Glossary

6.2 Equivalent control and chattering reduction

4 min read•august 14, 2024

is a powerful nonlinear control technique, but it comes with challenges. Equivalent control keeps the system on the sliding surface, while causes unwanted oscillations. These concepts are crucial for understanding the trade-offs in sliding mode design.

Chattering reduction techniques aim to balance robustness and smooth control. Methods like boundary layers and offer ways to minimize chattering while maintaining the benefits of sliding mode control. Understanding these approaches is key to effective implementation.

Equivalent Control in Sliding Mode

Concept and Derivation

Top images from around the web for Concept and Derivation

1 of 1

Top images from around the web for Concept and Derivation

1 of 1
  • Equivalent control is a continuous control law that maintains the system state on the sliding surface once it has been reached
  • Derived by setting the time derivative of the sliding surface to zero and solving for the control input
  • Necessary condition for the existence of sliding mode, ensuring that the system state remains on the sliding surface

Theoretical Nature and Significance

  • The equivalent control is not the actual control applied to the system; it is a theoretical concept used to analyze the system behavior on the sliding surface
  • Helps in understanding the robustness properties of sliding mode control and its ability to reject disturbances (matched uncertainties)
  • Provides insight into the system dynamics on the sliding surface and the required control effort to maintain sliding motion
  • Serves as a basis for the design of the overall sliding mode control law, which includes the equivalent control and a discontinuous term

Chattering in Sliding Mode Control

Causes and Characteristics

  • Chattering is a high-frequency oscillation of the control input around the sliding surface, caused by the discontinuous nature of the sliding mode control law
  • Main causes include unmodeled dynamics (sensor noise), time delays, and imperfect switching of the control input due to physical limitations of actuators (bandwidth limitations)
  • Characterized by rapid switching of the control input between positive and negative values, leading to a zigzag motion around the sliding surface
  • Frequency and amplitude of chattering depend on factors such as the control gain, the sampling time, and the presence of unmodeled dynamics

Effects and Consequences

  • Can lead to excessive wear and tear on the actuators, reducing their lifespan and increasing maintenance requirements
  • May excite unmodeled high-frequency dynamics, such as structural vibrations or electrical noise, degrading the overall system performance
  • The presence of chattering can lead to instability in the system, as the high-frequency oscillations may cause the system state to leave the sliding surface
  • Chattering is an undesirable phenomenon in sliding mode control and needs to be addressed through various chattering reduction techniques to ensure smooth and accurate control

Chattering Reduction Techniques

Boundary Layer Methods

  • Involve introducing a smooth approximation of the discontinuous signum function in the vicinity of the sliding surface, creating a "boundary layer" where the control input is continuous
  • Most common boundary layer method is the saturation function, which replaces the signum function with a smooth approximation (hyperbolic tangent or sigmoid function)
  • Width of the boundary layer determines the trade-off between chattering reduction and tracking precision; a wider boundary layer reduces chattering but may compromise tracking performance
  • Other boundary layer methods include the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) sliding surface and the fuzzy boundary layer, which adapt the boundary layer width based on the system state or external conditions

Higher-Order Sliding Modes (HOSM)

  • Aim to reduce chattering by using higher-order derivatives of the sliding surface in the control law, resulting in a continuous control input
  • Second-order sliding mode (SOSM) control algorithms (super-twisting algorithm and sub-optimal algorithm) are popular choices for chattering reduction
  • HOSM techniques can maintain the robustness properties of sliding mode control while effectively reducing chattering
  • May require more complex control laws and higher-order derivatives of the system state, which can be difficult to obtain in practice
  • Examples of HOSM include the twisting algorithm, the drift-algorithm, and the quasi-continuous HOSM, each with different properties and implementation requirements

