17.3 Social Influence on Cognitive Processes
2 min read•july 25, 2024
shape our behavior through descriptive and , leading to . Experiments like Asch's line judgment tasks reveal how group influence can alter perception, distort memory, and change attitudes, sometimes resulting in without .
and can hinder effective decision-making and productivity in groups. Meanwhile, can spark change, as seen in social movements. Social comparison theory explains how we evaluate ourselves by comparing to others, affecting self-esteem and attitude formation.
Social Influence and Group Dynamics
Influence of social norms
Top images from around the web for Influence of social norms
Frontiers | Evaluating the Role of Social Norms in Fostering Pro-Environmental Behaviors View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Social Influence in Adolescent Decision-Making: A Formal Framework | Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Evaluating the Role of Social Norms in Fostering Pro-Environmental Behaviors View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Social Influence in Adolescent Decision-Making: A Formal Framework | Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Top images from around the web for Influence of social norms
Frontiers | Evaluating the Role of Social Norms in Fostering Pro-Environmental Behaviors View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Social Influence in Adolescent Decision-Making: A Formal Framework | Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Evaluating the Role of Social Norms in Fostering Pro-Environmental Behaviors View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Social Influence in Adolescent Decision-Making: A Formal Framework | Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
- Social norms shape behavior through (common actions) and injunctive norms (expected actions)
- Conformity arises from (trusting others' knowledge) and (seeking acceptance)
- used line judgment tasks revealed factors affecting conformity (group size, unanimity)
- Conformity alters perception, distorts memory, and changes attitudes (misremembering event details)
- Behavioral consequences include public compliance without private acceptance (pretending to enjoy unpopular music)
- occurs when individuals falsely believe their private attitudes differ from the majority (college drinking culture)
Groupthink and social loafing
- Groupthink prioritizes harmony over critical thinking leads to poor decision-making (Bay of Pigs invasion)
- include illusion of invulnerability, collective rationalization, belief in inherent morality
- Groupthink results in incomplete alternative surveys, poor information searches, failure to examine risks
- Social loafing reduces individual effort in groups demonstrated by (rope-pulling experiment)
- Factors influencing social loafing: group size, task difficulty, individual identifiability
- Impact on group productivity and decision quality can be significant (brainstorming sessions, team projects)
Minority influence on groups
- Minority influence occurs when small groups affect majority beliefs or behaviors (environmental movements)
- demonstrated minority influence on color perception
- Effective minority influence requires consistency in arguments, flexibility in approach, timing of dissent
- distinguishes between direct vs. indirect influence and latent vs. manifest change
- leads to forgetting the source of minority-introduced ideas (technological innovations)
- Applications evident in social movements and innovation (civil rights movement, startup companies)
Role of social comparison
- includes upward, downward, and lateral comparisons
- involves reflection process (basking in reflected glory) and comparison process
- Social comparison occurs in various domains abilities, opinions, emotions
- Effects on self-esteem and self-concept through (feeling similar) and (feeling different)
- Influences attitude formation and change via and
- Social media intensifies constant comparison impacting mental health (Instagram, Facebook)
- and reinforce existing beliefs and attitudes (political polarization online)
Key Terms to Review (26)
Asch's Conformity Experiments: Asch's conformity experiments were a series of studies conducted by Solomon Asch in the 1950s that aimed to investigate the extent to which social pressure from a majority group could influence an individual to conform. These experiments demonstrated how individuals often conform to group opinions even when those opinions are clearly incorrect, revealing important insights about social influence on cognitive processes and decision-making.
Assimilation effect: The assimilation effect refers to the cognitive phenomenon where individuals alter their perceptions or judgments to align more closely with the prevailing views or norms of a social group. This effect highlights how social influence can shape cognitive processes, causing people to integrate new information in a way that fits with their existing beliefs and attitudes, often leading to a reduced sense of objectivity.
Conformity: Conformity is the adjustment of one's thoughts, feelings, or behaviors to align with those of a group or social norm. This phenomenon is driven by the desire for acceptance and the fear of rejection, leading individuals to adopt the beliefs and actions of others, sometimes even against their personal convictions. It plays a significant role in shaping cognitive processes, as social influence can affect how we perceive reality and make decisions.
