World War II

study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Scorched earth policy

from class:

World War II

Definition

The scorched earth policy is a military strategy that involves destroying anything that might be useful to the enemy while advancing through or retreating from an area. This includes burning crops, destroying infrastructure, and contaminating water supplies. In the context of Germany's invasion of the Soviet Union during World War II, this tactic was employed by Soviet forces as they retreated, aiming to deny the advancing German army access to essential resources and to slow their progress.

congrats on reading the definition of scorched earth policy. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. The scorched earth policy was famously utilized by the Soviets during their retreat in 1941, which significantly hindered the German advance.
  2. This strategy not only involved destroying agricultural resources but also included dismantling factories and infrastructure that could aid the enemy.
  3. As Soviet troops fell back, they implemented this tactic across vast territories, leading to immense hardship for both the local population and invading forces.
  4. The scorched earth policy was a desperate yet strategic move that demonstrated the Soviet commitment to resisting German occupation at any cost.
  5. While it slowed the Germans, it also resulted in long-term devastation and hardship for the Soviet Union, impacting its recovery post-war.

Review Questions

  • How did the scorched earth policy impact German military strategy during Operation Barbarossa?
    • The scorched earth policy significantly disrupted German supply lines during Operation Barbarossa. As Soviet forces withdrew and destroyed critical resources, the advancing German troops faced shortages of food, fuel, and equipment. This strategy forced Germany to stretch its supply lines further into hostile territory, ultimately affecting their operational effectiveness and contributing to their eventual failure in the campaign.
  • Evaluate the consequences of implementing a scorched earth policy on both military outcomes and civilian life during the invasion.
    • Implementing a scorched earth policy had severe consequences for both military operations and civilian populations. While it was intended to delay German forces, it also led to widespread suffering among civilians who lost their homes, crops, and access to basic necessities. The destruction of infrastructure made post-war recovery more difficult for the Soviet Union, highlighting a complex balance between military strategy and humanitarian impact during wartime.
  • Assess how the use of the scorched earth policy by the Soviets influenced future military strategies in warfare.
    • The use of the scorched earth policy by the Soviets during World War II influenced future military strategies by demonstrating the effectiveness of denying resources to an advancing enemy. This tactic showcased how such extreme measures could alter the course of an invasion and became a reference point for future conflicts where resource denial plays a crucial role. Additionally, it raised ethical questions regarding civilian suffering versus military necessity that continue to be debated in modern warfare contexts.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Guides