---
title: "NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. | American Government"
description: "NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. is the 1937 Supreme Court case that upheld the NLRA and expanded federal power under the Commerce Clause."
canonical: "https://fiveable.me/fundamentals-american-government/key-terms/nlrb-v-jones-and-laughlin-steel-corp"
type: "key-term"
subject: "Intro to American Government"
unit: "Unit 3"
---

# NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. | American Government

## Definition

NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. is the 1937 Supreme Court case that upheld the National Labor Relations Act and let the federal government regulate labor relations tied to interstate commerce.

## What It Is

NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. is a landmark Supreme Court case in Intro to American Government that shows how the federal government gained more power over labor and the economy during the New Deal. The Court said Congress could use the Commerce Clause to regulate a private company when labor trouble at that company had a substantial effect on interstate commerce.

The case involved Jones & Laughlin Steel, a large steel manufacturer. The National Labor Relations Board said the company had broken the National Labor Relations Act by firing workers involved in union activity. Jones & Laughlin argued that Congress had gone too far because labor relations inside one company were a local matter, not interstate commerce.

The Supreme Court rejected that narrow view. It ruled that even if a labor dispute happens inside one factory, it can still affect the flow of goods and services across state lines. That meant Congress could regulate labor practices in industries that matter to the national economy, not just cases where a shipment literally crosses a border during the dispute.

That shift matters because it marked a break from earlier decisions that treated the Commerce Clause more narrowly. After this case, the federal government had much more room to pass and defend laws that protected collective bargaining, union organizing, and other labor rights. In other words, the Court helped move American federalism toward a stronger national government in economic life.

For this course, the case is usually discussed as part of the New Deal and the evolution of American federalism. If you are tracing how power moved from states toward Washington, this case is one of the clearest examples. It shows the Court changing its interpretation of the Constitution to allow broader federal action during a period of economic crisis.

## Why It Matters

This case matters because it is one of the clearest turning points in the story of American federalism. Before it, the Court often read the Commerce Clause more narrowly, which limited how far Congress could go in regulating business and labor. After it, the federal government could reach more deeply into the economy when local activity had national effects.

That makes the case useful any time you are explaining the New Deal. Franklin Roosevelt’s programs depended on the idea that Washington could respond to economic problems on a national scale, not just leave them to the states. Jones & Laughlin gave constitutional backing to that approach.

It also gives you a concrete example of how Supreme Court decisions do more than settle one dispute. They shape the rules of government. Here, the Court helped define when Congress can regulate private companies, how labor rights are protected, and why the national government became a bigger player in economic policy.

## Connections

### National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)

This is the law the Court upheld in the case. The NLRA created protections for union organizing and collective bargaining, and Jones & Laughlin mattered because it confirmed that Congress could make those protections stick for private-sector workers tied to interstate commerce.

### Commerce Clause

The case is a major Commerce Clause decision because the Court said labor relations could affect interstate commerce enough for federal regulation. That is the constitutional move at the center of the ruling, and it is why the case comes up in federalism discussions.

### New Deal

Jones & Laughlin fits the New Deal because it supported Roosevelt-era efforts to make the national government more active in the economy. It shows how New Deal reforms were not just about policy, but also about expanding what Congress could legally do.

### [Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States](/fundamentals-american-government/key-terms/heart-atlanta-motel-v-united-states)

Both cases show the Court using the Commerce Clause to support broad federal regulation. Heart of Atlanta Motel later applied that logic in the civil rights context, so it is a helpful comparison for seeing how the Court treated national economic power across different issues.

## On the AP Exam

A quiz item may give you a short scenario about a factory, union activity, or federal labor law and ask which case allows Congress to regulate it. You use NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. to identify the idea that local labor disputes can be regulated when they substantially affect interstate commerce.

In a short essay or discussion prompt, you might trace how the case changed the balance between state and national power. The strongest move is to connect the ruling to the New Deal and the broader expansion of federal authority under the Commerce Clause. If the prompt mentions unions, collective bargaining, or the National Labor Relations Act, this case is usually the constitutional backing you bring in.

## NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. vs Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States

Both cases use the Commerce Clause to support federal power, but they show that power in different policy areas. NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. is about labor relations and the NLRA, while Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States is about civil rights and public accommodations.

## Key Takeaways

- NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. is the 1937 Supreme Court case that upheld the National Labor Relations Act.
- The ruling said Congress can regulate private labor activity when it has a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
- The case marked a major expansion of federal power and a shift away from a narrow reading of the Commerce Clause.
- It is one of the clearest New Deal cases for showing how the national government became more active in economic regulation.
- If a prompt asks about labor rights, union organizing, or federalism during the New Deal, this case is a strong example to use.

