Glossary

3.2 Hamming Distance and Minimum Distance

4 min read•august 7, 2024

use to measure differences between codewords. This concept is crucial for understanding error detection and correction capabilities. The between codewords determines how many errors a code can handle.

Hamming distance and minimum distance are key to designing effective coding schemes. They help balance the trade-off between error control and code efficiency. These concepts are fundamental to creating robust communication systems in the digital age.

Hamming Distance and Minimum Distance

Measuring Differences Between Codewords

Top images from around the web for Measuring Differences Between Codewords

  • Hamming Distance Trio : HAMMING DISTANCE TRIO : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet ... View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Addressing multiple bit/symbol errors in DRAM subsystem [PeerJ] View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Hamming Distance Trio : HAMMING DISTANCE TRIO : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet ... View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Measuring Differences Between Codewords

  • Hamming Distance Trio : HAMMING DISTANCE TRIO : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet ... View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Addressing multiple bit/symbol errors in DRAM subsystem [PeerJ] View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Hamming Distance Trio : HAMMING DISTANCE TRIO : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet ... View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3
  • Hamming distance quantifies the number of positions in which two codewords differ
  • Calculated by comparing each position of the codewords and counting the differences
  • Provides a metric for determining the dissimilarity between codewords
  • Essential for understanding the error detection and correction capabilities of a code

Properties and Applications

  • Minimum distance is the smallest Hamming distance between any two distinct codewords in a code
  • Determines the error detection and correction capabilities of a code
    • Larger minimum distance allows for better error detection and correction
  • Hamming weight is the number of non-zero elements in a codeword
    • Special case of Hamming distance when one codeword is the all-zero codeword
  • Minimum distance is equal to the minimum Hamming weight of any non-zero codeword in a linear code

Examples and Calculations

  • Consider two binary codewords: 
    1011
    and 
    0111
    • Hamming distance is 1 because they differ in only one position
  • For the code C = {
    000
    , 
    011
    , 
    101
    , 
    110
    }, the minimum distance is 2
    • Smallest Hamming distance between any two codewords is 2 (e.g., between 
      011
      and 
      101
      )
  • In the code C = {
    0000
    , 
    1111
    }, the minimum distance is 4
    • Codewords differ in all positions, resulting in a high

Error Detection and Correction Capabilities

Relationship with Minimum Distance

  • of a code depends on its minimum distance
    • A code can detect up to (dmin−1)(d_{min} - 1) errors, where dmind_{min} is the minimum distance
  • Error correction capability is determined by the minimum distance
    • A code can correct up to ⌊dmin−12⌋\lfloor\frac{d_{min} - 1}{2}\rfloor errors
  • Increasing the minimum distance improves both error detection and correction capabilities

Trade-offs and Code Rate

  • measures the efficiency of a code in terms of information transmission
    • Defined as the ratio of the number of information bits to the total number of bits in a codeword
  • Higher error detection and correction capabilities often come at the cost of a lower code rate
    • Adding more (parity bits) increases the codeword length and reduces the code rate
  • Balancing the code rate and error control capabilities is crucial in designing efficient coding schemes

Examples and Applications

  • Consider a code with a minimum distance of 5
    • It can detect up to 4 errors and correct up to 2 errors
  • are a class of linear codes with a minimum distance of 3
    • They can detect and correct single-bit errors
  • Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes and turbo codes achieve high error correction performance with reasonable code rates
    • Widely used in modern communication systems (5G, satellite communications)

Bounds and Perfect Codes

Sphere Packing Bound

  • bound provides an upper limit on the number of codewords in a code with a given length and minimum distance
  • Based on the concept of packing non-overlapping spheres in a high-dimensional space
    • Each sphere represents a codeword and its surrounding space that can be corrected
  • Helps determine the maximum possible code size for a given error correction capability

Singleton Bound and Perfect Codes

  • states that for a linear code with length nn, dimension kk, and minimum distance dd, d≤n−k+1d \leq n - k + 1
    • Provides an upper limit on the minimum distance of a code
  • Perfect codes are codes that attain the sphere packing bound with equality
    • They have the maximum possible number of codewords for a given length and minimum distance
  • Examples of perfect codes include the Hamming codes and the Golay codes
    • Hamming codes: Perfect codes with parameters (2m−1,2m−m−1,3)(2^m - 1, 2^m - m - 1, 3), where m≥2m \geq 2
    • Golay codes: Binary Golay code (23,12,7)(23, 12, 7) and ternary Golay code (11,6,5)(11, 6, 5)

Implications and Applications

  • Bounds provide theoretical limits on the performance of error-correcting codes
    • Help in understanding the fundamental trade-offs between code length, code rate, and error correction capability
  • Perfect codes are optimal in terms of error correction for a given length and code rate
    • However, they are rare and may not always be practical for real-world applications
  • Designing codes that approach the bounds while maintaining practical implementation complexity is an ongoing research area
    • Turbo codes, LDPC codes, and polar codes are examples of high-performance codes that approach the theoretical limits

Key Terms to Review (18)

