7.4 Ordinary Language Philosophy
3 min read•august 16, 2024
emerged in the mid-20th century as a reaction to formal logical analysis. It focused on examining how people use language in everyday contexts, aiming to dissolve by clarifying the ordinary usage of problematic terms.
This approach emphasized the and the importance of . It challenged the assumption that philosophical problems require technical language, instead seeking to uncover hidden assumptions and in everyday language use.
Ordinary Language Philosophy
Origins and Key Figures
Top images from around the web for Origins and Key Figures
The Rhetorical Situation – Essentials for ENGL-121 View original
Is this image relevant?
Ordinary language philosophy - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
“Nobody would really talk that way!”: the critical project in contemporary ordinary language ... View original
Is this image relevant?
The Rhetorical Situation – Essentials for ENGL-121 View original
Is this image relevant?
Ordinary language philosophy - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Origins and Key Figures
The Rhetorical Situation – Essentials for ENGL-121 View original
Is this image relevant?
Ordinary language philosophy - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
“Nobody would really talk that way!”: the critical project in contemporary ordinary language ... View original
Is this image relevant?
The Rhetorical Situation – Essentials for ENGL-121 View original
Is this image relevant?
Ordinary language philosophy - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Ordinary language philosophy emerged mid-20th century as a reaction to formal logical analysis
- Emphasized examining language use in everyday contexts
- and developed this philosophical approach
- Focused on nuances and complexities of natural language use
- Aimed to dissolve philosophical puzzles by clarifying ordinary usage of problematic terms
- Highlighted context-dependent nature of
- Stressed importance of pragmatic considerations in understanding language (speech situations, social conventions)
Methodological Approach
- Involved careful attention to subtle distinctions in common linguistic expressions
- Argued many traditional philosophical problems stem from misunderstandings of everyday language
- Challenged assumption that philosophical problems require technical language
- Emphasized to clarify concepts and dissolve confusions
- Expressed skepticism about constructing comprehensive philosophical theories
- Sought to uncover hidden assumptions and conceptual confusions in language use
- Examined implications of everyday phrases (time flies, the mind's eye)
Everyday Language and Philosophical Problems
Meaning Through Use
- Argued meaning of words and phrases understood through everyday contexts
- Rejected abstract definitions or formal logical analysis for determining meaning
- Focused on how people actually use language in daily life (greetings, requests, promises)
- Emphasized importance of context in shaping meaning (same phrase different meanings in various situations)
- Explored how language use reveals underlying
- Examined idiomatic expressions and their philosophical implications (it's raining cats and dogs, time is money)
Linguistic Confusion and Philosophical Issues
- Suggested many philosophical problems result from
- Aimed to dissolve rather than solve philosophical puzzles
- Challenged traditional metaphysical and epistemological debates as misguided
- Argued some philosophical problems disappear when language is properly understood
- Explored how ordinary language use can lead to conceptual muddles (mind-body problem, free will debate)
- Analyzed everyday concepts to reveal their complex logical structure (knowledge, belief, intention)
Analysis of Speech Acts and Discourse
Speech Act Theory
- J.L. Austin's theory distinguished between locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary acts
- refers to the literal meaning of an utterance
- describes the intended force or function of the utterance
- refers to the actual effect of the utterance on the listener
- Introduced concept of performative utterances (I now pronounce you husband and wife, I bet you $5)
- Challenged traditional view of language as purely descriptive
- Explored how certain statements constitute actions in themselves (naming a ship, making a promise)
Logic of Ordinary Discourse
- Revealed complex rules and conventions governing everyday communication
- Developed techniques for mapping conceptual relationships in language use
- Emphasized role of context, intention, and social conventions in determining meaning
- Explored implicit assumptions in everyday conversation ()
- Analyzed how people navigate ambiguity and vagueness in ordinary language
- Examined the role of metaphor and figurative language in shaping understanding (life is a journey, argument is war)
Criticisms and Limitations of Ordinary Language Philosophy
Methodological Concerns
- Critics argued approach relies too heavily on linguistic intuitions
- Questioned lack of rigorous philosophical arguments or theories
- Debated whether ordinary language is adequate for addressing all philosophical problems
- Criticized potential reification of current linguistic practices
- Questioned reliability of intuitions about language use across cultures and time periods
- Debated whether focus on linguistic analysis comes at expense of substantive metaphysical inquiries
Legacy and Influence
- Shaped subsequent developments in philosophy of language and pragmatics
- Influenced certain branches of cognitive science (embodied cognition, linguistic relativity)
- Ongoing debate about relationship between ordinary language philosophy and formal logical analysis
- Contemporary approaches continue to emphasize importance of linguistic and conceptual analysis
- Influenced development of experimental philosophy and conceptual analysis
- Contributed to interdisciplinary research on language, thought, and social interaction
Key Terms to Review (22)
Conceptual confusions: Conceptual confusions refer to misunderstandings or misinterpretations that arise when concepts are used inappropriately or ambiguously, leading to unclear communication or flawed reasoning. This term highlights the importance of clarifying language and ensuring that the meanings of terms are understood in their proper context to avoid misconceptions.
