8.1 Principles of experimental design
4 min read•august 13, 2024
Experimental design is crucial for engineers to systematically study factors affecting processes. By applying key principles like and , we can minimize bias and improve precision in our experiments. This topic lays the foundation for conducting meaningful studies.
Understanding factors, levels, and responses is essential for effective experimental design. We'll explore common designs like completely randomized and factorial, as well as advanced techniques like . These tools help engineers optimize processes and make data-driven decisions.
Principles of Experimental Design
Key Principles and Terminology
Top images from around the web for Key Principles and Terminology
MicroRNA panel in serum reveals novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer [PeerJ] View original
Is this image relevant?
Genetics: The next step in Mendelian randomization | eLife View original
Is this image relevant?
MicroRNA panel in serum reveals novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer [PeerJ] View original
Is this image relevant?
Genetics: The next step in Mendelian randomization | eLife View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Top images from around the web for Key Principles and Terminology
MicroRNA panel in serum reveals novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer [PeerJ] View original
Is this image relevant?
Genetics: The next step in Mendelian randomization | eLife View original
Is this image relevant?
MicroRNA panel in serum reveals novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer [PeerJ] View original
Is this image relevant?
Genetics: The next step in Mendelian randomization | eLife View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
- Experimental design is a systematic approach to planning and conducting experiments to obtain meaningful and valid conclusions about the factors affecting a process or system
- The key principles of experimental design include randomization, replication, and , which help to minimize bias, reduce variability, and improve the precision of the experimental results
- Factors are the independent variables that are manipulated or controlled during the experiment to observe their effect on the (temperature, pressure, concentration)
- Levels are the specific values or settings of the factors at which the experiment is conducted (low, medium, high)
- The response variable, also known as the dependent variable, is the measurable outcome of the experiment that is affected by the factors (yield, purity, strength)
Experimental Units and Treatments
- Experimental units are the entities or subjects on which the experiment is performed, such as materials, products, or processes (steel samples, chemical reactors, manufacturing lines)
- Treatments are the combinations of factor levels applied to the experimental units
- Proper selection and assignment of treatments to experimental units are crucial for obtaining reliable and interpretable results
- Treatments should be well-defined, reproducible, and representative of the conditions of interest
Importance of Randomization, Replication, and Blocking
Randomization
- Randomization is the process of randomly assigning treatments to experimental units, which helps to minimize bias and ensure that any differences in the response variable are due to the factors being studied
- Randomization helps to distribute any unknown or uncontrollable factors evenly across the treatments, reducing their impact on the experimental results
- Randomization can be achieved through the use of random number tables, computer-generated random numbers, or physical methods (coin flips, dice rolls)
Replication and Blocking
- Replication involves repeating the experiment multiple times under the same conditions, which allows for the estimation of and increases the precision of the results
- Replication helps to distinguish between the true effects of the factors and the random variation inherent in the experimental process
- Blocking is a technique used to reduce the variability in the response variable caused by known sources of variation that are not of primary interest in the experiment (batch-to-batch variation, operator differences)
- Blocking involves grouping similar experimental units together and assigning treatments within each block, which helps to isolate the effect of the blocking factor from the main factors of interest
Factors, Levels, and Responses
Identifying Factors and Levels
- To identify the factors in an experimental design, consider the variables that are believed to have an effect on the response variable and can be manipulated or controlled during the experiment
- Factors can be quantitative (temperature, pressure) or qualitative (material type, process method)
- Determine the levels for each factor by selecting a range of values or settings that cover the desired experimental space and are practically feasible to implement
- The number of levels for each factor depends on the complexity of the relationship between the factor and the response variable, as well as the available resources
Selecting Response Variables
- Identify the response variable by considering the measurable outcome that is relevant to the objectives of the experiment and can be used to assess the effect of the factors
- Response variables can be quantitative (yield, strength) or qualitative (color, appearance)
- Ensure that the response variable is quantifiable, reliable, and sensitive to changes in the factors being studied
- Multiple response variables may be necessary to fully characterize the performance of the system or process under study
Experimental Designs and Applications
Common Experimental Designs
- (CRD) is the simplest type of experimental design, where treatments are randomly assigned to experimental units without any blocking or restrictions
- (RCBD) is used when there is a known source of variation that can be controlled through blocking, and treatments are randomly assigned within each block
- is a special case of RCBD where the blocking is done in two dimensions (rows and columns) to control for two sources of variation simultaneously
- involves studying the effect of two or more factors simultaneously, where each factor has two or more levels, and all possible combinations of factor levels are tested
- includes all possible combinations of factor levels, while uses a subset of the combinations to reduce the experimental effort
Advanced Experimental Designs
- Response surface methodology (RSM) is used to optimize a response variable by fitting a polynomial model to the experimental data and identifying the optimal settings of the factors
- RSM designs, such as and , allow for the estimation of quadratic effects and interactions between factors
- is used when some factors are harder to change than others, and the experiment is divided into main plots (for hard-to-change factors) and subplots (for easy-to-change factors)
- Split-plot designs are useful in industrial settings where certain factors (oven temperature) are more difficult or costly to change than others (product formulation)
Key Terms to Review (27)
Alternative Hypothesis: The alternative hypothesis is a statement that suggests there is a significant effect or difference in a statistical test, contrasting with the null hypothesis which posits no effect or difference. This concept is fundamental to hypothesis testing, as it forms the basis for determining whether observed data provides sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative.