Contrast Effect: The contrast effect refers to the cognitive bias where the perception of a stimulus is influenced by the presence of a contrasting stimulus, often leading to an exaggeration of differences. This effect highlights how social contexts and comparisons can shape our judgments, leading us to see things in relative terms rather than absolute measures. It plays a crucial role in understanding how social influences affect our cognitive processes and decision-making.
Conversion Theory: Conversion theory refers to the psychological process by which individuals change their beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors as a result of social influence, often moving from one viewpoint to another. This theory highlights how social pressures, group dynamics, and interpersonal interactions can lead to significant shifts in cognition, demonstrating the powerful role that others play in shaping personal beliefs and decisions.
Descriptive norms: Descriptive norms refer to the behaviors or actions that are commonly observed within a specific group or society, essentially reflecting what most people do in a given situation. They serve as unwritten rules that guide social behavior and influence individual actions by providing a reference point for what is considered normal or typical in a particular context. By understanding descriptive norms, we can see how social influence shapes cognitive processes such as decision-making, conformity, and perception of social behavior.
Echo Chambers: Echo chambers refer to environments where individuals are exposed primarily to information and opinions that reinforce their own beliefs, leading to a distortion of reality. These spaces often arise in online communities and social media, where algorithms curate content based on user preferences, promoting a cycle of affirmation while suppressing dissenting viewpoints. This can significantly influence cognitive processes such as perception, judgment, and decision-making by limiting exposure to diverse perspectives.
Festinger's Social Comparison Theory: Festinger's Social Comparison Theory suggests that individuals determine their own social and personal worth based on how they stack up against others. This theory highlights the role of social context in shaping our self-perception and cognitive processes, emphasizing how comparing ourselves to others can influence our thoughts, emotions, and behaviors.
Filter Bubbles: Filter bubbles refer to the algorithm-driven personalized information environment created by search engines and social media platforms, where users are only exposed to content that aligns with their existing beliefs and preferences. This selective exposure can limit diverse viewpoints, create echo chambers, and influence cognitive processes such as decision-making and opinion formation, leading to a distortion of reality.
Groupthink: Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon where the desire for harmony and conformity within a group leads to irrational or dysfunctional decision-making. It occurs when group members prioritize consensus over critical analysis, which can result in poor decisions as alternative viewpoints and dissenting opinions are suppressed. This phenomenon is often intensified in cohesive groups and can significantly impact decision-making processes, social interactions, and overall cognitive functioning.
Informational influence: Informational influence occurs when individuals change their beliefs or behaviors based on the information provided by others, particularly in situations where they are uncertain or lack knowledge. This influence stems from the desire to be correct and is often seen in group settings where people look to others for guidance on how to think or act. It highlights the role of social context in shaping cognitive processes and decision-making.
Injunctive Norms: Injunctive norms refer to the perceived social expectations or rules about how individuals should behave in a given situation. These norms influence behavior by providing a sense of approval or disapproval from society, guiding individuals on what is considered acceptable or unacceptable conduct. This concept is essential in understanding how social influence shapes cognitive processes, as individuals often align their actions with these norms to gain social acceptance or avoid social sanctions.
Janis's Symptoms: Janis's symptoms refer to the specific psychological effects that can occur due to excessive groupthink and social influence, as described by psychologist Irving Janis. These symptoms manifest when individuals prioritize consensus over critical thinking, leading to poor decision-making processes. This can result in a lack of creativity, overconfidence in the group’s decisions, and a disregard for alternative viewpoints, ultimately impacting cognitive processes and judgment.
Minority influence: Minority influence refers to the process by which a smaller group or individual affects the beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors of a larger group. This concept is crucial for understanding how dissenting opinions can bring about change, often leading to shifts in social norms or group consensus. It emphasizes the power of persistence, consistency, and the credibility of minority viewpoints in shaping cognitive processes within social dynamics.
