7.3 Disturbance rejection
8 min read•august 20, 2024
is a crucial aspect of control theory, focusing on minimizing external influences on system performance. It involves modeling, analyzing, and compensating for various disturbances to maintain desired behavior and stability in real-world applications.
Control engineers use techniques like , , and to tackle disturbances. These methods aim to reduce system sensitivity to disturbances, proactively compensate for known disturbances, and maintain performance under uncertainties.
Disturbance rejection overview
- Disturbance rejection is a fundamental concept in control theory that focuses on designing control systems to minimize the impact of external disturbances on system performance
- It involves modeling, analyzing, and compensating for various types of disturbances to ensure the system maintains desired behavior and stability
- Effective disturbance rejection techniques are crucial for achieving robust and reliable control in real-world applications
Goals of disturbance rejection
Top images from around the web for Goals of disturbance rejection
Frontiers | Goal-directed, habitual and Pavlovian prosocial behavior | Behavioral Neuroscience View original
Is this image relevant?
MS - Decoupling active disturbance rejection trajectory-tracking control strategy for X-by-wire ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Toward a Generalizable Framework of Disturbance Ecology Through Crowdsourced Science View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Goal-directed, habitual and Pavlovian prosocial behavior | Behavioral Neuroscience View original
Is this image relevant?
MS - Decoupling active disturbance rejection trajectory-tracking control strategy for X-by-wire ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Goals of disturbance rejection
Frontiers | Goal-directed, habitual and Pavlovian prosocial behavior | Behavioral Neuroscience View original
Is this image relevant?
MS - Decoupling active disturbance rejection trajectory-tracking control strategy for X-by-wire ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Toward a Generalizable Framework of Disturbance Ecology Through Crowdsourced Science View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Goal-directed, habitual and Pavlovian prosocial behavior | Behavioral Neuroscience View original
Is this image relevant?
MS - Decoupling active disturbance rejection trajectory-tracking control strategy for X-by-wire ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Minimize the impact of external disturbances on system performance and stability
- Maintain desired system behavior and output despite the presence of disturbances
- Ensure robustness and reliability of the control system in real-world environments
- Improve the overall quality and efficiency of the controlled process or system
Types of disturbances
- : Predictable and repeatable disturbances (sinusoidal signals, step changes)
- : Random and unpredictable disturbances (white noise, random walks)
- : Disturbances that occur at regular intervals (vibrations, )
- : Non-repeating disturbances with irregular patterns (wind gusts, load changes)
Impact of disturbances on system performance
- Disturbances can cause deviations from the desired system output or reference signal
- They can introduce , , and oscillations in the
- Disturbances may lead to instability or degraded performance if not properly compensated for
- Unrejected disturbances can result in reduced efficiency, quality, and reliability of the controlled system
Disturbance modeling techniques
- Accurate modeling of disturbances is essential for designing effective disturbance rejection strategies
- Disturbance models help in understanding the nature and characteristics of the disturbances affecting the system
- Different modeling techniques are used depending on the type and location of the disturbances in the system
Additive input disturbance model
- Assumes the disturbance enters the system at the same point as the control input
- The disturbance is added to the control signal before being applied to the plant
- Commonly used for modeling external disturbances that directly affect the input of the system (wind disturbances in aircraft control)
Additive output disturbance model
- Assumes the disturbance affects the system output directly
- The disturbance is added to the measured output signal of the plant
- Suitable for modeling sensor noise or measurement disturbances (temperature fluctuations in process control)
Multiplicative disturbance model
- Assumes the disturbance affects the system parameters or dynamics
- The disturbance is multiplied with the system transfer function or state-space matrices
- Used for modeling parametric uncertainties or variations in the system (changes in mass or inertia in mechanical systems)
Feedback control for disturbance rejection
- Feedback control is a powerful approach for disturbance rejection in control systems
- It involves measuring the system output, comparing it with the desired reference, and generating a corrective control signal
- Feedback control can effectively attenuate the effects of disturbances and maintain system performance
Role of feedback in disturbance rejection
- Feedback control reduces the sensitivity of the system to disturbances by continuously monitoring and correcting deviations
- It generates a control signal that counteracts the effects of disturbances on the system output
- Feedback control can handle both known and unknown disturbances without requiring explicit disturbance models
