2.3 Finite volume methods
7 min read•august 21, 2024
are powerful tools for solving in numerical analysis. They excel at conserving physical quantities across computational domains by discretizing the space into and applying to each.
These methods use calculations to determine the flow of conserved quantities between control volumes. The choice of mesh type, flux calculation technique, and time integration method significantly impacts solution accuracy and computational efficiency. Higher-order schemes and advanced techniques further enhance the method's capabilities.
Fundamentals of finite volume methods
- Finite volume methods form a crucial part of numerical analysis for solving partial differential equations
- These methods excel in conserving physical quantities across computational domains
- Finite volume approaches discretize the domain into control volumes, applying conservation laws to each volume
Conservation laws and fluxes
Top images from around the web for Conservation laws and fluxes
Elastic Collisions in One Dimension · Physics View original
Is this image relevant?
Collisions of Point Masses in Two Dimensions · Physics View original
Is this image relevant?
Elastic Collisions in One Dimension · Physics View original
Is this image relevant?
Collisions of Point Masses in Two Dimensions · Physics View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Top images from around the web for Conservation laws and fluxes
Elastic Collisions in One Dimension · Physics View original
Is this image relevant?
Collisions of Point Masses in Two Dimensions · Physics View original
Is this image relevant?
Elastic Collisions in One Dimension · Physics View original
Is this image relevant?
Collisions of Point Masses in Two Dimensions · Physics View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
- Conservation laws describe the preservation of physical quantities (mass, momentum, energy)
- Fluxes represent the rate of flow of conserved quantities across control volume boundaries
- Integral form of conservation laws applied to each control volume ensures global conservation
- Flux calculation accuracy directly impacts the overall solution quality
Control volume discretization
- Domain divided into non-overlapping control volumes or cells
- Cell-averaged values of conserved quantities stored at cell centers
- Face values reconstructed from cell-averaged data for flux calculations
- Higher-order reconstructions improve accuracy but may introduce oscillations near discontinuities
Integral form vs differential form
- Integral form naturally enforces conservation laws over finite volumes
- Differential form requires additional steps to ensure conservation
- Integral form handles discontinuities more robustly than differential form
- Transformation between integral and differential forms using divergence theorem
Mesh types and geometry
- Mesh selection significantly impacts solution accuracy and computational efficiency
- Different suit various problem geometries and physical phenomena
- Proper mesh design crucial for capturing important flow features and minimizing numerical errors
Structured vs unstructured meshes
- Structured meshes feature regular connectivity and simple data structures
- Advantages include efficient memory usage and straightforward implementation
- Limitations in handling complex geometries
- Unstructured meshes offer flexibility for complex geometries
- Irregular connectivity requires more complex data structures
- Better adaptation to local flow features and geometry constraints
- Hybrid meshes combine structured and unstructured regions for optimal performance
Cell-centered vs vertex-centered schemes
- Cell-centered schemes store variables at cell centers
- Natural choice for finite volume methods
- Simplifies flux calculations across cell faces
- Vertex-centered schemes store variables at mesh vertices
- Easier to implement in some cases
- May require additional interpolation for flux calculations
- Choice between schemes affects accuracy and implementation complexity
Ghost cells and boundary conditions
- extend the computational domain beyond physical boundaries
- Used to implement boundary conditions consistently with interior scheme
- Types of boundary conditions (Dirichlet, Neumann, periodic) implemented through ghost cell values
- Proper ghost cell implementation crucial for maintaining solution accuracy near boundaries
Flux calculation techniques
- Accurate flux calculation essential for overall solution quality
- Different techniques balance accuracy, stability, and computational cost
- Choice of flux calculation method depends on problem characteristics and desired solution properties
Central differencing schemes
- Symmetric stencil using information from both sides of cell interface
- Second-order accurate for smooth solutions
- Can produce oscillations near discontinuities (non-monotonic)
- Simple to implement but may require artificial dissipation for stability
