9.1 Competitive actions and responses
8 min read•august 14, 2024
Competitive actions and responses are crucial elements of business strategy. Firms use various tactics like price changes, product innovations, and marketing campaigns to gain an edge over rivals. These moves can significantly impact market dynamics, altering demand patterns and industry structures.
Companies must carefully consider how to respond to competitors' actions. Factors like market overlap, resource similarity, and market importance influence response strategies. The speed and intensity of responses, along with a firm's competitive history, shape the effectiveness of these strategic moves in the marketplace.
Competitive Actions and Market Dynamics
Types of Competitive Actions
Top images from around the web for Types of Competitive Actions
Promotion: Integrated Marketing Communication (IMC) | Introduction to Business View original
Is this image relevant?
Marketing Mix Introduction | Introduction to Business View original
Is this image relevant?
Stages and Types of Strategy | Principles of Management View original
Is this image relevant?
Promotion: Integrated Marketing Communication (IMC) | Introduction to Business View original
Is this image relevant?
Marketing Mix Introduction | Introduction to Business View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Types of Competitive Actions
Promotion: Integrated Marketing Communication (IMC) | Introduction to Business View original
Is this image relevant?
Marketing Mix Introduction | Introduction to Business View original
Is this image relevant?
Stages and Types of Strategy | Principles of Management View original
Is this image relevant?
Promotion: Integrated Marketing Communication (IMC) | Introduction to Business View original
Is this image relevant?
Marketing Mix Introduction | Introduction to Business View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Competitive actions are strategic moves initiated by firms to improve their market position relative to rivals. These actions can be classified into several broad categories, each with distinct characteristics and potential market impacts.
- Price-based actions involve adjusting prices to gain market share or increase profitability
- Price cuts can stimulate demand and attract price-sensitive customers (discounts, promotions)
- Price hikes may improve margins if demand is inelastic (luxury goods, necessities)
- Product-based actions focus on introducing new products, improving existing offerings, or expanding product lines
- Product innovation involves launching entirely new products or significantly enhancing current ones, which can create first-mover advantages and shift market dynamics (iPhone, Tesla)
- Product imitation occurs when firms replicate successful offerings of rivals, potentially eroding the innovator's market share and profits (generic drugs, fast fashion)
- Promotion-based actions aim to increase brand awareness, stimulate demand, or influence consumer perceptions through advertising, sales promotions, or public relations efforts
- Effective promotional campaigns can boost sales and market share, particularly in competitive and differentiated markets (Coca-Cola, Nike)
- Tactics include TV commercials, social media marketing, celebrity endorsements, and event sponsorships
- Distribution-based actions seek to expand or optimize a firm's distribution network to improve product availability, customer convenience, or market coverage
- Entering new channels (online sales, international markets)
- Partnering with distributors (wholesalers, retailers)
- Investing in direct-to-consumer platforms (e-commerce, subscription services)
Impact on Market Dynamics
- Capacity-based actions involve adjusting production capacity or resource allocation to meet demand fluctuations, gain economies of scale, or deter potential entrants
- Capacity expansions can signal commitment to a market and may trigger competitive responses from rivals (new factories, increased workforce)
- Capacity reductions can help firms optimize costs during downturns or shifts in demand (plant closures, layoffs)
- Competitive actions can significantly impact market dynamics, including demand patterns, price levels, and industry structure
- Successful product innovations can disrupt existing markets and create new ones, reshaping competitive landscapes (smartphones, streaming services)
- Aggressive price-based actions can lead to price wars, eroding industry profitability and forcing some players out of the market (airlines, retail)
- Distribution and capacity moves can alter the balance of power among firms and influence long-term industry growth prospects (oil and gas, semiconductors)
Firm Responses to Competitive Actions
Factors Influencing Response Strategies
- Competitive responses are strategic moves taken by firms in reaction to the actions of their rivals. The nature and intensity of these responses can vary depending on various factors and market conditions.
