Fiveable
Fiveable
Fiveable
Fiveable

🏷️Financial Statement Analysis

🏷️financial statement analysis review

9.3 Substantive testing procedures

8 min readLast Updated on August 21, 2024

Substantive testing is a crucial part of financial statement audits, designed to detect material misstatements. Auditors use these procedures to gather evidence supporting the accuracy of financial assertions, examining account balances, transactions, and disclosures to verify their validity.

The process involves analytical procedures, tests of details, and external confirmations. Risk assessment guides the approach, with higher risks requiring more persuasive evidence. Auditors must balance efficiency with the need for sufficient appropriate evidence, using sampling techniques and leveraging technology to enhance their work.

Nature of substantive testing

  • Substantive testing forms a critical component of financial statement audits aimed at detecting material misstatements
  • Auditors employ substantive procedures to gather evidence supporting the accuracy and completeness of financial statement assertions
  • These tests directly examine account balances, transactions, and disclosures to verify their validity and proper reporting

Definition and purpose

Top images from around the web for Definition and purpose
Top images from around the web for Definition and purpose
  • Audit procedures designed to detect material misstatements at the assertion level
  • Aim to obtain direct evidence about the validity of transactions, account balances, and disclosures
  • Complement risk assessment procedures and tests of controls in the audit process
  • Help auditors form an opinion on the fairness of financial statements

Types of substantive procedures

  • Analytical procedures evaluate plausible relationships among financial and non-financial data
  • Tests of details examine specific transactions, account balances, or other financial statement elements
  • Dual-purpose tests simultaneously test controls and gather substantive evidence
  • External confirmations obtain direct written responses from third parties

Risk assessment considerations

  • Auditor's understanding of the entity and its environment influences substantive testing approach
  • Assessment of inherent and control risks guides the nature, timing, and extent of substantive procedures
  • Higher assessed risks typically require more persuasive audit evidence
  • Risk of material misstatement at the assertion level determines specific substantive procedures

Substantive analytical procedures

  • Analytical procedures involve comparing recorded amounts to expected values based on relevant information
  • These techniques help identify unusual fluctuations or relationships that may indicate material misstatements
  • Auditors use analytical procedures throughout the audit process, including planning, fieldwork, and conclusion phases

Trend analysis techniques

  • Examine changes in account balances or ratios over time to identify unexpected variations
  • Compare current period data to historical results and industry benchmarks
  • Utilize graphical representations to visualize trends and spot anomalies
  • Consider factors such as seasonality, economic conditions, and changes in business operations

Ratio analysis methods

  • Calculate financial ratios to assess relationships between different accounts or financial statement elements
  • Compare computed ratios to industry standards, prior periods, and management's expectations
  • Analyze profitability ratios (gross margin, return on assets) to evaluate financial performance
  • Examine liquidity ratios (current ratio, quick ratio) to assess short-term solvency

Predictive analysis approaches

  • Develop expectations for account balances or financial statement relationships using statistical models
  • Utilize regression analysis to forecast values based on historical data and relevant variables
  • Compare actual results to predicted values and investigate significant discrepancies
  • Consider non-financial data (production volumes, employee headcount) in developing predictions

Tests of details

  • Tests of details involve examining specific transactions, account balances, or disclosures
  • These procedures provide direct evidence about the existence, accuracy, and completeness of financial statement elements
  • Auditors select items for testing based on risk assessment and professional judgment

Vouching vs tracing

  • Vouching involves examining supporting documentation for recorded transactions or balances
  • Trace recorded amounts back to source documents to verify accuracy and completeness
  • Vouch from source documents to accounting records to test for unrecorded transactions
  • Select samples based on materiality, risk assessment, and population characteristics

Confirmation procedures

  • Obtain direct written responses from third parties to verify account balances or transactions
  • Commonly used for accounts receivable, bank balances, and investments
  • Design confirmation requests to address specific audit assertions (existence, rights and obligations)
  • Evaluate reliability of confirmations based on respondent's knowledge, objectivity, and independence

Physical observation techniques

  • Directly observe tangible assets to verify their existence and condition
  • Conduct inventory counts to test the accuracy of reported quantities
  • Inspect fixed assets to confirm their physical presence and operational status
  • Document observations through photographs, videos, or detailed notes

Recalculation methods

  • Independently recalculate amounts to verify mathematical accuracy of reported figures
  • Recompute depreciation expense to test fixed asset valuations
  • Recalculate interest expense on loans to verify accuracy of reported amounts
  • Use computer-assisted audit techniques for large-scale recalculations

Sampling in substantive testing

  • Sampling enables auditors to draw conclusions about entire populations by examining a subset of items
  • Proper sampling techniques help balance audit efficiency with the need for sufficient appropriate evidence
  • Auditors must carefully design and evaluate samples to support their audit opinions

Statistical vs non-statistical sampling

  • Statistical sampling uses probability theory to quantify sampling risk and precision
  • Non-statistical sampling relies on auditor judgment to determine sample size and evaluate results
  • Statistical methods include attribute sampling (for tests of controls) and variables sampling (for substantive tests)
  • Non-statistical approaches often involve judgmental or haphazard selection of sample items

Sample size determination

  • Consider factors such as population size, expected error rate, and desired level of assurance
  • Use statistical formulas or tables to calculate sample sizes for statistical sampling
  • Apply professional judgment to determine appropriate sample sizes for non-statistical sampling
  • Adjust sample sizes based on risk assessment and the nature of the population being tested

Evaluation of sampling results

  • Project sample results to the entire population to estimate potential misstatements
  • Consider both quantitative and qualitative factors when evaluating sampling results
  • Investigate and understand the nature of identified errors or deviations
  • Assess whether sampling results provide sufficient appropriate evidence to support audit conclusions

