Land dispossession and forced relocation deeply impacted Indigenous peoples in North America. European introduced the concept of private property, while ideology justified the taking of Indigenous lands. These processes disrupted sustainable land relationships and traditional ecological knowledge.

U.S. policies like the and the forcibly relocated Indigenous communities. Methods of dispossession included , , and . This displacement had profound environmental and cultural consequences, altering ecosystems and disrupting Indigenous practices and knowledge systems.

Historical context of dispossession

  • Land dispossession and forced relocation of Indigenous peoples in North America resulted from complex historical processes spanning centuries
  • European colonization and westward expansion fundamentally altered Indigenous relationships with land and resources
  • Understanding this history provides crucial context for contemporary environmental and cultural issues faced by Indigenous communities

Pre-colonial land relationships

Top images from around the web for Pre-colonial land relationships
Top images from around the web for Pre-colonial land relationships
  • Indigenous peoples maintained diverse, sustainable relationships with lands and ecosystems for millennia
  • Land viewed as a communal resource with spiritual significance rather than private property
  • Complex systems of land use and resource management developed (seasonal migration patterns, controlled burns)
  • Sustainable harvesting practices ensured long-term viability of plant and animal populations

European colonization impacts

  • Introduced concept of land as private property to be bought, sold, and owned individually
  • Brought devastating diseases that decimated Indigenous populations, disrupting traditional land use patterns
  • Established missions and settlements that encroached on Indigenous territories
  • Exploited natural resources at unprecedented rates (fur trade, timber harvesting)

Manifest Destiny ideology

  • 19th-century belief in the righteous expansion of the United States across North America
  • Justified dispossession of Indigenous lands as part of a divine plan or natural progress
  • Portrayed Indigenous peoples as "savage" and their land use as inefficient or wasteful
  • Fueled policies of westward expansion, including the Homestead Act and transcontinental railroad

Forced relocation policies

  • U.S. government implemented systematic policies to remove Indigenous peoples from their ancestral lands
  • Relocation disrupted traditional ecological knowledge and sustainable land management practices
  • Forced moves to unfamiliar environments created numerous challenges for Indigenous communities

Indian Removal Act

  • Passed in 1830 under President Andrew Jackson
  • Authorized negotiation of treaties to exchange Indigenous lands in eastern states for lands west of the Mississippi
  • Resulted in the forced relocation of tens of thousands of Indigenous people
  • Disproportionately affected the "" (Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muscogee, Seminole)

Trail of Tears

  • Series of forced relocations of Indigenous peoples in the southeastern United States
  • Occurred between 1830 and 1850, with the Cherokee removal in 1838-1839 being the most infamous
  • Thousands died from exposure, disease, and starvation during the grueling journeys
  • Covered over 5,000 miles of land and water routes

Reservation system establishment

  • Created to confine Indigenous peoples to specific, often marginal lands
  • Dramatically reduced the land base available to Indigenous communities
  • Disrupted traditional hunting, gathering, and agricultural practices
  • Often located in areas with limited natural resources or harsh climates

Methods of land dispossession

  • Multiple strategies employed by colonial and U.S. governments to acquire Indigenous lands
  • Combination of legal, military, and economic pressures used to dispossess Indigenous peoples
  • Methods evolved over time but consistently favored non-Indigenous interests

Treaty violations

  • Numerous treaties signed between Indigenous nations and U.S. government
  • Many treaties broken or unilaterally altered by the U.S. government
  • Failure to honor treaty obligations led to further land loss and relocation
  • Supreme Court cases (, ) highlighted treaty violations

Military force

  • U.S. Army used to enforce removal policies and suppress Indigenous resistance
  • Violent conflicts erupted as Indigenous peoples defended their lands (, )
  • Massacres of Indigenous civilians occurred (, )
  • Military campaigns disrupted Indigenous food sources and economic systems
  • Allotment policies divided communal Indigenous lands into individual parcels
  • of 1887 aimed to assimilate Indigenous peoples through private land ownership
  • "Surplus" lands opened to non-Indigenous settlement
  • of the 1950s-60s ended federal recognition of some tribes, leading to further land loss

Environmental consequences

  • Forced relocation and land dispossession had profound impacts on ecosystems and biodiversity
  • Disruption of Indigenous land management practices altered landscapes across North America
  • Environmental changes continue to affect Indigenous communities today

