Soviet Union – 1817 to 1991

study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Mutually assured destruction

from class:

Soviet Union – 1817 to 1991

Definition

Mutually assured destruction (MAD) is a military strategy in which both opposing sides possess enough nuclear weapons to destroy each other completely, leading to the understanding that any nuclear attack would result in total annihilation for both. This concept emerged during the Cold War as a deterrent, ensuring that neither side would launch a first strike due to the fear of retaliation and catastrophic consequences. As a result, MAD became a cornerstone of the nuclear arms race and shaped international relations during the tense standoff between superpowers.

congrats on reading the definition of mutually assured destruction. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. MAD was primarily developed as a response to the nuclear capabilities of both the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War, preventing either side from launching a first strike.
  2. The theory of MAD relies on the principle that both sides must have secure second-strike capabilities, meaning they can still retaliate even after being attacked.
  3. During the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, MAD played a significant role in preventing nuclear war, as both superpowers recognized the devastating consequences of escalation.
  4. The existence of MAD has led to extensive arms control agreements, such as the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT), which aimed to limit the number of nuclear weapons each side could possess.
  5. Despite its role in maintaining a fragile peace, critics argue that MAD creates a dangerous reliance on nuclear weapons and increases the risk of accidental or unauthorized launches.

Review Questions

  • How did mutually assured destruction influence military strategies during the Cold War?
    • Mutually assured destruction significantly influenced military strategies during the Cold War by establishing a deterrent framework that prevented direct conflict between the superpowers. Both the United States and the Soviet Union understood that engaging in a nuclear exchange would lead to total annihilation for both sides. This awareness led to a focus on building up nuclear arsenals to ensure second-strike capabilities while simultaneously avoiding open warfare, effectively creating a tense standoff characterized by threats and posturing.
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of mutually assured destruction as a deterrent against nuclear war during periods of heightened tensions, such as the Cuban Missile Crisis.
    • Mutually assured destruction proved effective as a deterrent against nuclear war during critical moments like the Cuban Missile Crisis. The recognition that any aggressive action could trigger catastrophic retaliation led both sides to seek diplomatic solutions rather than military confrontation. This understanding prevented escalation and ultimately resulted in negotiations that de-escalated tensions. However, it also highlighted how reliance on MAD could create precarious situations where miscalculations or miscommunications might lead to disaster.
  • Assess how the concept of mutually assured destruction has shaped modern nuclear policy and international relations since the end of the Cold War.
    • Since the end of the Cold War, mutually assured destruction has continued to shape modern nuclear policy and international relations by influencing how states perceive their security needs. The legacy of MAD has led some countries to maintain or develop nuclear arsenals as a means of ensuring national security against potential threats. However, this has also raised concerns about nuclear proliferation and regional conflicts, as nations seek similar deterrence strategies. As a result, new frameworks for arms control and disarmament discussions have emerged, reflecting both the enduring impact of MAD and the complexities of contemporary geopolitics.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Guides