Sensitivity function analysis
- The sensitivity function quantifies the impact of disturbances on the system output in the presence of feedback control
- It is defined as the transfer function from the disturbance to the system output
- A smaller magnitude of the sensitivity function indicates better disturbance rejection performance
Complementary sensitivity function
- The represents the transfer function from the reference input to the system output
- It quantifies the ability of the feedback control system to track the desired reference signal
- A larger magnitude of the complementary sensitivity function at low frequencies ensures good reference tracking performance
Feedforward control for disturbance rejection
- Feedforward control is another approach for disturbance rejection that relies on measuring or estimating the disturbance signal
- It generates a control signal that proactively compensates for the disturbance before it affects the system output
- Feedforward control can significantly improve disturbance rejection performance when the disturbance is measurable or predictable
Feedforward controller design
- The feedforward controller is designed based on the inverse dynamics of the plant and the disturbance model
- It generates a control signal that cancels out the effect of the disturbance on the system output
- The feedforward controller can be implemented as a static gain or a dynamic filter depending on the nature of the disturbance
Limitations of feedforward control
- Feedforward control requires accurate measurement or estimation of the disturbance signal
- It is sensitive to modeling errors and uncertainties in the plant and disturbance models
- Feedforward control alone may not be sufficient for complete disturbance rejection and is often combined with feedback control
Robust control for disturbance rejection
- Robust control techniques aim to design control systems that maintain performance and stability in the presence of uncertainties and disturbances
- They provide a systematic framework for handling modeling errors, parameter variations, and external disturbances
- Robust control methods optimize the worst-case performance of the system under bounded uncertainties
H-infinity control
- is a robust control technique that minimizes the maximum gain of the closed-loop system from disturbances to outputs
- It involves shaping the frequency response of the sensitivity and complementary sensitivity functions
- H-infinity control can handle multiple performance objectives and constraints simultaneously
Mu-synthesis
- is an extension of H-infinity control that explicitly accounts for structured uncertainties in the system
- It involves iterative design of a robust controller that minimizes the structured singular value (μ) of the closed-loop system
- Mu-synthesis can provide improved robustness and performance compared to standard H-infinity control
Disturbance observer-based control
- (DOBC) is a technique that estimates and compensates for disturbances in real-time
- It combines the advantages of feedback and feedforward control by using an observer to estimate the disturbance signal
- DOBC can effectively reject both measurable and unmeasurable disturbances without requiring explicit disturbance models
Disturbance observer concept
- A disturbance observer is a dynamic system that estimates the disturbance acting on the plant based on the measured input and output signals
- It uses the plant model and the control input to predict the expected output and compares it with the actual measured output
- The difference between the predicted and measured outputs is used to estimate the disturbance signal
Disturbance observer design
- The disturbance observer is designed based on the nominal plant model and the desired disturbance rejection bandwidth
- It typically consists of a low-pass filter that attenuates high-frequency measurement noise and a high-gain observer that ensures fast convergence of the disturbance estimate
- The observer gain is tuned to achieve a trade-off between disturbance rejection performance and robustness to model uncertainties
Disturbance observer-based control schemes
- DOBC schemes combine the disturbance observer with a nominal controller to achieve effective disturbance rejection
- The estimated disturbance is subtracted from the control signal generated by the nominal controller to compensate for the actual disturbance
- Different DOBC schemes can be used depending on the system characteristics and control objectives (disturbance observer-based , disturbance observer-based )
Adaptive control for disturbance rejection
- techniques adjust the controller parameters in real-time to cope with changing system dynamics and disturbances
- They can handle uncertainties, parameter variations, and time-varying disturbances without requiring accurate system models
- Adaptive control methods are particularly useful for systems with unknown or slowly varying disturbances
Model reference adaptive control (MRAC)
- MRAC is an adaptive control technique that aims to make the closed-loop system behave like a desired reference model
- It consists of a reference model, an adjustable controller, and an adaptation mechanism that updates the controller parameters
- MRAC can effectively reject disturbances by adapting the controller gains to minimize the error between the actual system output and the reference model output
Self-tuning regulators (STR)
