of force
    • High-profile incidents may lead to more cautious approach by officers
    • Fear of video recordings going viral can influence force decisions
  • Available resources and equipment affect force options
    • Departments with body-worn cameras may see changes in officer behavior
    • Access to less-lethal tools (beanbag shotguns, 40mm launchers) expands force options

Key Terms to Review (18)

Body cameras: Body cameras are portable recording devices worn by police officers that capture audio and video footage of their interactions during law enforcement activities. These cameras aim to increase transparency and accountability in policing, while also influencing officer behavior, decision-making, and community relations.
Community policing: Community policing is a proactive strategy that emphasizes building partnerships between police officers and community members to identify and solve problems related to crime and social disorder. This approach seeks to enhance the quality of life in neighborhoods by fostering trust and collaboration, while also focusing on crime prevention rather than just enforcement.
Critical Theory: Critical theory is a broad philosophical approach that critiques and seeks to change society by examining power structures, social inequalities, and the underlying ideologies that perpetuate oppression. It emphasizes the importance of understanding how social, economic, and political contexts influence human behavior and institutional practices. In relation to policing, critical theory helps analyze how various factors shape police decision-making and the use of force, highlighting biases and systemic issues within law enforcement.
De-escalation techniques: De-escalation techniques are strategies used by law enforcement officers to reduce the intensity of a conflict or potentially violent situation. These techniques aim to calm individuals, promote communication, and avoid the use of force, ultimately ensuring a safer resolution for all parties involved. By effectively employing these techniques, officers can navigate high-tension encounters while also adhering to legal standards and ethical obligations.
Discretion: Discretion refers to the power and authority that police officers have to make choices in how they enforce laws and handle situations. It involves the ability to decide whether to intervene, how to apply the law, or whether to exercise leniency based on the circumstances at hand. This decision-making process is influenced by various factors, such as individual judgment, situational context, and departmental policies.
Excessive force: Excessive force refers to the application of more physical force by law enforcement than is necessary to control a situation or to protect themselves or others. This concept is critical in discussions around police ethics, accountability, and the legal frameworks governing the use of force, as it raises questions about when and how much force is appropriate in various scenarios.
Knapp Commission: The Knapp Commission was a notable investigation established in 1970 to examine corruption within the New York City Police Department (NYPD). Its findings highlighted systemic issues, particularly focusing on the prevalence of graft and bribery, which directly influenced police use of force decisions and public trust in law enforcement.
Organizational Culture: Organizational culture refers to the shared values, beliefs, and practices that shape how members of an organization interact and work together. It influences the behavior of individuals within the organization and significantly impacts leadership styles, decision-making processes, and overall effectiveness in achieving goals. A strong organizational culture can promote cohesion and alignment among members, while a toxic culture can lead to dysfunction and conflicts.
Perceived Danger: Perceived danger refers to an officer's subjective assessment of a situation or individual that may pose a threat to their safety or the safety of others. This perception is influenced by various factors, including the behavior of individuals, environmental cues, and past experiences, ultimately impacting the decision-making process regarding the use of force. Understanding perceived danger is crucial as it shapes how law enforcement officers respond to potentially volatile situations.
Police Review Boards: Police review boards are independent bodies that evaluate complaints against police officers and agencies to ensure accountability and transparency within law enforcement. These boards typically consist of citizens or appointed officials who investigate allegations of misconduct, excessive force, and other issues related to police practices, helping to build public trust in the police force.
Police-community relations: Police-community relations refers to the collaborative partnership and trust between law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve. This concept emphasizes the importance of effective communication, mutual respect, and understanding to foster cooperation and reduce tensions. Strong police-community relations are crucial in shaping perceptions of policing, influencing community safety, and ultimately guiding police practices and policies.
Postcolonial theory: Postcolonial theory is an intellectual framework that critically examines the cultural, political, and social impacts of colonialism and imperialism on formerly colonized nations. It seeks to understand how colonial legacies shape contemporary identities, power dynamics, and societal structures. By analyzing the narratives and experiences of colonized peoples, this theory emphasizes the importance of recognizing diverse perspectives and challenges the dominance of Western viewpoints.
Qualified immunity: Qualified immunity is a legal doctrine that protects government officials, including law enforcement officers, from being held personally liable for constitutional violations unless they violated a clearly established statutory or constitutional right. This principle aims to strike a balance between allowing individuals to seek justice for wrongs and ensuring that officials can perform their duties without the constant fear of litigation.
Social Learning Theory: Social learning theory is a psychological concept that suggests people learn behaviors, attitudes, and norms through observing others and the outcomes of those behaviors. It emphasizes the importance of modeling, imitation, and reinforcement in the learning process. This theory can help explain how individuals, including law enforcement officers, adopt certain behaviors based on their interactions with peers and the social environment around them.
The President's Task Force on 21st Century Policing: The President's Task Force on 21st Century Policing was established in 2014 to address issues of policing in the United States and to promote effective strategies for building trust between law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve. The task force focused on various aspects of policing, including the use of force, community engagement, and training practices, aiming to create a framework for improving police-community relations.
Threat Assessment: Threat assessment is the process of evaluating potential threats to public safety and determining the level of risk posed by individuals or groups. This process involves analyzing behavior, context, and any specific indicators that may suggest a likelihood of violent or criminal actions. Effective threat assessments are crucial for police decision-making, especially when considering the use of force in various situations.
Use of Force Continuum: The use of force continuum is a guiding framework that outlines the appropriate levels of force law enforcement officers can use in response to a subject's behavior. It provides a structured approach for officers to assess situations and escalate or de-escalate their response based on the threat level posed by the subject, ensuring compliance with legal standards and promoting accountability.
Use of Force Policies: Use of force policies are guidelines established by law enforcement agencies to govern the circumstances and manner in which officers can apply physical force when dealing with suspects or the public. These policies are essential in defining the appropriate level of force in various situations and aim to ensure accountability, reduce the risk of injury, and maintain public trust.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.