ANOVA: ANOVA, or Analysis of Variance, is a statistical method used to compare the means of three or more groups to determine if at least one group mean is significantly different from the others. This technique helps in hypothesis testing by assessing the influence of one or more factors on a dependent variable, making it essential for experimental designs and understanding interactions between factors.
Blocking: Blocking is a design technique used in experimental research to reduce the effects of variability among experimental units by grouping similar units together. This approach helps to isolate the treatment effects by ensuring that comparisons are made within these homogeneous groups, leading to more accurate results. By minimizing the impact of confounding variables, blocking enhances the precision of the experiment and allows for better assessment of the treatment effects.
Box-Behnken Designs: Box-Behnken designs are a type of response surface methodology used in experimental design to build a second-order polynomial model for a response variable without needing a full three-level factorial experiment. These designs are particularly efficient for optimizing processes because they require fewer experimental runs while still providing a comprehensive view of the relationships between factors, enabling researchers to explore and understand complex interactions.
Central Composite Designs: Central composite designs are a type of experimental design used to build a second-order (quadratic) model for the response variable without needing a full three-level factorial experiment. They are particularly useful for optimizing processes where multiple factors influence the outcome. These designs enhance the efficiency of experiments by combining factorial or fractional factorial designs with additional points, helping in assessing curvature in the response surface.
Completely randomized design: A completely randomized design is a type of experimental design where all subjects are assigned to treatments purely by chance, eliminating any bias in the assignment process. This approach ensures that each treatment group is comparable, allowing for the valid assessment of treatment effects. It emphasizes randomization as a fundamental principle, providing a straightforward way to control for confounding variables.
Confounding Variable: A confounding variable is an external factor that can affect the outcome of a study by being related to both the independent and dependent variables, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. It often obscures the true relationship between the variables being studied, making it difficult to establish cause-and-effect connections. Recognizing and controlling for confounding variables is essential in research design to ensure valid and reliable results.
Control group: A control group is a baseline group in an experiment that does not receive the treatment or intervention being tested, allowing researchers to compare the effects of the treatment against this standard. By keeping all other conditions the same, the control group helps to isolate the effect of the treatment, ensuring that any observed changes in the experimental group can be attributed to the treatment itself. This comparison is essential for determining the validity of the experimental results.
Experimental error: Experimental error refers to the difference between the measured value and the true value in an experiment, arising from various factors such as limitations in measurement tools, environmental influences, and variability in the experimental process. Understanding experimental error is crucial for accurately interpreting data and drawing valid conclusions, as it directly impacts the reliability of results and the overall quality of the experimental design.
External validity: External validity refers to the extent to which the results of a study can be generalized to, or have relevance for settings, people, times, and measures beyond the specific conditions of the research. It emphasizes the importance of how well findings can apply outside the experimental context, impacting the generalizability of conclusions drawn from research. Achieving high external validity often involves careful consideration of the sample selection, setting of the experiment, and real-world applicability of the outcomes.
Factorial design: Factorial design is a type of experimental design that investigates the effects of two or more factors simultaneously, allowing researchers to evaluate not only the individual effects of each factor but also the interactions between them. This approach enables a comprehensive understanding of how different factors contribute to an outcome, making it particularly useful for optimizing processes and improving product quality.
Fractional factorial design: Fractional factorial design is a statistical method used in experimental design that allows researchers to study multiple factors simultaneously while only using a fraction of the full factorial design. This approach is especially useful when dealing with a large number of factors, as it helps to identify the most significant ones with fewer runs, saving time and resources. By strategically selecting a subset of the possible combinations of factor levels, researchers can still uncover important interactions and effects without needing to test every possible combination.