- Market commonality, or the degree of overlap between firms' target markets, can influence response likelihood and aggressiveness
- Rivals operating in highly overlapping markets may feel more threatened by competitive moves and respond more vigorously to protect their market share (Pepsi vs. Coca-Cola, McDonald's vs. Burger King)
- Firms with diversified market portfolios may be less sensitive to actions in specific segments
- Resource similarity, or the extent to which firms possess comparable assets and capabilities, can shape response strategies
- Competitors with similar resource endowments may be better equipped to match or counter each other's moves, leading to more intense rivalry (Apple vs. Samsung, Boeing vs. Airbus)
- Firms with unique or superior resources can enjoy more flexibility in their response options
- Market dependence, or the importance of a particular market to a firm's overall performance, can shape response priorities
- Firms may be more likely to respond aggressively to threats in their core markets while being more selective in peripheral ones (Gillette in razors, Starbucks in coffee)
- Diversified firms can allocate resources across markets based on strategic importance
Response Characteristics
- Response speed, or the time taken to react to a rival's action, can be a critical determinant of competitive dynamics
- Quick responses can help firms mitigate the impact of a rival's move and signal their commitment to defending their market position (fast-fashion retailers, tech giants)
- Delayed responses may allow rivals to gain a significant lead or establish their offerings as the market standard
- Response intensity refers to the scale and scope of a firm's reaction to a competitive action
- Intense responses, such as major price cuts or product overhauls, can escalate rivalry and alter market equilibrium (console gaming, ride-sharing)
- More measured or targeted responses may be appropriate when the threat is limited or the costs of escalation are high
- Competitive history and reputation can influence response patterns
- Firms with a track record of aggressive behavior may deter rivals from initiating certain actions (Intel in semiconductors, Amazon in e-commerce)
- Those known for accommodating stances may invite more competitive moves (local retailers vs. Walmart)
Effectiveness of Competitive Actions and Responses
Industry Context
- The effectiveness of competitive actions and responses can vary depending on industry characteristics, market conditions, and firm-specific factors. Evaluating the impact of these moves requires a nuanced understanding of the competitive landscape.
- In industries with high entry barriers and few players, such as oligopolies, competitive actions may have more pronounced and lasting effects on market dynamics
- Rivals' responses in such contexts can be more calculated and strategic, given the interdependence among firms (telecoms, airlines)
- Examples include coordinated price changes, capacity adjustments, or technological investments
- In fragmented industries with numerous competitors and low entry barriers, the impact of individual actions may be more limited
- Firms may need to undertake bolder or more frequent moves to stand out and elicit meaningful responses from rivals (restaurants, retail)
- Localized or niche-focused actions can be effective in these markets (craft breweries, specialized boutiques)
Firm Capabilities and Resources
- In mature industries with stable demand and established customer loyalties, competitive actions focused on price or promotion may have diminishing returns
- Firms may need to emphasize product innovation or differentiation to gain an edge (automotive, consumer packaged goods)
- Incremental improvements or targeted marketing campaigns can help firms maintain their position
- In fast-paced, technology-driven industries, the effectiveness of competitive moves can hinge on speed and adaptability
- Firms that can quickly introduce cutting-edge products or exploit emerging market opportunities may gain a significant advantage over slower rivals (smartphones, biotech)
- Continuous innovation and rapid response to market shifts are critical success factors
- The success of competitive actions also depends on a firm's execution capabilities and resources
- Well-planned and efficiently implemented moves are more likely to yield positive outcomes than poorly executed ones, even if the underlying strategy is sound (Apple's product launches, Toyota's lean manufacturing)
- Firms with strong brands, loyal customers, or proprietary technologies can be more resilient to competitive pressures
Sustainability of Advantage
- The sustainability of any competitive advantage gained through depends on the ease of imitation by rivals
- Moves that are difficult to replicate, such as those based on unique resources or capabilities, may provide longer-lasting benefits (Google's search algorithm, Coca-Cola's brand equity)
- Easily imitated actions, such as price cuts or promotional offers, may provide only temporary advantages
- Firms can enhance the sustainability of their competitive edge by continually innovating, building customer switching costs, or creating network effects
- Ongoing product improvements and new feature introductions can keep rivals playing catch-up (Adobe's Creative Suite, Microsoft's Office)
- High switching costs, such as those arising from platform lock-in or personalized services, can deter customers from defecting to competitors (Apple's ecosystem, Salesforce's CRM)
- Network effects, where the value of a product or service increases with the number of users, can create winner-take-all dynamics and durable market leadership (Facebook, Uber)
Competitive Rivalry and Firm Behavior
Drivers of Rivalry
- refers to the ongoing struggle between firms in an industry to gain market share, profits, and customer loyalty at each other's expense. The intensity of rivalry can vary across industries and over time, shaping the competitive dynamics and performance outcomes.