Robustness vs Chattering in Sliding Mode Design

Trade-offs and Design Considerations

  • Sliding mode control offers excellent robustness properties (insensitivity to matched uncertainties and disturbances) but this comes at the cost of chattering
  • The discontinuous nature of the sliding mode control law, which is essential for its robustness, is also the main cause of chattering
  • Chattering reduction techniques (boundary layer methods and HOSM) can mitigate chattering but may compromise the robustness properties of the controller
  • The width of the boundary layer in boundary layer methods directly affects the trade-off between chattering and robustness; a narrower boundary layer preserves robustness but may lead to more chattering

Application-Specific Requirements and Tuning

  • Higher-order sliding modes can maintain robustness while reducing chattering, but they may require more complex control laws and higher-order derivatives of the system state, which can be difficult to obtain in practice
  • The choice of the sliding mode control design parameters (sliding surface and control gain) also influences the trade-off between robustness and chattering
  • The optimal balance between robustness and chattering depends on the specific application requirements (acceptable level of chattering and desired robustness to uncertainties and disturbances)
  • Tuning of the sliding mode controller involves selecting the appropriate chattering reduction technique, adjusting the boundary layer width or HOSM parameters, and choosing the sliding surface and control gain to achieve the desired performance while minimizing chattering

Key Terms to Review (20)

