Contracts

📄Contracts Unit 8 – Defenses: Mistake, Misrepresentation & Duress

Contract defenses like mistake, misrepresentation, and duress provide legal grounds to avoid contractual obligations. These defenses can render contracts void or voidable, depending on the circumstances and type of defense asserted. Understanding these defenses is crucial for determining contract enforceability and protecting parties' rights. Courts consider factors like the parties' sophistication, bargaining power, and knowledge when evaluating defenses in specific cases.

Key Concepts

  • Defenses in contract law provide parties with legal grounds to avoid contractual obligations
  • Three main defenses covered in this unit include mistake, misrepresentation, and duress
  • Mistake occurs when one or both parties have an incorrect understanding of the contract terms or subject matter
  • Misrepresentation involves false statements made by one party to induce the other party to enter the contract
  • Duress refers to the use of threats or coercion to force a party into agreeing to a contract
  • Understanding these defenses is crucial for determining the enforceability of contracts and protecting parties' rights
  • Case law and statutory provisions shape the application of these defenses in various jurisdictions

Types of Defenses

  • Defenses can be categorized as affirmative defenses or negative defenses
    • Affirmative defenses require the defendant to prove the existence of certain circumstances (mistake, duress)
    • Negative defenses involve the defendant denying the plaintiff's allegations (lack of consideration, incapacity)
  • Other types of defenses include equitable defenses (unclean hands, laches) and statutory defenses (statute of frauds, statute of limitations)
  • Some defenses render a contract void (mistake, duress), while others make it voidable at the option of the aggrieved party (misrepresentation, undue influence)
  • The availability and success of defenses depend on the specific facts of each case and the governing law

Mistake: Definition and Types

  • Mistake is an erroneous belief held by one or both parties at the time of contracting
  • Two main types of mistakes are unilateral mistake and mutual mistake
    • Unilateral mistake occurs when only one party is mistaken about a material fact
    • Mutual mistake occurs when both parties share the same mistaken belief
  • Mistakes can relate to the identity of the parties, the subject matter of the contract, or the terms of the agreement
  • For a mistake to be a valid defense, it must be material and not caused by the party's own negligence
  • Examples of mistakes include a buyer purchasing the wrong property (subject matter) or a seller contracting with an imposter (identity)

Misrepresentation: Elements and Categories

  • Misrepresentation is a false statement of fact made by one party to induce the other party to enter the contract
  • Elements of misrepresentation include a false statement of material fact, intent to induce reliance, actual reliance by the other party, and resulting damages
  • Misrepresentation can be categorized as fraudulent, negligent, or innocent
    • Fraudulent misrepresentation involves knowingly making a false statement with the intent to deceive
    • Negligent misrepresentation occurs when a party makes a false statement without reasonable grounds for believing it to be true
    • Innocent misrepresentation involves a false statement made without knowledge of its falsity or intent to deceive
  • Remedies for misrepresentation may include rescission of the contract or damages, depending on the type of misrepresentation and jurisdiction

Duress: Understanding Coercion

  • Duress is the use of threats or coercion to force a party into agreeing to a contract against their will
  • The threat must be improper and leave the party with no reasonable alternative but to agree to the contract
  • Examples of duress include physical threats, economic pressure, or threats to disclose sensitive information
  • Duress can be exerted by the other contracting party or a third party
  • Contracts entered into under duress are voidable at the option of the coerced party
  • Proving duress requires demonstrating that the threat was sufficiently severe and that the party's consent was not freely given
  • The presence of a valid defense can render a contract unenforceable or allow the aggrieved party to seek remedies
  • Case law provides guidance on the application of defenses in various contexts
    • In Sherwood v. Walker (1887), the court found that a mutual mistake about the reproductive capacity of a cow allowed the seller to avoid the contract
    • In Laidlaw v. Organ (1817), the court held that the buyer's failure to disclose information about the end of the War of 1812 did not constitute fraudulent misrepresentation
    • In Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp. (1971), the court found that economic duress by a subcontractor justified the prime contractor's breach of contract
  • The burden of proof for asserting defenses typically falls on the party seeking to avoid contractual obligations
  • Courts may consider factors such as the parties' sophistication, bargaining power, and knowledge when evaluating defenses

Practical Applications

  • Parties should exercise due diligence and thoroughly review contracts to minimize the risk of mistakes or misrepresentations
  • Businesses should establish policies and procedures to prevent employees from engaging in conduct that could give rise to duress or misrepresentation claims
  • Individuals should be cautious of high-pressure sales tactics or offers that seem too good to be true, as these may involve misrepresentations or duress
  • In negotiations, parties should document discussions and agreements to help prevent misunderstandings or disputes related to mistakes or misrepresentations
  • Seeking legal advice when entering into complex or high-stakes contracts can help identify potential defenses and protect parties' interests

Common Pitfalls and Misconceptions

  • Parties may incorrectly believe that any mistake or misrepresentation automatically voids a contract, failing to recognize the specific requirements for each defense
  • Some may assume that a contract can be avoided simply because it is unfavorable or the terms are later regretted, without meeting the criteria for a valid defense
  • Parties may underestimate the difficulty of proving defenses such as duress or fraudulent misrepresentation, which require clear and convincing evidence
  • Relying on oral representations or promises not included in the written contract can lead to disputes and difficulty asserting misrepresentation defenses
  • Failing to promptly assert defenses or seek relief after discovering a mistake, misrepresentation, or duress may waive the right to do so or limit available remedies


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.