Disruption of traditional practices

  • Seasonal hunting, fishing, and gathering cycles interrupted by confinement to reservations
  • Traditional fire management techniques suppressed, leading to changes in forest composition
  • Loss of access to medicinal plants and other important natural resources
  • Forced adoption of sedentary lifestyles and non-Indigenous agricultural practices

Loss of biodiversity knowledge

  • Displacement from ancestral lands resulted in loss of detailed ecological knowledge
  • Intergenerational transfer of plant and animal knowledge disrupted
  • Decline in use and understanding of Indigenous languages that encoded environmental information
  • Reduced ability to identify and utilize diverse plant and animal species

Ecological changes in new territories

  • Indigenous peoples relocated to unfamiliar environments with different flora and fauna
  • New landscapes often less productive or suitable for traditional practices
  • Introduction of non-native species and agricultural practices altered ecosystems
  • Changes in water management and land use patterns led to erosion and habitat loss

Cultural impacts

  • Forced relocation and land dispossession had devastating effects on Indigenous cultures
  • Loss of connection to ancestral lands disrupted spiritual practices and social structures
  • Cultural impacts continue to reverberate through generations of Indigenous communities

Displacement of sacred sites

  • Removal from lands containing burial grounds, ceremonial locations, and other sacred places
  • Loss of access to sites crucial for religious and spiritual practices
  • Destruction or desecration of sacred sites by non-Indigenous development
  • Challenges in maintaining cultural continuity without physical connection to important places

Disruption of social structures

  • Traditional leadership and governance systems undermined by forced relocation
  • Clan and kinship networks fragmented as communities were separated
  • Gender roles and family structures altered by new economic realities
  • Imposition of non-Indigenous governance systems (tribal councils, BIA administration)

Language and tradition loss

  • Separation from ancestral lands accelerated loss of Indigenous languages
  • Forced assimilation policies (boarding schools) actively suppressed language and cultural practices
  • Traditional ecological knowledge tied to specific landscapes became less relevant or lost
  • Interruption of oral tradition and storytelling practices linked to particular places

Resistance and adaptation

  • Indigenous peoples actively resisted land dispossession and forced relocation through various means
  • Adaptation strategies developed to maintain cultural identity and connection to land
  • Resistance and adaptation continue to shape Indigenous responses to environmental challenges

Armed conflicts

  • Military resistance to removal policies (Seminole Wars, 1814-1858)
  • and armed resistance at Wounded Knee (1890)
  • (AIM) and armed occupation of Wounded Knee (1973)
  • Ongoing conflicts over and land rights ( against Dakota Access Pipeline)
  • Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) and Worcester v. Georgia (1832) challenged removal policies
  • Use of U.S. legal system to assert and land claims
  • Development of tribal legal expertise and institutions to navigate federal Indian law
  • Recent Supreme Court cases affirming tribal sovereignty and land rights (, 2020)

Cultural preservation efforts

  • Creation of cultural centers and museums to maintain connection to ancestral lands
  • Revival of traditional ceremonies and practices, often adapted to new environments
  • Documentation and preservation of oral histories and traditional ecological knowledge
  • Development of language immersion programs to revitalize Indigenous languages

Modern land rights issues

  • Ongoing struggles for Indigenous land rights and sovereignty in North America
  • Intersection of land rights with environmental protection and resource management
  • Complex legal and political landscape surrounding Indigenous land claims

Land claim settlements

  • (1971) established Native corporations
  • (1993) created new Indigenous-governed territory in Canada
  • Ongoing negotiations and settlements of specific land claims in U.S. and Canada
  • Challenges in implementing and enforcing land claim agreements

Resource extraction conflicts

  • Disputes over mining, logging, and oil/gas development on or near Indigenous lands
  • Concerns about environmental impacts and violation of treaty rights
  • Indigenous-led protests against pipelines and other infrastructure projects
  • Legal battles over consultation requirements and environmental assessments

Urban relocation programs

  • Federal policies in 1950s-60s encouraged Indigenous people to move to urban areas
  • Resulted in large urban Indigenous populations disconnected from tribal lands
  • Creation of urban Indian centers and organizations to maintain cultural connections
  • Challenges in accessing services and maintaining tribal enrollment for urban Indigenous people

