Glossary

Research design types are crucial in political science for gathering and analyzing data. Quantitative designs use numerical data to test hypotheses, while qualitative designs explore complex phenomena through non-numerical data. Mixed methods combine both approaches for a more comprehensive understanding.

Comparative designs compare cases to identify patterns, while longitudinal designs track changes over time. Each type has strengths and limitations, and researchers choose based on their research questions and available resources. Understanding these designs helps students critically evaluate political research and conduct their own studies.

Quantitative research designs

  • involve the collection and analysis of numerical data to test hypotheses and draw conclusions about political phenomena
  • These designs are often used to establish cause-and-effect relationships, measure the strength of associations between variables, and generalize findings to larger populations

Experimental designs

Top images from around the web for Experimental designs

  • Randomised Trials View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Chapter 5 Research Design – Research Methods for the Social Sciences View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Randomised Trials View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Experimental designs

  • Randomised Trials View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Chapter 5 Research Design – Research Methods for the Social Sciences View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Randomised Trials View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3
  • Involve the manipulation of one or more independent variables to observe their effect on a dependent variable
  • Participants are randomly assigned to treatment and control groups to ensure that any differences in outcomes can be attributed to the manipulation of the independent variable
  • Examples: Randomly assigning voters to receive different campaign messages to assess their impact on voting behavior, or randomly assigning legislators to different committee assignments to assess their impact on legislative outcomes

Quasi-experimental designs

  • Similar to but lack random assignment of participants to treatment and control groups
  • Often used when random assignment is not feasible or ethical
  • Examples: Comparing the outcomes of a policy change in one state to outcomes in a similar state that did not implement the change, or comparing the attitudes of individuals who were exposed to a natural disaster to those who were not

Survey research

  • Involves the use of questionnaires or interviews to collect data from a sample of individuals
  • Can be used to measure attitudes, opinions, behaviors, and demographic characteristics
  • Examples: Conducting a national survey to assess public opinion on a particular policy issue, or surveying members of a particular organization to assess their satisfaction with leadership

Content analysis

  • Involves the systematic analysis of written, verbal, or visual communication to identify patterns, themes, or trends
  • Can be used to analyze media coverage, political speeches, or social media posts
  • Examples: Analyzing the frequency and tone of media coverage of a particular candidate during an election campaign, or analyzing the content of legislative debates to identify key arguments and positions

Qualitative research designs

  • involve the collection and analysis of non-numerical data, such as text, images, or observations
  • These designs are often used to explore complex social and political phenomena, generate new theories or hypotheses, and provide rich, detailed descriptions of particular cases or contexts

Case studies

  • Involve the in-depth analysis of a single case or a small number of cases to generate insights into a particular phenomenon
  • Can be used to explore the unique features of a particular case or to identify patterns across multiple cases
  • Examples: Conducting a case study of a particular social movement to understand its origins, strategies, and outcomes, or conducting a comparative case study of multiple countries to understand the factors that contribute to democratic transitions

Ethnographic research

  • Involves the immersion of the researcher in a particular social or cultural context to observe and document the behaviors, beliefs, and experiences of the people in that context
  • Can be used to generate rich, detailed descriptions of particular communities or groups and to identify patterns and themes in their social and political lives
  • Examples: Conducting in a particular neighborhood to understand the impact of gentrification on long-time residents, or conducting ethnographic research in a government agency to understand the culture and practices of bureaucrats

Phenomenological research

  • Focuses on understanding the lived experiences of individuals who have experienced a particular phenomenon
  • Involves in-depth interviews or other forms of data collection to capture the subjective experiences and meanings that individuals attach to the phenomenon
  • Examples: Conducting to understand the experiences of refugees who have fled conflict or persecution, or conducting phenomenological research to understand the experiences of individuals who have participated in a particular social or political movement

Grounded theory

  • Involves the generation of new theories or explanations based on the systematic analysis of qualitative data
  • Researchers collect and analyze data in an iterative process, constantly comparing and refining their emerging theories based on new data
  • Examples: Conducting research to develop a new theory of political mobilization based on interviews with activists and participants in social movements, or conducting grounded theory research to develop a new theory of policy implementation based on observations of government agencies

Narrative research

  • Focuses on the stories and narratives that individuals use to make sense of their experiences and to communicate their beliefs and values
  • Involves the collection and analysis of personal stories, life histories, or other forms of narrative data
  • Examples: Conducting to understand how individuals construct their political identities through the stories they tell about their lives, or conducting narrative research to understand how social movements use storytelling to mobilize supporters and generate public support

