🐝Intro to Aristotle Unit 7 – Aristotle's Virtue Ethics and Mean Doctrine
Aristotle's Virtue Ethics and Mean Doctrine form the cornerstone of his moral philosophy. These ideas explore how individuals can achieve eudaimonia, or human flourishing, through the cultivation of virtuous character traits and the practice of finding the golden mean between extremes.
Aristotle's approach emphasizes practical wisdom and habituation in developing moral virtues. His doctrine of the mean suggests that virtues lie at the midpoint between deficiency and excess, requiring individuals to exercise judgment in applying ethical principles to specific situations.
Eudaimonia represents the highest human good, a state of flourishing and well-being achieved through virtuous living
Virtues are character traits that enable individuals to live well and achieve eudaimonia (courage, temperance, justice)
Vices are character traits that hinder eudaimonia and lead to an unfulfilled life (cowardice, intemperance, injustice)
The Golden Mean refers to the desirable middle point between two extremes, a virtue that avoids excess and deficiency
Moral responsibility implies that individuals are responsible for their actions and character development
Voluntary actions are those that originate within the agent and are not performed under external compulsion or ignorance
Involuntary actions are performed under compulsion or ignorance and are not blameworthy
Deliberation involves rationally considering different courses of action to determine the best choice in a given situation
Historical Context
Aristotle lived from 384-322 BCE, during the Classical period of Ancient Greece
He studied under Plato at the Academy in Athens for nearly 20 years
Aristotle founded his own school, the Lyceum, where he taught and wrote extensively on various subjects (ethics, politics, metaphysics)
His ethical works, primarily the Nicomachean Ethics, laid the foundation for his virtue-based approach to morality
Aristotle's ethics were influenced by the cultural values and practices of ancient Greek society
Emphasis on excellence (arete) and the cultivation of virtues
The importance of reason and moderation in human affairs
His ethical thought departed from Plato's focus on abstract, eternal Forms and instead emphasized practical wisdom (phronesis)
Aristotle's Ethical Framework
Teleological approach focuses on the ultimate purpose or goal (telos) of human life, which Aristotle identifies as eudaimonia
Virtue ethics emphasizes the development of good character traits rather than adherence to moral rules or consequences of actions
Aristotle distinguishes between intellectual virtues, acquired through teaching, and moral virtues, developed through habit and practice
Eudaimonia is achieved through the exercise of virtues in accordance with reason
It is a state of flourishing, not a subjective feeling of happiness
Virtues are a mean between two extremes, a deficiency and an excess (courage is the mean between cowardice and recklessness)
Moral virtues are acquired through practice and habituation, becoming a stable part of one's character over time
Practical wisdom (phronesis) is the intellectual virtue that enables individuals to discern the right course of action in particular circumstances
The Doctrine of the Mean
The Doctrine of the Mean asserts that virtues lie at the midpoint between two vices, an excess and a deficiency
Aristotle uses the analogy of an archer aiming at a target to illustrate the mean: virtue is like hitting the bullseye, while vices miss the mark
The mean is not a precise mathematical average but varies depending on the individual and the situation
What constitutes the mean for one person may not be the same for another
Finding the mean requires practical wisdom and an understanding of the particular circumstances
Examples of virtues as means between extremes:
Courage is the mean between cowardice (deficiency) and recklessness (excess)
Temperance is the mean between insensibility (deficiency) and intemperance (excess)
The mean is not always equidistant from the extremes; sometimes it may be closer to one extreme than the other
Aiming for the mean is a continuous process of moral development and self-correction
Virtues and Vices
Aristotle discusses several key virtues and their corresponding vices:
Courage: the mean between cowardice and recklessness
Temperance: the mean between insensibility and intemperance
Liberality: the mean between stinginess and prodigality
Magnificence: the mean between shabbiness and vulgarity
Magnanimity: the mean between pusillanimity and vanity
Proper ambition: the mean between unambitiousness and over-ambitiousness
Truthfulness: the mean between self-deprecation and boastfulness
Each virtue is associated with a particular sphere of human experience (courage relates to fear and confidence, temperance to pleasure and pain)
Virtues are not innate but developed through practice and habituation
Engaging in virtuous actions cultivates virtuous dispositions over time
Vices corrupt character and lead individuals away from eudaimonia
Some actions and emotions do not have a mean and are always wrong (malice, envy, adultery)
Practical Application
Aristotle emphasizes the practical nature of ethics; virtues must be lived out in concrete situations
Individuals must use practical wisdom to discern the appropriate course of action in particular circumstances
General principles must be adapted to specific contexts
Moral education is crucial for developing virtuous character
Parents and society play a key role in habituating children to virtuous behavior
Aristotle recognizes that external goods (wealth, friends, political power) are necessary for eudaimonia, but they are not sufficient
Virtues are more important than external goods for achieving eudaimonia
Friendship is an important context for exercising virtues and contributing to eudaimonia
Friends provide opportunities for virtuous actions and moral support
Political participation is another arena for exercising virtues and promoting the common good
Aristotle sees ethics and politics as closely interconnected
Criticisms and Debates
Aristotle's doctrine of the mean has been criticized for being vague and difficult to apply in practice
Determining the mean in specific situations requires a high degree of moral judgment
Some argue that Aristotle's virtues are culturally specific to ancient Greece and may not apply universally
Different societies may prioritize different virtues or interpret them differently
Aristotle's view of women and slaves as inferior has been rightly criticized as prejudiced and mistaken
The relationship between virtues and external goods is a point of contention
Some argue that virtues are intrinsically valuable regardless of external circumstances
Aristotle's emphasis on habits and character development has been criticized for neglecting the role of reason and deliberation in moral decision-making
The unity of the virtues thesis, which suggests that to have one virtue is to have them all, is controversial
It seems possible to possess some virtues without others
Legacy and Influence
Aristotle's virtue ethics has had a profound impact on Western moral philosophy
It offers an alternative to rule-based and consequence-based approaches to ethics
Medieval philosophers such as Thomas Aquinas synthesized Aristotelian virtue ethics with Christian theology
Virtue ethics experienced a revival in the 20th century, with philosophers such as Alasdair MacIntyre and Rosalind Hursthouse building on Aristotle's ideas
Aristotle's emphasis on character development and practical wisdom has influenced fields such as moral education and professional ethics
Virtue-based approaches are used in medical ethics, business ethics, and environmental ethics
The Doctrine of the Mean has been applied in various domains, from aesthetics (the golden mean in art and architecture) to psychology (the concept of a healthy mean between extremes)
Aristotle's teleological approach to ethics has been influential, even among those who reject his specific conception of eudaimonia
The Nicomachean Ethics remains a classic text in moral philosophy, studied and debated by scholars and students alike