The federal judiciary is a complex system with three tiers: district courts, appeals courts, and the . Each level plays a unique role in interpreting laws and resolving disputes, from initial trials to final appeals.
is crucial for fair decision-making. Protected by the Constitution, it allows courts to check other branches and safeguard rights. The laid the groundwork for today's federal court structure and jurisdictions.
Federal Court System Hierarchy
Three-Tiered Structure
Top images from around the web for Three-Tiered Structure
Intro To Criminal Justice 2015-16 - Criminal Justice Collaboratory View original
Is this image relevant?
U S Courts: Structure and Procedure | United States Government View original
Is this image relevant?
Chapter Three: Courts in the United States – CRIMJ 100 View original
Is this image relevant?
Intro To Criminal Justice 2015-16 - Criminal Justice Collaboratory View original
Is this image relevant?
U S Courts: Structure and Procedure | United States Government View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Three-Tiered Structure
Intro To Criminal Justice 2015-16 - Criminal Justice Collaboratory View original
Is this image relevant?
U S Courts: Structure and Procedure | United States Government View original
Is this image relevant?
Chapter Three: Courts in the United States – CRIMJ 100 View original
Is this image relevant?
Intro To Criminal Justice 2015-16 - Criminal Justice Collaboratory View original
Is this image relevant?
U S Courts: Structure and Procedure | United States Government View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
The federal court system has a three-tiered hierarchical structure
U.S. Supreme Court at the top
(Circuit Courts) in the middle
at the bottom
District Courts
There are 94 U.S. District Courts that serve as trial courts
Cases are initially filed and decided in district courts
District courts hear both civil and criminal cases
Courts of Appeals
There are 13 U.S. Courts of Appeals that hear appeals from district courts within their regional circuit
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has nationwide jurisdiction to hear appeals in specialized cases (patent law, international trade)
Supreme Court
The U.S. Supreme Court is the highest court in the country
Has the final say on cases appealed from lower courts
Also has in limited cases (disputes between states, cases involving ambassadors)
District vs Appeals vs Supreme Courts
District Court Jurisdiction and Role
Federal district courts have original jurisdiction and are the trial courts of the federal system
Cases are filed, trials are held, and initial rulings are made in district courts
Hear both civil cases (disputes between individuals or organizations) and criminal cases (violations of federal law)
Appeals Court Jurisdiction and Role
U.S. Courts of Appeals have
Review decisions of the district courts within their circuit for errors
Determine if the law was applied correctly in the trial court
Do not hold trials or hear new evidence, only review the record from the district court
Supreme Court Jurisdiction and Role
The U.S. Supreme Court has limited original jurisdiction
Cases involving disputes between states or involving ambassadors
Has appellate jurisdiction and is the final arbiter in cases appealed from lower courts
Has discretion over which cases it hears through
Primary role is to interpret the Constitution and rule on the constitutionality of laws or executive actions
Decisions are on all lower courts
Judicial Independence Significance
Constitutional Protections for Judicial Independence
Judicial independence is the idea that the judicial branch is independent from political or other outside influence in its decision making
of the Constitution protects judicial independence
Grants during good behavior
Prohibits decreases in federal judges' salaries
Importance of Judicial Independence
Allows courts to make decisions based on the rule of law rather than political pressure
Protects and from the tyranny of the majority
Courts can strike down popular laws that violate constitutional rights (desegregation decisions)
Serves as an important check and balance on the legislative and executive branches
Can invalidate unconstitutional laws passed by Congress or actions taken by the President
Judiciary Act of 1789 Role
Establishing Lower Federal Courts
The Constitution outlined the powers and structure of the Supreme Court, but left the creation of lower federal courts up to Congress
The Judiciary Act of 1789 established the basic three-tiered structure of the federal court system that still exists today
Created 13 district courts and 3 circuit courts
Established their jurisdictions
Defining Federal Court Jurisdiction
The Act specified the types of cases that could be heard in federal courts
Gave federal courts jurisdiction over , civil suits involving citizens of different states (), and other cases related to federal laws
Gave the Supreme Court appellate jurisdiction over certain decisions from state courts
Creating Federal Judicial Positions and Support
Created the position of to represent the United States in cases before the Supreme Court
Established the federal marshal system to support federal judicial proceedings
serve as law enforcement arm of the federal courts
Duties include protecting judges, transporting prisoners, serving subpoenas
Key Terms to Review (19)
Appellate jurisdiction: Appellate jurisdiction refers to the authority of a higher court to review and change the decision of a lower court. This type of jurisdiction is crucial in the judicial system as it ensures that errors made in lower courts can be corrected, maintaining the integrity of the legal process. Courts with appellate jurisdiction do not conduct new trials but rather examine the records from the lower court to determine if legal errors were made.
Article III: Article III of the United States Constitution establishes the judicial branch of the federal government, defining the structure and authority of the judiciary. It creates the Supreme Court and allows for the establishment of lower courts, while also outlining the jurisdiction of these courts and the nature of federal offenses. This article is fundamental in ensuring a system of checks and balances by delineating judicial power separate from legislative and executive branches.
Attorney general: The attorney general is the chief law enforcement officer and legal advisor of a jurisdiction, primarily responsible for representing the government in legal matters and enforcing laws. This position plays a critical role in both the federal and state governments, overseeing a range of legal activities, including criminal prosecutions, civil litigation, and regulatory enforcement.
