9.5 Employee inventions and works made for hire

Employee inventions and works made for hire are crucial aspects of employment law. They determine who owns the intellectual property created during employment, balancing the interests of employers and employees. Understanding these concepts is essential for protecting rights and avoiding disputes in the workplace.

Ownership of employee inventions depends on factors like scope of employment and use of company resources. Works made for hire doctrine governs copyright ownership for employee-created works. Both areas involve complex legal principles that shape the rights and obligations of employers and employees regarding intellectual property.

Ownership of employee inventions

• In the context of employment law, ownership of inventions created by employees is a key issue that arises between employers and employees
• Determining who owns the rights to an employee's invention depends on various factors, such as the scope of employment, use of company resources, and the nature of the invention
• Understanding the legal principles governing ownership of employee inventions is crucial for both employers and employees to protect their respective interests

Inventions made within scope of employment

Top images from around the web for Inventions made within scope of employment

• 

  Ownership - Free of Charge Creative Commons Handwriting image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Free Roles & Responsibilities Matrix PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Functions of Human Resources Management | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ownership - Free of Charge Creative Commons Handwriting image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Free Roles & Responsibilities Matrix PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Inventions made within scope of employment

• 

  Ownership - Free of Charge Creative Commons Handwriting image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Free Roles & Responsibilities Matrix PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Functions of Human Resources Management | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ownership - Free of Charge Creative Commons Handwriting image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Free Roles & Responsibilities Matrix PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Generally, inventions made by an employee within the scope of their employment are owned by the employer
• Scope of employment refers to the duties and responsibilities assigned to the employee as part of their job
• If an employee creates an invention while performing their job duties or during work hours, the employer typically has ownership rights over the invention
• For example, if a software engineer develops a new algorithm as part of their assigned project, the employer would likely own the rights to that invention

Inventions made using company resources

• Inventions made by employees using company resources, such as equipment, facilities, or funding, are often considered the property of the employer
• The use of company resources in the creation of an invention establishes a connection between the invention and the employee's work for the company
• Even if the invention is not directly related to the employee's job duties, the use of company resources may give the employer a claim to ownership
• For instance, if an employee uses the company's laboratory equipment to develop a new chemical compound outside of their regular work hours, the employer may still assert ownership rights

Inventions related to employee's work

• Inventions that are related to the employee's work or the employer's business are more likely to be owned by the employer
• If an employee creates an invention that falls within the same field or industry as their employer's business, it may be considered related to their work
• This is particularly true if the invention builds upon or improves the employer's existing products, services, or processes
• For example, if a mechanical engineer employed by a car manufacturer invents a new type of fuel-efficient engine, the invention would likely be considered related to their work and owned by the employer

Employee invention assignment agreements

• Employee invention assignment agreements are contracts that govern the ownership of inventions created by employees during the course of their employment
• These agreements are commonly used by employers to ensure that they retain ownership rights over inventions made by their employees
• Invention assignment agreements can be entered into either before or after an invention is created, with different implications for enforceability

Pre-invention assignment agreements

• Pre-invention assignment agreements are contracts signed by employees before they begin working for a company or before an invention is created
• These agreements typically require employees to assign ownership rights of any future inventions they create during their employment to the employer
• Pre-invention assignment agreements are commonly included as part of an employment contract or as a separate document signed at the start of employment
• The enforceability of pre-invention assignment agreements may depend on factors such as the scope of the agreement, consideration provided to the employee, and state laws

Post-invention assignment agreements

• Post-invention assignment agreements are contracts signed by employees after an invention has already been created
• These agreements transfer ownership rights of a specific invention from the employee to the employer
• Post-invention assignment agreements are often used when an invention is created outside the scope of an employee's regular duties or when there is no pre-existing invention assignment agreement in place
• The enforceability of post-invention assignment agreements may be subject to scrutiny, particularly if the employee did not receive adequate consideration for assigning their rights