Environmental justice movements

  • Indigenous communities at forefront of efforts
  • Recognition of links between Indigenous rights, land stewardship, and environmental protection
  • Growing collaborations between Indigenous groups and environmental organizations

Indigenous land stewardship

  • Revitalization of traditional ecological knowledge and management practices
  • Establishment of Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas (IPCAs)
  • Integration of Indigenous perspectives into conservation and restoration projects
  • Use of traditional fire management techniques to reduce wildfire risks

Co-management initiatives

  • Collaborative management of natural resources between Indigenous groups and government agencies
  • Examples include Pacific Salmon Commission and Great Bear Rainforest Agreement
  • Incorporation of Indigenous knowledge into wildlife management and conservation planning
  • Challenges in balancing different knowledge systems and decision-making processes

Climate change adaptation strategies

  • Indigenous communities often on frontlines of climate change impacts
  • Development of community-based adaptation plans incorporating traditional knowledge
  • Relocation of entire communities due to sea level rise and coastal erosion (Alaska Native villages)
  • Advocacy for Indigenous rights and perspectives in international climate negotiations

Reconciliation efforts

  • Growing recognition of need to address historical injustices related to land dispossession
  • Various initiatives aimed at reconciliation between Indigenous peoples and settler societies
  • Challenges in implementing meaningful reconciliation beyond symbolic gestures

Land repatriation cases

  • Return of Blue Lake to Taos Pueblo (1970) set precedent for land repatriation
  • Establishment of Badlands National Park South Unit co-managed with Oglala Sioux Tribe
  • Land Back movement advocating for return of public lands to Indigenous stewardship
  • Challenges in navigating complex legal and political landscapes for land returns

Government apologies

  • Official apologies for historical policies of forced relocation and assimilation
  • U.S. apology resolution in 2009 acknowledged history of violence and maltreatment
  • Canadian government's apology for residential school system in 2008
  • Debates over the effectiveness and sincerity of government apologies without concrete action

Cultural revitalization programs

  • Establishment of tribal colleges and universities to promote Indigenous knowledge and languages
  • Federal support for Native language preservation and revitalization efforts
  • Repatriation of cultural artifacts and human remains through NAGPRA legislation
  • Integration of Indigenous history and perspectives into public education curricula

Legacy and ongoing challenges

  • Impacts of land dispossession and forced relocation continue to affect Indigenous communities
  • Addressing historical injustices requires long-term commitment and systemic changes
  • Ongoing efforts to heal from trauma while asserting Indigenous rights and sovereignty

Intergenerational trauma

  • Psychological and emotional impacts of dispossession passed down through generations
  • Higher rates of mental health issues and substance abuse in many Indigenous communities
  • Efforts to address trauma through culturally appropriate healing practices
  • Recognition of connection between land dispossession and ongoing health disparities

Economic disparities

  • Loss of traditional land base contributed to persistent poverty in many Indigenous communities
  • Limited economic opportunities on many reservations with high unemployment rates
  • Challenges in accessing capital and developing sustainable tribal economies
  • Innovative approaches to economic development (tribal enterprises, renewable energy projects)

Environmental degradation

  • Many reservations face environmental contamination from resource extraction and industrial activities
  • Loss of traditional food sources due to habitat destruction and pollution
  • Health impacts from exposure to environmental toxins (uranium mining on Navajo Nation)
  • Efforts to restore degraded lands and revitalize traditional food systems

Key Terms to Review (35)

Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act: The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) is a landmark law enacted in 1971 that settled land claims for Alaska Natives and established a framework for their rights to land and resources. This act was a response to the historical injustices faced by Indigenous peoples in Alaska, aiming to address issues of land dispossession and forced relocation while promoting economic development through the establishment of regional and village corporations.
American Indian Movement: The American Indian Movement (AIM) is a grassroots organization founded in 1968 aimed at advocating for the rights of Native Americans and addressing issues such as sovereignty, treaty rights, and social justice. AIM emerged as a response to systemic injustices faced by Indigenous communities, including land dispossession, cultural erasure, and forced relocation, and has played a significant role in promoting Indigenous rights, environmental protection, and self-determination.
Broken treaties: Broken treaties refer to agreements between Indigenous Peoples and governments, particularly the U.S. federal government, that have not been honored or fulfilled. These treaties often promised rights, land, and resources to Indigenous communities in exchange for their cooperation or cession of territory. The violation of these agreements has contributed significantly to land dispossession and forced relocation of Indigenous Peoples, leading to profound social, economic, and cultural disruptions.
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia: Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was a landmark case in 1831 in which the Cherokee Nation sought to prevent the state of Georgia from enforcing laws that stripped them of their rights and sovereignty within their own territory. This case highlighted the struggle for Native American land rights and self-governance in the face of increasing encroachment by state governments, setting a precedent for the legal treatment of Indigenous nations and their relationship with federal authorities.
Chief Joseph: Chief Joseph was a prominent leader of the Nez Perce tribe in the late 19th century, known for his resistance against the U.S. government's attempts to forcibly relocate his people from their ancestral lands. He became a symbol of Native American resistance and the struggle for Indigenous rights during a time of widespread land dispossession and forced relocation across the United States, particularly in the Pacific Northwest.
Colonization: Colonization is the process by which a central system of power dominates the surrounding land and its components, often resulting in the settlement of colonizers and the exploitation of resources. This process typically involves the displacement of Indigenous populations, leading to land dispossession and forced relocation, as well as significant impacts on cultural practices, including the erosion of oral traditions and environmental knowledge held by these communities.
Cultural Genocide: Cultural genocide refers to the systematic destruction of a group's cultural identity and heritage, often through policies that aim to erase their customs, languages, and traditions. This term highlights the ways in which dominant powers can undermine the cultural foundations of marginalized communities, particularly through land dispossession and forced relocation, which serve to sever ties to ancestral lands and disrupt cultural practices that are inherently linked to those spaces.
Dawes Act: The Dawes Act, enacted in 1887, was a law aimed at assimilating Native Americans into American society by allotting them individual plots of land and granting U.S. citizenship. This act represented a shift in federal policy from recognizing tribal sovereignty to promoting individual land ownership, which led to significant land dispossession and the fragmentation of Indigenous communities. The act's implementation had far-reaching effects on traditional landscapes, as it disrupted Indigenous relationships with the land and promoted agricultural practices that were foreign to many Native cultures.
Displacement trauma: Displacement trauma refers to the psychological and emotional distress experienced by individuals and communities as a result of forced removal from their homeland or traditional lands. This term encapsulates the long-term effects of land dispossession and relocation, which can lead to loss of identity, cultural disconnection, and feelings of grief and loss among affected populations. Such trauma not only impacts individuals but also resonates through generations, affecting community cohesion and cultural practices.
Environmental Justice: Environmental justice is the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all individuals, regardless of race, color, national origin, or income, in environmental decision-making processes. It emphasizes the need for equitable distribution of environmental benefits and burdens, particularly focusing on marginalized communities who often bear the brunt of environmental degradation and pollution.
Five Civilized Tribes: The Five Civilized Tribes refers to five Native American nations—Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek (Muscogee), and Seminole—that adopted various cultural practices of European settlers during the 19th century. These tribes engaged in agriculture, established schools, and developed written languages, which led to their classification as 'civilized' by European Americans. This label is crucial in understanding the complex dynamics of land dispossession and forced relocation that these tribes faced during the Indian Removal Act of 1830 and subsequent policies.
Ghost Dance Movement: The Ghost Dance Movement was a spiritual revival and religious movement among Native American tribes in the late 19th century, primarily during the 1880s and 1890s. It aimed to restore Native American culture and way of life through a vision of peace and the reunion of deceased ancestors, often seen as a response to land dispossession and forced relocation experienced by Indigenous peoples. This movement played a significant role in the efforts to resist colonization and reclaim cultural identity amidst drastic changes brought on by European-American expansion.