- STR is another adaptive control approach that estimates the system parameters online and updates the controller gains accordingly
- It consists of a parameter estimator, a controller design algorithm, and a control law that is computed based on the estimated parameters
- STR can automatically tune the controller to maintain optimal performance in the presence of disturbances and parameter variations
Case studies and applications
- Disturbance rejection techniques find widespread applications in various domains of control engineering
- They are crucial for ensuring robust and reliable operation of control systems in real-world environments
- The following case studies highlight the importance and effectiveness of disturbance rejection in different application areas
Industrial process control
- Disturbance rejection is essential in industrial process control to maintain product quality, efficiency, and safety
- Examples include temperature control in chemical reactors, pressure control in pipelines, and level control in storage tanks
- Advanced disturbance rejection techniques (DOBC, adaptive control) are employed to handle process disturbances, load changes, and parameter variations
Automotive control systems
- Disturbance rejection is critical in automotive control systems to ensure vehicle stability, comfort, and performance
- Applications include engine control, suspension control, and active safety systems (electronic stability control, adaptive cruise control)
- Robust control and disturbance observer-based approaches are used to reject disturbances caused by road conditions, wind gusts, and vehicle parameter variations
Aerospace control systems
- Disturbance rejection is vital in aerospace control systems to maintain flight stability, tracking performance, and safety
- Examples include attitude control of satellites, flight control of aircraft, and guidance of missiles
- H-infinity control, mu-synthesis, and adaptive control techniques are employed to handle atmospheric disturbances, sensor noise, and model uncertainties
Challenges and future directions
- Despite significant advancements in disturbance rejection techniques, several challenges and opportunities for future research exist
- These challenges drive the development of more advanced and intelligent disturbance rejection methods to cope with complex and uncertain systems
Nonlinear disturbance rejection
- Many real-world systems exhibit nonlinear behavior, which poses challenges for traditional linear disturbance rejection techniques
- Nonlinear control methods, such as sliding mode control and backstepping, are being explored for effective disturbance rejection in nonlinear systems
- Adaptive and robust nonlinear control approaches are also being developed to handle uncertainties and disturbances in nonlinear systems
Intelligent disturbance rejection techniques
- Intelligent control techniques, such as fuzzy logic control and neural network control, are gaining attention for disturbance rejection
- These methods can learn from data and adapt to changing system conditions without requiring explicit mathematical models
- Intelligent disturbance rejection techniques can handle complex and uncertain disturbances by leveraging the learning and approximation capabilities of intelligent algorithms
Integration of machine learning in disturbance rejection
- Machine learning algorithms, such as deep learning and reinforcement learning, are being integrated into disturbance rejection frameworks
- These algorithms can learn disturbance models, control policies, and adaptation strategies from data collected during system operation
- The integration of machine learning in disturbance rejection enables the development of data-driven and self-learning control systems that can adapt to unknown disturbances and improve performance over time
Key Terms to Review (28)
Adaptive Control: Adaptive control is a type of control strategy that adjusts its parameters in real-time to cope with changes in system dynamics or the environment. This approach allows for improved performance in systems where the model is uncertain or when external disturbances affect the operation. By continuously updating its parameters, adaptive control can maintain optimal performance and stability across varying conditions, making it highly relevant in fields such as mechanical systems, aerospace engineering, and feedback control architectures.
Aperiodic Disturbances: Aperiodic disturbances are irregular and unpredictable changes or fluctuations that can affect the performance of control systems. Unlike periodic disturbances, which have a regular occurrence, aperiodic disturbances can arise unexpectedly and may be caused by various factors such as environmental changes, equipment malfunctions, or sudden external forces. Understanding how to manage and mitigate these disturbances is crucial for ensuring system stability and achieving effective disturbance rejection.
Complementary Sensitivity Function: The complementary sensitivity function, denoted as $$T(s)$$, is a key concept in control theory that measures how well a control system can respond to changes or disturbances in the input signal while maintaining desired performance. It complements the sensitivity function and represents the system's ability to reject disturbances at different frequencies. The complementary sensitivity function is crucial for understanding the trade-offs between performance and robustness in control systems, especially when dealing with disturbances and uncertainties.