Binding precedent: Binding precedent refers to a legal principle that requires courts to follow the decisions made in previous cases when the facts of the current case are similar. This concept ensures consistency and predictability in the law, as lower courts are obligated to adhere to the rulings established by higher courts within the same jurisdiction. Binding precedent is a key element of common law systems, where legal precedents shape the interpretation and application of laws over time.
Checks and balances: Checks and balances is a system that ensures no one branch of government becomes too powerful by providing each branch with specific powers to limit the actions of the others. This interconnected framework is crucial for maintaining the rule of law, preventing abuse of power, and promoting accountability among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
Civil liberties: Civil liberties are the fundamental rights and freedoms that protect individuals from government overreach and ensure personal freedoms. These rights are often enshrined in law and safeguard various aspects of individual autonomy, including freedom of speech, religion, and assembly. They form a critical part of democratic governance by limiting the powers of the state in relation to individuals.
Diversity jurisdiction: Diversity jurisdiction is a legal concept that allows federal courts to hear cases involving parties from different states or countries, provided the amount in controversy exceeds a specified threshold. This concept is crucial because it helps ensure fairness in the judicial process, especially in cases where local biases may affect the outcome in state courts. By allowing these cases to be heard in federal court, diversity jurisdiction aims to provide a neutral forum for resolving disputes.
Federal Crimes: Federal crimes are offenses that violate federal laws established by the United States Congress. These crimes encompass a wide range of illegal activities, from drug trafficking and immigration violations to cybercrime and terrorism, often prosecuted in federal courts rather than state courts. The enforcement of federal laws is crucial as it maintains national security, regulates interstate commerce, and protects the rights of citizens.
Federal Judges: Federal judges are appointed officials who preside over federal court cases and interpret federal laws. They play a crucial role in the federal judiciary system, which includes various levels of courts such as district courts, appellate courts, and the Supreme Court. Their decisions can shape national policies and influence the interpretation of the Constitution.
Federal Marshals: Federal marshals are law enforcement officers who serve the U.S. federal judiciary by executing court orders, managing prisoners, and ensuring the safety of court proceedings. They play a vital role in maintaining order in federal courts and can also assist in criminal investigations and apprehensions, linking them closely with the broader structure of the federal judiciary.
Judicial independence: Judicial independence refers to the principle that the judiciary should remain independent from other branches of government, ensuring fair and impartial justice. This concept is crucial for maintaining the rule of law and protecting individual rights, as it prevents external pressures from influencing judicial decisions, whether from legislative or executive branches. A strong judiciary can uphold constitutional principles and ensure that justice is served without bias or favoritism.
Judiciary Act of 1789: The Judiciary Act of 1789 was a landmark piece of legislation that established the federal judiciary system in the United States, creating the structure and jurisdiction of the federal court system. This act laid the groundwork for the Supreme Court and lower federal courts, which are essential components of the American legal framework, defining their roles and powers within the government.
Life tenure: Life tenure refers to the condition in which federal judges, including Supreme Court justices, hold their positions for life, barring instances of impeachment or resignation. This system is designed to ensure judicial independence, allowing judges to make decisions based solely on the law without fear of political repercussions or loss of their jobs due to controversial rulings.
Minority rights: Minority rights refer to the legal and social protections granted to individuals or groups who are part of a smaller or less powerful segment of the population, ensuring they have equal access to political participation, cultural expression, and protection from discrimination. These rights are essential in a democratic society, promoting the idea that all citizens, regardless of their background, deserve equal treatment and opportunities.
Original jurisdiction: Original jurisdiction refers to the authority of a court to hear a case for the first time, rather than on appeal. This concept is crucial in understanding how legal disputes are initially resolved within the court system, particularly regarding which courts have the power to hear specific types of cases. In the context of the federal judiciary, original jurisdiction is primarily held by the Supreme Court and certain lower federal courts, influencing how cases involving federal law and disputes between states are handled.
Supreme Court: The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States and serves as the final arbiter of legal disputes, with the power to interpret the Constitution and review laws. Its decisions have a significant impact on American law and politics, influencing civil rights, government authority, and individual freedoms. As a crucial component of the federal judiciary, it plays a key role in maintaining the rule of law and ensuring justice across the nation.
U.S. Courts of Appeals: The U.S. Courts of Appeals, also known as circuit courts, are the intermediate appellate courts in the federal judiciary system. They review decisions made by lower district courts and administrative agencies, serving as the primary forum for appeals in federal cases. Their role is crucial in shaping federal law and ensuring uniformity across different jurisdictions, as they hear cases from specific geographic regions known as circuits.
U.S. District Courts: U.S. District Courts are the general trial courts of the federal judiciary system in the United States, where most federal cases are initially filed and tried. Each court has jurisdiction over a specific geographic area, dealing with both civil and criminal cases, and plays a critical role in interpreting federal law and ensuring justice at the ground level.
Writs of certiorari: Writs of certiorari are orders issued by a higher court, typically the Supreme Court, to review the decision of a lower court. This legal mechanism allows the Supreme Court to selectively choose cases that it wants to hear, which is crucial for maintaining its authority and ensuring that important legal questions are addressed. The process helps shape the interpretation of laws and the Constitution, as the Supreme Court's rulings on these cases set precedents that influence future cases.