Idle No More: Idle No More is a grassroots movement that began in Canada in late 2012, aiming to raise awareness about Indigenous rights and environmental issues affecting Indigenous communities. The movement emerged in response to government policies perceived as threatening Indigenous lands and ecosystems, advocating for respect and recognition of treaties, environmental protection, and social justice.
Indian Removal Act: The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a law enacted by the U.S. Congress that facilitated the forced relocation of Native American tribes living east of the Mississippi River to designated 'Indian Territory' west of the river. This act aimed to open up land for settlement by American farmers and was justified by a belief in Manifest Destiny, leading to significant land dispossession, demographic shifts, and long-lasting impacts on traditional landscapes.
Legal mechanisms: Legal mechanisms refer to the formal processes and frameworks established by laws and regulations that govern actions, rights, and responsibilities within a society. These mechanisms can include statutes, treaties, court decisions, and administrative rules that dictate how land use, property rights, and governance are managed, especially in contexts of land dispossession and forced relocation. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for recognizing how they have been used historically to facilitate or challenge injustices against marginalized communities.
Manifest Destiny: Manifest Destiny is the 19th-century belief that the expansion of the United States across the American continents was both justified and inevitable. This ideology was used to rationalize westward expansion, asserting that it was the nation's divine right to spread democracy and civilization, often leading to the disregard for Indigenous rights and lands. The concept has roots in earlier European explorations and played a significant role in land dispossession and forced relocation of Native peoples.
McGirt v. Oklahoma: McGirt v. Oklahoma is a landmark 2020 Supreme Court decision that affirmed the existence of a Creek Nation reservation in eastern Oklahoma, impacting criminal jurisdiction and tribal sovereignty. This ruling is significant as it underscores the historical injustices faced by Indigenous Peoples, particularly in relation to land dispossession and forced relocation, highlighting how legal interpretations can influence the rights of Native tribes over their ancestral lands.
Military force: Military force refers to the use of armed power by a state or organization to achieve political, territorial, or strategic objectives. This term is significant in understanding how power dynamics and conflict shape societal structures, especially in relation to land dispossession and forced relocation of Indigenous Peoples, where military actions often enforce policies that lead to the loss of lands and homes.
Nunavut Land Claims Agreement: The Nunavut Land Claims Agreement is a comprehensive land claim agreement signed in 1993 between the Inuit of the Nunavut region and the Government of Canada. This agreement established the creation of Nunavut as a territory and outlined the rights of the Inuit to land and resources, helping to address historical injustices related to land dispossession and forced relocation of Indigenous peoples in Canada. It also serves as a framework for self-governance and resource management, fostering economic development while recognizing the importance of cultural identity.
Plains Indian Wars: The Plains Indian Wars were a series of conflicts that occurred between the mid-19th century and the late 19th century in the Great Plains region of North America, primarily involving various Indigenous tribes and the United States government. These wars were largely fueled by the westward expansion of settlers, the U.S. military's efforts to control Native lands, and the subsequent dispossession and forced relocation of Indigenous peoples from their ancestral territories, resulting in significant loss of life and culture.
Red Power Movement: The Red Power Movement was a social and political movement that emerged in the 1960s and 1970s, aimed at promoting the rights and sovereignty of Indigenous peoples in the United States. It sought to address issues of land dispossession, cultural preservation, and social justice, often drawing inspiration from the civil rights movement. The movement highlighted the struggles against forced relocation and aimed to reclaim Indigenous identity and heritage.
Reservation system: The reservation system refers to the practice of designating specific areas of land for the exclusive use of Indigenous Peoples in North America, often resulting from treaties and government policies aimed at controlling and assimilating Native populations. This system emerged as a response to land dispossession and forced relocation, often leading to the separation of Indigenous communities from their traditional lands and cultures. While intended to provide a semblance of autonomy, reservations frequently faced issues like limited resources, legal restrictions, and systemic neglect.
Resource extraction: Resource extraction refers to the process of removing natural resources from the environment for economic use, often involving activities like mining, drilling, and logging. This practice significantly impacts local ecosystems and Indigenous communities, frequently leading to land dispossession, environmental degradation, and conflicts over land use and rights. The dynamics of resource extraction highlight the complex relationships between economic development, environmental sustainability, and the rights of Indigenous peoples.