Upwind schemes
- Biased stencil based on flow direction (characteristic information)
- First-order schemes more dissipative but monotonicity-preserving
- Higher-order (QUICK, MUSCL) improve accuracy
- Better handling of discontinuities compared to central schemes
Flux limiters and TVD methods
- combine high-order accuracy with monotonicity preservation
- Total Variation Diminishing (TVD) schemes prevent spurious oscillations
- Limiter functions (minmod, superbee, van Leer) control solution gradients
- Ensure stability and accuracy near discontinuities while maintaining high-order convergence in smooth regions
Time integration methods
- Time integration crucial for solving time-dependent problems
- Choice of method affects stability, accuracy, and computational efficiency
- Proper time step selection balances solution accuracy and computational cost
Explicit vs implicit schemes
- (forward Euler, Runge-Kutta) simple to implement
- Update solution using known values from previous time step
- Stability limited by , requiring small time steps
- (backward Euler, Crank-Nicolson) allow larger time steps
- Require solving system of equations at each time step
- Generally more stable but computationally expensive per step
- Semi-implicit methods combine advantages of both approaches
Stability considerations
- Numerical stability ensures errors do not grow unbounded over time
- CFL condition limits time step size for explicit schemes
- Implicit schemes generally more stable but may introduce artificial diffusion
- used to determine stability criteria
- Stability requirements often more stringent than accuracy requirements
Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy condition
- CFL condition relates time step size to spatial discretization and wave speed
- Ensures that numerical domain of dependence includes physical domain of dependence
- CFL number typically kept below 1 for explicit schemes
- , where is wave speed, is time step, is grid spacing
- depends on specific numerical scheme and problem characteristics
Higher-order finite volume methods
- Higher-order methods improve solution accuracy and reduce numerical diffusion
- Increased complexity and computational cost compared to lower-order methods
- Careful treatment required near discontinuities to maintain stability
MUSCL schemes
- Monotonic Upstream-centered Scheme for Conservation Laws
- Achieves second-order accuracy through piecewise linear reconstruction
- Slope limiters prevent oscillations near discontinuities
- Can be extended to higher-order accuracy (MUSCL-Hancock scheme)
ENO and WENO schemes
- Essentially Non-Oscillatory (ENO) schemes use adaptive stencil selection
- Choose smoothest stencil to avoid using data across discontinuities
- High-order accuracy without introducing spurious oscillations
- Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory (WENO) schemes improve upon ENO
- Combine multiple stencils with nonlinear weights
- Achieve optimal order of accuracy in smooth regions
- Robust handling of both smooth and discontinuous solutions
Discontinuous Galerkin methods
- Combine features of finite volume and finite element methods
- High-order accuracy within elements with discontinuities allowed between elements
- Basis functions (often polynomials) used to represent solution within each element
- Flux calculations at element interfaces ensure conservation
- Hp-adaptivity allows local refinement in both mesh size and polynomial order
Applications and case studies
- Finite volume methods widely used in computational physics and engineering
- Versatile approach applicable to various conservation law problems
- Case studies demonstrate method's effectiveness in real-world scenarios
Fluid dynamics problems
- Compressible flow simulations (transonic and supersonic aerodynamics)
- Incompressible flow modeling (low-speed aerodynamics, hydrodynamics)
- Turbulence modeling using RANS, LES, or DNS approaches
- Multiphase flows (cavitation, droplet dynamics)
Heat transfer simulations
- Conduction in solids with complex geometries
- Convection heat transfer in fluids (natural and forced convection)
- Conjugate heat transfer problems coupling fluid and solid domains
- Radiation heat transfer modeling using discrete ordinates method
Multiphase flow modeling
- Two-phase flows (gas-liquid, liquid-liquid) in pipes and porous media
- Three-phase flows in oil reservoirs and chemical reactors
- Interface tracking methods (VOF, level set) for free surface flows
- Eulerian-Lagrangian approaches for dispersed phase modeling
Error analysis and convergence
- Rigorous error analysis essential for assessing solution reliability
- Convergence studies verify numerical method's behavior as discretization is refined
- Verification and validation ensure numerical results accurately represent physical phenomena
Truncation error estimation
- arises from discretization of continuous equations
