---
title: "West Coast Hotel v. Parrish | Civil Rights"
description: "West Coast Hotel v. Parrish is the 1937 Supreme Court case that upheld a state minimum wage law, showing a shift toward stronger labor regulation."
canonical: "https://fiveable.me/civil-rights-civil-liberties/key-terms/west-coast-hotel-v-parrish"
type: "key-term"
subject: "Civil Rights and Civil Liberties"
unit: "Unit 1"
---

# West Coast Hotel v. Parrish | Civil Rights

## Definition

West Coast Hotel v. Parrish is the 1937 Supreme Court case that upheld a state minimum wage law for women. In Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, it shows the Court moving toward allowing more government regulation of labor and economic fairness.

## What It Is

West Coast Hotel v. Parrish is a Supreme Court case from 1937 that upheld Washington state’s minimum wage law for women. In this course, it matters because it marks a major turning point in how the Court treated economic regulation during the New Deal.

The dispute started when Elsie Parrish, a hotel employee, sued for back wages after her employer paid less than the state minimum wage. West Coast Hotel argued that the wage law violated freedom of contract, a legal idea that had been used before to strike down labor protections. The Court rejected that argument and ruled that states could set minimum wages to protect workers.

That decision reversed the older approach seen in cases like Adkins v. Children’s Hospital, where the Court had been much more skeptical of labor laws. By 1937, though, the Court was becoming more willing to let government step in when it came to wages, working conditions, and economic security. That shift is one reason the case shows up in civil rights and civil liberties units that cover federalism and the expansion of government power.

A big part of the case is not just the wage rule itself, but the Court’s change in attitude. It signaled that the Constitution did not automatically block every labor regulation. Instead, the government could act to protect workers from exploitative conditions, especially when the law aimed at fairness and public welfare.

The case is also tied to women’s labor because the law at issue protected female workers specifically. That makes it a useful example of how courts, economic policy, and rights language overlap. It is not a full equal rights case in the modern sense, but it helped make labor protections more acceptable, which mattered for later civil rights and workplace equality debates.

## Why It Matters

This case matters because it shows how civil liberties and civil rights can overlap with economic policy. A lot of students think rights cases are only about speech, race, or privacy, but West Coast Hotel v. Parrish shows that the Court also shaped the conditions of work and pay.

It is one of the clearest examples of the New Deal era changing constitutional law. Before this shift, the Court often treated labor regulation as an unconstitutional intrusion on private business contracts. After this case, government regulation of wages became easier to defend, which helped set the stage for broader labor protections.

For a Civil Rights and Civil Liberties class, the case is also a reminder that rights do not grow in isolation. Wage rules, due process, and equal protection debates all affect who gets treated fairly in daily life. If you are tracing how federal and state power changed over time, this case is a good checkpoint because it shows the Court giving states more room to protect workers.

## Connections

### Minimum Wage

This case is directly about a minimum wage law, so the term is the policy side of the ruling. The Court approved the idea that government can set a wage floor instead of leaving pay entirely to employers and workers. When you see minimum wage in this course, think about it as a government tool for labor protection, not just an economics topic.

### New Deal

West Coast Hotel v. Parrish fits the broader New Deal shift toward more government action in the economy. The case came during a time when the federal government was trying to respond to the Great Depression with labor and welfare reforms. It shows the Court becoming less hostile to regulation that aimed to stabilize workers’ lives.

### Equal Protection Clause

The case is not mainly an Equal Protection Clause case, but it connects to fairness in government treatment. The law protected women workers by setting a wage standard, which raises questions about whether the government is helping or separating groups. In class, this link often comes up when comparing labor protection to later equality-based claims.

### [National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius](/civil-rights-civil-liberties/key-terms/national-federation-of-independent-business-v-sebelius)

Both cases show the Court allowing more room for government action in economic and social policy, though in very different eras and contexts. West Coast Hotel dealt with wages and labor regulation, while NFIB v. Sebelius dealt with health care and federal power. Together they show how constitutional law can shift when judges reconsider how much regulation is acceptable.

## On the AP Exam

A quiz, essay, or case-analysis question might ask you to identify West Coast Hotel v. Parrish as the case that upheld minimum wage regulation and marked a move away from the freedom-of-contract approach. If you get a prompt about New Deal reforms, labor rights, or changing Supreme Court attitudes in the 1930s, use this case as evidence that the Court became more open to government regulation.

When you analyze it, connect the holding to the broader pattern, not just the facts. A strong answer explains that the Court allowed states more power to protect workers, especially in economic conditions where laissez-faire rules looked outdated. If the question compares court cases, mention that this ruling reversed the earlier hostility toward wage laws and helped normalize labor protections.