Enforceability of assignment agreements

• The enforceability of employee invention assignment agreements can vary depending on state laws and specific circumstances
• Some states have laws that limit the scope of invention assignment agreements or require employers to provide additional consideration to employees for assigning their rights
• Courts may also consider factors such as the reasonableness of the agreement, the employee's bargaining power, and whether the agreement is overly broad or restrictive
• Employers should carefully draft invention assignment agreements to ensure they are enforceable and comply with applicable laws, while employees should review and understand the terms of such agreements before signing

Works made for hire doctrine

• The works made for hire doctrine is a principle in copyright law that determines ownership of copyrightable works created by employees or commissioned parties
• Under this doctrine, the employer or commissioning party is considered the author and owner of the work, rather than the individual who actually created it
• The works made for hire doctrine applies to two categories of works: those created by employees within the scope of their employment and those specially commissioned and agreed to be works made for hire

Ownership of copyrightable works

• When a work qualifies as a work made for hire, the employer or commissioning party owns all rights to the work, including the copyright
• This means that the employer has the exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, display, perform, and create derivative works based on the original work
• The individual creator of the work, whether an employee or independent contractor, does not retain any ownership rights in the work
• For example, if a graphic designer creates a logo for a company as part of their job duties, the company would own the copyright to the logo as a work made for hire

Employee-created works vs independent contractors

• The works made for hire doctrine applies differently to works created by employees and those created by independent contractors
• Works created by employees within the scope of their employment automatically qualify as works made for hire, and the employer owns the copyright
• Works created by independent contractors only qualify as works made for hire if they fall into certain categories (such as a contribution to a collective work or a part of a motion picture) and there is a written agreement specifying that the work is a work made for hire
• If an independent contractor's work does not meet these requirements, the contractor retains the copyright unless there is an express written agreement transferring ownership to the commissioning party

Scope of employment for works made for hire

• For a work created by an employee to qualify as a work made for hire, it must be created within the scope of their employment
• Factors considered in determining whether a work falls within the scope of employment include:
  • Whether the work is the kind the employee is employed to perform
  • Whether the work occurs substantially within authorized work hours and space
  • Whether the work is actuated, at least in part, by a purpose to serve the employer
• If an employee creates a work outside the scope of their employment, such as a personal project unrelated to their job duties, the work may not qualify as a work made for hire, and the employee may retain ownership rights

Employer vs employee rights

• The ownership of employee inventions and works often involves a balance between the rights of the employer and the rights of the employee
• Employers have an interest in protecting their intellectual property and ensuring that they benefit from the creative output of their employees
• Employees, on the other hand, may seek to retain some control over their inventions and works, particularly if they believe they are entitled to additional compensation or recognition

Employee's right to royalties or compensation

• In some cases, employees may be entitled to royalties or additional compensation for inventions or works they create during their employment
• This can occur when there is an agreement in place that provides for such compensation or when the employee's invention or work generates significant value for the employer
• However, the right to royalties or compensation is not automatic and often depends on the specific terms of the employment agreement or applicable laws
• Employees should carefully review their employment contracts and any invention assignment agreements to understand their rights and potential entitlements

Employer's right to patent or copyright

• Employers generally have the right to seek patent protection for inventions created by their employees within the scope of their employment
• Similarly, employers own the copyright for works made for hire created by their employees
• By securing patent or copyright protection, employers can prevent others from using, making, or selling the invention or work without permission
• Employers may also have the right to license or assign the rights to the invention or work to third parties
• However, employers must follow proper procedures and meet legal requirements when applying for patents or registering copyrights

Negotiating ownership and rights

• In some situations, employers and employees may negotiate the ownership and rights related to employee inventions or works
• This can involve discussing the scope of invention assignment agreements, the employee's right to use the invention or work for personal purposes, or the sharing of royalties or other benefits
• Negotiating ownership and rights requires open communication and a willingness to find a mutually beneficial arrangement
• Employees with significant bargaining power, such as those with unique skills or expertise, may have more leverage in negotiating favorable terms
• Employers should be open to reasonable requests from employees while still protecting their legitimate business interests