- Taylor series expansion used to estimate local truncation error
- Global truncation error accumulates over entire domain and time integration
- Richardson extrapolation technique estimates error using solutions on multiple grids
Grid convergence studies
- Systematic refinement of spatial and temporal discretization
- Observed order of accuracy compared to theoretical order
- Grid convergence index (GCI) quantifies numerical uncertainty
- Asymptotic range of convergence identified for reliable error estimates
Verification and validation techniques
- Verification ensures correct implementation of numerical methods
- Method of manufactured solutions generates exact solutions for testing
- Code-to-code comparison with established solvers
- Validation assesses how well numerical results represent physical reality
- Comparison with experimental data or high-fidelity simulations
- Uncertainty quantification techniques account for input parameter uncertainties
Advanced topics in finite volume methods
- Cutting-edge techniques push boundaries of finite volume methods
- Address challenges in computational efficiency and solution accuracy
- Integration with other numerical methods expands applicability
Adaptive mesh refinement
- Dynamically adjusts mesh resolution based on solution features
- h-refinement subdivides cells in regions of interest
- p-refinement increases polynomial order of approximation
- Error estimators guide refinement decisions
- Balances computational efficiency with solution accuracy
Parallel computing strategies
- Domain decomposition methods for distributed memory systems
- Load balancing crucial for efficient parallel performance
- Ghost cell exchange handles inter-process communication
- Shared memory parallelism using OpenMP or GPU acceleration
- Hybrid MPI-OpenMP approaches for modern HPC architectures
- Scalability studies assess parallel efficiency on large-scale problems
Coupling with other numerical methods
- Finite volume methods combined with finite element or spectral methods
- Immersed boundary methods for fluid-structure interaction problems
- Particle methods (SPH, DEM) coupled with finite volume solvers
- Multiphysics simulations integrating different conservation laws
- Multi-scale modeling techniques bridging disparate length and time scales
Key Terms to Review (27)
Boundary Conditions: Boundary conditions are constraints or conditions that are applied to the edges of a domain in mathematical modeling and numerical analysis, which help define the behavior of a system at its boundaries. These conditions are crucial for obtaining unique solutions to differential equations and can significantly influence the results of simulations. Depending on the nature of the problem, boundary conditions can be categorized into types like Dirichlet, Neumann, and mixed conditions, each with its specific implications on how a model behaves.
Central Differencing Schemes: Central differencing schemes are numerical methods used to approximate derivatives by considering the average of function values at points on either side of the point of interest. These schemes provide a way to discretize differential equations, which is particularly important in the context of finite volume methods where conservation laws are being solved. By balancing accuracy and stability, central differencing schemes help in achieving better approximations of the flow characteristics in computational fluid dynamics.
CFL Condition: The CFL condition, or Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy condition, is a mathematical criterion that determines the stability of numerical schemes for solving hyperbolic partial differential equations. It ensures that information propagates at a speed not exceeding the grid's time step and spatial discretization, helping to prevent numerical instabilities in simulations. This condition is crucial when using methods like the method of lines and finite volume methods to ensure accurate and reliable solutions.
Computational Fluid Dynamics: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is a branch of fluid mechanics that uses numerical analysis and algorithms to solve and analyze problems involving fluid flows. By leveraging the finite volume method, CFD discretizes fluid domain equations, enabling simulation of complex flow behaviors. This approach allows for the prediction of how fluids interact with surfaces and boundaries, which is critical in various engineering applications.
Conservation Laws: Conservation laws are fundamental principles in physics and mathematics that assert certain physical quantities remain constant over time in a closed system. These laws are crucial in understanding the behavior of various systems, particularly in fluid dynamics, where mass, momentum, and energy must be conserved. In numerical analysis, these laws guide the development of mathematical models that effectively simulate real-world phenomena.
