9.5 Adaptive control

Adaptive control is a powerful technique that adjusts controller parameters in real-time to maintain performance despite system changes. It enables control systems to adapt to uncertainties, time-varying parameters, and external disturbances in various applications like aerospace and robotics.

This topic covers key approaches like Model Reference Adaptive Control, Self-Tuning Regulators, and Gain Scheduling. It also explores robust adaptive control techniques, stability analysis methods, and implementation challenges to ensure practical feasibility in real-world systems.

Adaptive control overview

• Adaptive control is a advanced control technique that adjusts controller parameters in real-time to maintain desired performance despite changes in the system or environment
• Enables a control system to adapt to uncertain or time-varying plant parameters, unmodeled dynamics, and external disturbances
• Finds wide applications in various domains such as aerospace, robotics, process control, and automotive systems where systems often operate under changing conditions or with incomplete system knowledge

Model reference adaptive control

• MRAC is a direct adaptive control approach that aims to make the closed-loop system behave like a specified reference model
• Consists of a reference model, a controller with adjustable parameters, and an adaptation mechanism that updates the controller parameters based on the error between the plant output and the reference model output
• Ensures that the controlled system tracks the desired reference model despite parameter variations or uncertainties in the plant

Direct vs indirect MRAC

Top images from around the web for Direct vs indirect MRAC

• 

  Frontiers | Model Reference Predictive Adaptive Control for Large-Scale Soft Robots View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Adaptive Control Strategies for Interlimb Coordination in Legged Robots: A Review View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Model Reference Predictive Adaptive Control for Large-Scale Soft Robots View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Adaptive Control Strategies for Interlimb Coordination in Legged Robots: A Review View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Direct vs indirect MRAC

• 

  Frontiers | Model Reference Predictive Adaptive Control for Large-Scale Soft Robots View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Adaptive Control Strategies for Interlimb Coordination in Legged Robots: A Review View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Model Reference Predictive Adaptive Control for Large-Scale Soft Robots View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Adaptive Control Strategies for Interlimb Coordination in Legged Robots: A Review View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Direct MRAC directly adjusts the controller parameters based on the tracking error without explicitly estimating the plant parameters
  • Simpler implementation and requires less computational overhead compared to indirect MRAC
  • Suitable when the plant parameters are not of primary interest or are difficult to estimate accurately
• Indirect MRAC first estimates the unknown plant parameters using a parameter estimation technique and then uses these estimates to compute the controller parameters
  • Provides explicit knowledge of the estimated plant parameters, which can be useful for monitoring or fault detection purposes
  • Requires more computational resources due to the additional parameter estimation step

Reference model selection

• The reference model specifies the desired closed-loop system behavior and is chosen based on performance requirements (settling time, overshoot)
• Should be achievable by the plant under nominal conditions and realistic in terms of the system's physical limitations
• Typically represented as a linear time-invariant system with known parameters and satisfies the desired stability and performance criteria

Adjustment mechanism design

• The adjustment mechanism updates the controller parameters based on the tracking error to minimize the difference between the plant output and the reference model output
• Common adjustment mechanisms include gradient-based algorithms (MIT rule), Lyapunov-based designs, and least-squares estimation techniques
• The choice of the adjustment mechanism depends on factors such as convergence speed, robustness to noise, and computational complexity

Self-tuning regulators

• STRs are a class of indirect adaptive control schemes that estimate the plant parameters online and use these estimates to compute the controller parameters
• Consist of a recursive parameter estimator, a control law design block, and a control law implementation block
• Suitable for systems with unknown or slowly varying parameters and can handle both deterministic and stochastic disturbances

Recursive parameter estimation

• Recursive parameter estimation techniques (recursive least squares, extended Kalman filter) are used to estimate the unknown plant parameters in real-time
• The estimator updates the parameter estimates based on the measured input-output data from the plant
• The forgetting factor is a tuning parameter that determines the weight given to past data in the estimation process and allows for tracking time-varying parameters

