Glossary

9.4 Risk aversion and utility functions

7 min read•august 21, 2024

is a key concept in economics that explains how people prefer certainty over uncertainty. It shapes decisions about investments, insurance, and spending. Understanding risk aversion helps us predict economic behaviors and design better policies.

provides a framework for analyzing choices under uncertainty. It assumes people maximize expected utility rather than expected monetary value. This theory, along with measures like the and , helps economists model real-world decision-making.

Definition of risk aversion

  • Fundamental concept in economics describes individuals' preference for certainty over uncertainty
  • Plays crucial role in understanding decision-making processes under conditions of uncertainty
  • Directly impacts various economic behaviors including investment, insurance, and consumption choices

Expected utility theory

Top images from around the web for Expected utility theory

  • Expected utility, independence, and continuity | Theory and Decision View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Nonhuman Primates Satisfy Utility Maximization in Compliance with the Continuity Axiom of ... View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Expected utility, independence, and continuity | Theory and Decision View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Expected utility theory

  • Expected utility, independence, and continuity | Theory and Decision View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Nonhuman Primates Satisfy Utility Maximization in Compliance with the Continuity Axiom of ... View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Expected utility, independence, and continuity | Theory and Decision View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3
  • Framework for analyzing decision-making under uncertainty
  • Assumes individuals maximize expected utility rather than expected monetary value
  • Incorporates probability-weighted outcomes to determine optimal choices
  • Bernoulli's solution to the laid foundation for this theory
  • Axioms include completeness, transitivity, continuity, and independence

Risk aversion coefficient

  • Quantitative measure of an individual's degree of risk aversion
  • Calculated using the second derivative of the utility function divided by the first derivative
  • Higher values indicate greater risk aversion
  • Influences investment decisions and portfolio allocations
  • Can vary across different wealth levels and risk scenarios

Certainty equivalent

  • Amount of certain payoff an individual considers equally desirable to a risky prospect
  • Always less than the expected value of a risky prospect for risk-averse individuals
  • Difference between expected value and certainty equivalent defines the risk premium
  • Used in determining insurance premiums and valuing financial assets
  • Calculated using the inverse of the utility function applied to expected utility

Utility functions

  • Mathematical representations of individuals' preferences over different outcomes
  • Central to modeling economic decision-making under uncertainty
  • Shape of utility function reflects risk attitudes (concave for risk-averse, convex for risk-seeking)

Von Neumann-Morgenstern utility

  • Axiomatic approach to defining utility functions under uncertainty
  • Ensures utility functions satisfy key properties for rational decision-making
  • Allows for numerical representation of preferences over lotteries
  • Four key axioms completeness, transitivity, continuity, and independence
  • Enables calculation of expected utility for complex decision scenarios

Concave vs convex functions

  • Concave utility functions represent risk-averse preferences
  • Convex utility functions indicate
  • Linear utility functions correspond to risk-neutral attitudes
  • Second derivative of utility function determines concavity or convexity
  • Marginal utility decreases with wealth for concave functions (diminishing marginal utility)

Constant relative risk aversion

  • Utility function where remains constant across wealth levels
  • Often expressed as U(W)=W1−γ1−γU(W) = \frac{W^{1-\gamma}}{1-\gamma} where γ\gamma is the coefficient of relative risk aversion
  • Widely used in economic modeling due to its tractability
  • Implies that the proportion of wealth invested in risky assets remains constant as wealth changes
  • Special cases include logarithmic utility (γ=1\gamma = 1) and quadratic utility (γ=2\gamma = 2)

Measures of risk aversion

  • Quantitative tools for comparing risk attitudes across individuals or situations
  • Essential for empirical studies and policy analysis related to risk
  • Help in predicting economic behaviors and designing risk management strategies

Arrow-Pratt measure

  • Developed independently by Kenneth Arrow and John W. Pratt
  • defined as −U′′(W)U′(W)-\frac{U''(W)}{U'(W)}
  • Relative risk aversion given by −WU′′(W)U′(W)-W\frac{U''(W)}{U'(W)}
  • Provides local measure of risk aversion at a specific wealth level
  • Used to classify utility functions and compare risk attitudes

