4.3 The appropriation and commodification of African art by colonial powers
4 min read•Last Updated on August 13, 2024
Colonial powers took African art by force and trade, viewing it as primitive. They displayed it in museums, reinforcing stereotypes and cultural superiority. This appropriation ignored the art's true meaning and context.
The commodification of African art turned cultural objects into marketable goods. This global trade exploited African artists and communities, leading to cultural erosion. These issues continue to impact contemporary art markets and cultural institutions.
Colonial Appropriation of African Art
Acquisition and Assertion of Cultural Superiority
Top images from around the web for Acquisition and Assertion of Cultural Superiority
Henry Morton Stanley meeting David Livingstone at Ujiji, in Africa. Coloured wood engraving by H ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Colonial powers (France, Britain, Germany) engaged in large-scale acquisition of African art through military conquest, trade, and scientific expeditions
The collection of African art was driven by a desire to assert cultural superiority, with European colonizers viewing African art as primitive, exotic, and inferior to Western art traditions
Colonial administrators, missionaries, and anthropologists played a significant role in the collection and classification of African art, often using exploitative and disrespectful methods towards African communities
Eurocentric Classification and Display
The classification of African art by colonial powers was based on Eurocentric notions of art and aesthetics, leading to the imposition of Western categories and hierarchies on diverse African artistic traditions
African art was often displayed in colonial exhibitions, world fairs, and museums as curiosities or ethnographic artifacts, rather than as works of art in their own right
The display of African art in colonial contexts served to reinforce stereotypes and misconceptions about African cultures, while promoting the idea of European cultural supremacy
African art was frequently presented as static and unchanging, ignoring the dynamic and evolving nature of African artistic traditions
The display of African art in colonial contexts often involved the removal of art objects from their original cultural and spiritual contexts, leading to a loss of meaning and significance
Commodification of African Art
Transformation into Marketable Commodities
The commodification of African art by colonial powers transformed traditional African art objects into marketable commodities, leading to the development of a global trade in African art
The economic value of African art was often determined by Western collectors and art markets, rather than by the communities that created the art, leading to the exploitation of African artists and the undervaluing of their work
The global trade in African art was characterized by unequal power relations, with African artists and communities having little control over the production, distribution, and sale of their art
Cultural Erosion and Contemporary Issues
The commodification of African art contributed to the erosion of traditional cultural practices and the loss of cultural heritage in many African communities
The commodification of African art also led to the proliferation of forgeries and replicas, which further devalued and misrepresented African artistic traditions
The economic and cultural implications of the commodification of African art continue to be felt in contemporary art markets and cultural institutions, where issues of authenticity, ownership, and cultural appropriation remain contentious
Contemporary African artists often struggle to assert their agency and cultural identity in the face of ongoing commodification and appropriation of African art by Western markets and institutions
Decontextualization of African Cultures
Removal from Cultural Contexts
The appropriation of African art by colonial powers often involved the removal of art objects from their original cultural contexts, leading to a loss of meaning and significance
African art was frequently presented in colonial contexts as primitive, exotic, and Other, reinforcing stereotypes and misconceptions about African cultures
The decontextualization of African art by colonial powers contributed to the erasure of the complex histories, beliefs, and practices associated with African artistic traditions
Imposition of Western Standards and Marginalization
The misrepresentation of African art by colonial powers often involved the imposition of Western aesthetic standards and interpretations, which failed to capture the diversity and complexity of African art forms
The appropriation of African art by colonial powers also contributed to the marginalization and suppression of African cultural identities, as African art was often used to justify colonial ideologies of cultural superiority and domination
The legacy of the decontextualization and misrepresentation of African art by colonial powers continues to shape contemporary understandings of African cultures and artistic traditions
Contemporary African artists and scholars are working to reclaim and recontextualize African art, challenging the colonial narratives and asserting the agency and diversity of African artistic traditions
Museums and the Colonial Legacy
Perpetuating Colonial Ideologies and Power Structures
Museums and art institutions in Europe and North America played a significant role in the collection, classification, and display of African art during the colonial period, often perpetuating colonial ideologies and power structures
The acquisition policies and practices of museums and collectors during the colonial period were often unethical and exploitative, involving the removal of art objects from African communities without proper consent or compensation
The display of African art in museums and art institutions during the colonial period often reinforced stereotypes and misconceptions about African cultures, presenting African art as primitive, exotic, and inferior to Western art traditions
Classification Systems and Contemporary Debates
The classification systems used by museums and art institutions to organize and interpret African art were often based on Eurocentric notions of art and aesthetics, failing to capture the diversity and complexity of African artistic traditions
The legacy of colonial-era museum practices and collecting policies continues to shape contemporary debates around the repatriation and restitution of African art objects
Museums and art institutions in the postcolonial era have a responsibility to critically examine their role in perpetuating the colonial legacy of African art appropriation and to develop new approaches to the collection, display, and interpretation of African art that prioritize the perspectives and experiences of African communities
Contemporary museums and art institutions are increasingly engaging in collaborative projects with African communities and artists to develop more culturally sensitive and inclusive approaches to the display and interpretation of African art