Full factorial design: A full factorial design is an experimental setup that investigates all possible combinations of factors and their levels to evaluate their effects on a response variable. This approach provides a comprehensive understanding of how multiple factors interact with each other, allowing for the assessment of both main effects and interaction effects. By systematically varying each factor, researchers can gain insights into complex relationships and optimize processes effectively.
Internal validity: Internal validity refers to the extent to which a study accurately establishes a cause-and-effect relationship between the treatment and the outcome, minimizing the impact of confounding variables. High internal validity means that any observed changes in the dependent variable are directly attributable to the manipulation of the independent variable. This concept is crucial in experimental design, as it ensures that the results are credible and can be relied upon for drawing conclusions.
Latin Square Design: A Latin Square Design is a statistical method used in experimental design that controls for two sources of variability by arranging treatments in a grid format. This design helps ensure that each treatment appears only once in each row and column, minimizing the potential for confounding variables and allowing for more accurate comparisons of treatment effects. By systematically organizing the treatments, researchers can isolate the effect of the treatments while accounting for variations related to rows and columns.
Null hypothesis: The null hypothesis is a statement that suggests there is no significant effect or relationship between variables in a study, serving as a starting point for statistical testing. It acts as a benchmark against which alternative hypotheses are tested, guiding researchers in determining if observed data is statistically significant or likely due to chance.
Randomization: Randomization is the process of assigning experimental units to different treatment groups using random methods to ensure that each unit has an equal chance of being assigned to any group. This technique helps eliminate bias and ensures that the results are not influenced by external factors. It is a fundamental principle in experimental design, particularly when exploring interactions between multiple factors in factorial designs.
Randomized complete block design: A randomized complete block design is an experimental setup where subjects are divided into blocks based on a specific characteristic, and treatments are randomly assigned within each block. This method helps to control for variability among experimental units by ensuring that each treatment appears in each block, allowing for more accurate comparisons of treatment effects. By grouping similar subjects together, researchers can isolate the treatment effect from the block effect.
Regression analysis: Regression analysis is a statistical method used to examine the relationships between variables, typically focusing on predicting the value of a dependent variable based on one or more independent variables. It helps in understanding how changes in predictor variables affect the outcome, which is crucial for making informed decisions in engineering applications. This technique is widely utilized for data analysis, model fitting, and evaluating experimental results.
Replication: Replication refers to the process of repeating an experiment or study to verify results and ensure reliability. It plays a crucial role in experimental design by helping to confirm the findings of an initial study, thereby providing stronger evidence for conclusions drawn. The ability to replicate experiments under similar conditions can reveal the consistency of results across different samples and settings, contributing to the overall validity of statistical analyses.
Response surface methodology: Response surface methodology (RSM) is a collection of mathematical and statistical techniques used for modeling and analyzing problems in which a response of interest is influenced by several variables. This approach is widely applied in the optimization of processes, allowing for the identification of optimal conditions and improving product quality by systematically exploring the relationships between input factors and responses.
Response Variable: A response variable is the main variable that researchers are interested in measuring or predicting in a study. It is influenced by independent variables and is often used to understand the effect of different treatments or conditions. Understanding the response variable is crucial in both logistic regression and experimental design, as it helps to assess the outcomes of the research.
Sampling method: A sampling method is a technique used to select individuals or units from a larger population to create a subset that represents the population as a whole. Choosing an appropriate sampling method is critical in experimental design because it affects the validity and reliability of the results, ensuring that the sample reflects the characteristics of the entire population.
Split-plot design: A split-plot design is an experimental design that involves two levels of experimental units, typically where one treatment is applied to whole plots and another treatment is applied to subplots within those whole plots. This design is particularly useful when dealing with factors that are difficult or costly to change, allowing researchers to analyze interactions between factors while maintaining a clear structure for data analysis. By utilizing both whole plots and subplots, this design helps in managing variability and improving the efficiency of the experiment.
Treatment effect: The treatment effect refers to the difference in outcomes between groups that receive different treatments or interventions. It is a fundamental concept in experimental research, as it helps to determine whether an intervention is effective and quantifies its impact on the outcome variable, allowing for comparisons across various experimental conditions.
Type I Error: A Type I error occurs when a statistical test incorrectly rejects a true null hypothesis, essentially signaling that a difference or effect exists when it actually does not. This error is commonly referred to as a 'false positive' and represents a significant concern in hypothesis testing, as it can lead to misleading conclusions and potentially flawed decision-making.
Type II Error: A Type II error occurs when a statistical test fails to reject a null hypothesis that is false, meaning that the test concludes there is no effect or difference when there actually is one. This concept is crucial for understanding the effectiveness and reliability of hypothesis testing, as it relates directly to the power of a test and the consequences of incorrect conclusions drawn from experimental data.