Relative vs absolute risk aversion

  • Absolute risk aversion measures risk aversion in absolute wealth terms
  • Relative risk aversion considers risk aversion relative to current wealth level
  • (DARA) common assumption in many economic models
  • (CRRA) often used for its analytical tractability
  • (IRRA) observed in some empirical studies

Risk premium calculation

  • Difference between expected value of a risky prospect and its certainty equivalent
  • Calculated as RP=E[X]−CERP = E[X] - CE, where E[X]E[X] is expected value and CECE is certainty equivalent
  • Approximated by RP≈12σ2A(W)RP \approx \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 A(W) for small risks, where σ2\sigma^2 is variance and A(W)A(W) is absolute risk aversion
  • Used in pricing insurance policies and risk management strategies
  • Varies with wealth level and magnitude of risk

Risk preferences

  • Describe individuals' attitudes towards uncertain outcomes
  • Crucial for understanding economic decision-making under uncertainty
  • Influence a wide range of behaviors from financial investments to career choices

Risk-averse behavior

  • Preference for certain outcomes over uncertain ones with equal expected value
  • Characterized by concave utility functions
  • Willingness to pay to avoid risk (insurance premiums)
  • Diversification in investment portfolios to reduce overall risk exposure
  • Tendency to choose lower but guaranteed returns over higher but uncertain ones

Risk-neutral behavior

  • Indifference between certain outcomes and uncertain ones with equal expected value
  • Represented by linear utility functions
  • Decisions based solely on expected monetary value, disregarding risk
  • Rare in practice but useful as a theoretical benchmark
  • May apply in situations with very small stakes or for well-diversified investors

Risk-seeking behavior

  • Preference for uncertain outcomes over certain ones with equal expected value
  • Characterized by convex utility functions
  • Willingness to pay for the opportunity to take risks (gambling)
  • Attraction to high-risk, high-reward investment strategies
  • Often observed in specific contexts (small probabilities of large gains)

Applications in economics

  • Risk aversion concepts applied across various economic fields
  • Crucial for understanding market behaviors and designing economic policies
  • Informs decision-making processes in both microeconomic and macroeconomic contexts

Insurance markets

  • Risk aversion drives demand for insurance products
  • Insurers use risk pooling to manage and price risks
  • Adverse selection and moral hazard as key challenges in
  • Risk classification and premium differentiation based on individual risk profiles
  • Government intervention in insurance markets (mandatory coverage, subsidies)

Portfolio theory

  • Modern (MPT) incorporates risk aversion in investment decisions
  • Efficient frontier represents optimal risk-return trade-offs
  • Diversification as a strategy to reduce unsystematic risk
  • Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) links expected returns to systematic risk
  • Risk aversion influences asset allocation between risky and risk-free assets

Behavioral economics insights

  • Prospect Theory challenges traditional expected utility theory
  • Loss aversion suggests asymmetric valuation of gains and losses
  • Framing effects influence risk perceptions and decision-making
  • Overconfidence and optimism bias affect risk assessments
  • Mental accounting impacts risk-taking behavior across different domains

Mathematical representations

  • Formalize risk aversion concepts for rigorous analysis
  • Enable quantitative predictions and hypothesis testing
  • Provide tools for modeling complex economic scenarios involving risk

Utility function derivatives

  • First derivative (U′(W)U'(W)) represents marginal utility of wealth
  • Second derivative (U′′(W)U''(W)) indicates risk attitude (negative for risk aversion)
  • of absolute risk aversion: −U′′(W)U′(W)-\frac{U''(W)}{U'(W)}
  • Relative risk aversion: −WU′′(W)U′(W)-W\frac{U''(W)}{U'(W)}
  • Higher-order derivatives used in more advanced risk analysis (prudence, temperance)

Jensen's inequality

  • Fundamental theorem relating convex functions to expected values
  • For concave utility functions: U(E[X])≥E[U(X)]U(E[X]) \geq E[U(X)]
  • Explains why risk-averse individuals prefer certain outcomes
  • Applications in finance (option pricing) and information theory
  • Generalizes to higher dimensions for multivariate risk analysis

Indifference curves under risk

  • Graphical representation of combinations of risk and return yielding equal utility
  • Convex to the origin for risk-averse individuals
  • Slope at any point represents marginal rate of substitution between risk and return
  • Used in portfolio theory to determine optimal asset allocations
  • Shape affected by degree of risk aversion and wealth levels

