12.1 Framework and components of ecological risk assessment
3 min read•august 7, 2024
Ecological risk assessment is a structured approach to evaluate potential environmental impacts. It involves , where hazards are identified and conceptual models developed, and exposure and , which quantifies stressor-receptor relationships.
The framework includes defining assessment endpoints, selecting measurement endpoints, and using a for analysis. This process helps scientists and decision-makers understand and manage risks to ecosystems from various stressors like pollutants or habitat changes.
Problem Formulation
Defining the Problem and Identifying Hazards
Top images from around the web for Defining the Problem and Identifying Hazards
Figure 6.3 View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Developing an Ecological Risk Assessment to Effectively Manage Marine Resources in ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Applying the water safety plan to water reuse: towards a conceptual risk management framework ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Figure 6.3 View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Developing an Ecological Risk Assessment to Effectively Manage Marine Resources in ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Defining the Problem and Identifying Hazards
Figure 6.3 View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Developing an Ecological Risk Assessment to Effectively Manage Marine Resources in ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Applying the water safety plan to water reuse: towards a conceptual risk management framework ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Figure 6.3 View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Developing an Ecological Risk Assessment to Effectively Manage Marine Resources in ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Problem formulation establishes the goals, breadth, and focus of the ecological risk assessment by defining the problem and identifying potential hazards
- Hazard identification involves determining the types of adverse effects or hazards that may be caused by the stressor of concern (chemical contaminants, physical disturbances, biological invasions)
- Conceptual model is a visual representation that describes the relationships between ecological entities and the stressors to which they may be exposed, including sources of stressors, routes of exposure, and ecological effects
- Assessment endpoints are explicit expressions of the environmental values to be protected, such as survival, growth, and reproduction of a particular species or the structure and function of a specific ecosystem
- Measurement endpoints are quantitative expressions of an observed or measured response to a stressor that is related to the valued ecological entity chosen as an assessment endpoint (abundance of a species, biomass of a population, diversity of a community)
Developing the Conceptual Model and Selecting Endpoints
- Conceptual model development involves identifying the sources of stressors, the pathways by which they reach ecological receptors, and the potential effects they may cause
- Assessment endpoints selection involves choosing specific ecological entities and attributes that are valued by society and are potentially at risk from the stressor (threatened or endangered species, commercially important fisheries, recreational areas)
- Measurement endpoints selection involves choosing measurable responses that can be used to evaluate the effects of the stressor on the assessment endpoints (survival rates, growth rates, species diversity indices)
- Conceptual model and endpoints provide a framework for designing the exposure and effects assessment and for interpreting the results in terms of ecological risks
Exposure and Effects Assessment
Tiered Approach and Stressor-Response Relationships
- Tiered approach is used in exposure and effects assessment to progressively increase the complexity and realism of the assessment as needed to reduce uncertainty and improve risk estimates
- Tier 1 assessments use conservative assumptions and simple models to provide screening-level estimates of exposure and effects (maximum exposure concentrations, toxicity benchmarks)
- Tier 2 assessments use more realistic exposure scenarios and site-specific data to refine the exposure and effects estimates (measured exposure concentrations, site-specific toxicity tests)
- Tier 3 assessments use complex models and field studies to provide the most realistic estimates of exposure and effects (population models, mesocosm studies)
- Stressor-response relationships describe the quantitative relationship between the level of exposure to a stressor and the magnitude of the ecological effect (dose-response curves, species sensitivity distributions)
Exposure Pathways and Ecological Effects
- Exposure pathways are the routes by which ecological receptors come into contact with stressors, such as ingestion of contaminated food or water, dermal absorption, or inhalation
- Exposure assessment involves estimating the magnitude, frequency, and duration of exposure to the stressor for each relevant exposure pathway (measured or modeled exposure concentrations)
- Effects assessment involves estimating the magnitude of the ecological effects that may result from exposure to the stressor, based on the stressor-response relationships and the sensitivity of the ecological receptors (toxicity tests, field studies)
- Ecological effects can occur at different levels of biological organization, from individual organisms to populations, communities, and ecosystems (reduced growth and reproduction, changes in species composition and diversity, alterations in ecosystem functions)
Key Terms to Review (15)
Biodiversity: Biodiversity refers to the variety and variability of life forms within a given ecosystem, including the diversity of species, genetic variations, and ecological processes. This concept is crucial because it influences ecosystem health, resilience, and the services ecosystems provide, connecting to environmental quality and the balance of ecological interactions.