## Key Takeaways

- West Coast Hotel v. Parrish is the 1937 Supreme Court case that upheld a state minimum wage law for women.
- The ruling signaled a shift away from the Court’s earlier protection of freedom of contract in labor disputes.
- It fit the New Deal era’s broader move toward stronger government regulation of wages and working conditions.
- The case matters in Civil Rights and Civil Liberties because it shows how courts shape fairness in the workplace, not just speech or voting rights.
- It is a useful example of federalism because it shows states gaining room to regulate labor for the public good.

## FAQs

### What is West Coast Hotel v. Parrish in Civil Rights and Civil Liberties?

It is the 1937 Supreme Court case that upheld Washington’s minimum wage law for women. In this course, it shows the Court moving toward accepting government regulation of labor and away from the old freedom-of-contract approach.

### Why did West Coast Hotel v. Parrish matter for labor rights?

The decision made it easier for governments to set wage floors and protect workers from very low pay. That mattered because it gave legal support to labor reforms that had been harder to defend before the New Deal shift.

### Is West Coast Hotel v. Parrish about equal protection?

Not directly, but it connects to fairness and treatment under the law. The case involved a wage rule for women, so it can come up in discussions about how the government protects vulnerable workers and how labor policy intersects with civil rights.

### How do I use West Coast Hotel v. Parrish in an essay?

Use it as evidence that the Supreme Court became more willing to uphold economic regulation during the New Deal. It works well in essays about federalism, labor rights, or the changing role of government in protecting workers.

## Related Study Guides

- [1.7 Federalism and civil rights](/civil-rights-civil-liberties/unit-1/federalism-civil-rights/study-guide/OrtUF1p2sJNgU7RM)

## About This Document

Canonical Fiveable pages are available as Markdown at the same path plus `.md`.

- [llms.txt](https://fiveable.me/llms.txt): index of Fiveable's sections and URL patterns
- [llms-full.txt](https://fiveable.me/llms-full.txt): complete subject and unit listing
- [MCP server](https://fiveable.me/mcp): call Fiveable as tools instead of fetching pages (`https://fiveable.me/api/mcp`)
- [MCP server for AP teachers](https://fiveable.me/mcp/teachers): a teacher's classes, assignments and AP-rubric grading (`https://fiveable.me/api/mcp/teacher`)

## Structured Data

```json
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"LearningResource","@id":"https://fiveable.me/civil-rights-civil-liberties/key-terms/west-coast-hotel-v-parrish#resource","name":"West Coast Hotel v. Parrish | Civil Rights","url":"https://fiveable.me/civil-rights-civil-liberties/key-terms/west-coast-hotel-v-parrish","learningResourceType":"Concept explainer","educationalLevel":"AP® / High School","about":{"@id":"https://fiveable.me/civil-rights-civil-liberties/key-terms/west-coast-hotel-v-parrish#term"},"audience":{"@type":"EducationalAudience","educationalRole":"student"},"dateModified":"2026-07-03T02:21:15.319Z","isPartOf":{"@type":"Collection","name":"Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Key Terms","url":"https://fiveable.me/civil-rights-civil-liberties/key-terms"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Fiveable","url":"https://fiveable.me"}},{"@type":"DefinedTerm","@id":"https://fiveable.me/civil-rights-civil-liberties/key-terms/west-coast-hotel-v-parrish#term","name":"West Coast Hotel v. Parrish","description":"West Coast Hotel v. Parrish is the 1937 Supreme Court case that upheld a state minimum wage law for women. In Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, it shows the Court moving toward allowing more government regulation of labor and economic fairness.","url":"https://fiveable.me/civil-rights-civil-liberties/key-terms/west-coast-hotel-v-parrish","inDefinedTermSet":{"@type":"DefinedTermSet","name":"Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Key Terms","url":"https://fiveable.me/civil-rights-civil-liberties/key-terms"}},{"@type":"FAQPage","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"What is West Coast Hotel v. Parrish in Civil Rights and Civil Liberties?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"It is the 1937 Supreme Court case that upheld Washington’s minimum wage law for women. In this course, it shows the Court moving toward accepting government regulation of labor and away from the old freedom-of-contract approach."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Why did West Coast Hotel v. Parrish matter for labor rights?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"The decision made it easier for governments to set wage floors and protect workers from very low pay. That mattered because it gave legal support to labor reforms that had been harder to defend before the New Deal shift."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Is West Coast Hotel v. Parrish about equal protection?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Not directly, but it connects to fairness and treatment under the law. The case involved a wage rule for women, so it can come up in discussions about how the government protects vulnerable workers and how labor policy intersects with civil rights."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How do I use West Coast Hotel v. Parrish in an essay?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Use it as evidence that the Supreme Court became more willing to uphold economic regulation during the New Deal. It works well in essays about federalism, labor rights, or the changing role of government in protecting workers."}}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Civil Rights and Civil Liberties","item":"https://fiveable.me/civil-rights-civil-liberties"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Key Terms","item":"https://fiveable.me/civil-rights-civil-liberties/key-terms"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Unit 1","item":"https://fiveable.me/civil-rights-civil-liberties/unit-1"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"West Coast Hotel v. Parrish"}]}]}
```