Mixed methods research designs

  • involve the collection and analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data within a single study
  • These designs are often used to provide a more comprehensive understanding of complex social and political phenomena, to triangulate findings from different data sources, and to address the limitations of single-method approaches

Convergent parallel design

  • Involves the simultaneous collection and analysis of quantitative and qualitative data, with the goal of comparing and integrating the findings to provide a more complete understanding of the phenomenon under study
  • Examples: Conducting a survey and focus groups simultaneously to assess public opinion on a particular policy issue, or conducting a of media coverage and in-depth interviews with journalists to understand the factors that shape media framing of a particular issue

Explanatory sequential design

  • Involves the collection and analysis of quantitative data, followed by the collection and analysis of qualitative data to help explain or elaborate on the quantitative findings
  • Examples: Conducting a survey to identify patterns in voting behavior, followed by in-depth interviews with a subset of survey respondents to understand the reasons behind their voting choices, or conducting an experiment to test the effectiveness of a particular intervention, followed by focus groups with participants to understand their experiences and perceptions of the intervention

Exploratory sequential design

  • Involves the collection and analysis of qualitative data, followed by the collection and analysis of quantitative data to test or generalize the qualitative findings
  • Examples: Conducting in-depth interviews with a small sample of individuals to identify key themes and patterns, followed by a larger-scale survey to test the prevalence and correlates of those themes in a broader population, or conducting ethnographic research to identify potential barriers to political participation, followed by a survey to assess the prevalence and impact of those barriers in a larger population

Embedded design

  • Involves the embedding of one type of data (either quantitative or qualitative) within a larger study of the other type
  • Examples: Embedding qualitative within a larger quantitative survey to provide more in-depth understanding of particular cases or contexts, or embedding a quantitative survey within a larger qualitative ethnographic study to provide more generalizable data on particular variables of interest

Multiphase design

  • Involves multiple phases of data collection and analysis, with each phase building on the findings of the previous phase
  • Can involve any combination of quantitative and qualitative methods, and can be used to address complex research questions that require multiple stages of inquiry
  • Examples: Conducting a multiphase study to develop and test a new intervention for increasing political participation among marginalized groups, with each phase involving different combinations of quantitative and qualitative methods to refine and evaluate the intervention

Comparative research designs

  • involve the comparison of two or more cases or units of analysis to identify similarities, differences, and patterns
  • These designs are often used to test theories or hypotheses about the causes or consequences of political phenomena, to identify best practices or lessons learned from different contexts, and to generate new insights and explanations

Most similar systems design

  • Involves the comparison of cases that are similar in most respects but differ on the key variable of interest
  • Used to control for potential confounding variables and to isolate the effect of the key variable on the outcome of interest
  • Examples: Comparing two countries with similar political, economic, and social characteristics but different electoral systems to assess the impact of electoral systems on political stability and representation, or comparing two states with similar demographic and economic profiles but different policies on a particular issue to assess the impact of those policies on outcomes

Most different systems design

  • Involves the comparison of cases that differ in most respects but are similar on the key variable of interest
  • Used to identify the common factors that contribute to a particular outcome across diverse contexts
  • Examples: Comparing countries with different political, economic, and social characteristics but similar levels of political violence to identify the common factors that contribute to political instability, or comparing organizations with different structures, cultures, and goals but similar levels of innovation to identify the common factors that foster creativity and adaptability

Longitudinal research designs

  • involve the collection and analysis of data from the same individuals or units over an extended period of time
  • These designs are often used to track changes or trends over time, to identify the causes and consequences of those changes, and to test theories or hypotheses about the dynamic processes that shape political phenomena

Panel studies

  • Involve the collection of data from the same individuals at multiple points in time
  • Used to track changes in attitudes, behaviors, or outcomes over time and to identify the factors that contribute to those changes
  • Examples: Conducting a panel study of voters to track changes in their political preferences and behaviors over the course of an election campaign, or conducting a panel study of legislators to track changes in their policy positions and voting patterns over the course of their careers

Cohort studies

  • Involve the collection of data from individuals who share a common characteristic or experience (such as being born in the same year or experiencing a particular event) at multiple points in time
  • Used to identify the long-term effects of particular experiences or exposures on political attitudes, behaviors, or outcomes
  • Examples: Conducting a cohort study of individuals who came of age during a particular political or social movement to assess the long-term impact of that experience on their political attitudes and behaviors, or conducting a cohort study of individuals who were exposed to a particular policy or program to assess its long-term effects on their outcomes