Block codes: Block codes are a type of error-correcting code that encodes data in fixed-size blocks, allowing for the detection and correction of errors that may occur during data transmission or storage. These codes are defined by their length and dimension, providing a structured method to represent information, which connects to various coding techniques and mathematical properties.
Bose–Chaudhuri–Hocquenghem codes: Bose–Chaudhuri–Hocquenghem (BCH) codes are a class of cyclic error-correcting codes that are designed to correct multiple random errors in data transmissions. These codes are defined over finite fields and are particularly notable for their ability to provide a high level of error correction capability, making them widely used in various communication systems. Their design relies heavily on the concepts of Hamming distance and minimum distance, as well as weight distribution principles.
Code Equivalence: Code equivalence refers to the relationship between two codes that encode the same set of information or messages, despite potentially differing in their structure or representation. This concept is particularly important when analyzing codes, as it highlights that different codes can achieve the same functionality in terms of error detection and correction, linking closely to the efficiency and effectiveness of coding schemes.
Code Rate: Code rate is a crucial metric in coding theory that represents the efficiency of a code by quantifying the ratio of the number of information bits to the total number of bits transmitted. A higher code rate indicates a more efficient code, but it may also mean less error correction capability. Understanding code rate helps in evaluating different coding techniques, their performance, and their application in various communication systems.
D = min{d(x, y)}: The expression d = min{d(x, y)} refers to the minimum distance in a coding theory context, where d(x, y) represents the distance between two codewords x and y. This minimum distance is crucial for understanding error detection and correction capabilities of a code, as it helps determine how many errors can be reliably detected or corrected. Essentially, the minimum distance quantifies the worst-case scenario for distinguishing between codewords and plays a vital role in ensuring the integrity of data transmission.
D ≤ t + 1: The inequality $$d \leq t + 1$$ relates to error correction in coding theory, where 'd' represents the minimum distance of a code and 't' represents the maximum number of errors that can be corrected. This relationship is crucial because it establishes the threshold for how many errors a code can successfully correct while still being able to distinguish between different codewords. Understanding this inequality helps in designing codes that are both efficient and reliable in error correction.
Distance Properties: Distance properties refer to the measures that quantify how different two codewords are in coding theory, crucial for assessing error detection and correction capabilities. These properties, including Hamming distance and minimum distance, play a vital role in determining the effectiveness of codes for data transmission and storage, influencing their ability to identify and correct errors that may occur during communication or data retrieval.
Error correction capability: Error correction capability refers to the ability of a coding scheme to detect and correct errors that occur during data transmission or storage. This capability is crucial in ensuring data integrity and reliability, as it allows systems to recover from mistakes caused by noise or interference in communication channels. The effectiveness of this capability is often measured by parameters like Hamming distance, which helps in determining the number of errors that can be corrected.
Error detection capability: Error detection capability refers to the ability of a coding scheme to identify and locate errors that occur during data transmission or storage. This capability is crucial for maintaining the integrity of data, allowing systems to recognize when errors have happened and take appropriate actions, such as requesting retransmission. Effective error detection ensures that information remains accurate and reliable, which is essential in digital communication systems.
Hamming Codes: Hamming codes are a family of error-correcting codes that can detect and correct single-bit errors in digital data transmission. They achieve this by adding redundancy to the original data using parity bits, which allows the receiver to identify and fix errors that may have occurred during transmission, thereby ensuring data integrity. Hamming codes are directly related to concepts like Hamming distance and minimum distance, which measure the error-correcting capability of the code, as well as generator and parity check polynomials that provide systematic ways to encode and decode messages.
Hamming Distance: Hamming distance is a metric used to measure the difference between two strings of equal length, specifically counting the number of positions at which the corresponding symbols are different. This concept plays a crucial role in error detection and correction, providing a way to quantify how many bit errors have occurred between transmitted and received data, as well as establishing the minimum distance required for effective error correction in coding schemes.
Hamming's Theorem: Hamming's Theorem states that for a linear code to be able to correct a certain number of errors, there must be a minimum distance between codewords that is sufficiently large. Specifically, it provides a relationship between the minimum distance of a code and its error-correcting capabilities, helping to establish the number of correctable errors based on the code's parameters. This theorem is fundamental in understanding how generator and parity check matrices are designed, as well as determining the Hamming distance and minimum distance in coding theory.
Linear codes: Linear codes are a class of error-correcting codes that are defined over a finite field and exhibit linearity in their encoding process. This means that any linear combination of codewords results in another codeword, allowing for efficient encoding and decoding processes. The properties of linear codes relate closely to concepts such as distance, weight distribution, and decoding techniques, making them essential in the design of reliable communication systems.
Minimum Distance: Minimum distance refers to the smallest Hamming distance between any two distinct codewords in a coding system. This concept is crucial because it determines the error-correcting and error-detecting capabilities of the code, as a larger minimum distance allows for the correction of more errors and provides better reliability in data transmission.
Redundancy: Redundancy in coding theory refers to the intentional inclusion of extra bits in a message to ensure that errors can be detected and corrected. This additional information provides a safety net that helps maintain the integrity of data during transmission or storage, enhancing the reliability of communication systems.
Singleton Bound: The singleton bound is a fundamental limit in coding theory that provides a relationship between the length of a code, the number of information symbols, and its error-correcting capability. It states that for a block code with length $n$, dimension $k$, and minimum distance $d$, the inequality $d \leq n - k + 1$ must hold. This concept connects to various features of coding, including error correction efficiency and optimality in specific codes.
Sphere Packing: Sphere packing is a concept in mathematics and coding theory that refers to the arrangement of non-overlapping spheres within a given space to maximize the number of spheres that can fit. This idea is closely related to error detection and correction, as it helps define the distances between different codewords, specifically by determining how many spheres can fit without overlapping based on their radius, which is tied to the minimum distance in coding theory.
Weight Enumeration: Weight enumeration is the process of counting the number of codewords in a coding system that have a specific Hamming weight, which is the number of non-zero elements (or '1's) in a codeword. This concept is crucial in understanding how many codewords can be formed and their distributions, which ties directly into analyzing the error detection and correction capabilities of codes. By knowing the weight distribution, one can determine the minimum distance of the code, which helps in identifying its effectiveness in protecting against errors during data transmission.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Back
Practice QuizGlossary
Practice QuizGlossary
Next guide