The () protects at-risk species through a careful listing process. This process involves petitions, reviews, and public input to determine if a species should be classified as threatened or endangered.

Once listed, species receive protection for their critical habitats. These are areas essential for survival and recovery. Agencies like the and manage the listing process and enforce protections.

ESA Listing Categories

Endangered Species Act Overview and Species Classifications

Top images from around the web for Endangered Species Act Overview and Species Classifications
Top images from around the web for Endangered Species Act Overview and Species Classifications
  • Act (ESA) enacted in 1973 to protect and recover imperiled species and ecosystems
  • Provides framework for conservation and protection of threatened and endangered species
  • face likely endangerment in the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range
    • Requires proactive conservation measures to prevent further decline
    • Examples include polar bears and northern spotted owls
  • Endangered species currently in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range
    • Necessitates immediate and intensive conservation efforts
    • Examples include California condor and leatherback sea turtle
  • ESA listing categories determine level of protection and conservation priorities for species

Listing Process and Criteria

  • Species can be listed based on five factors:
    • Present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of habitat or range
    • Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes
    • Disease or predation
    • Inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms
    • Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence
  • Listing decisions based on best available scientific and commercial data
  • Process involves public input and to ensure accuracy and transparency

Listing Process

Petition Submission and Initial Review

  • Listing petition initiates formal process for species consideration under ESA
  • Any individual or organization can submit a petition to list, delist, or reclassify a species
  • Petition must include detailed information about the species' status, threats, and scientific data
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) receives and reviews petition
  • 90-day finding determines if petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information
    • If substantial information found, species moves to 12-month review
    • If not substantial, petition denied and process ends

Comprehensive Status Review and Final Determination

  • 12-month finding involves comprehensive review of species' status and threats
  • Agencies conduct in-depth analysis of scientific data, population trends, and conservation efforts
  • allows input from scientists, stakeholders, and general public
  • Three possible outcomes of 12-month finding:
    • Listing warranted: Species proposed for listing as threatened or endangered
    • Listing not warranted: Species not listed, process ends
    • Listing warranted but precluded: Species added to candidate list for future consideration
  • Proposed rule published in Federal Register if listing warranted
  • Final rule issued after additional public comment period, typically within one year of proposed rule

Habitat Protection

Critical Habitat Designation and Management

  • areas containing physical or biological features essential to species conservation
  • Designation occurs concurrently with listing or within one year of final listing rule
  • Two types of critical habitat:
    • Occupied habitat: Areas currently used by the species
    • Unoccupied habitat: Areas not currently used but essential for species recovery
  • Critical habitat designation considers economic impact, national security, and other relevant factors
  • Federal agencies must consult with USFWS or NMFS before taking actions that may affect critical habitat
  • Examples of critical habitat: nesting beaches for sea turtles, specific forest types for northern spotted owls
  • Critical habitat designation does not create wildlife refuge or restrict private landowner activities
  • Provides additional layer of review for federally funded or permitted projects in designated areas

Recovery Planning and Habitat Conservation

  • Recovery plans developed for listed species outline actions needed to achieve self-sustaining populations
  • Habitat conservation plans (HCPs) allow non-federal landowners to develop land while conserving species
  • Safe Harbor Agreements encourage voluntary management and restoration of habitats on private lands
  • Candidate Conservation Agreements promote conservation actions for species before they become listed

Responsible Agencies

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Roles and Responsibilities

  • Primary agency responsible for terrestrial and freshwater species under ESA
  • Manages listing process, critical habitat designation, and recovery planning for these species
  • Conducts consultations with federal agencies on actions affecting listed species
  • Enforces prohibitions against take of listed species
  • Provides grants and technical assistance for species conservation efforts
  • Oversees permitting for activities involving listed species (research, habitat restoration)
  • Examples of USFWS-managed species: bald eagle, gray wolf, Florida panther

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Marine Species Management

  • Responsible for most marine and anadromous species under ESA
  • Also known as NOAA Fisheries, part of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Manages listing process, critical habitat designation, and recovery planning for marine species
  • Conducts consultations on federal actions affecting marine listed species
  • Develops and implements recovery plans for marine endangered and threatened species
  • Enforces regulations to prevent take of listed marine species
  • Collaborates with international partners on conservation of migratory marine species
  • Examples of NMFS-managed species: humpback whale, green sea turtle, Atlantic salmon

Key Terms to Review (20)

Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Great Oregon: Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Great Oregon is a landmark Supreme Court case from 1995 that addressed the interpretation of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) regarding the definition of 'harm' to endangered species. The court ruled that the term 'harm' could include habitat modification and destruction, thereby extending protections under the ESA to include actions that adversely affect species even if the species are not directly killed or injured.
Best scientific data available: Best scientific data available refers to the most reliable and credible scientific information and research that can be accessed when making decisions regarding the conservation and management of species and habitats. This concept is crucial in ensuring that decisions are based on sound science, particularly during the ESA listing process and critical habitat designation, where accurate data influences the protection of endangered species.
Biological assessment: A biological assessment is an evaluation process used to determine the health of a particular ecosystem, species, or habitat based on various biological indicators. This assessment helps in identifying the presence and condition of endangered species and their habitats, and is a critical step in regulatory processes that aim to protect biodiversity. It plays a crucial role in decisions regarding conservation efforts, habitat protection, and compliance with environmental laws.
Critical Habitat: Critical habitat refers to specific geographic areas that contain features essential for the conservation of a threatened or endangered species, as designated under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). These areas may require special management considerations or protection to ensure the survival and recovery of the species, and their designation is a key step in the ESA listing process. Understanding critical habitat is crucial for recognizing its implications in enforcement actions and the controversies that can arise when development and conservation interests clash.
Endangered species: An endangered species is a type of organism that is at risk of extinction due to a drastic decline in its population, loss of habitat, or threats from human activities. These species are often protected by law, and efforts are made to conserve them and their habitats to prevent their extinction.
Endangered Species Act: The Endangered Species Act (ESA) is a key piece of environmental legislation enacted in 1973 aimed at the conservation of species at risk of extinction and their habitats. The act emphasizes the protection of both endangered and threatened species, establishing a framework for federal and state cooperation to recover populations, which connects deeply with various aspects of environmental law, policy, and conservation strategies.
Environmental Impact Statement: An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is a document required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) that outlines the potential environmental effects of a proposed federal action. It serves as a critical tool for decision-making by assessing the impacts on the environment and exploring alternatives to minimize harm. This process ensures that environmental factors are weighed alongside economic and technical considerations in federal projects.
ESA: The Endangered Species Act (ESA) is a key piece of environmental legislation enacted in 1973 aimed at protecting threatened and endangered species and their habitats. The ESA establishes a framework for the conservation of species at risk of extinction, focusing on the listing process for species and the designation of critical habitats that are essential for their survival. It emphasizes the need for collaboration between federal agencies, states, and local governments in conservation efforts.
Habitat conservation plan: A habitat conservation plan (HCP) is a detailed strategy designed to protect and conserve endangered species and their habitats while allowing for sustainable land use and development. HCPs are critical tools under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), ensuring that activities impacting these species are balanced with the need for economic development, ultimately aiming to minimize harm to endangered species and promote recovery efforts.
Incidental Take Permit: An incidental take permit is a legal authorization issued under the Endangered Species Act that allows for the unintended take of a protected species during otherwise lawful activities. This permit is crucial for balancing development and conservation, as it provides landowners and developers with a way to proceed with projects that may pose risks to endangered species, as long as they implement an approved habitat conservation plan to minimize impacts.
National Marine Fisheries Service: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is a branch of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) focused on the stewardship of the nation’s ocean resources and their habitat. NMFS plays a critical role in implementing the Endangered Species Act (ESA) as it pertains to marine species, including overseeing the listing process for endangered species and designating critical habitats essential for their survival.
Peer Review: Peer review is a process by which scholarly work, research, or ideas are evaluated by others who are experts in the same field. This essential mechanism serves to ensure the quality, validity, and credibility of research findings, which is particularly important in fields like environmental policy and law where decisions can significantly impact ecosystems and communities. Through this process, studies are scrutinized for methodology, accuracy, and relevance before being published or accepted for use in decision-making.
Petition process: The petition process is a formal procedure that allows individuals or groups to request government action, such as the listing of a species as endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). This process serves as a critical mechanism for public involvement in environmental protection efforts, providing a way for citizens to advocate for species conservation and influence policy decisions.
Public Comment Period: A public comment period is a designated timeframe during which individuals, organizations, and stakeholders can provide their input or feedback on proposed government actions, regulations, or policies. This period is crucial for promoting transparency and public participation in the decision-making processes, allowing the voices of affected communities to be heard before final decisions are made.
Section 10 Permit: A Section 10 permit is a legal authorization under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) that allows for the incidental take of endangered or threatened species during otherwise lawful activities. This permit is crucial for ensuring compliance with the ESA while enabling development and land-use projects to move forward. The process includes demonstrating that the applicant's actions will not jeopardize the continued existence of the species or destroy their critical habitat.
Stakeholder engagement: Stakeholder engagement refers to the process of involving individuals, groups, or organizations that may be affected by or have an influence on a decision, project, or policy. This process helps ensure that diverse perspectives are considered, fostering transparency and inclusivity in decision-making related to environmental issues.
Status review: A status review is a formal assessment process used to evaluate the conservation status of a species or ecosystem, particularly in the context of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). This process helps determine whether a species should be listed as endangered or threatened, or if its current status should be changed. It includes analyzing new scientific data, population trends, and habitat conditions to ensure that decisions about protection are based on the most up-to-date information.
Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill: Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill is a landmark Supreme Court case from 1978 that addressed the conflict between federal projects and endangered species protection under the Endangered Species Act. This case underscored the importance of preserving biodiversity, particularly highlighting the plight of the snail darter fish, and established the precedent that federal agencies must adhere to environmental laws when planning development projects, shaping how regulatory agencies function in relation to environmental protections.
Threatened species: A threatened species is a plant or animal species that is likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. This designation helps prioritize conservation efforts and protect biodiversity by focusing resources on species that are at risk of extinction, ensuring they have the necessary protections under environmental laws.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is a federal agency under the Department of the Interior responsible for the management, conservation, and protection of fish, wildlife, and their habitats. It plays a crucial role in implementing various environmental laws and regulations, particularly concerning the conservation of endangered species and the restoration of ecosystems, making it integral to efforts aimed at biodiversity preservation and natural resource management.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.