Glossary

9.4 Negation and Quantifiers

3 min read•august 7, 2024

Quantifiers and are key to understanding logical statements. We'll look at how to negate universal and existential statements, flipping quantifiers and negating predicates.

These rules are crucial for working with complex logical expressions. We'll also explore for quantifiers and learn about contradictory and equivalent forms of quantified statements.

Negating Quantified Statements

Negating Universal Statements

Top images from around the web for Negating Universal Statements

  • forall x v1.4 – News For Wombats View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • forall x v1.4 – News For Wombats View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Negating Universal Statements

  • forall x v1.4 – News For Wombats View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • forall x v1.4 – News For Wombats View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 2
  • Universal statements use the ∀\forall (for all) to make assertions about all elements in a domain
  • To negate a universal statement, change the universal quantifier ∀\forall to the ∃\exists (there exists) and negate the predicate
  • For example, the negation of ∀xP(x)\forall x P(x) is ∃x¬P(x)\exists x \neg P(x), meaning there exists at least one element in the domain for which the predicate is false
  • Negating a universal statement is equivalent to asserting that there is a counterexample to the original statement

Negating Existential Statements

  • Existential statements use the existential quantifier ∃\exists (there exists) to assert the existence of at least one element in the domain that satisfies the predicate
  • To negate an existential statement, change the existential quantifier ∃\exists to the universal quantifier ∀\forall (for all) and negate the predicate
  • For instance, the negation of ∃xP(x)\exists x P(x) is ∀x¬P(x)\forall x \neg P(x), meaning the predicate is false for all elements in the domain
  • Negating an existential statement is equivalent to asserting that no element in the domain satisfies the original predicate

Quantifier Negation Rules

  • The negation of a universally quantified statement ∀xP(x)\forall x P(x) is an existentially quantified statement with a negated predicate ∃x¬P(x)\exists x \neg P(x)
  • Conversely, the negation of an existentially quantified statement ∃xP(x)\exists x P(x) is a universally quantified statement with a negated predicate ∀x¬P(x)\forall x \neg P(x)
  • These rules can be summarized as:
    • ¬(∀xP(x))≡∃x¬P(x)\neg(\forall x P(x)) \equiv \exists x \neg P(x)
    • ¬(∃xP(x))≡∀x¬P(x)\neg(\exists x P(x)) \equiv \forall x \neg P(x)
  • Applying these rules allows for the correct negation of quantified statements while maintaining

Logical Equivalences with Quantifiers

De Morgan's Laws for Quantifiers

  • De Morgan's laws for quantifiers are analogous to De Morgan's laws for propositional logic
  • The first law states that the negation of a conjunction of two quantified statements is equivalent to the disjunction of their negations:
    • ¬(∀xP(x)∧∀xQ(x))≡∃x¬P(x)∨∃x¬Q(x)\neg(\forall x P(x) \wedge \forall x Q(x)) \equiv \exists x \neg P(x) \vee \exists x \neg Q(x)
  • The second law states that the negation of a disjunction of two quantified statements is equivalent to the conjunction of their negations:
    • ¬(∃xP(x)∨∃xQ(x))≡∀x¬P(x)∧∀x¬Q(x)\neg(\exists x P(x) \vee \exists x Q(x)) \equiv \forall x \neg P(x) \wedge \forall x \neg Q(x)
  • These laws allow for the simplification and manipulation of complex quantified statements

Contradictory and Equivalent Forms

  • Contradictory forms are pairs of quantified statements that cannot both be true simultaneously
  • For example, ∀xP(x)\forall x P(x) and ∃x¬P(x)\exists x \neg P(x) are contradictory because they assert opposite claims about the elements in the domain
  • Equivalent forms are pairs of quantified statements that have the same truth value for all possible interpretations
  • For instance, ∀x(P(x)→Q(x))\forall x (P(x) \rightarrow Q(x)) is equivalent to ∃xP(x)→∃xQ(x)\exists x P(x) \rightarrow \exists x Q(x), as they both express the idea that if there exists an element satisfying PP, then there must also exist an element satisfying QQ
  • Recognizing contradictory and equivalent forms helps in understanding the relationships between quantified statements and their logical implications

Key Terms to Review (15)