Conceptual frameworks: Conceptual frameworks are systems of ideas and beliefs that help individuals or groups organize and interpret information within a particular context. These frameworks provide a lens through which people understand complex issues, shape their perceptions, and guide their reasoning and decision-making processes. They play a vital role in ordinary language philosophy, where the focus is on how language is used in everyday contexts to construct meaning.
Context-dependent nature of meaning: The context-dependent nature of meaning refers to the idea that the meaning of words and phrases can vary significantly depending on the situational, cultural, or conversational context in which they are used. This concept emphasizes that language is not static; instead, it relies on the context to convey appropriate meanings, which can shift based on factors such as speaker intention, audience interpretation, and surrounding discourse.
Conversational implicature: Conversational implicature refers to the information that is implied in a conversation but not explicitly stated, relying on context, shared knowledge, and the principles of communication. This concept highlights how people often convey meanings indirectly, allowing for richer and more nuanced interactions beyond the literal interpretation of words. Understanding this term is crucial when examining how language functions in everyday conversations and how meaning can vary based on context and speaker intention.
Gilbert Ryle: Gilbert Ryle was a British philosopher best known for his critique of Cartesian dualism and for his role in the development of ordinary language philosophy. He argued against the notion of a 'ghost in the machine,' asserting that mental states should not be treated as separate from physical actions and behaviors. His work emphasizes the importance of examining how language is used in everyday contexts to clarify philosophical problems, particularly concerning the mind and behavior.
How to do things with words: The phrase 'how to do things with words' refers to the idea that language is not just a tool for describing reality but can also be used to perform actions, create realities, and effect change. This concept emphasizes the performative function of language, suggesting that when we speak, we can enact commitments, promises, or declarations that have real-world implications.
Illocutionary act: An illocutionary act is a speech act that conveys the speaker's intention behind a statement, which often goes beyond the literal meaning of the words. It represents the purpose of communication, such as making a promise, giving an order, or asking a question, and highlights the importance of context in understanding meaning. This concept emphasizes that the effectiveness of communication relies not just on what is said, but also on how it is interpreted by listeners based on shared social conventions and contexts.
J.L. Austin: J.L. Austin was a British philosopher known for his work in ordinary language philosophy, which emphasizes the importance of everyday language use in understanding meaning and reference. He argued that the way we use language in everyday situations reveals important insights about how meaning is constructed and understood, challenging traditional views of philosophy that focused on abstract theorizing. His ideas have significantly shaped the discussion around theories of meaning and reference.
Linguistic confusion: Linguistic confusion refers to the misunderstanding or ambiguity that arises from the use of language, particularly when terms or phrases are interpreted differently by different individuals. This concept highlights how language can lead to philosophical problems when the meanings of words are not clear or when they are used in various contexts, often causing debates and misinterpretations in discussions.