Trend studies

  • Involve the collection of data from different individuals or units at multiple points in time, but using the same measures or indicators
  • Used to track changes or trends in attitudes, behaviors, or outcomes at the population level over time
  • Examples: Conducting a trend study of public opinion on a particular issue over several decades using data from multiple surveys, or conducting a trend study of voter turnout rates over multiple election cycles using data from official records

Cross-sectional vs longitudinal designs

  • involve the collection of data from a sample of individuals or units at a single point in time
  • Longitudinal designs involve the collection of data from the same individuals or units at multiple points in time
  • Cross-sectional designs are often used to provide a snapshot of a particular phenomenon at a particular moment in time, while longitudinal designs are used to track changes or trends over time
  • Cross-sectional designs are generally less expensive and time-consuming than longitudinal designs, but they cannot establish causal relationships or track changes over time

Observational vs interventional studies

  • involve the collection of data from individuals or units without any manipulation or intervention by the researcher
  • involve the manipulation or intervention by the researcher to assess the impact of a particular treatment or exposure on outcomes
  • Observational studies are often used to identify associations or correlations between variables, while interventional studies are used to establish causal relationships between variables
  • Observational studies are generally less expensive and more feasible than interventional studies, but they cannot control for potential confounding variables or establish causal relationships with the same level of certainty as interventional studies

Key Terms to Review (40)