Automotive systems: Automotive systems refer to the various components and technologies within vehicles that work together to ensure performance, safety, and efficiency. These systems include engine control, braking, steering, and stability control, often utilizing nonlinear control techniques to enhance functionality under varying driving conditions.
Backstepping control: Backstepping control is a recursive design methodology used for stabilizing nonlinear systems by systematically constructing a Lyapunov function. This approach breaks down a complex system into simpler subsystems, allowing for step-by-step stabilization and ensuring that the overall system behaves as desired. It is particularly useful in systems with uncertainties and allows for the creation of robust controllers that can handle various nonlinearities.
Boundary Layer Technique: The boundary layer technique is a method used in control systems to manage and reduce chattering phenomena that occur in sliding mode control. By creating a 'boundary layer' around the sliding surface, this technique allows for smoother transitions and reduces the effects of high-frequency oscillations in the system. It helps in achieving a balance between robustness and stability, enhancing the performance of the control system while minimizing undesirable behavior.
Chattering: Chattering refers to the rapid switching behavior often observed in sliding mode control systems, where the control signal oscillates back and forth around the desired value instead of stabilizing. This phenomenon can lead to increased wear on actuators and can negatively impact system performance. Understanding and managing chattering is crucial for ensuring robust control while minimizing undesirable effects on the system's dynamics.
Dead Zone Nonlinearity: Dead zone nonlinearity refers to a situation in control systems where there is a range of input values for which the output does not respond, creating a 'dead zone' where no action is taken. This can lead to undesired behavior in systems, such as oscillations or slow response times, especially when trying to maintain stability or achieve desired performance through control techniques. Addressing dead zone nonlinearity is crucial for effective system design, particularly in applications requiring precise control.
Equivalent Control Principle: The equivalent control principle is a technique used in the design and analysis of nonlinear control systems, particularly for systems that exhibit sliding mode behavior. It helps to simplify the control design process by finding a control law that stabilizes the system at its desired equilibrium point while compensating for disturbances or uncertainties. This principle is key in managing chattering effects, ensuring smoother system performance and robustness.
Feedback linearization: Feedback linearization is a control technique that transforms a nonlinear system into an equivalent linear system by applying a feedback law that cancels the nonlinear dynamics. This method allows for the use of linear control techniques to stabilize and control nonlinear systems effectively, making it crucial in various engineering applications.
Global asymptotic stability: Global asymptotic stability refers to the property of a dynamical system where all trajectories converge to an equilibrium point from any initial condition, and they do so over time. This concept emphasizes not just convergence but also that this behavior holds for every possible starting point in the system's state space, ensuring that the equilibrium is robust and resilient to initial conditions. Achieving global asymptotic stability is crucial in control theory as it indicates a system will eventually stabilize regardless of how it starts.
Higher-order sliding modes: Higher-order sliding modes are advanced techniques in control theory that extend traditional sliding mode control by providing improved performance and robustness against disturbances and uncertainties. These methods aim to achieve a smoother control action while effectively eliminating chattering, a common issue in standard sliding mode systems. By utilizing higher derivatives of the sliding variable, these control strategies enhance system stability and tracking accuracy.
Input-to-State Stability: Input-to-state stability (ISS) is a property of a dynamical system that describes how the state of the system responds to bounded inputs. Specifically, it ensures that if the input remains bounded, the state of the system will also remain within certain limits over time. This concept is closely tied to various stability notions and is particularly useful in analyzing nonlinear systems, helping to ensure robust performance in the presence of disturbances or uncertainties.
Lyapunov Function: A Lyapunov function is a scalar function that helps assess the stability of a dynamical system by demonstrating whether system trajectories converge to an equilibrium point. This function, which is typically positive definite, provides insight into the system's energy-like properties, allowing for analysis of both stability and the behavior of nonlinear systems in various control scenarios.
Lyapunov stability: Lyapunov stability refers to the property of a dynamic system where, if it is perturbed from its equilibrium position, it will eventually return to that position over time. This concept is essential in assessing how systems respond to disturbances and is foundational in the design and analysis of control systems, especially nonlinear ones.
Observer design: Observer design refers to a technique used in control systems to estimate the internal state of a system based on its output measurements and a model of the system dynamics. This approach is crucial for implementing feedback control in systems where not all states are directly measurable. By effectively reconstructing unmeasured states, observer design enhances the system's performance and robustness against uncertainties and disturbances.
Robotic systems: Robotic systems refer to the integration of various components, including sensors, actuators, and control algorithms, that enable machines to perform tasks autonomously or semi-autonomously. These systems are crucial for applications in manufacturing, healthcare, exploration, and many other fields, demonstrating the importance of advanced control techniques to achieve precise and reliable performance.
Robustness against disturbances: Robustness against disturbances refers to the ability of a control system to maintain its performance and stability in the presence of external disruptions or uncertainties. This concept is essential when designing systems that need to function reliably despite variations in operating conditions, such as changes in the environment or unexpected inputs. In the context of nonlinear control strategies, achieving robustness often involves techniques like equivalent control and methods aimed at minimizing undesirable behaviors, such as chattering.
Saturation Nonlinearity: Saturation nonlinearity refers to the behavior of a system where the output cannot exceed a certain limit, regardless of the input signal magnitude. This nonlinearity is characterized by a flat response beyond a specific threshold, creating a situation where the system fails to respond proportionally to larger inputs. Understanding saturation nonlinearity is crucial for analyzing how systems behave under extreme conditions and for designing effective control strategies to mitigate its effects.
Settling Time: Settling time is the duration required for a control system's response to reach and remain within a specified range of the desired output after a disturbance or change in input. This term reflects how quickly a system can stabilize after being perturbed and is critical for evaluating performance in various control strategies. A shorter settling time indicates a more responsive system, which is essential in ensuring minimal delay in achieving desired operational states across different control methodologies.
Sliding Mode Control: Sliding mode control is a robust control strategy designed for controlling nonlinear systems by forcing the system state to 'slide' along a predefined surface in the state space. This technique is particularly effective in dealing with uncertainties and disturbances, making it a valuable approach when analyzing nonlinear systems and their unique behaviors, as well as distinguishing between linear and nonlinear characteristics.
State Feedback: State feedback is a control strategy where the controller uses the state variables of a system to compute the control input. This approach enhances system stability and performance by allowing for direct modification of the system's dynamics based on its current state, enabling tailored responses to varying conditions. It plays a crucial role in improving robustness, handling uncertainties, and ensuring desired system behavior through feedback mechanisms.
Tracking Error: Tracking error is the difference between the desired output of a control system and the actual output it produces, often represented as the error signal. This discrepancy is crucial for assessing the performance and accuracy of various control strategies, especially in nonlinear systems where maintaining desired performance can be challenging due to inherent system dynamics.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Back
Practice QuizGlossary
Practice QuizGlossary
Next guide