12.1 Types of climate models and their development
5 min read•july 22, 2024
Climate models are essential tools for understanding and predicting Earth's complex climate system. From simple Energy Balance Models to sophisticated Earth System Models, these digital representations simulate various climate processes and interactions.
As climate science advances, models evolve to incorporate new knowledge, higher resolutions, and additional components. This progression allows for more accurate simulations of climate dynamics, from global trends to regional impacts, enhancing our ability to forecast future climate scenarios.
Types of Climate Models
Types of climate models
Top images from around the web for Types of climate models
Why trust climate models? It’s a matter of simple science View original
Is this image relevant?
Climate model - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
LABORATORY 6: CLIMATE CHANGE – PART 1 – Physical Geography Lab Manual: The Atmosphere and Biosphere View original
Is this image relevant?
Why trust climate models? It’s a matter of simple science View original
Is this image relevant?
Climate model - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Types of climate models
Why trust climate models? It’s a matter of simple science View original
Is this image relevant?
Climate model - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
LABORATORY 6: CLIMATE CHANGE – PART 1 – Physical Geography Lab Manual: The Atmosphere and Biosphere View original
Is this image relevant?
Why trust climate models? It’s a matter of simple science View original
Is this image relevant?
Climate model - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
-
- Simplest type of climate model
- Focus on the balance between incoming solar radiation and outgoing terrestrial radiation
- Treat the Earth as a single point or a small number of latitude bands
- Do not explicitly represent atmospheric or ocean dynamics (winds, currents)
- Useful for understanding basic climate processes and feedbacks (greenhouse effect, albedo)
-
- More complex than EBMs but simpler than General Circulation Models
- Include some representation of atmospheric and ocean dynamics
- Often have reduced spatial resolution or simplified physics compared to GCMs
- Used for long-term climate simulations (thousands to millions of years) and understanding climate feedbacks (, ice sheets)
- Examples: UVic ESCM, CLIMBER
- General Circulation Models (GCMs)
- Most comprehensive and complex type of climate model
- Divide the Earth's atmosphere and oceans into a 3D grid
- Solve mathematical equations representing physical processes within each grid cell (fluid dynamics, thermodynamics, radiative transfer)
- Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean GCMs (AOGCMs) simulate interactions between the atmosphere and oceans
- Earth System Models (ESMs) build upon AOGCMs by including additional components such as the carbon cycle, vegetation (dynamic vegetation models), and ice sheets
- Examples: CESM, HadGEM, IPSL-CM
Development of climate models
- Incorporation of new scientific understanding
- As knowledge of climate processes advances, models are updated to reflect this understanding
- Examples include improvements in representing cloud processes (microphysics, convection), aerosols (direct and indirect effects), and the carbon cycle (land and ocean carbon uptake)
- Increased spatial resolution
- Over time, computational power has increased, allowing for finer grid resolutions in models
- Higher resolution enables better representation of small-scale processes (topography, land-sea contrast) and extreme events (tropical cyclones, heavy precipitation)
- Typical resolutions have improved from ~500 km in the 1970s to ~25 km today
- Addition of new model components
- Climate models have evolved to include more components of the Earth system
- Examples include the incorporation of dynamic vegetation (land use change, carbon uptake), ice sheets (sea level rise), and atmospheric chemistry (ozone, methane)
- Enables more comprehensive understanding of climate feedbacks and impacts
- Improved parameterizations
- Parameterizations are simplified representations of complex processes that occur at scales smaller than the model grid (subgrid-scale processes)
- As understanding of these processes improves, parameterizations are updated to better capture their effects
- Examples include parameterizations for cloud microphysics, boundary layer turbulence, and radiative transfer
-
- Initiatives such as the compare results from different climate models
- These projects help identify strengths and weaknesses of individual models and guide future model development
- CMIP provides a framework for coordinated experiments and analysis, enabling more robust assessments of climate change
Parameterization in climate modeling
- is necessary because some processes occur at scales smaller than the model grid
- Examples include cloud formation (microphysics), turbulence (boundary layer), and small-scale convection (cumulus convection)
- These processes cannot be explicitly resolved by the model's grid
- Parameterizations use simplified mathematical equations to represent the effects of these processes on the larger-scale climate
- For example, cloud parameterizations estimate the fraction of a grid cell covered by clouds and their radiative properties based on variables like humidity and temperature
- The choice of parameterization schemes can significantly impact model results
- Different parameterizations may have different sensitivities to changes in climate forcing (CO2, aerosols)
- Parameterizations can introduce uncertainties and biases into model simulations
- Different models may use different parameterizations for the same process, contributing to model uncertainty
- For example, models may use different schemes for deep convection (Arakawa-Schubert, Kain-Fritsch) or boundary layer turbulence (K-profile, Mellor-Yamada)
- Improving parameterizations is an ongoing area of research in climate modeling
- Advances in understanding of physical processes and availability of high-resolution observations (field campaigns, satellites) help refine parameterizations