Minimum variance control

• Minimum variance control is a control law design approach used in STRs that aims to minimize the variance of the system output
• Assumes that the plant is described by an ARMAX (autoregressive moving average with exogenous input) model and the disturbance is a white noise process
• The resulting controller is a feedback law that minimizes the expected value of the squared output deviation from a desired reference signal

Pole placement approach

• Pole placement is another control law design technique used in STRs that assigns the closed-loop poles to desired locations in the complex plane
• The controller parameters are computed based on the estimated plant parameters and the desired pole locations
• Allows for shaping the closed-loop system response (rise time, settling time, damping ratio) by appropriate selection of the pole locations

Gain scheduling

• Gain scheduling is an adaptive control approach that adjusts the controller gains based on the operating point of the system
• Designed for systems with known nonlinearities or parameter variations that depend on measurable variables (scheduling variables)
• Consists of a set of linear controllers, each designed for a specific operating point, and a scheduling mechanism that interpolates between the controllers based on the current operating condition

Operating point parameters

• Operating point parameters are measurable variables that characterize the current operating condition of the system (speed, altitude, temperature)
• The range of operating conditions is divided into a finite number of operating points, and a linear controller is designed for each operating point
• The operating point parameters are used as scheduling variables to determine the appropriate controller gains at any given time

Controller gain adjustment

• The controller gains are adjusted in real-time based on the current values of the scheduling variables
• Linear interpolation or more advanced techniques (fuzzy logic, neural networks) can be used to smoothly transition between the controller gains as the operating point changes
• The gain adjustment mechanism ensures that the controller adapts to the changing system dynamics while maintaining stability and performance

Stability and performance considerations

• Gain scheduling requires careful design to ensure stability and performance across the entire operating range
• The individual linear controllers should be designed to provide satisfactory performance at their respective operating points
• The scheduling mechanism should ensure smooth transitions between the controllers to avoid abrupt changes in the control signal
• Lyapunov-based techniques or linear matrix inequalities can be used to analyze the stability of the gain-scheduled system

Robust adaptive control

• Robust adaptive control aims to maintain system stability and performance in the presence of uncertainties, unmodeled dynamics, and external disturbances
• Combines adaptive control techniques with robust control design principles to achieve robustness against modeling errors and disturbances
• Modifications to the standard adaptive control schemes (dead-zone, projection, σ-modification) are introduced to ensure boundedness of the adaptive parameters and closed-loop stability

Parametric uncertainties

• Parametric uncertainties refer to the unknown or uncertain parameters in the system model
• Robust adaptive control techniques are designed to handle bounded parametric uncertainties and ensure stability and performance despite these uncertainties
• Parameter projection or bounded parameter adaptation laws are used to keep the parameter estimates within known bounds and prevent parameter drift

Unmodeled dynamics

• Unmodeled dynamics represent the discrepancy between the actual system and the assumed model used for control design
• Robust adaptive control schemes incorporate additional robustness terms (e.g., leakage terms) in the adaptation law to account for the effects of unmodeled dynamics
• These modifications ensure that the adaptive controller remains stable and performs satisfactorily even in the presence of unmodeled dynamics

Dead-zone modification

• Dead-zone modification is a robust adaptive control technique that introduces a dead-zone in the adaptation law to prevent parameter adaptation when the tracking error is small
• The dead-zone prevents unnecessary parameter updates due to noise or disturbances and ensures that adaptation occurs only when the error exceeds a certain threshold
• The size of the dead-zone is a design parameter that trades off between adaptation speed and robustness to disturbances

Applications of adaptive control

• Adaptive control finds extensive applications in various domains where systems operate under uncertain, time-varying, or nonlinear conditions
• Some notable application areas include aerospace, process control, robotics, and automotive systems
• Adaptive control enables these systems to maintain desired performance, handle parameter variations, and compensate for external disturbances