∀: The symbol ∀ represents the universal quantifier in logic, indicating that a statement applies to all elements within a particular domain. This concept is essential for expressing general truths and plays a crucial role in understanding predicates and translating categorical propositions into formal logic.
∃: The symbol ∃ represents the existential quantifier in logic, which asserts that there exists at least one element in a specified domain that satisfies a given property. It connects closely to the notion of predicates and is essential for expressing statements about existence within various logical frameworks.
De Morgan's Laws: De Morgan's Laws are fundamental rules in logic that describe the relationship between conjunctions (AND) and disjunctions (OR) through negation. They state that the negation of a conjunction is equivalent to the disjunction of the negations, and the negation of a disjunction is equivalent to the conjunction of the negations. These principles play a vital role in understanding how to manipulate logical expressions, particularly in truth tables and proofs.
Double Negation: Double negation refers to the logical principle that negating a negation results in the affirmation of the original statement. In other words, if a statement is negated twice, it is equivalent to the original statement itself. This concept plays a crucial role in understanding truth values, logical equivalence, inference rules, and the handling of negation in both propositional and predicate logic.
Existential Quantifier: The existential quantifier is a logical symbol used to express that there exists at least one element in a particular domain for which a given predicate holds true. This concept is crucial for expressing statements involving existence and is represented by the symbol $$\exists$$, often translated as 'there exists' or 'for some'.
For all x: 'For all x' is a universal quantifier used in formal logic to indicate that a statement applies to every element within a specified domain. This term establishes a condition that must hold true for each individual in that set, highlighting the universality of the assertion being made. It plays a critical role in formulating logical statements, particularly when discussing properties or relationships applicable to all elements of a particular category.
Logical Equivalence: Logical equivalence refers to the relationship between two statements or propositions that have the same truth value in every possible scenario. This concept is crucial for understanding how different expressions can represent the same logical idea, allowing for the simplification and transformation of logical statements while preserving their meanings.
Negating Quantified Statements: Negating quantified statements involves determining the opposite truth value of statements that include quantifiers such as 'for all' (universal quantifier) or 'there exists' (existential quantifier). This process is essential in logic as it helps to understand how the negation affects the scope and meaning of the quantified statements, leading to the correct interpretation of logical expressions.
Negation: Negation is a logical operation that takes a proposition and produces a new proposition that is true if the original proposition is false, and false if the original proposition is true. This concept is foundational in logic, impacting how statements are formulated and evaluated across various forms of reasoning.
Negation (¬): Negation, represented by the symbol ¬, is a logical operation that takes a proposition and transforms it into its opposite truth value. If a proposition is true, its negation is false, and vice versa. Understanding negation is crucial because it helps in constructing truth tables, recognizing tautologies and contradictions, applying quantifiers correctly, and forming well-structured formulas.
Quantifier negation: Quantifier negation is a logical principle that describes how the negation of quantified statements affects their meaning. Specifically, it states that negating a universally quantified statement transforms it into an existentially quantified statement and vice versa. This principle highlights the relationship between universal quantifiers (like 'for all') and existential quantifiers (like 'there exists'), which is crucial for understanding logical expressions and reasoning.
Quantifier scope ambiguity: Quantifier scope ambiguity occurs when a statement with quantifiers can be interpreted in multiple ways based on the arrangement of those quantifiers. This ambiguity often arises in logical expressions, where the placement of quantifiers like 'for all' ($$\forall$$) and 'there exists' ($$\exists$$) affects the meaning of the statement. Understanding this concept is crucial when dealing with negation and quantifiers, as the interpretation of a statement can change dramatically depending on how the quantifiers are scoped.
There exists y: The phrase 'there exists y' is a quantifier used in logic to express that there is at least one element, denoted by 'y', within a given set or domain that satisfies a specified property or condition. This concept is crucial when discussing the existence of certain elements in logical statements, often paired with other quantifiers like 'for all' to establish the nature of relationships among elements.
Translation rules: Translation rules are systematic methods used to convert natural language statements into symbolic logic expressions. These rules help bridge the gap between everyday language and formal logic, allowing for precise reasoning and analysis. By applying translation rules, one can accurately represent complex ideas in a structured format that facilitates logical operations and deductions.
Universal Quantifier: The universal quantifier is a symbol used in logic and mathematics to indicate that a statement applies to all members of a specified set. It is commonly represented by the symbol '∀', and its role is crucial in expressing generalizations and universal truths in logical expressions.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Back
Practice QuizGlossary
Practice QuizGlossary
Next guide