Sand Creek Massacre: The Sand Creek Massacre was a tragic event that took place on November 29, 1864, when a Colorado U.S. Volunteer Cavalry attacked a peaceful encampment of Cheyenne and Arapaho people in southeastern Colorado. This horrific act is a critical example of the violent consequences of land dispossession and forced relocation as Native Americans were displaced from their ancestral lands and subjected to military aggression under the guise of securing territory for white settlers.
Seminole Wars: The Seminole Wars were a series of conflicts in the 19th century between the United States and the Seminole Tribe of Florida, primarily over issues of land dispossession and the forced relocation of Native Americans. These wars were marked by guerrilla tactics used by the Seminoles and highlighted the struggle of Indigenous peoples against U.S. expansionist policies. They illustrate the broader theme of land dispossession faced by Indigenous groups in America during this period.
Standing Rock Sioux Protest: The Standing Rock Sioux Protest was a significant movement that began in 2016, opposing the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL), which threatened the water supply and sacred lands of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. This protest drew nationwide attention, highlighting issues related to indigenous rights, environmental protection, and the impact of land dispossession on Native communities. The protest became a symbol of broader struggles against corporate interests infringing on indigenous sovereignty and environmental integrity.
Surplus Lands: Surplus lands refer to parcels of land that are deemed excess or unnecessary for the purposes of a specific government program or jurisdiction, often following the allotment of land to Indigenous peoples under treaties. This term is crucial in understanding how land was taken from Native American tribes, particularly after the implementation of policies like the Dawes Act, which aimed to assimilate Indigenous peoples into Euro-American society by allotting them individual plots while leaving surplus lands open for settlement and sale.
Termination policies: Termination policies were governmental strategies aimed at assimilating Indigenous peoples into mainstream American society by ending the recognition of their tribal sovereignty and legal status. These policies were part of a broader agenda to dismantle reservations, relocate Indigenous communities, and promote individual land ownership, significantly impacting their cultural identity and social structures.
Trail of Tears: The Trail of Tears refers to the forced relocation of several Native American tribes, primarily the Cherokee, from their ancestral homelands in the Southeastern United States to designated Indian Territory west of the Mississippi River during the 1830s. This tragic event symbolizes the broader patterns of land dispossession and forced relocation that Indigenous peoples faced in the face of American expansionism and federal policies aimed at removing Native populations from desirable lands.
Treaty rights: Treaty rights refer to the legal entitlements and protections granted to Indigenous peoples through treaties made with the federal government, often encompassing land use, resource management, and cultural preservation. These rights are vital for maintaining Indigenous sovereignty and addressing historical injustices associated with land dispossession and forced relocation.
Treaty violations: Treaty violations refer to the breaches or failures to adhere to agreements made between parties, particularly in the context of treaties between Indigenous Peoples and government entities. These violations can lead to significant consequences, including land dispossession and forced relocation, as they often disregard the rights and agreements established with Indigenous communities. The impact of such violations extends beyond legal disputes, affecting the cultural, social, and environmental well-being of affected Indigenous groups.
Urban relocation policies: Urban relocation policies refer to government initiatives aimed at moving populations, often from rural areas to urban centers, typically driven by economic, social, or environmental factors. These policies can involve the resettlement of Indigenous communities and marginalized populations, resulting in significant impacts on their cultural and social structures, as well as their relationship with the land. The implementation of these policies is often tied to broader themes of land dispossession and forced relocation, raising important questions about sovereignty and human rights.
Winona LaDuke: Winona LaDuke is a prominent Indigenous activist, environmentalist, and writer from the Ojibwe tribe, known for her work on sustainable development, environmental justice, and Indigenous rights. Her efforts highlight the intersection of cultural preservation and environmental stewardship in addressing the challenges faced by Indigenous communities in North America.
Worcester v. Georgia: Worcester v. Georgia was a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1832, where the Court ruled that the state of Georgia could not enforce its laws within the boundaries of the Cherokee Nation. This case underscored the sovereignty of Native American nations and highlighted the tensions between state and federal authority regarding land rights and legal jurisdiction, particularly during a period marked by land dispossession and forced relocation.
Wounded Knee Massacre: The Wounded Knee Massacre, which occurred on December 29, 1890, was a tragic event where U.S. troops killed hundreds of Lakota Sioux men, women, and children at Wounded Knee Creek in South Dakota. This massacre symbolizes the violent repression faced by Indigenous Peoples during the U.S. government's efforts to assimilate and control them, particularly reflecting the broader patterns of dispossession and forced relocation experienced by Native communities in the North American West.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.