Fiveable

๐Ÿ“œClassical Poetics Unit 12 Review

QR code for Classical Poetics practice questions

12.4 The influence of On the Sublime on later literary criticism

12.4 The influence of On the Sublime on later literary criticism

Written by the Fiveable Content Team โ€ข Last updated August 2025
Written by the Fiveable Content Team โ€ข Last updated August 2025
๐Ÿ“œClassical Poetics
Unit & Topic Study Guides

Longinus' On the Sublime shaped how critics, philosophers, and artists thought about greatness in writing for centuries after it was composed. The treatise didn't just stay locked in the ancient world; it became a touchstone that each major literary period reinterpreted for its own purposes. Tracing that influence reveals how a single classical text helped build the foundations of modern aesthetics and literary criticism.

Influence on Neoclassicism and Romanticism

Neoclassical Adoption of Sublime Principles

The Neoclassical period (roughly the 17th and 18th centuries) treated Longinus as an authority on par with Aristotle and Horace. Writers and critics valued his emphasis on grandeur, emotional impact, and elevated style, seeing these as principles that could discipline and enrich modern composition.

The pivotal moment was Nicolas Boileau-Desprรฉaux's French translation of On the Sublime in 1674. Boileau didn't just translate the text; he championed it. His own Art Poรฉtique (also 1674) wove Longinus' ideas into a systematic French literary theory, and the translation made Longinus accessible to readers across France and England. For decades afterward, critics in both countries treated the sublime as a legitimate standard for judging literary quality alongside classical rules of form and decorum.

Romantic Reinterpretation of the Sublime

Romanticism took Longinus' concept and pushed it in a dramatically different direction. Where Neoclassical writers focused on rhetorical technique as the vehicle for sublimity, Romantic poets and artists shifted the emphasis toward overwhelming emotional experience, particularly experiences triggered by nature and individual perception.

  • William Wordsworth explored the sublime in poems like Tintern Abbey, finding it in the contemplation of natural landscapes and the workings of memory.
  • Samuel Taylor Coleridge evoked it in Kubla Khan through visionary imagery and a sense of creative mystery.
  • Romantic painters like Caspar David Friedrich depicted vast, awe-inspiring landscapes specifically to produce the emotional transport Longinus described.

The key shift: Longinus had located the sublime primarily in language and rhetoric. The Romantics relocated it to experience itself, especially experiences of terror, infinity, and the unknown. This was a genuine expansion of the concept, not just a restatement.

Evolution of Sublime Concepts

Boileau's translation served as a bridge between these two phases. Neoclassical thinkers read Longinus as a guide to producing elevated writing. Romantic thinkers read him as evidence that the deepest power of art lies in its emotional and psychological effects. Both readings are defensible based on the original text, which is part of why On the Sublime proved so durable. The concept evolved from rhetorical grandeur into something broader: a category of intense aesthetic experience that influenced artistic and literary movements well into the 19th century and beyond.

Neoclassical Adoption of Sublime Principles, Neoclassicism and Romanticism | Boundless Art History

Impact on Aesthetic Theory

Burke's Psychological Approach to the Sublime

Edmund Burke's A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (1757) was one of the first systematic attempts to explain the sublime in psychological terms. Burke argued that the sublime is rooted in feelings of terror, astonishment, and awe, and he drew a sharp contrast between the sublime and the beautiful:

  • The beautiful produces pleasure through qualities like smoothness, smallness, and delicacy.
  • The sublime produces a kind of "delightful horror" through vastness, darkness, power, and obscurity.

Burke identified sources of the sublime in nature (storms, mountains, the ocean), in art, and in human experiences of danger or overwhelming force. His emphasis on terror as the core emotion of sublimity gave Romantic writers and painters a theoretical framework for the intense, sometimes frightening imagery they favored.

Kant's Philosophical Exploration of the Sublime

Immanuel Kant built on both Longinus and Burke in his Critique of Judgment (1790), developing the most philosophically rigorous account of the sublime. Kant distinguished two types:

  • Mathematical sublime: the feeling produced by vast magnitudes that overwhelm our ability to comprehend them (a starry sky, an endless desert).
  • Dynamical sublime: the feeling produced by powerful natural forces that could destroy us but that we observe from safety (a violent storm, an erupting volcano).

For Kant, the sublime arises from a tension: our senses are overwhelmed, but our rational mind recognizes that it can think beyond what the senses can grasp. That recognition of reason's power over sensory limitation is what ultimately produces the feeling of elevation. This account gave the sublime a philosophical grounding that connected it to broader questions about human cognition and freedom.

Neoclassical Adoption of Sublime Principles, What a Portrait of a British Family Reveals about 18th-Century England and Tea | Getty Iris

Aesthetic Theory Developments

Together, Longinus, Burke, and Kant established the sublime as a central concept in Western aesthetics. Their work sparked ongoing debates about the relationship between form, content, and emotional impact. Philosophers and critics explored how imagination functions in both perceiving and creating sublime experiences, and the sublime became a key term in discussions of taste, beauty, and artistic value. These developments shaped modern aesthetics and fed into movements from Symbolism to Abstract Expressionism.

Contributions to Literary Criticism

Elevation of Emotional Impact in Literature

Before Longinus, much ancient criticism focused on structure, imitation, and moral instruction. Longinus introduced a different measure of literary quality: transport (Greek: ekstasis), the power of a text to seize and elevate the reader beyond ordinary experience. This was a radical claim. It meant that a work could break formal rules and still be great if it moved the audience powerfully enough.

This idea had lasting consequences. Critics like Samuel Johnson and William Hazlitt incorporated emotional impact into their evaluations of literature. And the broader principle that a text's effect on the reader matters as much as its formal properties eventually contributed to 20th-century developments like reader-response criticism and affective stylistics.

Genius Theory and Creative Inspiration

Longinus argued that the first and most important source of the sublime is greatness of thought, which depends on the writer's innate capacity. You can learn rhetorical technique, but you can't teach someone to think greatly. This emphasis on natural talent over learned skill fed directly into genius theory, the idea that the greatest art comes from extraordinary individuals with inborn creative power.

The Romantics took this further, casting the poet as a visionary or prophet whose personal experience and imagination were the true sources of literary value. This led to increased interest in biographical criticism (reading works through the lens of the author's life) and questions about authorial intent that remain central to literary study.

Expansion of Critical Vocabulary

On the Sublime gave critics a concrete analytical framework. Longinus identified five sources of the sublime:

  1. Grand thoughts (greatness of conception)
  2. Strong emotions (powerful and inspired passion)
  3. Figures of speech (effective use of rhetorical figures)
  4. Noble diction (elevated word choice and imagery)
  5. Dignified composition (arrangement of words for rhythm and grandeur)

These categories gave later critics specific tools for analyzing why a passage works, not just whether it works. That kind of systematic attention to textual detail influenced the development of close reading practices and contributed to the formation of modern literary theory and criticism as disciplined fields of study.