🔍Auditing Unit 4 – Audit Evidence and Documentation

Audit evidence and documentation form the backbone of the audit process. Auditors must gather sufficient, appropriate evidence to support their opinions and conclusions, using various methods like physical examination, confirmation, and analytical procedures. Proper documentation of audit procedures, evidence, and conclusions is crucial for transparency and accountability. Auditors must exercise professional skepticism, evaluate evidence critically, and maintain clear, comprehensive records throughout the audit engagement.

What's This Unit About?

  • Focuses on the critical role of audit evidence in supporting the auditor's opinion and conclusions
  • Explores the various types of audit evidence auditors collect and evaluate during an audit engagement
  • Discusses the importance of proper documentation to support the audit process and conclusions reached
  • Highlights the auditor's responsibility to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
  • Examines the factors that influence the reliability and persuasiveness of audit evidence
    • Includes considerations such as the source, nature, and timing of evidence obtained
  • Emphasizes the need for professional skepticism when gathering and evaluating audit evidence
  • Covers the methods and techniques used by auditors to obtain audit evidence (inquiry, observation, inspection, etc.)

Key Concepts and Definitions

  • Audit Evidence: Information used by the auditor to arrive at conclusions that form the basis for the auditor's opinion
    • Can be obtained from internal or external sources
  • Sufficiency: Refers to the measure of the quantity of audit evidence obtained
    • Influenced by factors such as the assessed risks of material misstatement and the quality of evidence
  • Appropriateness: Relates to the measure of the quality of audit evidence, including its relevance and reliability
  • Professional Skepticism: An attitude that includes a questioning mind and a critical assessment of audit evidence
  • Audit Documentation: The record of audit procedures performed, relevant audit evidence obtained, and conclusions reached (also known as working papers)
  • Audit Procedures: The specific actions and steps taken by the auditor to gather and evaluate audit evidence
  • Substantive Procedures: Audit procedures designed to detect material misstatements at the assertion level
    • Includes tests of details and substantive analytical procedures

Types of Audit Evidence

  • Physical Examination: Inspection or count of tangible assets (inventory, cash, property, etc.)
  • Confirmation: Obtaining written or electronic verification from a third party (accounts receivable, bank balances, legal confirmations)
  • Documentation: Examining records, documents, or other information, whether internal or external, in paper or electronic form (contracts, invoices, meeting minutes)
  • Analytical Procedures: Evaluating financial and non-financial data to identify unusual trends, fluctuations, or relationships
  • Inquiry: Seeking information from knowledgeable persons within or outside the entity (management, employees, experts)
  • Observation: Watching a process or procedure being performed by others (inventory count, internal control activities)
  • Recalculation: Checking the mathematical accuracy of documents or records
  • Reperformance: Independently executing procedures or controls originally performed by the entity

Gathering Audit Evidence

  • Plan and perform audit procedures to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
  • Consider the relevance and reliability of information to be used as audit evidence
    • Evaluate the source, nature, and timing of evidence
  • Use a combination of audit procedures to gather evidence from various sources
    • Corroborative evidence from multiple sources enhances the persuasiveness of conclusions
  • Adapt audit procedures based on the assessed risks of material misstatement and the nature of the assertion being tested
  • Exercise professional skepticism when gathering audit evidence
    • Maintain a questioning mind and critically assess the evidence obtained
  • Document the audit procedures performed and the evidence gathered in the working papers

Evaluating Audit Evidence

  • Assess the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence obtained
    • Consider the quantity and quality of evidence in relation to the assessed risks and assertions
  • Evaluate the consistency of audit evidence from different sources
    • Investigate and resolve any inconsistencies or contradictory evidence
  • Consider the relevance and reliability of audit evidence
    • Assess factors such as the source, nature, and timing of evidence
  • Determine whether the audit evidence supports the assertions and conclusions reached
  • Exercise professional judgment in evaluating the persuasiveness of audit evidence
  • Document the evaluation process and conclusions in the working papers
    • Clearly link the evidence to the assertions and conclusions

Documentation Requirements

  • Prepare audit documentation that provides a clear understanding of the work performed, evidence obtained, and conclusions reached
  • Include sufficient detail to enable an experienced auditor with no previous connection to the audit to understand the nature, timing, and extent of procedures performed
  • Document significant matters arising during the audit, the conclusions reached, and significant professional judgments made
  • Ensure audit documentation is complete, accurate, and finalized on a timely basis
    • Assemble the final audit file within a reasonable period after the date of the auditor's report
  • Maintain the confidentiality, safe custody, integrity, accessibility, and retrievability of audit documentation
  • Retain audit documentation for a period sufficient to meet the needs of the firm, professional standards, and legal and regulatory requirements

Common Challenges and Pitfalls

  • Overreliance on management representations without obtaining corroborative evidence
  • Failing to exercise professional skepticism when gathering and evaluating audit evidence
  • Not obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support conclusions
  • Inadequate documentation of audit procedures performed and evidence obtained
    • Lack of clear linkage between evidence and conclusions
  • Not adapting audit procedures to address identified risks or changes in circumstances
  • Overlooking inconsistencies or contradictory evidence
  • Inadequate supervision and review of audit work performed by team members
  • Not considering the relevance and reliability of audit evidence from external sources

Practical Applications

  • When testing the existence of inventory, perform physical examination procedures to obtain direct evidence
    • Observe the client's inventory count process and perform independent test counts
  • To verify accounts receivable balances, send confirmation requests to a sample of customers
    • Evaluate the responses and perform alternative procedures for non-responses
  • When assessing the valuation of investments, obtain independent confirmations from third parties (brokers, custodians)
    • Examine supporting documentation such as investment statements and market data
  • To test the completeness of liabilities, review subsequent cash disbursements and unpaid invoices
    • Inquire with management and legal counsel about potential unrecorded liabilities
  • When evaluating the appropriateness of revenue recognition, examine customer contracts and shipping documents
    • Perform cut-off testing to ensure revenue is recognized in the proper period
  • To assess the reasonableness of management's estimates, review the assumptions and methodologies used
    • Compare estimates to historical data, industry benchmarks, and subsequent events
  • When testing internal controls over financial reporting, observe the performance of control activities
    • Inspect relevant documentation and reperform key controls to assess their operating effectiveness


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.