Deterministic disturbances: Deterministic disturbances refer to predictable and repeatable external influences that affect the behavior of a control system. Unlike random disturbances, these disturbances can be modeled and anticipated, allowing for strategies to mitigate their impact on system performance. Understanding these disturbances is crucial for designing effective control systems that maintain desired outputs despite external changes.
Disturbance Observer-Based Control: Disturbance observer-based control is a control strategy that estimates external disturbances acting on a system and uses this estimation to improve system performance and stability. This approach enhances disturbance rejection by effectively compensating for the impact of unmeasured disturbances, enabling the system to maintain desired performance even in the presence of external uncertainties.
Disturbance rejection: Disturbance rejection refers to a system's ability to maintain desired output performance despite the presence of external disturbances that can negatively affect the system's behavior. This concept is crucial in control systems as it ensures stability and performance even when unexpected changes occur in the environment or system parameters, impacting how control strategies like feedforward, cascade, and H-infinity control are implemented.
Feedback Control: Feedback control is a process that uses the output of a system to adjust its input in order to achieve desired performance. This method ensures stability and accuracy in systems by continuously monitoring outputs and making necessary adjustments, thereby enhancing overall system behavior. It plays a crucial role in various applications, including electrical and fluid systems, transient response analysis, and disturbance rejection, while also being represented in frequency domain techniques like Bode plots.
Feedforward Control: Feedforward control is a proactive control strategy that anticipates disturbances by measuring input variables before they affect the output of a system. This method allows for adjustments to be made based on known or predicted changes, thereby improving the system's responsiveness and stability. By compensating for disturbances before they occur, feedforward control complements feedback control techniques, making it particularly useful in various applications such as fluid systems, disturbance rejection, and digital controller design.
H-infinity control: H-infinity control is a robust control design methodology aimed at minimizing the worst-case impact of disturbances and model uncertainties on system performance. It focuses on achieving a desired level of performance across a range of operating conditions, which is essential in systems where uncertainty and disturbances are prevalent. This approach connects deeply with state feedback mechanisms, sensitivity and robustness measures, disturbance rejection strategies, and more advanced techniques like mu-synthesis, ensuring systems can perform reliably even under adverse conditions.
John Doyle: John Doyle is a prominent figure in the field of control theory, known for his contributions to robust control, optimization, and the development of various control design methodologies. His work often emphasizes practical applications and theoretical foundations, bridging the gap between abstract concepts and real-world systems. Doyle's research has influenced areas such as lead-lag compensators, disturbance rejection strategies, and cascade control systems.
Kalman filtering: Kalman filtering is a mathematical algorithm that provides estimates of unknown variables based on noisy measurements over time. It is particularly effective in systems where uncertainty and noise are present, enabling optimal estimates of states by incorporating both the model of the system dynamics and measurement data. This technique is widely used in various applications, including navigation and tracking, where accurate state estimation is critical.
Model reference adaptive control: Model reference adaptive control is a control strategy that adjusts the controller parameters in real-time to ensure that the output of a controlled system follows a reference model's desired output. This approach allows systems to adapt to changes in dynamics and external disturbances, maintaining performance and stability. The adaptability of this control method is crucial for effective disturbance rejection, assessing performance indices, and enhancing overall adaptive control mechanisms.
Mu-synthesis: Mu-synthesis is a robust control design technique used to create controllers that can handle uncertainties and disturbances in dynamic systems. It focuses on minimizing the worst-case effects of these uncertainties on system performance, which is crucial for maintaining stability and achieving desired outputs despite external disturbances.
Oscillations: Oscillations refer to the repetitive variations, typically in time, of some measure about a central value or between two or more different states. They are characterized by periodic motion and can occur in various physical systems, influencing stability and response to disturbances. Understanding oscillations is crucial in evaluating how systems react to changes and return to equilibrium.
Periodic Disturbances: Periodic disturbances are consistent, repetitive changes in a system's environment that can affect its performance and stability. These disturbances can arise from various sources and occur at regular intervals, making them predictable yet challenging to manage in control systems. Understanding how to reject these disturbances is crucial for maintaining the desired output of a system.