Control Volumes: Control volumes are defined regions in space used to analyze the flow of mass, momentum, and energy within fluid dynamics. By focusing on these specific areas, one can apply conservation laws and gain insights into the behavior of fluids as they interact with their surroundings. This concept is essential for numerical methods that seek to approximate solutions to fluid flow problems, especially in finite volume methods where the control volume becomes a core element in discretizing governing equations.
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods: Discontinuous Galerkin methods are numerical techniques used for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) that allow for discontinuities in the solution across element boundaries. These methods combine features of finite element and finite volume methods, enabling them to handle complex geometries and capture sharp gradients effectively while maintaining high accuracy. They are particularly useful in computational fluid dynamics and other applications where solution discontinuities may arise.
Discretization: Discretization is the process of transforming continuous models and equations into discrete counterparts, allowing for numerical analysis and computation. By breaking down continuous domains into finite elements or intervals, it enables the application of various numerical methods to solve complex problems, including those involving differential equations and boundary conditions.
ENO Schemes: ENO schemes, or Essentially Non-Oscillatory schemes, are numerical methods used for solving hyperbolic partial differential equations that aim to capture discontinuities and sharp gradients without introducing spurious oscillations. These schemes adaptively choose the reconstruction of the solution based on the local characteristics of the data, ensuring stability and accuracy in regions with steep gradients or discontinuities. ENO schemes are particularly useful in computational fluid dynamics and other applications where high-resolution solutions are essential.
Explicit schemes: Explicit schemes are numerical methods used to solve differential equations where the solution at the next time step is calculated directly from known values at the current time step. This approach is characterized by its straightforward implementation, allowing for easy time-stepping through the problem domain. However, explicit schemes can be limited by stability conditions that dictate how large time steps can be, impacting their applicability in certain situations.
Finite Volume Methods: Finite volume methods are numerical techniques used for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) that conserve quantities over discrete control volumes. These methods focus on the fluxes across the boundaries of control volumes, ensuring that the integral form of conservation laws is satisfied, which makes them particularly useful for problems involving fluid dynamics and other transport phenomena. The approach is well-suited for complex geometries and allows for adaptive grid refinement.
Flux: Flux refers to the rate at which a quantity passes through a surface per unit area, and it is often used to describe the flow of physical quantities such as mass, energy, or momentum. In numerical analysis and particularly in finite volume methods, fluxes are crucial for approximating the transport of quantities across control volumes, which helps in solving partial differential equations that model physical phenomena like fluid flow or heat transfer.
Flux Limiters: Flux limiters are mathematical tools used in numerical methods to control the amount of flux passing through computational cells, particularly in the context of finite volume methods. They help prevent unphysical oscillations and ensure stability in solutions when modeling hyperbolic partial differential equations. By limiting the numerical flux, they improve the accuracy and physical realism of simulations in fluid dynamics and other fields.
Ghost cells: Ghost cells are a computational technique used in finite volume methods to handle boundary conditions and improve numerical stability. They act as extra cells added outside the physical domain, enabling the simulation of fluid flow across boundaries by providing necessary values for calculations at the edges of the computational grid. This helps ensure that conservation laws are satisfied and allows for more accurate approximations of fluxes at the interfaces.
Grid Convergence Studies: Grid convergence studies are techniques used to analyze the accuracy and reliability of numerical solutions by refining the computational grid and observing the effects on the results. The main goal is to ensure that the numerical solution approaches the true solution as the grid resolution increases, thus validating the computational method's performance. These studies help identify errors and establish confidence in simulations, particularly when using finite volume methods to solve partial differential equations.
Heat transfer: Heat transfer refers to the movement of thermal energy from one physical system to another, driven by a temperature difference. This process occurs through three primary mechanisms: conduction, convection, and radiation, each playing a vital role in various applications including engineering and environmental science. Understanding heat transfer is essential for analyzing thermal systems and designing effective thermal management solutions.