Moscovici's Blue-Green Slides Experiment: Moscovici's Blue-Green Slides Experiment was a study conducted to investigate the influence of a minority on the majority's perception and judgment. It demonstrated how a consistent minority viewpoint could sway the opinions of a larger group, showcasing the dynamics of social influence and cognitive processing. This experiment illustrated the conflict between personal perception and social pressure, revealing the complexities of how individuals can be influenced by group dynamics.
Normative influence: Normative influence refers to the process by which individuals change their behavior, beliefs, or attitudes to fit in with a group or to be accepted by others. This type of social influence is driven by the desire for social approval and acceptance, leading individuals to conform to group norms, even when they privately disagree. Normative influence plays a crucial role in shaping cognitive processes, as it affects how people perceive situations, make decisions, and form judgments based on the expectations of others.
Opinion leaders: Opinion leaders are individuals who have a significant influence on the attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of others within their social network. They often possess expertise, knowledge, or credibility in a specific area, which makes them trusted sources of information and guidance. Their impact is especially pronounced in social influence, as they can shape public opinion and behaviors through their communication and interpersonal connections.
Pluralistic Ignorance: Pluralistic ignorance is a social psychological phenomenon where individuals mistakenly believe that their own thoughts, feelings, or behaviors are different from those of the majority. This misperception can lead to a lack of action or communication, as individuals may assume that their feelings are unique and therefore refrain from expressing them, resulting in group norms that do not reflect true consensus.
Private acceptance: Private acceptance refers to the psychological phenomenon where individuals not only conform to the beliefs or behaviors of a group but also genuinely adopt these beliefs or behaviors as their own. This differs from mere public compliance, where an individual may outwardly conform while internally disagreeing. Private acceptance highlights the significant impact of social influence on cognitive processes, showing how individuals can change their attitudes and beliefs through group dynamics.
Public compliance: Public compliance is the act of conforming to group norms or behaviors while privately disagreeing with them. This phenomenon often occurs in social situations where individuals feel pressured to align with the majority view, even if it contradicts their personal beliefs. Public compliance highlights the impact of social influence on individual behavior, particularly in the context of cognitive processes and decision-making.
Reference Groups: Reference groups are social groups that individuals use as a standard for evaluating their own beliefs, behaviors, and attitudes. These groups can significantly influence one's self-concept and can either motivate or discourage certain actions based on the perceived norms and values of the group. Understanding reference groups is crucial because they shape how individuals think, feel, and act in various social contexts.
Ringelmann Effect: The Ringelmann Effect refers to the phenomenon where individuals in a group exert less effort on a task when they are part of a larger group compared to when they work alone. This effect highlights how social dynamics can influence individual motivation and performance, illustrating a decrease in personal accountability as group size increases. It is an important concept in understanding how social influence can affect cognitive processes and behavior in collaborative settings.
Self-evaluation maintenance model: The self-evaluation maintenance model is a psychological theory that explains how individuals maintain their self-esteem in relation to others by managing their social comparisons. It suggests that when someone close to us performs better than we do in an area we consider important, we experience a threat to our self-esteem, which can lead us to either downplay the importance of that area or distance ourselves from the successful individual. This model highlights the dynamics of social influence on our cognitive processes, particularly regarding self-assessment and emotional responses.
Social Cryptomnesia: Social cryptomnesia refers to a cognitive phenomenon where individuals mistakenly believe that an idea or piece of information is original to them, despite it being acquired from another person or source in the past. This concept highlights how social influences can shape memory processes, leading to errors in recollection where the source of information is forgotten, yet its content is still utilized or expressed as if it were new.
Social loafing: Social loafing refers to the tendency for individuals to put in less effort when working in a group compared to when they are working alone. This phenomenon occurs because individuals may feel less accountable for their contributions in a group setting, leading to reduced motivation and effort. It highlights the influence of group dynamics on individual behavior and performance, emphasizing how social contexts can affect cognitive processes related to effort and responsibility.
Social Norms: Social norms are the unwritten rules and expectations about how individuals should behave in a given social group or society. They guide behavior by providing standards for what is considered acceptable or unacceptable, influencing how people think, feel, and act in various situations. These norms can vary greatly between different cultures and contexts, shaping the cognitive processes that drive social interaction and individual decision-making.