Normal forms in help simplify complex formulas. moves to the front, eliminates existential quantifiers, and breaks formulas into conjunctions of disjunctions.

These transformations are crucial for automated reasoning and theorem proving. By converting formulas to these standard forms, we can apply efficient algorithms for logical inference and manipulation, making complex logical problems more manageable.

Normal Forms of First-Order Logic

Definition of Prenex Normal Form

Top images from around the web for Definition of Prenex Normal Form
Top images from around the web for Definition of Prenex Normal Form
  • Prenex normal form is a first-order logic formula where all quantifiers appear at the beginning of the formula, followed by a quantifier-free matrix
  • The quantifiers are grouped together and moved to the front of the formula, while the remaining formula (matrix) contains no quantifiers
  • Example: xy(P(x)Q(y))\forall x \exists y (P(x) \rightarrow Q(y)) is in prenex normal form

Definition of Skolem Normal Form

  • Skolem normal form is a formula in prenex normal form where all existential quantifiers have been eliminated by replacing existentially quantified variables with Skolem functions or Skolem constants
  • Existentially quantified variables are replaced with functions (Skolem functions) that depend on the universally quantified variables preceding them
  • If no universally quantified variables precede an existentially quantified variable, it is replaced with a constant (Skolem constant)
  • Example: xy(P(x,f(x,y))Q(y))\forall x \forall y (P(x, f(x, y)) \rightarrow Q(y)) is in Skolem normal form, where ff is a Skolem function

Definition of Clausal Normal Form

  • Clausal normal form, also known as , is a formula in Skolem normal form that consists of a conjunction of clauses, where each clause is a disjunction of literals
    • A literal is an atomic formula or the negation of an atomic formula
    • In clausal normal form, the conjunction of clauses is often represented as a set of clauses, and each clause is represented as a set of literals
  • The formula is a conjunction (AND) of clauses, and each clause is a disjunction (OR) of literals
  • Example: {{P(a),¬Q(b)},{¬P(c),R(d)}}\{\{P(a), \neg Q(b)\}, \{\neg P(c), R(d)\}\} is in clausal normal form, representing the formula (P(a)¬Q(b))(¬P(c)R(d))(P(a) \vee \neg Q(b)) \wedge (\neg P(c) \vee R(d))

Conversion to Prenex Normal Form

Moving Quantifiers to the Beginning of the Formula

  • To convert a formula into prenex normal form, move all quantifiers to the beginning of the formula while preserving the formula's
  • Use the following equivalence rules to move quantifiers:
    • (xA)Bx(AB)(\forall x A) \wedge B \equiv \forall x (A \wedge B), if xx does not occur free in BB
    • (xA)Bx(AB)(\exists x A) \wedge B \equiv \exists x (A \wedge B), if xx does not occur free in BB
    • (xA)Bx(AB)(\forall x A) \vee B \equiv \forall x (A \vee B), if xx does not occur free in BB
    • (xA)Bx(AB)(\exists x A) \vee B \equiv \exists x (A \vee B), if xx does not occur free in BB
  • Example: xP(x)yQ(y)\forall x P(x) \wedge \exists y Q(y) can be converted to xy(P(x)Q(y))\forall x \exists y (P(x) \wedge Q(y))

Renaming Variables and Obtaining the Matrix

  • Rename variables as necessary to avoid variable capture when moving quantifiers
    • Variable capture occurs when a variable becomes bound by a quantifier it was not originally bound by
  • After moving all quantifiers to the beginning of the formula, the remaining formula is called the matrix, which should be quantifier-free
  • Example: xy(P(x)yQ(y))\forall x \exists y (P(x) \wedge \forall y Q(y)) should be renamed to xy(P(x)zQ(z))\forall x \exists y (P(x) \wedge \forall z Q(z)) to avoid variable capture, with the matrix being P(x)zQ(z)P(x) \wedge \forall z Q(z)

Transformation to Skolem Normal Form

Eliminating Existential Quantifiers

  • To convert a formula in prenex normal form into Skolem normal form, eliminate all existential quantifiers by replacing existentially quantified variables with Skolem functions or Skolem constants
  • For each existentially quantified variable, introduce a new function symbol (Skolem function) that depends on the universally quantified variables preceding the existential quantifier
    • If there are no universally quantified variables preceding the existential quantifier, replace the existentially quantified variable with a new constant symbol (Skolem constant)
  • Example: xyP(x,y)\forall x \exists y P(x, y) can be converted to xP(x,f(x))\forall x P(x, f(x)), where ff is a Skolem function