Decision-making under uncertainty

  • Explores how individuals make choices when outcomes are uncertain
  • Incorporates psychological factors influencing risk perceptions
  • Challenges and extends traditional expected utility theory

Certainty effect

  • Tendency to overweight certain outcomes relative to probable ones
  • Violates independence axiom of expected utility theory
  • Explains preference reversals in decision-making under risk
  • Allais paradox as classic demonstration of
  • Implications for marketing strategies and public policy design

Prospect theory basics

  • Developed by Kahneman and Tversky as alternative to expected utility theory
  • Value function defined over gains and losses rather than final wealth
  • Probability weighting function overweights small probabilities and underweights large ones
  • Reference point dependence in evaluating outcomes
  • Explains observed behaviors like simultaneous insurance purchase and lottery participation

St. Petersburg paradox

  • Historical problem challenging expected value as decision criterion
  • Infinite expected value for a game with finite willingness to pay
  • Resolved by introducing utility functions with diminishing marginal utility
  • Demonstrates importance of risk aversion in decision-making
  • Led to development of expected utility theory

Empirical evidence

  • Tests theoretical predictions of risk aversion models against real-world data
  • Informs refinements and extensions of existing theories
  • Crucial for policy design and economic forecasting

Experimental methods

  • Laboratory experiments to measure individual risk preferences
  • Elicitation techniques (certainty equivalents, multiple price lists)
  • Hypothetical vs. incentivized choices in risk preference measurement
  • Contextual factors influencing experimental results (framing, stakes)
  • Challenges in extrapolating lab results to real-world decisions

Real-world risk aversion studies

  • Analysis of insurance purchasing behaviors
  • Investment portfolio allocations across different demographics
  • Wage differentials for risky occupations
  • Farmer crop choices and technology adoption in developing countries
  • Consumer product choices under quality uncertainty

Limitations of utility theory

  • Violations of expected utility axioms in empirical studies
  • Challenges in measuring and comparing utility across individuals
  • Context-dependence of risk preferences
  • Difficulty in separating risk aversion from other factors (ambiguity aversion, loss aversion)
  • Need for more complex models to capture real-world decision-making processes

Key Terms to Review (27)

