State and Federal Constitutions

study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Juror

from class:

State and Federal Constitutions

Definition

A juror is an individual selected to serve on a jury, responsible for hearing evidence in a legal case and rendering a verdict based on the facts presented. Jurors play a critical role in the judicial process, as they ensure that trials are conducted fairly and impartially, reflecting community standards and values. Their decisions can significantly impact the outcome of trials, influencing not just the lives of the defendants and plaintiffs but also setting precedents within the legal system.

congrats on reading the definition of Juror. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Jurors are typically selected from the general population through a random process, ensuring a diverse representation of the community.
  2. In most cases, jurors must be impartial and free from any bias or preconceived notions about the case they are judging.
  3. Juries can vary in size, with criminal cases often requiring 12 jurors, while civil cases may have smaller juries.
  4. Jurors are instructed by judges on how to apply the law to the facts they hear during a trial, ensuring their verdicts are based on legal standards.
  5. The deliberation process among jurors is confidential, allowing them to discuss their views freely before reaching a final verdict.

Review Questions

  • How does the selection process of jurors reflect the principles of fairness and impartiality in the judicial system?
    • The selection process for jurors aims to ensure fairness and impartiality by using random sampling from the general population. This helps create a diverse jury that represents various perspectives within the community. Potential jurors are screened for biases and conflicts of interest to uphold the integrity of the trial, reinforcing the idea that justice should be administered without favoritism or prejudice.
  • Discuss the differences between a jury in criminal trials and civil trials regarding the number of jurors and their decision-making process.
    • In criminal trials, juries typically consist of 12 members who must reach a unanimous verdict for a defendant's guilt or innocence. In contrast, civil trials may use smaller juries, often 6-8 members, and may allow for non-unanimous verdicts depending on state laws. The decision-making process differs as well; criminal juries must adhere to a higher standard of proof known as 'beyond a reasonable doubt,' while civil juries operate under the 'preponderance of evidence' standard, making it easier to find for plaintiffs.
  • Evaluate the impact of jury decisions on legal precedents and how this shapes future cases within state court systems.
    • Jury decisions have significant implications for legal precedents because they reflect community standards and values. When juries render verdicts in high-profile cases, they can influence public opinion and guide future judicial interpretations. This impact extends beyond individual cases; successful legal arguments presented during jury trials can be cited in future cases, shaping the evolving landscape of law within state court systems as courts strive to align with societal expectations.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Guides