- New approaches such as machine learning and stochastic parameterizations are being explored to improve subgrid-scale representations
Validation of climate models
- involves comparing model output to observations to assess model performance
- This can be done using historical climate data, such as temperature and precipitation records (instrumental records, proxy data)
- Validation can also use data from satellite observations (radiation budgets, sea surface temperatures) and field campaigns (atmospheric profiles, ocean measurements)
- Evaluation helps identify strengths and weaknesses of models
- Areas where models perform well (large-scale patterns, long-term trends) increase confidence in their projections
- Areas where models perform poorly (regional biases, extreme events) highlight the need for improvement
- Example: Models generally simulate global temperature trends well but may struggle with regional precipitation patterns
- Evaluation can guide model development by prioritizing areas for improvement
- Identifying systematic biases or weaknesses can inform the refinement of model components or parameterizations
- Example: Evaluating model performance in simulating El Niño events can guide improvements in ocean and atmosphere dynamics
- Model evaluation is an ongoing process as new observations become available and models are updated
- Newer generations of models (CMIP6 vs CMIP5) can be evaluated against a larger set of observations and under different forcing scenarios (historical, future projections)
- Techniques for model evaluation include:
- Statistical measures of model-observation agreement, such as correlation (R), root-mean-square error (RMSE), and bias
- Visual comparison of spatial patterns (maps) and time series (trends, variability)
- Detection and attribution studies that assess the ability of models to simulate observed climate change in response to different forcings (greenhouse gases, aerosols, natural variability)
- Example: Comparing modeled and observed patterns of temperature change to detect the human influence on climate
Key Terms to Review (21)
Atmospheric components: Atmospheric components refer to the various gases and particles that make up the Earth's atmosphere, including nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide, water vapor, and aerosols. These components play crucial roles in regulating climate, influencing weather patterns, and participating in complex chemical processes that affect air quality and the Earth's energy balance.
Calibration: Calibration refers to the process of adjusting and validating the accuracy of instruments and models used to measure or predict climate variables. This process ensures that these tools provide reliable data that can be used to understand climate patterns, both in modeling future scenarios and in reconstructing past climates. Proper calibration is essential for improving the precision and reliability of climate science, making it a critical aspect of both climate modeling and historical climate reconstructions.
Carbon Cycle: The carbon cycle is the process by which carbon is exchanged between the Earth's atmosphere, land, oceans, and living organisms. This cycle plays a crucial role in regulating the Earth's climate and supporting life by enabling the flow of carbon through various ecosystems and geological processes. Understanding the carbon cycle is essential for analyzing climate models and assessing how terrestrial and marine ecosystems interact with carbon in their environments.
Climate projection: A climate projection is a scientific estimate of future climate conditions based on various scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions and other influencing factors. These projections are derived from climate models, which simulate how the climate system responds to different levels of human activities, natural processes, and other variables over time. Understanding climate projections helps in assessing potential impacts and guiding policy decisions related to climate change adaptation and mitigation.
Climate sensitivity: Climate sensitivity is a measure of how much the Earth's average temperature will increase in response to a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations. It is a crucial concept in understanding the potential impacts of climate change, as it helps estimate future temperature changes based on current and projected levels of greenhouse gases, radiative forcing, and various climate feedback mechanisms.
Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP): The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) is an international effort that aims to improve climate model simulations and projections by facilitating the comparison of different climate models. CMIP provides a standardized framework for climate modeling groups around the world to share their results, which helps in understanding the strengths and weaknesses of various models, thereby advancing climate science as a whole.
Cross-validation: Cross-validation is a statistical technique used to assess how the results of a predictive model will generalize to an independent dataset. It involves partitioning the data into subsets, training the model on some of these subsets, and validating it on the remaining ones, which helps in evaluating the model's performance and preventing overfitting. This method is crucial in climate modeling, as it ensures that predictions made by models are robust and reliable.
Dynamic Modeling: Dynamic modeling refers to the process of simulating the behavior of a system over time using mathematical equations that account for the interactions between different components. This approach is crucial in climate science as it allows researchers to predict how various factors, such as greenhouse gas emissions and land-use changes, can influence climate systems. By incorporating real-time data and feedback loops, dynamic modeling helps in understanding complex climate dynamics and assessing the potential impacts of human activities on the environment.