- Rivalry is driven by the structure of an industry, including the number and size of competitors, the degree of , and the presence of entry or exit barriers. These factors influence the bargaining power of firms and the intensity of competition.
- Industries with a large number of similarly sized firms tend to have more intense rivalry (restaurants, hotels)
- Markets with highly differentiated products or strong brand loyalties may experience less direct rivalry (luxury cars, designer fashion)
- High entry barriers, such as large capital requirements or regulatory hurdles, can limit the threat of new competitors and moderate rivalry (utilities, pharmaceuticals)
- The threat of potential rivalry from new entrants can also shape incumbent firm behavior
- The presence of low entry barriers or the anticipation of new rivals can prompt existing firms to fortify their market positions through strategic investments or preemptive actions (ride-sharing vs. traditional taxis, e-commerce vs. brick-and-mortar retail)
- Incumbents may seek to deter entry by signaling commitment, building excess capacity, or locking in customers through long-term contracts
Consequences of Rivalry
- In industries with intense rivalry, firms may engage in frequent and aggressive competitive actions to maintain or improve their market position
- This can lead to price wars, advertising battles, or rapid product innovation cycles, which can erode industry profitability (airlines, consumer electronics)
- Firms may face pressure to cut costs, outsource activities, or consolidate to survive
- Rivalry can also spur firms to improve operational efficiency, invest in new technologies, or explore untapped market segments to stay ahead of competitors
- This dynamic can drive industry-wide innovation and productivity gains, benefiting consumers (automotive safety features, mobile phone capabilities)
- Intense competition can accelerate the diffusion of new technologies and business models (streaming video, e-commerce)
- Rivalry can have both positive and negative effects on market outcomes
- While intense competition can lead to lower prices, improved quality, and greater consumer choice, it can also result in reduced industry profitability, increased business risk, and potential market instability (oil and gas, airlines)
- In some cases, rivalry may lead to consolidation, as firms merge to gain scale advantages or eliminate excess capacity (beer industry, banking)
Managing Rivalry
- Firms may attempt to manage or mitigate the impact of rivalry through various strategies, such as differentiation, niche targeting, or strategic alliances with rivals. The effectiveness of these approaches depends on the specific industry context and the actions of other market participants.
- Differentiation strategies aim to create unique or superior customer value through product features, quality, brand image, or customer service
- By offering something distinct from rivals, firms can reduce direct competition and command premium prices (Apple, Whole Foods)
- Successful differentiation requires ongoing investment in marketing, R&D, and customer engagement
- Niche targeting involves focusing on specific customer segments or market domains where a firm can establish a strong competitive position
- By catering to the unique needs of a well-defined target market, firms can avoid head-to-head competition with larger or more generalist rivals (Lululemon in athleisure, Rolls-Royce in luxury cars)
- Niche strategies often require deep customer insights, specialized capabilities, and a focused value proposition
- Strategic alliances or partnerships with rivals can help firms manage competitive pressures by sharing risks, costs, or complementary resources
- Alliances can take various forms, such as joint ventures, co-marketing agreements, or technology sharing (Sony and Samsung in LCD panels, Ford and Volkswagen in commercial vans)
- While alliances can provide benefits, they also involve challenges related to coordination, trust, and appropriation of value
Key Terms to Review (17)
Competitive Parity: Competitive parity refers to a situation where a company matches the competitive advantages of its rivals, leading to an equal standing in the marketplace. This balance means that while a company is not necessarily outperforming others, it can avoid being outperformed and maintain its market position. Competitive parity is significant in the context of strategy as it highlights the importance of sustaining competitive advantage, responding effectively to competitors, and evaluating internal resources and capabilities.
Competitive Rivalry: Competitive rivalry refers to the ongoing battle between firms in the same industry to gain market share, enhance performance, and achieve competitive advantage. This rivalry influences various aspects of strategic planning, including resource allocation, pricing strategies, and innovation efforts, shaping how companies position themselves in the marketplace.
Disruptive innovation: Disruptive innovation refers to the process by which a smaller company with fewer resources successfully challenges established businesses, often by offering simpler, more affordable, or more convenient products or services. This type of innovation typically starts at the bottom of the market and eventually moves up, displacing established competitors and altering industry dynamics.
