Standards-based education and high-stakes testing have reshaped American schools. These reforms aim to improve student achievement through clear learning goals and . However, they've sparked debates about the best ways to measure learning and ensure educational quality.

The push for standards and testing has led to significant changes in curriculum, instruction, and assessment. While supporters argue these changes drive improvement, critics worry about unintended consequences like and narrowing the curriculum.

Standards and Legislation

Common Core State Standards

Top images from around the web for Common Core State Standards
Top images from around the web for Common Core State Standards
  • Developed by state education chiefs and governors in 48 states
  • Aim to ensure students are prepared for success in college, career, and life
  • Define the knowledge and skills students should gain throughout their K-12 education
  • Emphasize critical thinking, problem-solving, and analytical skills
  • Implemented by states on a voluntary basis (adopted by 41 states as of 2021)

Federal Education Legislation

  • (NCLB) of 2001
    • Required states to develop assessments in basic skills
    • Mandated states to administer these assessments to all students at select grade levels
    • Established measurable goals intended to close and improve schools
    • Schools that failed to meet Adequate Yearly Progress faced sanctions and interventions
  • Every Student Succeeds (ESSA) of 2015
    • Replaced NCLB and shifted accountability provisions to states
    • Maintained requirements but allowed states more flexibility
    • Required states to include non-academic indicators (attendance rates) in their accountability systems
    • Provided more autonomy to states and local districts in setting goals and determining interventions for low-performing schools

Assessment Methods

Standardized Testing

  • Tests administered and scored in a consistent manner
  • Often used to compare student performance across schools, districts, or states
  • Examples include , , ACT, and (National Assessment of Educational Progress)
  • Criticized for narrowing curriculum, encouraging rote memorization, and not adequately measuring higher-order thinking skills
  • Proponents argue they provide valuable data for identifying achievement gaps and evaluating educational programs

Performance-Based Assessments

  • Require students to demonstrate knowledge and skills through tasks, projects, or portfolios
  • Aim to assess higher-order thinking skills and real-world application of knowledge
  • Can include presentations, experiments, research papers, and artistic performances
  • Provide a more comprehensive view of student abilities but can be time-consuming and subjective to grade
  • Examples include Advanced Placement (AP) exams, International Baccalaureate (IB) assessments, and project-based learning showcases

Accountability and Evaluation

Accountability Measures

  • Used to hold schools, districts, and states responsible for student performance
  • Often tied to standardized test scores and other quantitative indicators (graduation rates)
  • Can result in rewards for high-performing schools and sanctions for low-performing ones
  • Intended to ensure all students receive a quality education and to close achievement gaps
  • Critics argue they place too much emphasis on test scores and can lead to unintended consequences

Teaching to the Test

  • The practice of focusing instruction on the content and format of standardized tests
  • Can lead to a narrowing of the curriculum and neglect of non-tested subjects (arts, physical education)
  • May result in a focus on test-taking strategies rather than deep understanding of content
  • Can be especially prevalent in schools facing pressure to improve test scores quickly
  • Argued to undermine the purpose of education and limit opportunities for meaningful learning

Value-Added Models

  • Statistical methods used to measure the impact of teachers or schools on student learning
  • Aim to isolate the effect of individual teachers by controlling for factors outside their control (student background)
  • Used in some states as part of teacher evaluation and compensation systems
  • Proponents argue they provide a fairer way to assess teacher effectiveness
  • Critics contend they are unreliable, can be influenced by factors outside of teachers' control, and may discourage teachers from working with high-need students

Key Terms to Review (12)

Accountability measures: Accountability measures refer to the standards and assessments used to evaluate the performance of schools, educators, and students in relation to set educational goals. These measures are often tied to policies that mandate consequences for schools and educators based on their performance, influencing funding, job security, and school operations. They play a significant role in standards-based education by ensuring that educational institutions are held responsible for achieving specific learning outcomes.
Achievement gaps: Achievement gaps refer to the disparities in academic performance and educational attainment between different groups of students, often categorized by socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, and disability. These gaps highlight the unequal opportunities and resources available to students, leading to significant differences in their educational outcomes and opportunities for future success.
Act: In the context of standards-based education and high-stakes testing, an act refers to a formal legislative decision that establishes policies and regulations governing educational practices and accountability measures. These acts typically set forth the expectations for student achievement, assessment methods, and the responsibilities of schools and educators in ensuring that students meet established standards.
Common Core State Standards: Common Core State Standards (CCSS) are a set of educational benchmarks for K-12 students in English Language Arts and Mathematics, aimed at ensuring all students acquire the necessary skills for success in college and careers. These standards provide a clear framework for what students should know and be able to do at each grade level, promoting consistency and accountability across states. By establishing shared goals, CCSS aims to improve educational outcomes and align curricula and assessments nationwide.
NAEP: The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) is a nationwide assessment that measures the academic performance of students in various subjects across the United States. Often referred to as the 'Nation's Report Card,' it provides a comprehensive snapshot of student achievement over time and informs policymakers and educators about educational progress and disparities.
No Child Left Behind Act: The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was a significant piece of legislation enacted in 2001 aimed at improving educational outcomes for all students in the United States. This act mandated standardized testing to hold schools accountable for students' academic performance and to ensure that every child received a quality education, regardless of their background. It was a key driver of the standards-based education movement and introduced high-stakes testing as a primary means to measure educational progress and effectiveness.
Performance-based assessments: Performance-based assessments are evaluation methods that require students to demonstrate their knowledge, skills, and competencies through real-world tasks and projects. These assessments emphasize the application of learning rather than rote memorization, aligning closely with standards-based education and high-stakes testing that focus on students' mastery of specific educational standards.
SAT: The SAT is a standardized college admission test widely used in the United States, designed to assess a student's readiness for college through sections that evaluate mathematics, reading, and writing skills. The SAT plays a significant role in standards-based education and high-stakes testing, often serving as a benchmark for evaluating student performance and school effectiveness.
Standardized testing: Standardized testing refers to a method of assessment where students take the same test under similar conditions, allowing for uniform measurement of academic performance across different populations. This approach is often linked to the idea of standardization in education, where a consistent curriculum and evaluation methods are used to facilitate comparison among students and schools. The concept has gained traction in various educational systems as a means to assess student learning and improve educational outcomes.
State-mandated tests: State-mandated tests are standardized assessments required by state education agencies to measure students' academic performance and proficiency in core subjects. These tests are often used to evaluate schools, determine funding allocations, and assess whether students meet educational standards. The results can have significant implications for students, educators, and school systems, making these assessments critical in the landscape of standards-based education and high-stakes testing.
Teaching to the test: Teaching to the test refers to the practice where educators focus their instruction primarily on preparing students for standardized assessments. This approach often prioritizes test-taking strategies and content directly related to the tests over a more comprehensive educational experience, potentially limiting critical thinking and creativity in the classroom.
Value-added models: Value-added models (VAM) are statistical methods used to measure the effectiveness of educators by analyzing student test score data and controlling for various factors that may influence learning outcomes. These models aim to isolate the contribution of individual teachers or schools to students' academic progress over time, particularly in the context of standards-based education and high-stakes testing, where accountability measures rely heavily on quantifiable performance metrics.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.