Removing Existential Quantifiers and Obtaining Skolem Normal Form

  • After replacing all existentially quantified variables with Skolem functions or constants, remove the existential quantifiers from the formula
  • The resulting formula is in Skolem normal form, containing only universal quantifiers followed by a quantifier-free matrix
  • Example: xyzwP(x,y,z,w)\forall x \exists y \forall z \exists w P(x, y, z, w) can be converted to xzP(x,f(x),z,g(x,z))\forall x \forall z P(x, f(x), z, g(x, z)), where ff and gg are Skolem functions

Conversion to Clausal Normal Form

Converting the Matrix to Conjunctive Normal Form

  • To convert a formula in Skolem normal form into clausal normal form, first convert the matrix of the formula into conjunctive normal form (CNF)
  • Use the following equivalence rules to convert the matrix into CNF:
    • Eliminate implications (AB¬ABA \rightarrow B \equiv \neg A \vee B) and bi-implications (AB(AB)(BA)A \leftrightarrow B \equiv (A \rightarrow B) \wedge (B \rightarrow A))
    • Move negations inward using De Morgan's laws (¬(AB)¬A¬B\neg (A \wedge B) \equiv \neg A \vee \neg B and ¬(AB)¬A¬B\neg (A \vee B) \equiv \neg A \wedge \neg B) and double negation elimination (¬¬AA\neg \neg A \equiv A)
    • Distribute disjunctions over conjunctions using the distributive law (A(BC)(AB)(AC)A \vee (B \wedge C) \equiv (A \vee B) \wedge (A \vee C))
  • Example: x(P(x)(Q(x)R(x)))\forall x (P(x) \rightarrow (Q(x) \wedge R(x))) can be converted to x((¬P(x)Q(x))(¬P(x)R(x)))\forall x ((\neg P(x) \vee Q(x)) \wedge (\neg P(x) \vee R(x)))

Representing Clauses as Sets of Literals

  • After converting the matrix into CNF, the formula will consist of a conjunction of clauses, where each clause is a disjunction of literals
  • Drop the universal quantifiers from the formula, as they are implicit in clausal normal form
  • Represent the conjunction of clauses as a set of clauses, and each clause as a set of literals
  • The resulting set of clauses is the clausal normal form of the original formula
  • Example: xy((P(x)Q(y))(¬P(x)R(y)))\forall x \forall y ((P(x) \vee Q(y)) \wedge (\neg P(x) \vee R(y))) can be represented as {{P(x),Q(y)},{¬P(x),R(y)}}\{\{P(x), Q(y)\}, \{\neg P(x), R(y)\}\} in clausal normal form

Key Terms to Review (18)