PID Control: PID control, or Proportional-Integral-Derivative control, is a widely used control loop feedback mechanism that adjusts an output based on the difference between a desired setpoint and a measured process variable. By combining three control actions—proportional, integral, and derivative—this method effectively minimizes steady-state error, enhances disturbance rejection, and optimizes performance in various applications, including robotics and process control.
Robust Control: Robust control refers to the ability of a control system to maintain performance despite uncertainties or variations in system parameters and external disturbances. This concept emphasizes designing systems that can effectively handle real-world conditions, ensuring stability and reliability in the presence of model inaccuracies and unpredictable changes.
Rudolf Kalman: Rudolf Kalman is a renowned mathematician and engineer best known for developing the Kalman filter, a powerful mathematical tool used for estimating the state of a dynamic system from noisy measurements. His work has had a profound impact on various fields, including control theory, robotics, and signal processing, enabling effective decision-making in systems affected by uncertainty.
Self-tuning regulators: Self-tuning regulators are control systems that automatically adjust their parameters based on the performance of the system they control. This adaptability allows them to effectively manage changes in system dynamics and disturbances without requiring manual intervention, making them essential for maintaining performance in environments where conditions frequently change.
Sensitivity function analysis: Sensitivity function analysis is a method used to assess how the output of a system responds to changes in input parameters or disturbances. It plays a crucial role in understanding disturbance rejection by quantifying how sensitive a control system is to variations in parameters like gain or time constant, thus allowing engineers to design more robust systems.
Sliding Mode Control: Sliding mode control is a robust control technique designed to drive the system state to a predetermined sliding surface and maintain it there, despite disturbances and uncertainties. This method effectively deals with external disturbances and system uncertainties, making it suitable for nonlinear systems while ensuring desired performance indices are met.
State-space model: A state-space model is a mathematical representation of a physical system, defined by a set of first-order differential equations that describe the system's dynamics through state variables. It captures the relationships between inputs, outputs, and the internal states of the system, providing a comprehensive framework for analyzing both transient and steady-state behavior. This model is essential in studying how systems respond to various inputs and disturbances, making it relevant for understanding transient responses and disturbance rejection mechanisms.
Steady-state errors: Steady-state errors are the discrepancies that remain between the desired output and the actual output of a control system after it has settled into a stable operating condition. These errors highlight the system's ability to accurately track a desired reference input in the presence of disturbances or changes. Understanding steady-state errors is crucial for evaluating system performance and improving accuracy in feedback control systems.
Stochastic Disturbances: Stochastic disturbances refer to random variations or unpredictable influences that affect the behavior of a system over time. These disturbances can arise from numerous sources such as environmental changes, measurement noise, or inherent uncertainties within the system itself. Understanding these disturbances is crucial for developing effective control strategies that can maintain desired system performance despite these random fluctuations.
System Response: System response refers to how a dynamic system reacts to inputs or disturbances over time. It is crucial in analyzing system behavior, stability, and performance, particularly in control systems. Understanding the system response allows engineers to design appropriate controllers that ensure desired output behavior when subjected to various inputs or disturbances.
Transfer function model: A transfer function model is a mathematical representation that describes the relationship between the input and output of a linear time-invariant system in the frequency domain. It allows for the analysis of system dynamics, particularly how systems respond to different inputs, including disturbances, through the use of Laplace transforms. By using a transfer function, one can easily assess system stability, performance, and the effect of disturbances on the output.
Transient overshoots: Transient overshoots refer to the temporary exceedance of a system's desired output level during the response to a disturbance or a change in input. This phenomenon occurs as the system works to return to its steady-state equilibrium after being perturbed, often leading to oscillations before settling down. Understanding transient overshoots is crucial for evaluating the stability and performance of control systems, particularly in how they reject disturbances effectively.
Transient response: Transient response refers to the behavior of a system during the time period when it is transitioning from one state to another, particularly in response to a change in input or an initial condition. This phase is crucial as it affects the system's stability, speed of response, and overall performance before reaching a steady state. Understanding transient response is essential for analyzing stability margins, designing compensators, and ensuring systems can handle disturbances effectively.