Linguistic therapy: Linguistic therapy is a method in philosophy that uses ordinary language analysis to address philosophical problems, focusing on how language shapes our understanding and the meanings we derive from it. This approach emphasizes clarifying concepts and resolving confusions that arise from misinterpretations of language, making it a practical tool for tackling philosophical issues.
Locutionary Act: A locutionary act is the basic act of producing sounds or writing words, which convey meaning in language. This act forms the foundation of speech acts, focusing solely on the content of the utterance without considering its context or implications. Understanding locutionary acts is essential in analyzing how language functions in ordinary situations, highlighting the significance of clarity and intent in communication.
Meaning: Meaning refers to the significance or interpretation of a word, phrase, or concept within a particular context. It plays a crucial role in how language is understood and used, emphasizing the importance of context and everyday language in conveying ideas and thoughts effectively.
Mouffe's Critique: Mouffe's Critique refers to the critical perspective offered by political theorist Chantal Mouffe regarding the limitations of consensus-driven approaches in political discourse, particularly in relation to Ordinary Language Philosophy. She argues that such consensus can obscure important differences and conflicts that are central to democratic politics, emphasizing the need for a more agonistic approach that acknowledges and embraces these tensions.
Ordinary language philosophy: Ordinary language philosophy is a philosophical approach that emphasizes the importance of everyday language and the way people use it in their daily lives. It suggests that many philosophical problems arise from misunderstandings about language, and by closely examining how terms are used in ordinary contexts, we can clarify or resolve these issues.
Ordinary use: Ordinary use refers to the way language and concepts are typically understood and employed in everyday life, focusing on common meanings rather than specialized or technical interpretations. This concept emphasizes the importance of analyzing how words function in practical contexts, revealing deeper philosophical insights about language and communication.
Performative utterance: A performative utterance is a statement that performs an action simply by being spoken, rather than merely describing a situation or relaying information. This concept highlights the way language can be used not only to convey meaning but also to create social realities, often depending on the context and the speaker's intention. The significance of performative utterances challenges traditional views of language as merely descriptive, illustrating how speech acts can have tangible effects in the world.
Perlocutionary act: A perlocutionary act refers to the effect or outcome that a speaker's utterance has on a listener, which goes beyond the literal meaning of the words spoken. This concept highlights how communication influences emotions, thoughts, and actions of the audience, rather than just conveying information. Understanding perlocutionary acts is essential in analyzing how language shapes social interactions and the implications of speech in various contexts.
Philosophical investigations: Philosophical investigations refer to the approach in philosophy that focuses on analyzing and clarifying concepts through ordinary language. This method emphasizes the way people naturally use language in daily life, believing that many philosophical problems arise from misunderstandings of language and its use in context.
Philosophical puzzles: Philosophical puzzles are complex problems or questions that challenge our understanding of fundamental concepts, often revealing ambiguities or contradictions in our thoughts and language. These puzzles frequently arise from ordinary language and highlight the importance of careful analysis in philosophical inquiry, encouraging deeper reflection on meaning and interpretation.
Pragmatic considerations: Pragmatic considerations refer to the practical aspects and implications of language use, emphasizing how context, purpose, and social interactions shape meaning. This concept plays a crucial role in understanding how ordinary language functions, revealing that the meaning of words often depends not just on their definitions but on the situations in which they are used, and the intentions of the speakers involved.
Searle's objections: Searle's objections refer to critiques made by philosopher John Searle regarding certain aspects of ordinary language philosophy, particularly its reliance on language to convey meaning and the potential oversimplification of complex philosophical issues. These objections highlight the limitations of using language as a tool for understanding thought and reality, emphasizing that meaning is not merely derived from linguistic conventions but also involves a deeper engagement with intentions and contexts.
Speech act: A speech act is a communicative action performed through spoken or written language that conveys meaning, intention, or a commitment. This concept emphasizes how language does not just describe reality but can also enact change or perform specific functions, such as making promises, requests, or apologies. Understanding speech acts highlights the significance of context and the intentions behind utterances in ordinary conversations.