: The symbol ∀ represents universal quantification in first-order logic, indicating that a statement applies to all members of a specified domain. This concept is fundamental in constructing logical expressions that assert a property or relation holds for every element within a particular set, connecting deeply with the structure of predicates and the rules governing quantifiers.
∃ (Existential Quantifier): The existential quantifier, denoted by ∃, is a symbol used in formal logic to express that there exists at least one element in a given domain that satisfies a specified property. It plays a crucial role in making statements about the existence of objects and is foundational in various logical expressions involving predicates, variables, and connectives.
¬: The symbol '¬' represents negation in formal logic, indicating that a statement is false or not true. This operator is essential for constructing logical expressions and understanding the relationships between statements, particularly when dealing with contradictions, truth values, and logical equivalences.
Clausal Normal Form: Clausal normal form is a specific way of structuring logical expressions, particularly in predicate logic, where the formula is expressed as a conjunction of disjunctions. This means that the expression is made up of multiple clauses, each of which is a disjunction of literals, allowing for a clear and standardized representation of logical statements. This form is crucial in various logical operations, including resolution and automated theorem proving.
Conjunctive Normal Form: Conjunctive Normal Form (CNF) is a way of structuring logical expressions where a formula is represented as a conjunction of one or more disjunctions of literals. This format is important because it helps in simplifying complex logical expressions and makes them easier to process, especially when applying resolution techniques in proofs and theorem proving. CNF is also closely linked with other normal forms, including disjunctive normal form, and is foundational in converting formulas into simpler equivalents for automated reasoning.
Disjunctive Normal Form: Disjunctive Normal Form (DNF) is a standard way of representing logical expressions where a formula is expressed as an OR of ANDs. In DNF, each clause consists of literals combined using AND, and these clauses are connected using OR. This format allows for easy evaluation of logical expressions and plays a crucial role in simplifying and converting logical formulas into other normal forms.
Existential Instantiation: Existential instantiation is a rule of inference in first-order logic that allows one to infer the existence of a specific individual from an existentially quantified statement. This rule enables us to replace an existential quantifier with a name or constant, allowing us to work with the specific instance while maintaining the truth of the original statement. It plays a crucial role in constructing formal proofs and manipulating logical expressions, particularly when transforming logical formulas into forms that are more suitable for proof strategies.
First-order logic: First-order logic (FOL) is a formal system used in mathematics, philosophy, linguistics, and computer science that allows for the expression of statements about objects and their properties using quantifiers, variables, and predicates. It extends propositional logic by enabling the representation of relationships between objects and can express more complex statements involving variables and quantification.
Herbrand's Theorem: Herbrand's Theorem provides a fundamental result in first-order logic, establishing a connection between the satisfiability of a first-order logic formula and the existence of a finite model. It asserts that a first-order formula is satisfiable if and only if there is a finite set of ground instances of the formula's predicates that is satisfiable. This theorem plays a critical role in understanding the relationship between different normal forms and the process of Skolemization, as well as the completeness of resolution methods in logic.
Logical Equivalence: Logical equivalence is a relationship between two statements or formulas where they always yield the same truth value in every possible interpretation. This means that if one statement is true, the other must also be true, and if one is false, so is the other. Logical equivalence is crucial in various logical forms and transformations, allowing for the simplification of expressions and aiding in the analysis of logical systems.
Matrix form: Matrix form refers to a specific way of expressing logical formulas, particularly in the context of predicate logic, where quantifiers and variables are organized systematically. This structured representation facilitates the transformation of logical expressions into different normal forms, such as prenex or clausal normal forms, which are crucial for automated theorem proving and various logical computations.
Prenex Normal Form: Prenex normal form is a way of structuring logical formulas in which all the quantifiers are moved to the front of the formula, resulting in a sequence of quantifiers followed by a quantifier-free matrix. This form is essential because it simplifies the analysis and manipulation of logical statements, allowing for easier conversions to other forms like clausal normal form and facilitating processes like Skolemization and the application of Herbrand's theorem.
Propositional Logic: Propositional logic is a branch of logic that deals with propositions, which are statements that can be either true or false. This area of logic focuses on the relationships between these propositions and how they can be combined using logical connectives such as 'and', 'or', 'not', and 'if...then'. Understanding propositional logic is essential for various processes like resolution and theorem proving, as well as for establishing the foundational principles in artificial intelligence and computer science.
Quantifiers: Quantifiers are symbols or phrases used in formal logic to express the extent to which a predicate applies to a set of objects. They allow for the formulation of statements that can refer to all elements (universal quantifier) or at least one element (existential quantifier) within a domain, making them crucial for constructing logical expressions and proofs. Understanding quantifiers is essential for working with formal proofs, transforming statements into prenex form, and interpreting models of first-order theories.
Resolution principle: The resolution principle is a rule of inference used in formal logic and automated theorem proving that enables the derivation of a conclusion from a set of premises by resolving pairs of clauses. This principle is significant as it facilitates the process of proving the unsatisfiability of a set of propositions through refutation, allowing for the simplification and transformation of logical expressions into a clausal normal form that can be easily managed.
Skolem Normal Form: Skolem Normal Form is a specific type of logical formula that is generated by a process called Skolemization. This form eliminates existential quantifiers from a formula while preserving its satisfiability, transforming it into a universally quantified formula. By doing this, Skolem Normal Form makes it easier to analyze the structure of logical statements, particularly in relation to concepts such as prenex form and clausal normal form.
Skolemization: Skolemization is a process in logic that eliminates existential quantifiers from logical formulas by replacing them with specific function symbols, effectively transforming the formula into an equivalent one that is quantifier-free. This technique is crucial for converting logical expressions into forms that are easier to manipulate, especially in relation to normalization and proof procedures.
Universal Instantiation: Universal instantiation is a rule of inference in formal logic that allows one to derive specific instances from a universally quantified statement. This principle is essential in reasoning because it enables the application of general statements to particular cases, facilitating the construction of formal proofs, ensuring soundness and completeness of proof systems, and working with theories and axioms in first-order logic.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.