Audit evidence

  • Audit evidence forms the foundation for the auditor's opinion on financial statements
  • Auditors must obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to support their conclusions
  • The nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures determine the quality and quantity of evidence gathered

Sources of audit evidence

  • Internal sources include accounting records, management representations, and entity-generated reports
  • External sources encompass third-party confirmations, industry data, and public records
  • Physical evidence obtained through observation and inspection procedures
  • Analytical procedures generate evidence through the analysis of financial and non-financial data

Reliability of audit evidence

  • Consider the source and nature of evidence when assessing its reliability
  • Evidence obtained from independent external sources generally more reliable than internally generated information
  • Original documents typically more reliable than photocopies or facsimiles
  • Direct evidence obtained by the auditor (observation, recalculation) generally more reliable than indirect evidence

Sufficiency and appropriateness

  • Sufficiency refers to the quantity of audit evidence obtained
  • Appropriateness relates to the quality, relevance, and reliability of evidence
  • Auditors must exercise professional judgment to determine when sufficient appropriate evidence has been gathered
  • Consider the risk of material misstatement and the persuasiveness of evidence when evaluating sufficiency and appropriateness

Substantive testing by account

  • Auditors tailor substantive procedures to address specific risks and assertions for each significant account or class of transactions
  • The nature, timing, and extent of testing vary based on the assessed risks and characteristics of each account

Revenue and receivables

  • Perform cutoff tests to ensure proper revenue recognition in the correct period
  • Confirm accounts receivable balances with customers to verify existence and accuracy
  • Analyze sales returns and allowances to assess the reasonableness of reported net revenue
  • Test cash receipts subsequent to year-end to evaluate the collectibility of receivables

Inventory and cost of goods sold

  • Observe physical inventory counts to verify existence and condition of inventory
  • Test inventory pricing by examining purchase invoices and recalculating unit costs
  • Perform analytical procedures to assess the reasonableness of inventory turnover and gross margins
  • Evaluate inventory obsolescence by examining slow-moving items and market conditions

Fixed assets and depreciation

  • Inspect significant fixed asset additions to verify existence and proper capitalization
  • Recalculate depreciation expense to test the accuracy of reported amounts
  • Review repair and maintenance accounts for potential capital expenditures
  • Assess the reasonableness of useful lives and residual values used in depreciation calculations

Liabilities and expenses

  • Confirm loan balances and terms with lenders to verify completeness and accuracy
  • Perform search for unrecorded liabilities by examining subsequent cash disbursements
  • Analyze accrued expenses for completeness and proper cutoff
  • Test payroll expenses by recalculating wages and examining supporting documentation

Timing of substantive procedures

  • The timing of substantive procedures impacts the relevance and reliability of audit evidence obtained
  • Auditors must balance the need for timely evidence with the desire to minimize disruption to the client's operations

Interim vs year-end testing

  • Interim testing performed before the balance sheet date to spread audit work and identify issues early
  • Year-end testing focuses on updating interim work and addressing high-risk areas
  • Consider the effectiveness of internal controls when determining the extent of interim testing
  • Perform roll-forward procedures to cover the period between interim testing and year-end

Subsequent events procedures

  • Review transactions and events occurring after the balance sheet date but before the audit report date
  • Inquire of management about any significant subsequent events or transactions
  • Examine board minutes, financial reports, and legal documents for evidence of subsequent events
  • Assess the impact of identified subsequent events on financial statement disclosures and audit opinion

Documentation requirements

  • Audit documentation provides evidence of the auditor's work and supports the conclusions reached
  • Proper documentation enables experienced auditors to understand the nature, timing, and extent of procedures performed

Working papers for substantive tests

  • Document the objectives, procedures performed, and results of substantive tests
  • Include copies of relevant source documents, schedules, and analyses
  • Clearly identify the preparer, reviewer, and dates of preparation and review
  • Cross-reference working papers to facilitate navigation and demonstrate completeness

Evidence of procedures performed

  • Maintain detailed records of samples selected and items examined
  • Document the basis for analytical expectations and conclusions drawn
  • Include evidence of management's responses to inquiries and follow-up procedures performed
  • Retain copies of external confirmations and other third-party evidence obtained

Technology in substantive testing

  • Advancements in technology have transformed the way auditors perform substantive testing
  • Auditors leverage various tools and techniques to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of audit procedures

Data analytics tools

  • Utilize data visualization software to identify trends, patterns, and anomalies in large datasets
  • Apply machine learning algorithms to detect unusual transactions or relationships
  • Perform continuous auditing by analyzing entire populations rather than samples
  • Use predictive analytics to develop more precise expectations for analytical procedures

Computer-assisted audit techniques

  • Employ audit software to extract and analyze data from client systems
  • Automate routine audit tasks such as recalculations and comparisons
  • Use scripting languages to develop custom audit routines for complex testing scenarios
  • Leverage robotic process automation to perform repetitive audit procedures

Limitations of substantive testing

  • While substantive testing provides valuable evidence, auditors must recognize its inherent limitations
  • Understanding these limitations helps auditors design appropriate procedures and interpret results

Inherent limitations

  • Sampling risk exists when conclusions based on samples may differ from those based on entire populations
  • Fraud involving collusion or management override may be difficult to detect through substantive procedures alone
  • Timing differences between the occurrence of transactions and the performance of audit procedures
  • Limitations in the availability and reliability of audit evidence for certain assertions or accounts

Professional skepticism considerations

  • Maintain an attitude of professional skepticism throughout the audit process
  • Critically evaluate audit evidence obtained through substantive procedures
  • Remain alert to contradictory evidence or circumstances that may indicate potential misstatements
  • Consider the possibility of management bias in accounting estimates and judgments


© 2025 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2025 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.