## FAQs

### What is NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. in Intro to American Government?

It is a 1937 Supreme Court case that upheld the National Labor Relations Act. The Court ruled that Congress could regulate labor relations in private companies when those practices substantially affect interstate commerce. In American Government, it is a major federalism and Commerce Clause case.

### Why does NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. matter for federalism?

It shows a shift toward stronger national power. Instead of treating labor relations as purely local, the Court allowed federal regulation because the effects reached the national economy. That is a big example of the balance between state and federal authority changing during the New Deal.

### How is this case related to the Commerce Clause?

The ruling relied on the Commerce Clause to justify federal action. The Court said Congress could regulate activities that have a substantial effect on interstate commerce, even if the dispute itself happens inside one state. That broader reading became very influential in later cases.

### Is this the same thing as the National Labor Relations Act?

No. The NLRA is the law, and NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. is the Supreme Court case that upheld it. The case is the constitutional approval that made the law more secure and helped protect federal labor regulation.

## Related Study Guides

- [3.2 The Evolution of American Federalism](/fundamentals-american-government/unit-3/2-evolution-american-federalism/study-guide/2DbHDXxxgY8XbUVy)

## About This Document

Canonical Fiveable pages are available as Markdown at the same path plus `.md`.

- [llms.txt](https://fiveable.me/llms.txt): index of Fiveable's sections and URL patterns
- [llms-full.txt](https://fiveable.me/llms-full.txt): complete subject and unit listing
- [MCP server](https://fiveable.me/mcp): call Fiveable as tools instead of fetching pages (`https://fiveable.me/api/mcp`)
- [MCP server for AP teachers](https://fiveable.me/mcp/teachers): a teacher's classes, assignments and AP-rubric grading (`https://fiveable.me/api/mcp/teacher`)

## Structured Data

```json
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"LearningResource","@id":"https://fiveable.me/fundamentals-american-government/key-terms/nlrb-v-jones-and-laughlin-steel-corp#resource","name":"NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. | American Government","url":"https://fiveable.me/fundamentals-american-government/key-terms/nlrb-v-jones-and-laughlin-steel-corp","learningResourceType":"Concept explainer","educationalLevel":"AP® / High School","about":{"@id":"https://fiveable.me/fundamentals-american-government/key-terms/nlrb-v-jones-and-laughlin-steel-corp#term"},"audience":{"@type":"EducationalAudience","educationalRole":"student"},"dateModified":"2026-07-03T02:24:19.093Z","isPartOf":{"@type":"Collection","name":"Intro to American Government Key Terms","url":"https://fiveable.me/fundamentals-american-government/key-terms"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Fiveable","url":"https://fiveable.me"}},{"@type":"DefinedTerm","@id":"https://fiveable.me/fundamentals-american-government/key-terms/nlrb-v-jones-and-laughlin-steel-corp#term","name":"NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.","description":"NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. is the 1937 Supreme Court case that upheld the National Labor Relations Act and let the federal government regulate labor relations tied to interstate commerce.","url":"https://fiveable.me/fundamentals-american-government/key-terms/nlrb-v-jones-and-laughlin-steel-corp","inDefinedTermSet":{"@type":"DefinedTermSet","name":"Intro to American Government Key Terms","url":"https://fiveable.me/fundamentals-american-government/key-terms"}},{"@type":"FAQPage","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"What is NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. in Intro to American Government?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"It is a 1937 Supreme Court case that upheld the National Labor Relations Act. The Court ruled that Congress could regulate labor relations in private companies when those practices substantially affect interstate commerce. In American Government, it is a major federalism and Commerce Clause case."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Why does NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. matter for federalism?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"It shows a shift toward stronger national power. Instead of treating labor relations as purely local, the Court allowed federal regulation because the effects reached the national economy. That is a big example of the balance between state and federal authority changing during the New Deal."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How is this case related to the Commerce Clause?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"The ruling relied on the Commerce Clause to justify federal action. The Court said Congress could regulate activities that have a substantial effect on interstate commerce, even if the dispute itself happens inside one state. That broader reading became very influential in later cases."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Is this the same thing as the National Labor Relations Act?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No. The NLRA is the law, and NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. is the Supreme Court case that upheld it. The case is the constitutional approval that made the law more secure and helped protect federal labor regulation."}}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Intro to American Government","item":"https://fiveable.me/fundamentals-american-government"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Key Terms","item":"https://fiveable.me/fundamentals-american-government/key-terms"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Unit 3","item":"https://fiveable.me/fundamentals-american-government/unit-3"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp."}]}]}
```