Implicit Schemes: Implicit schemes are numerical methods used for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) where the unknowns at a new time step are implicitly defined through an equation that involves both current and future values. This approach often leads to a system of equations that needs to be solved simultaneously, making it particularly effective for stiff problems or when stability is a concern. Implicit schemes can provide better stability and accuracy compared to explicit methods, especially in the context of advection-dominated problems and in the analysis of various spatial discretization methods.
Mesh Types: Mesh types refer to the various geometric configurations used in numerical methods, particularly in finite volume methods, to discretize a computational domain. These configurations can greatly influence the accuracy and efficiency of numerical simulations, impacting how well a model represents the underlying physical phenomena.
Muscl Schemes: Muscl schemes, which stands for Multidimensional Universal Solver for Conservation Laws, are a type of numerical method used for solving hyperbolic partial differential equations. They are particularly popular in the finite volume framework due to their ability to handle complex fluid dynamics problems while conserving mass, momentum, and energy. These schemes can adaptively adjust to changes in flow properties, making them well-suited for capturing shock waves and discontinuities in solutions.
Partial Differential Equations: Partial differential equations (PDEs) are mathematical equations that involve multiple independent variables and the partial derivatives of a dependent variable with respect to those independent variables. They are essential for modeling various physical phenomena, including heat transfer, fluid dynamics, and wave propagation, and are connected to a variety of numerical methods for finding solutions, including different discretization techniques and analysis of boundary conditions.
Structured Grid: A structured grid is a type of grid used in numerical methods, particularly in computational fluid dynamics, where the grid points are arranged in a regular, organized pattern, typically forming a series of intersecting lines or meshes. This arrangement allows for systematic indexing of grid points and simplifies the implementation of numerical algorithms. It provides significant advantages in terms of ease of data management and computational efficiency when solving partial differential equations.
Truncation Error: Truncation error is the difference between the exact mathematical solution and the approximation obtained through numerical methods. This error arises when an infinite process is approximated by a finite process, leading to discrepancies in calculated values, especially in methods that involve approximating derivatives or integrals.
TVD Methods: TVD methods, or Total Variation Diminishing methods, are numerical techniques used for solving hyperbolic partial differential equations, especially in fluid dynamics. They are designed to prevent the unphysical oscillations that can arise in numerical solutions of these equations, thus ensuring that the computed solution remains stable and physically realistic. This characteristic is especially crucial when dealing with problems involving shock waves or discontinuities.
Unstructured Grid: An unstructured grid is a type of grid used in computational simulations where the mesh elements can have various shapes and sizes, allowing for a more flexible representation of complex geometries. This flexibility makes unstructured grids particularly useful for problems in fluid dynamics and finite volume methods, where they can adapt to intricate boundaries and varying solution characteristics without being constrained to a regular layout.
Upwind Schemes: Upwind schemes are numerical methods used to solve hyperbolic partial differential equations, particularly in the context of fluid dynamics. They work by approximating the fluxes at cell interfaces based on the direction of the flow, ensuring stability and reducing numerical oscillations. This directional approach helps maintain accuracy when simulating advection-dominated problems, making them essential in finite volume methods for capturing wave propagation and transport phenomena.
Von Neumann stability analysis: Von Neumann stability analysis is a mathematical technique used to determine the stability of numerical schemes applied to partial differential equations. It involves examining how perturbations in the solution propagate over time, allowing for the assessment of whether numerical errors will grow or diminish. This method connects to various numerical methods, helping ensure that solutions remain stable and accurate over time.
WENO Schemes: WENO (Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory) schemes are advanced numerical methods used for solving hyperbolic partial differential equations, particularly in fluid dynamics. These schemes are designed to handle sharp gradients and discontinuities in the solution while maintaining high accuracy. By using a weighted combination of different polynomial approximations, WENO schemes achieve better resolution of features in the data without introducing spurious oscillations that can occur with traditional methods.