First Mover Advantage: First mover advantage refers to the competitive edge gained by the initial company to enter a specific market or industry with a new product or service. This advantage can stem from various factors, such as establishing brand recognition, securing access to resources, and creating customer loyalty before competitors enter. By being the first in a market, a company can set industry standards and shape consumer preferences, influencing the strategies of later entrants.
Game Theory: Game theory is a mathematical framework for analyzing strategic interactions between rational decision-makers. It explores how individuals or organizations make decisions when their outcomes depend not only on their actions but also on the actions of others, leading to various competitive and cooperative scenarios. This concept is crucial in understanding the dynamics of competitive actions, responses, and co-opetition strategies.
Henry Mintzberg: Henry Mintzberg is a prominent management scholar known for his work on organizational structure and strategic management. His research provides critical insights into how strategies are formed and implemented within organizations, emphasizing the importance of understanding both the deliberate and emergent aspects of strategy development.
Market entry: Market entry refers to the strategy or process a company uses to begin selling products or services in a new market. It involves various decisions regarding how to enter, such as choosing between direct investment, partnerships, or acquisitions, and understanding the competitive landscape and customer preferences in the target market. Successful market entry is crucial for gaining a foothold against existing competitors and can significantly impact a company's growth and profitability.
Market Positioning: Market positioning is the process of establishing a brand or product's unique place in the minds of consumers relative to competitors. It involves differentiating a brand through strategic marketing tactics that communicate its value proposition and target specific customer segments. This concept is crucial in competitive strategy as it influences how consumers perceive a brand, impacting market share and overall success.
Michael Porter: Michael Porter is a renowned academic known for his work on competitive strategy and economics, particularly his frameworks that analyze industries and competition. His concepts of competitive advantage, the Five Forces model, and value chain analysis have fundamentally shaped how businesses assess their strategic positioning and competitive strategies in various markets.
Price Competition: Price competition refers to the strategy where businesses compete primarily by lowering prices to attract customers and gain market share. This approach is crucial in markets with similar products or services, as it encourages firms to differentiate themselves through pricing rather than other features. The intensity of price competition can significantly influence overall industry profitability and shapes the actions and responses of competitors in the marketplace.
Product Differentiation: Product differentiation is a marketing strategy that businesses use to distinguish their products or services from those of competitors. This can be achieved through unique features, design, quality, branding, or customer service. By creating a perception of uniqueness, companies aim to attract specific customer segments and build brand loyalty, which can lead to competitive advantages in the marketplace.
Resource-based view: The resource-based view (RBV) is a strategic management framework that emphasizes the importance of a firm's internal resources and capabilities as the primary sources of competitive advantage. This perspective suggests that organizations should focus on leveraging their unique assets to create value and outperform competitors, rather than merely responding to external market forces.
Strategic actions: Strategic actions are deliberate choices made by a company that can significantly affect its competitive position and performance in the market. These actions often involve significant investments of resources and are designed to enhance a firm's long-term objectives, such as expanding market share, entering new markets, or responding to competitors' moves. By carefully planning and executing these actions, companies aim to create sustainable advantages that differentiate them from their rivals.
Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Sustainable competitive advantage refers to a company's ability to maintain its competitive edge over time, through unique resources, capabilities, or positioning that are difficult for competitors to replicate. This concept is crucial as it allows a firm to achieve long-term profitability and market dominance, while effectively responding to competitive pressures and industry changes.
SWOT Analysis: SWOT analysis is a strategic planning tool used to identify and evaluate the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats of an organization. This framework helps businesses assess their internal capabilities and external environment, guiding strategic decision-making and resource allocation.
Tactical Actions: Tactical actions refer to the short-term, specific responses that a firm employs to address competitive challenges in the marketplace. These actions are usually aimed at achieving immediate objectives and can include price adjustments, promotional strategies, or product enhancements. Understanding these actions is crucial for firms to effectively compete and respond to competitors' moves in a dynamic environment.
Value Chain Analysis: Value chain analysis is a strategic tool used to identify the primary and support activities that create value for a business, helping to understand how each step contributes to the overall competitive advantage. This analysis allows firms to pinpoint areas where they can improve efficiency, reduce costs, or enhance differentiation, aligning closely with strategic thinking and decision-making processes.