Biological agents: Biological agents are living organisms or substances derived from living organisms that can cause adverse effects on ecological systems and human health. These agents include pathogens, parasites, and toxins produced by microorganisms, which can impact biodiversity, ecosystem stability, and the well-being of various species, including humans. Understanding biological agents is crucial in ecological risk assessments as they help evaluate the potential hazards posed to ecosystems by various stressors.
Chemical Pollutants: Chemical pollutants are substances that are introduced into the environment and cause harmful effects on ecosystems, wildlife, and human health. They can originate from various sources, including industrial processes, agricultural activities, and waste disposal, leading to contamination of air, water, and soil. Understanding chemical pollutants is crucial for assessing ecological risks and implementing effective management strategies.
Community engagement: Community engagement refers to the process of involving community members in decision-making and actions that affect their environment and well-being. This concept emphasizes the importance of collaboration between stakeholders, including local residents, governmental agencies, and environmental organizations, to foster a sense of ownership and responsibility towards ecological health and sustainability.
Data gaps: Data gaps refer to the absence or lack of sufficient information and data necessary for making informed decisions, particularly in regulatory and assessment processes. These gaps can hinder the ability to evaluate potential risks, monitor environmental impacts, and establish effective regulatory measures. Understanding these gaps is crucial for developing robust frameworks in environmental science and risk assessment.
Ecosystem Health: Ecosystem health refers to the ability of an ecosystem to maintain its structure, functions, and processes over time while adapting to environmental changes and pressures. This concept is closely tied to understanding how pollutants and other stressors affect ecosystems, which involves various interdisciplinary approaches combining ecology, toxicology, and environmental science.
Effects assessment: Effects assessment refers to the process of evaluating the potential adverse impacts of a stressor on ecological systems, including both wildlife and their habitats. This evaluation plays a critical role in understanding how pollutants or other environmental stressors can affect organisms, populations, and communities within ecosystems. It integrates various lines of evidence to determine the severity and nature of effects, informing management and regulatory decisions.
ISO standards: ISO standards are international guidelines and specifications developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) to ensure quality, safety, efficiency, and interoperability of products and services. These standards provide a framework for organizations to follow in various fields, promoting consistency and best practices, which is crucial for both acute and chronic toxicity testing methods as well as ecological risk assessment.
Population Viability: Population viability refers to the ability of a population to sustain itself over time, maintaining its numbers and genetic diversity despite environmental challenges. This concept is critical in assessing how populations respond to factors like habitat destruction, pollution, and climate change, and is a key component in ecological risk assessment frameworks.
Problem Formulation: Problem formulation is the initial and critical step in ecological risk assessment, where specific questions are identified and framed to guide the assessment process. This stage sets the foundation for understanding what issues need to be addressed, including identifying potential hazards, affected ecosystems, and the desired outcomes of the assessment. By clearly defining the problem, it helps ensure that subsequent steps in the risk assessment are relevant and focused.
Public Participation: Public participation refers to the process by which individuals and communities engage in decision-making and policy development that affects their environment and health. This involvement is crucial in ensuring that diverse perspectives are considered, leading to more effective management of emerging contaminants and thorough ecological risk assessments. Engaging the public enhances transparency, builds trust, and fosters collaboration among stakeholders, which is essential for addressing complex environmental issues.
Sensitivity analysis: Sensitivity analysis is a method used to evaluate how changes in input variables of a model affect its output. This technique helps identify which variables have the most influence on the model's results, providing insight into the robustness and reliability of the predictions. By assessing variability in inputs, it supports decision-making under uncertainty, particularly in ecological risk assessments.
Species richness: Species richness refers to the number of different species present in a given ecosystem or community. It is a key component of biodiversity and helps to assess the health and stability of ecosystems. High species richness typically indicates a well-functioning ecosystem, while low species richness can signal disruptions in ecosystem structure and function, community dynamics, trophic interactions, and ecological risk assessments.
Tiered approach: The tiered approach is a systematic method used in ecological risk assessment that organizes the assessment process into different levels or tiers, each providing increasingly detailed information and analysis. This approach allows for a more efficient evaluation of potential ecological risks, starting with simple screening tools and progressing to more complex assessments as needed, depending on the outcomes of previous tiers. By structuring assessments this way, resources can be allocated effectively while addressing uncertainties in risk evaluations.
Weight of evidence: Weight of evidence is an approach used in ecological risk assessment to evaluate and integrate multiple lines of evidence regarding the potential risks of a stressor to the environment. It combines qualitative and quantitative data from various sources to make informed decisions about ecological impacts. This method is crucial in determining whether a particular chemical or activity poses significant risks, considering factors like uncertainty and variability in the data.