Intro to Public Policy

study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Interviews

from class:

Intro to Public Policy

Definition

Interviews are a qualitative research method used to gather in-depth information through direct interaction between the interviewer and the participant. This method allows researchers to explore complex topics, gain insights into people's perspectives, and understand the reasoning behind their thoughts and actions. Interviews can vary in structure, from structured with set questions to unstructured, allowing for open-ended discussions, making them versatile for evaluation research.

congrats on reading the definition of Interviews. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Interviews can be conducted in various formats, including face-to-face, over the phone, or via video conferencing, making them adaptable to different situations.
  2. They can be categorized into three main types: structured (with predetermined questions), semi-structured (with some flexibility), and unstructured (open-ended conversations).
  3. Interviews are particularly valuable in evaluation research because they provide rich qualitative data that can reveal the motivations and experiences of participants.
  4. The effectiveness of interviews relies on the skills of the interviewer, including their ability to build rapport, ask follow-up questions, and listen actively.
  5. Ethical considerations are crucial in interviews, as researchers must ensure informed consent, confidentiality, and respect for participants' rights and feelings.

Review Questions

  • How do interviews differ from other qualitative methods like focus groups in terms of data collection?
    • Interviews differ from focus groups primarily in their format and interaction dynamics. While interviews involve one-on-one conversations allowing for deeper exploration of individual perspectives, focus groups gather multiple participants for a collective discussion. This can lead to different types of data; interviews provide personal insights while focus groups can reveal group dynamics and social influences on opinions.
  • Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using structured versus unstructured interviews in evaluation research.
    • Structured interviews offer consistency and comparability across responses due to their fixed question format, making it easier to analyze data quantitatively. However, they may limit the depth of responses. On the other hand, unstructured interviews allow for greater flexibility and richer data as participants can express themselves freely, but analyzing this data can be more challenging due to its subjective nature. The choice between these approaches often depends on the specific goals of the evaluation research.
  • Evaluate how the interviewer’s skills impact the quality of data collected during interviews in evaluation research.
    • The quality of data collected during interviews is heavily influenced by the interviewer’s skills, such as their ability to create a comfortable environment for participants and ask insightful follow-up questions. A skilled interviewer can elicit more detailed responses by building trust and encouraging openness. Conversely, an inexperienced interviewer might fail to engage participants effectively or miss key information, leading to superficial data. Therefore, interviewer competence is essential for maximizing the value of qualitative insights gained through interviews.

"Interviews" also found in:

Subjects (148)

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Guides