Protecting trade secrets and confidential information

• In addition to inventions and works, employers often seek to protect their trade secrets and confidential information from unauthorized disclosure or use by employees
• Trade secrets are valuable, non-public information that provides a competitive advantage to the company, such as formulas, processes, or customer lists
• Confidential information encompasses a broader range of sensitive business information that the company wishes to keep private

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs)

• Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) are contracts that prohibit employees from disclosing or using the company's trade secrets and confidential information without authorization
• NDAs typically define the scope of confidential information covered and the employee's obligations to maintain secrecy
• Employers often require employees to sign NDAs as a condition of employment or when working on sensitive projects
• NDAs can help prevent employees from sharing valuable information with competitors or using it for their own benefit after leaving the company

Confidentiality provisions in employment contracts

• Employment contracts may include confidentiality provisions that outline the employee's duty to protect the company's trade secrets and confidential information
• These provisions may specify the types of information considered confidential, the employee's obligations to safeguard the information, and the consequences of unauthorized disclosure
• Confidentiality provisions in employment contracts reinforce the importance of maintaining the secrecy of sensitive business information and provide a legal basis for enforcing those obligations
• Employers should ensure that confidentiality provisions are clearly drafted and that employees understand their responsibilities under the contract

Misappropriation of trade secrets by employees

• Misappropriation of trade secrets occurs when an employee acquires, uses, or discloses the company's trade secrets without authorization and in violation of a duty of confidentiality
• This can happen when an employee steals trade secrets to use for their own benefit, shares them with a competitor, or uses them to start a competing business
• Misappropriation of trade secrets is a serious legal offense and can result in civil and criminal penalties
• Employers can take legal action against employees who misappropriate trade secrets, seeking injunctions to prevent further disclosure and damages for any harm caused to the company

Disputes over employee inventions and works

• Disputes can arise between employers and employees over the ownership, use, and compensation related to employee inventions and works
• These disputes may involve disagreements over the interpretation of invention assignment agreements, the scope of employment, or the employee's right to royalties or other benefits
• Resolving disputes over employee inventions and works can be complex and may require legal intervention

Breach of contract claims

• If an employee violates the terms of an invention assignment agreement or confidentiality provisions in their employment contract, the employer may have a claim for breach of contract
• Breach of contract claims can seek damages for any losses suffered by the employer as a result of the employee's actions, such as lost profits or the cost of developing alternative solutions
• Employers may also seek injunctive relief to prevent the employee from further violating the contract or using the invention or work without permission
• To prevail on a breach of contract claim, the employer must prove that a valid contract existed, the employee breached the contract, and the breach caused harm to the employer

Intellectual property infringement claims

• Disputes over employee inventions and works may also involve claims of intellectual property infringement
• If an employee uses or discloses the employer's patented invention or copyrighted work without authorization, the employer may have a claim for patent or copyright infringement
• Infringement claims can result in significant damages, including lost profits, reasonable royalties, and statutory damages in cases of willful infringement
• Employers may also seek injunctions to stop the infringing activity and prevent further unauthorized use of their intellectual property
• In some cases, employees may also assert intellectual property infringement claims against their employers if they believe their rights have been violated

Resolution through arbitration or litigation

• Disputes over employee inventions and works can be resolved through various means, including negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or litigation
• Arbitration is a private dispute resolution process where a neutral third party (the arbitrator) hears the case and makes a binding decision
• Arbitration can be faster and less expensive than litigation, and the proceedings are generally confidential
• Litigation involves filing a lawsuit in court and having the case decided by a judge or jury
• Litigation can be a lengthy and costly process, but it may be necessary for complex cases or when the parties cannot reach an agreement through other means
• The choice between arbitration and litigation may depend on the terms of the employment agreement, the nature of the dispute, and the preferences of the parties involved
• Regardless of the method chosen, it is important for both employers and employees to seek legal counsel to protect their rights and interests in disputes over inventions and works