Absolute risk aversion: Absolute risk aversion refers to the degree to which an individual prefers certainty over uncertainty regarding outcomes, particularly in relation to financial decisions. This concept is central to understanding how people make choices when faced with risky situations, as it can influence their utility functions and overall decision-making process in economics. Individuals with high absolute risk aversion are likely to avoid risky investments, while those with low risk aversion may seek out opportunities with uncertain outcomes.
Arrow-Pratt Measure: The Arrow-Pratt measure is a mathematical representation of risk aversion, quantifying how much an individual's utility function is concave. This measure captures the degree to which a person prefers certainty over risky prospects, linking risk aversion to the curvature of the utility function. A higher Arrow-Pratt measure indicates greater risk aversion, helping economists analyze consumer behavior and decision-making under uncertainty.
Behavioral economics insights: Behavioral economics insights refer to the understanding of how psychological factors and cognitive biases influence the economic decisions individuals make, especially in uncertain situations. These insights help explain why people may deviate from traditional economic theories that assume rational behavior, highlighting the importance of emotions, heuristics, and social influences in decision-making. By examining these non-rational behaviors, behavioral economics provides a more comprehensive view of how individuals assess risks and make choices under uncertainty.
Certainty Effect: The certainty effect is a behavioral economics concept that describes how individuals tend to overvalue outcomes that are certain compared to those that are merely probable, even when the expected value of the uncertain outcome may be higher. This phenomenon highlights the tendency of people to prefer guaranteed outcomes, leading to a skewed decision-making process where they might choose a sure thing over a gamble with potentially better returns. The certainty effect plays a crucial role in understanding risk aversion and utility functions as it reveals how individuals perceive risk differently based on certainty levels.
Certainty equivalent: The certainty equivalent is the guaranteed amount of money that an individual considers equally desirable as a risky gamble with uncertain outcomes. This concept helps to measure an individual's risk preference, particularly their level of risk aversion, by providing a monetary value that reflects the subjective value of uncertain prospects. Understanding the certainty equivalent is crucial for analyzing how individuals make choices when faced with different levels of risk and uncertainty.
Concave Utility Function: A concave utility function is a type of utility function that exhibits diminishing marginal utility, meaning that as an individual consumes more of a good or service, the additional satisfaction gained from each additional unit decreases. This concept is essential in understanding risk aversion, as individuals with concave utility functions prefer certain outcomes over risky ones, reflecting their desire to avoid uncertainty and loss.
Constant relative risk aversion: Constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) is a concept in economics that describes an individual's attitude toward risk, characterized by a consistent level of risk aversion regardless of wealth levels. This means that as a person's wealth changes, their willingness to take risks in their consumption or investment decisions remains constant, which simplifies the analysis of their utility functions. CRRA is often represented mathematically, providing a way to compare different individuals' risk preferences within the framework of utility theory.
Convex utility function: A convex utility function is a type of utility function where the preferences of an individual exhibit diminishing marginal utility, meaning that as consumption of a good increases, the additional satisfaction gained from consuming each additional unit decreases. This concept is crucial in understanding risk aversion, as individuals with convex utility functions prefer to avoid risky situations in favor of certain outcomes, thereby demonstrating their risk-averse behavior.
Decreasing absolute risk aversion: Decreasing absolute risk aversion refers to a situation where an individual's level of risk aversion decreases as their wealth increases. This concept suggests that wealthier individuals are more willing to take risks compared to those with less wealth. It connects to the idea of utility functions, where risk preferences change based on the level of wealth, impacting decisions related to investments and consumption.
Expected utility theory: Expected utility theory is a decision-making framework that helps individuals make choices under uncertainty by quantifying their preferences and potential outcomes. It combines the probabilities of various outcomes with the utilities derived from those outcomes, allowing for a more systematic approach to understanding risk and making decisions that align with one's preferences. This theory is essential for analyzing how individuals assess risk and formulate choices in uncertain environments.
Increasing relative risk aversion: Increasing relative risk aversion refers to a situation where an individual's aversion to risk grows as their wealth increases. This concept is essential in understanding how utility functions behave when individuals face uncertain outcomes. It suggests that wealthier individuals may become more cautious and prefer safer investments, reflecting a change in their risk preferences as their financial circumstances evolve.
Indifference Curves Under Risk: Indifference curves under risk represent the combinations of different risky prospects that provide the same level of expected utility to a decision-maker. These curves illustrate an individual's preferences when faced with uncertain outcomes, highlighting their risk tolerance and attitude toward risk. They serve as a tool for visualizing how a person's utility changes with varying levels of risk and expected return, and they help to illustrate concepts like risk aversion, risk neutrality, and risk seeking behavior.
Insurance markets: Insurance markets are platforms where individuals and businesses can purchase financial protection against potential future losses or risks. These markets operate based on the principles of risk pooling and risk sharing, allowing for the distribution of financial burden across a larger group. The interaction between buyers and sellers in these markets is influenced by various factors including risk aversion, premium pricing, and the underlying utility functions of participants.
