Plyler v. Doe

Definition

Plyler v. Doe was a landmark Supreme Court case that established the right of undocumented immigrant children to receive a free public education in the United States. The case challenged a Texas law that denied funding for public education to children who were not legally admitted into the country.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. The Plyler v. Doe decision was issued by the Supreme Court in 1982 and struck down a Texas law that denied funding for public education to children who were not legally admitted into the country.
2. The Court ruled that the Texas law violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which prohibits states from denying any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
3. The Court applied an intermediate level of scrutiny to the Texas law, finding that it was not substantially related to a substantial government interest.
4. The Court recognized that denying education to undocumented immigrant children would impose a lifetime of hardship on a discrete class of children not accountable for their unlawful status.
5. The Plyler v. Doe decision has been a significant precedent in protecting the educational rights of undocumented immigrant children in the United States.

Review Questions

• Explain the key holding and reasoning of the Supreme Court in the Plyler v. Doe decision.
  • In Plyler v. Doe, the Supreme Court held that a Texas law denying funding for public education to children who were not legally admitted into the country violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court applied an intermediate level of scrutiny and found that the law was not substantially related to a substantial government interest. The Court recognized that denying education to undocumented immigrant children would impose a lifetime of hardship on a discrete class of children not accountable for their unlawful status, and that education is not merely some governmental 'benefit' indistinguishable from other forms of social welfare legislation.
• Analyze how the Plyler v. Doe decision expanded the protections of the Equal Protection Clause to undocumented immigrant children.
  • The Plyler v. Doe decision expanded the protections of the Equal Protection Clause to undocumented immigrant children by rejecting the argument that the Equal Protection Clause applies only to citizens. The Court recognized that the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection extends to anyone 'within [the State's] jurisdiction,' including undocumented immigrant children. The Court's application of intermediate scrutiny to the Texas law, rather than the more deferential rational basis review, signaled a heightened level of protection for this vulnerable class of children who were not responsible for their immigration status.
• Evaluate the long-term impact and significance of the Plyler v. Doe decision on the educational rights of undocumented immigrant children in the United States.
  • The Plyler v. Doe decision has had a profound and lasting impact on the educational rights of undocumented immigrant children in the United States. By establishing that denying these children a public education violates the Equal Protection Clause, the decision has ensured that undocumented immigrant children have access to the same educational opportunities as their citizen peers. This has been critical in preventing the creation of a permanent underclass and has helped to provide undocumented immigrant children with the tools and resources necessary to integrate into American society. The decision has also served as an important precedent in protecting the rights of other vulnerable groups and has been a significant victory for the principle of equal protection under the law.

Related terms

Equal Protection Clause:

The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires that the government treat all people under its jurisdiction equally and not make distinctions that lack a rational basis.

Undocumented Immigrants: Undocumented immigrants, also known as illegal immigrants, are foreign nationals who reside in a country without the legal authorization to do so.

Intermediate Scrutiny:

Intermediate scrutiny is a standard of judicial review in which a law or government action must be substantially related to an important government interest in order to be considered constitutional.