Case studies: Case studies are in-depth examinations of a single instance, event, or entity, providing a detailed analysis that can reveal broader insights about similar situations. This method is often used to gather rich qualitative data, and it plays a significant role in understanding complex phenomena while allowing researchers to explore the context and factors influencing outcomes.
Cohort Studies: Cohort studies are a type of observational research design that follows a group of individuals, known as a cohort, over time to assess the relationships between exposure to certain risk factors and specific outcomes. These studies are particularly useful in understanding the long-term effects of exposures and can provide insights into trends and associations that may lead to causal inferences. By observing the same group repeatedly, researchers can identify changes and developments in health or behavior associated with various influences.
Comparative Research Designs: Comparative research designs are methodologies used in political research that allow for the systematic comparison of two or more entities, such as countries, political systems, or policies, to identify patterns and differences. These designs help researchers understand the implications of various political contexts and facilitate the examination of causal relationships across different cases.
Confidentiality: Confidentiality refers to the ethical principle of keeping sensitive information private and secure, ensuring that personal data collected during research is protected from unauthorized access or disclosure. It is vital in research to build trust with participants, especially when sensitive topics are discussed, and it plays a crucial role in various research design types, data collection methods, and ethical review processes.
Content analysis: Content analysis is a research method used to systematically analyze the content of communication, such as text, images, or audio, to identify patterns, themes, and meanings. This technique can be applied to various types of materials, making it a valuable tool for understanding both primary and secondary sources, as well as documents. It plays a crucial role in research design by providing a structured way to examine qualitative data and is particularly relevant when discussing media engagement and the methodology of political research.
Convergent parallel design: Convergent parallel design is a mixed-methods research approach that involves collecting both quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously but analyzing them separately. This design aims to compare and validate findings from different data sources to gain a more comprehensive understanding of a research problem. By integrating results at the interpretation stage, researchers can triangulate data and corroborate conclusions drawn from diverse methodologies.
Cross-sectional designs: Cross-sectional designs are research methods that collect data at a single point in time from a sample or population to analyze relationships or patterns. This approach is often used in social sciences to provide a snapshot of a situation, allowing researchers to identify correlations and trends without delving into cause-and-effect relationships. By analyzing data collected concurrently, cross-sectional designs can highlight differences across various groups based on demographics or other variables.
Embedded Design: Embedded design is a research approach that integrates qualitative and quantitative methods within a single study, allowing researchers to address complex questions by leveraging the strengths of both paradigms. This design enables the collection of rich, contextual data while also providing the ability to generalize findings through statistical analysis. By embedding one method within another, researchers can deepen their understanding of a phenomenon and gain a more comprehensive view of the research problem.
Ethnographic research: Ethnographic research is a qualitative research method that involves the systematic study of people and cultures through direct observation, participation, and immersion in their environment. This approach allows researchers to gain in-depth insights into the social practices, behaviors, and beliefs of a particular group, often revealing complex social dynamics that might not be captured through other research methods.
Experimental designs: Experimental designs are research strategies used to determine causal relationships by manipulating one or more independent variables and observing their effect on a dependent variable. This approach allows researchers to establish cause-and-effect relationships through controlled conditions, often involving random assignment to treatment and control groups. By controlling for extraneous variables, experimental designs provide robust evidence for hypothesis testing and theory validation.
Explanatory sequential design: Explanatory sequential design is a research methodology that combines both qualitative and quantitative approaches in a specific order, where the researcher first collects and analyzes quantitative data, followed by qualitative data to further explain or elaborate on the quantitative findings. This type of design allows researchers to obtain a comprehensive understanding of a phenomenon by utilizing the strengths of both research methods, enhancing the validity and depth of the study.
Exploratory sequential design: Exploratory sequential design is a mixed-methods research approach that begins with qualitative data collection and analysis, followed by quantitative data collection and analysis. This design is particularly useful when exploring new topics or phenomena, allowing researchers to gain insights from qualitative findings before developing quantitative instruments or hypotheses. It emphasizes the importance of understanding context and participant perspectives, which can lead to more informed and effective research outcomes.
External validity: External validity refers to the extent to which the findings of a study can be generalized to, or have relevance for, settings, people, times, and measures beyond the specific conditions of the study. It is crucial for understanding how applicable research results are in real-world situations and how they relate to broader populations.
Grounded theory: Grounded theory is a qualitative research methodology that involves developing theories through the systematic collection and analysis of data. It emphasizes generating theories that are grounded in empirical evidence, rather than testing existing theories, making it particularly useful for exploring complex social processes and phenomena.
Hypothesis testing: Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to make decisions or inferences about population parameters based on sample data. This process involves formulating a null hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis, then using statistical techniques to determine whether there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. This concept is vital for establishing relationships and making predictions within various research designs, analyzing data with statistical software, and structuring the methodology of a research project.
Informed Consent: Informed consent is a fundamental ethical principle in research that ensures participants are fully aware of the nature of the study, including its purpose, procedures, risks, and potential benefits, before agreeing to participate. This principle is essential for protecting participants' autonomy and fostering trust between researchers and subjects.
Internal validity: Internal validity refers to the extent to which a study accurately establishes a causal relationship between the treatment and the outcome, free from confounding variables. It is crucial for ensuring that the results of an experiment truly reflect the effects of the independent variable on the dependent variable, rather than other external factors that could influence the outcome.
Interventional studies: Interventional studies are a type of research design where researchers actively manipulate one or more variables to determine their effect on a specific outcome. This approach is often used in clinical trials, where participants are assigned to different treatments or interventions to compare their effects on health outcomes. By controlling the intervention, researchers can establish causal relationships between variables.
Interviewing: Interviewing is a qualitative research method where a researcher engages with participants through direct conversation to gather detailed information, insights, and perspectives on specific topics or experiences. This technique is essential in understanding complex social phenomena and obtaining rich, contextual data that quantitative methods might overlook.
Longitudinal research designs: Longitudinal research designs are research strategies that involve repeated observations of the same variables over a long period of time. This approach allows researchers to study changes and developments within the same subjects, providing insights into trends and causal relationships. By tracking the same participants over time, these designs help distinguish between short-term fluctuations and long-term changes in behaviors, attitudes, or outcomes.