Jensen's Inequality: Jensen's Inequality is a fundamental concept in economics and mathematics that states that for a convex function, the value of the function at the expected value of a random variable is less than or equal to the expected value of the function applied to that random variable. This concept connects deeply with decision-making under uncertainty and is essential in understanding how individuals value risk and their utility functions when faced with uncertain outcomes.
Linear utility function: A linear utility function represents a person's preferences where the utility derived from consumption increases at a constant rate as more of a good is consumed. This type of utility function implies that the consumer is indifferent to changes in the quantity of goods consumed, leading to the assumption of risk neutrality, which is important for understanding decision-making under uncertainty.
Portfolio theory: Portfolio theory is a framework for constructing an investment portfolio that aims to maximize expected returns while minimizing risk through diversification. This approach helps investors make decisions under uncertainty by balancing risk and return, and connects to concepts of risk aversion and utility functions by emphasizing how individuals derive satisfaction from their investment choices based on their risk preferences.
Prospect Theory Basics: Prospect theory is a behavioral economic theory that describes how individuals evaluate potential losses and gains when making decisions under risk. It contrasts traditional utility theory by suggesting that people value gains and losses differently, leading to risk-averse behavior when facing potential gains and risk-seeking behavior when facing potential losses. This theory provides insights into why people may make irrational decisions, often deviating from expected utility maximization.
Relative risk aversion: Relative risk aversion measures how much a person's attitude toward risk changes as their wealth changes. It's a key concept in understanding how utility functions relate to an individual's choices under uncertainty. A higher level of relative risk aversion indicates that an individual becomes more risk-averse as they accumulate wealth, which affects their decision-making and overall utility derived from risky outcomes.
Risk aversion: Risk aversion is a behavioral economic concept where individuals prefer outcomes that are certain over uncertain ones, even if the uncertain option may yield a higher expected return. This tendency stems from a desire to avoid losses and maintain stability, leading to decisions that favor guaranteed outcomes rather than taking on potentially beneficial risks. Understanding risk aversion is crucial for analyzing how individuals make choices in uncertain situations and how they value different outcomes.
Risk aversion coefficient: The risk aversion coefficient quantifies an individual's or entity's preference for certain outcomes over uncertain ones, reflecting their degree of risk aversion in decision-making. This coefficient is critical in understanding how different individuals weigh potential risks against potential rewards when faced with uncertain scenarios. It is often used in utility functions to help model and predict behavior related to investment choices, insurance decisions, and consumption patterns under uncertainty.
Risk premium calculation: Risk premium calculation refers to the process of determining the additional return an investor expects to receive for taking on a higher level of risk compared to a risk-free investment. This concept is closely tied to the principles of risk aversion and utility functions, as it reflects how individuals evaluate potential investments based on their risk preferences and the perceived utility derived from different levels of return and risk.
Risk-averse behavior: Risk-averse behavior refers to the tendency of individuals to prefer outcomes with lower uncertainty over those with higher uncertainty, even if the latter might lead to potentially greater rewards. This behavior is closely linked to the way individuals evaluate utility, where a risk-averse person values a certain outcome more highly than an uncertain one with the same expected value. The concept is essential in understanding how choices are made under uncertainty and has significant implications in economic decision-making.
Risk-neutral behavior: Risk-neutral behavior refers to the decision-making style where an individual is indifferent to risk, valuing potential outcomes solely based on their expected utility without any concern for the variability of those outcomes. This behavior contrasts with risk-averse individuals who prefer certain outcomes over uncertain ones with the same expected value. A risk-neutral person will make choices that maximize their expected returns, treating gains and losses equally in terms of their utility.
Risk-seeking behavior: Risk-seeking behavior refers to the tendency of individuals to prefer options that involve a higher level of risk, often in exchange for the possibility of greater rewards. This behavior contrasts with risk aversion, where individuals prefer certainty and lower risks. People exhibiting risk-seeking behavior may engage in activities such as gambling or investing in volatile markets, driven by the allure of potential high returns despite the associated risks.
St. Petersburg Paradox: The St. Petersburg Paradox is a famous problem in probability and economics that illustrates the conflict between expected value and actual decision-making under risk. In this paradox, a game offers a potentially infinite payout based on a coin toss, leading to an infinite expected value, yet most individuals are unwilling to pay a high entry fee to play the game, highlighting the limits of expected utility theory and the concept of risk aversion.
Utility Function Derivatives: Utility function derivatives refer to the rates of change of a utility function with respect to the consumption of goods or services. This concept is crucial for understanding how individuals derive satisfaction from consuming different quantities of goods, especially in the context of risk aversion. The derivatives help in determining the marginal utility, which indicates how much additional satisfaction a consumer gains from consuming one more unit of a good, and are essential in analyzing preferences under uncertainty.
Von Neumann-Morgenstern Utility: Von Neumann-Morgenstern utility is a concept in economic theory that describes how individuals make choices under uncertainty based on their preferences for different outcomes. This utility function allows for the representation of a decision-maker's preferences over risky alternatives, translating uncertain prospects into a single numerical value that reflects their satisfaction or value derived from those prospects. This approach is fundamental to understanding how people evaluate risk and make decisions, especially when considering options with varying degrees of uncertainty.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Back
Practice QuizGlossary
Practice QuizGlossary
Next guide