Earth System Models of Intermediate Complexity (EMICs): Earth System Models of Intermediate Complexity (EMICs) are a class of climate models that strike a balance between the detailed representation of physical processes and computational efficiency. EMICs use simplified representations of key processes in the Earth's climate system, such as ocean circulation and carbon cycling, making them less complex than fully coupled General Circulation Models (GCMs) but more detailed than simple energy balance models. These models are particularly useful for studying long-term climate dynamics and the potential impacts of climate change.
Energy Balance Models (EBMs): Energy Balance Models (EBMs) are simplified representations of the Earth's climate system that focus on the balance between incoming solar radiation and outgoing thermal radiation. These models help in understanding how energy is absorbed, reflected, and emitted by the Earth's surface and atmosphere, which is crucial for predicting temperature changes and climate behavior over time.
Hindcasting: Hindcasting is a method used in climate science to validate climate models by comparing their predictions to historical data. This process helps researchers assess the accuracy and reliability of models, ensuring that they can effectively simulate past climate conditions and predict future scenarios. By analyzing how well a model's outputs match observed climate records, scientists can refine their models and improve understanding of climate processes.
James Hansen: James Hansen is a prominent American climate scientist known for his research on climate change and his role in raising public awareness about global warming. He is particularly recognized for his early warnings regarding the impacts of greenhouse gas emissions, emphasizing the urgency of addressing climate change through policy and action.
Model Intercomparison Projects: Model intercomparison projects are collaborative efforts that bring together multiple climate models to evaluate their performance against each other and to enhance the understanding of climate processes. These projects aim to assess how different models simulate various aspects of the climate system, including temperature, precipitation, and other critical variables. By comparing the outputs of diverse models, researchers can identify strengths and weaknesses in model design and improve future climate predictions.
Model validation: Model validation is the process of evaluating a climate model's performance by comparing its outputs with observed data to ensure its reliability and accuracy. This step is crucial for establishing confidence in the model's ability to predict future climate scenarios, as it helps identify any discrepancies and allows for adjustments to improve the model's performance. Effective model validation involves statistical analysis and can include various methods such as cross-validation, sensitivity testing, and the use of independent datasets.
NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies: NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) is a research facility located in New York City, dedicated to advancing our understanding of climate change and its impact on the Earth. The institute plays a pivotal role in the development of climate models, utilizing extensive data to analyze atmospheric conditions and predict future climate scenarios. GISS focuses on creating sophisticated climate simulations that help scientists understand complex climate interactions and inform policymakers about potential environmental outcomes.
Oceanic components: Oceanic components refer to the various elements and processes within the oceans that influence climate systems and global climate models. These components include factors like ocean currents, sea surface temperatures, salinity, and the interaction between the ocean and the atmosphere. Understanding these components is crucial for developing accurate climate models, as they play a significant role in regulating heat distribution and carbon cycling on Earth.
Parameterization: Parameterization refers to the process of simplifying complex physical processes in climate models by representing them with adjustable variables or parameters. This technique allows modelers to include significant phenomena, like cloud formation or turbulence, without needing to resolve every detail, thus making simulations computationally feasible. It plays a crucial role in developing various types of climate models, ensuring that they remain manageable while still providing valuable insights into climate behavior and projections.
Radiative forcing: Radiative forcing is a measure of the influence a factor has on the energy balance of the Earth's atmosphere, usually expressed in watts per square meter (W/m²). It quantifies how different factors, such as greenhouse gases or aerosols, affect the balance of incoming solar energy and outgoing infrared radiation, thus playing a critical role in climate change dynamics.
Scenario uncertainty: Scenario uncertainty refers to the unpredictability and variability associated with different possible future outcomes related to climate change, based on the assumptions and parameters used in climate models. This concept highlights how small changes in input data or model structure can lead to vastly different projections of climate impacts, making it a crucial consideration in the development and interpretation of climate models.
Statistical downscaling: Statistical downscaling is a method used to derive local- or regional-scale climate information from larger-scale climate model outputs, primarily focusing on understanding the potential impacts of climate change at a finer resolution. This technique uses statistical relationships between large-scale predictors, such as atmospheric variables, and local observations to generate projections that reflect the nuances of specific areas. By connecting global climate models with localized data, statistical downscaling allows for better decision-making in climate adaptation and mitigation strategies.
Structural Uncertainty: Structural uncertainty refers to the lack of knowledge about the underlying processes and interactions within a climate model, which can affect the reliability of predictions. This uncertainty arises from simplifications made in model design, assumptions about natural systems, and limitations in data, leading to variations in model outputs. Understanding structural uncertainty is crucial for evaluating the robustness of climate projections and informing decision-making processes related to climate change mitigation and adaptation.