Mixed methods research designs: Mixed methods research designs combine both qualitative and quantitative approaches in a single study to provide a more comprehensive understanding of research questions. This approach allows researchers to leverage the strengths of both methodologies, making it possible to explore complex phenomena from multiple perspectives and enhance the validity of the findings.
Most Different Systems Design: Most different systems design is a research strategy used in comparative studies where researchers analyze cases that are fundamentally different from each other but share a specific outcome. This method focuses on identifying how different contexts lead to similar results, helping to uncover causal relationships in political phenomena. By selecting cases with diverse backgrounds, researchers aim to minimize the influence of contextual variables and highlight key factors that contribute to the observed outcome.
Most Similar Systems Design: Most Similar Systems Design is a comparative research method that analyzes cases that are similar in many respects but differ in a key variable. This approach aims to identify the effects of the differing variable while controlling for other factors, providing a clearer understanding of causal relationships. By focusing on cases that are alike, this method enhances the ability to draw meaningful conclusions about the impact of specific conditions or events.
Multiphase design: Multiphase design is a research approach that combines different methods and stages in order to gather comprehensive data and insights. This design allows researchers to explore complex phenomena by integrating qualitative and quantitative techniques across multiple phases, thereby enhancing the overall validity and depth of the study.
Narrative research: Narrative research is a qualitative research design that focuses on the stories and personal accounts of individuals, emphasizing how they make sense of their experiences. This approach allows researchers to explore the complexities of human experiences, revealing how narratives shape identities, values, and social realities. By examining these narratives, researchers can gain insights into cultural and societal contexts that influence people's lives.
Observational studies: Observational studies are research methods where the researcher observes subjects in their natural environment without manipulating variables or assigning treatments. This type of study is essential for understanding real-world behaviors and phenomena, allowing researchers to gather data about how people behave, think, and interact in various contexts without interference.
Operationalization: Operationalization is the process of defining and measuring variables in a way that allows researchers to empirically assess concepts. This is crucial for transforming abstract ideas into concrete, measurable factors that can be used in research, enabling the development of research questions and hypotheses, and ensuring the effectiveness of the scientific method.
Panel Studies: Panel studies are a type of research design that involve collecting data from the same subjects over multiple time periods. This approach allows researchers to track changes and developments in individuals' attitudes, behaviors, or characteristics over time, providing insights into trends and causal relationships. The ability to analyze longitudinal data makes panel studies particularly valuable in understanding dynamics within social, political, and economic contexts.
Phenomenological research: Phenomenological research is a qualitative research approach that focuses on understanding the lived experiences and perspectives of individuals regarding a particular phenomenon. This method emphasizes the subjective interpretation of participants' experiences, aiming to uncover the essence of those experiences through in-depth interviews and thematic analysis.
Qualitative research designs: Qualitative research designs are systematic approaches used to gather, analyze, and interpret non-numerical data to understand concepts, thoughts, or experiences. This method emphasizes depth over breadth, focusing on the meanings individuals attach to their experiences rather than quantifying those experiences through numerical data. These designs are crucial for exploring complex issues in political research, as they allow researchers to capture nuanced perspectives and rich contextual details.
Quantitative research designs: Quantitative research designs are structured approaches that focus on collecting and analyzing numerical data to understand patterns, relationships, or causal effects in social phenomena. These designs emphasize measurement, statistical analysis, and the ability to generalize findings to larger populations, making them essential in political research for testing hypotheses and validating theories.
Quasi-experimental designs: Quasi-experimental designs are research methods that resemble experimental designs but lack random assignment to treatment or control groups. These designs are often used in real-world settings where randomization is not feasible, allowing researchers to evaluate the effects of interventions or treatments while still controlling for certain variables. They are particularly useful for examining causal relationships and assessing outcomes in social sciences.
Questionnaire: A questionnaire is a research instrument consisting of a series of questions aimed at gathering information from respondents. It serves as a structured method for collecting data that can be analyzed quantitatively or qualitatively, making it a vital tool in various research designs, including surveys and experimental studies.
Random sampling: Random sampling is a statistical technique used to select a subset of individuals from a larger population, ensuring that every member of the population has an equal chance of being chosen. This method is essential for obtaining unbiased and representative data, which is critical for research design, making inferences from data, testing hypotheses, and collecting survey responses accurately.
Regression analysis: Regression analysis is a statistical method used to examine the relationship between one dependent variable and one or more independent variables. This technique helps in predicting the value of the dependent variable based on the values of the independent variables, establishing connections between them and providing insights into how changes in predictors influence outcomes.
Sampling: Sampling is the process of selecting a subset of individuals or observations from a larger population to make inferences about that population. It is a crucial part of research design because it helps researchers draw conclusions without needing to study every single member of the population, making the research more efficient and manageable. Different sampling methods can affect the validity and reliability of the results, influencing how findings can be generalized to the broader population.
Stratified Sampling: Stratified sampling is a method of sampling that involves dividing a population into distinct subgroups or strata, and then selecting samples from each stratum to ensure that the sample accurately reflects the diversity within the population. This technique helps enhance the precision of estimates and ensures representation across different segments of the population, making it a crucial tool in various research contexts.
Survey research: Survey research is a quantitative research method used to collect data from a predefined group of respondents, typically through questionnaires or interviews. This method allows researchers to gather information on opinions, behaviors, and characteristics of a population, making it essential for analyzing variables and operationalizing concepts in social sciences. By employing various sampling techniques, survey research provides insights that can inform broader research designs and hypotheses.
Theory-driven design: Theory-driven design refers to a research approach that relies on existing theories to guide the formation of research questions, hypotheses, and methodologies. This approach helps researchers ensure that their studies are grounded in established knowledge, enhancing the validity and relevance of their findings in the context of research design types.
Trend studies: Trend studies are a type of longitudinal research that track changes in a particular phenomenon over time by repeatedly sampling different populations from the same group. They help researchers understand how attitudes, behaviors, or characteristics evolve within a society, allowing for insights into social changes and patterns across time periods. This type of research design can be particularly useful in political research to gauge shifts in public opinion or demographic changes over time.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Back
Practice QuizGlossary
Practice QuizGlossary
Next guide