Aircraft control systems

• Adaptive control is used in aircraft control systems to handle changing flight conditions (altitude, speed, weight) and ensure stable and efficient operation
• Gain scheduling is commonly employed to adapt the flight control gains based on the aircraft's operating point (Mach number, dynamic pressure)
• Adaptive control also helps in handling aircraft parameter variations due to fuel consumption, payload changes, or system failures

Process control industries

• Process control industries (chemical plants, refineries, power plants) rely on adaptive control to maintain product quality and optimize process efficiency
• Adaptive controllers are used to handle process parameter variations, nonlinearities, and external disturbances (temperature, pressure, flow rates)
• Self-tuning regulators and model reference adaptive control are employed to adapt the controller parameters based on the changing process conditions

Robotics and automation

• Adaptive control is crucial in robotics and automation to cope with changing robot dynamics, payload variations, and uncertain environments
• Adaptive controllers enable robots to maintain precise tracking performance and adapt to different tasks or operating conditions
• Robust adaptive control techniques are used to handle unmodeled robot dynamics, friction, and external disturbances, ensuring stable and accurate robot motion control

Stability analysis techniques

• Stability analysis is a critical aspect of adaptive control design to ensure that the closed-loop system remains stable under parameter adaptation and uncertainties
• Various techniques are employed to analyze the stability of adaptive control systems and derive conditions for guaranteed stability and convergence
• These techniques help in designing stable and robust adaptive controllers and provide insights into the system's behavior under different operating conditions

Lyapunov stability theory

• Lyapunov stability theory is a powerful tool for analyzing the stability of nonlinear systems, including adaptive control systems
• Lyapunov functions are used to study the stability properties of the closed-loop system and derive conditions for asymptotic stability and convergence
• The Lyapunov function is chosen to capture the energy or the deviation of the system from its equilibrium state, and its time derivative is analyzed to infer stability

Boundedness of signals

• Boundedness of signals is an important property in adaptive control systems to ensure that the system variables (tracking error, parameter estimates) remain bounded over time
• Techniques such as parameter projection, leakage modifications, and dead-zone modifications are used to guarantee the boundedness of adaptive parameters
• Signal boundedness analysis helps in establishing the stability and robustness of the adaptive control system in the presence of uncertainties and disturbances

Persistence of excitation

• Persistence of excitation (PE) is a crucial concept in adaptive control that refers to the sufficient richness of the input signals for parameter convergence
• PE conditions ensure that the input signals provide enough information for the adaptive controller to accurately estimate the unknown parameters
• Techniques such as signal normalization, dither signals, and probing signals are used to ensure PE and improve parameter estimation accuracy

Implementation challenges

• Adaptive control implementation poses several challenges that need to be addressed for successful real-world deployment
• These challenges include computational complexity, noise and disturbances, and actuator saturation effects
• Careful consideration of these issues and appropriate design modifications are necessary to ensure the practical feasibility and performance of adaptive control systems

Computational complexity

• Adaptive control algorithms often involve complex computations (matrix inversions, optimization) that can be computationally demanding, especially for high-dimensional systems
• The computational complexity increases with the number of adaptive parameters and the size of the system model
• Efficient numerical algorithms, model reduction techniques, and hardware optimization are employed to reduce the computational burden and enable real-time implementation

Noise and disturbances

• Practical systems are subject to measurement noise, process noise, and external disturbances that can affect the performance of adaptive control systems
• Noise and disturbances can lead to parameter drift, inaccurate estimation, and degraded control performance
• Robust adaptive control techniques (dead-zone modification, σ-modification) and filtering approaches are used to mitigate the effects of noise and disturbances and ensure reliable operation

Actuator saturation effects

• Actuator saturation occurs when the control signal exceeds the physical limits of the actuators, leading to performance degradation and potential instability
• Adaptive control systems need to be designed to handle actuator saturation and prevent excessive control efforts
• Anti-windup techniques, control signal limiting, and modifications to the adaptation law are employed to accommodate actuator saturation and maintain stable operation within the actuator limits