Grothendieck topologies generalize classical topological spaces to abstract categories. They provide a framework for defining sheaves on categories, crucial for studying algebraic and arithmetic properties of schemes. This approach enables the development of cohomology theories in arithmetic geometry, extending beyond traditional topological settings.
Introduced by in the 1960s, these topologies arose from the need to study étale cohomology for schemes lacking a suitable classical topology. They allow for a more flexible notion of "covering" in categories, extending beyond open subsets and enabling the study of geometric properties in non-classical settings.
Definition of Grothendieck topologies
Grothendieck topologies generalize classical topological spaces to abstract categories
Provide a framework for defining sheaves on categories, crucial for studying algebraic and arithmetic properties of schemes
Enable the development of cohomology theories in arithmetic geometry, extending beyond traditional topological settings
Motivation and historical context
Top images from around the web for Motivation and historical context
Motivation | Introduction to Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Motivic cohomology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original
Motivation | Introduction to Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Motivic cohomology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Introduced by Alexander Grothendieck in the 1960s to unify various cohomology theories
Arose from the need to study étale cohomology for schemes lacking a suitable classical topology
Allowed for a more flexible notion of "covering" in categories, extending beyond open subsets
Relation to site theory
Sites consist of a category equipped with a
Provide a foundation for defining sheaves on categories
Enable the study of geometric properties in non-classical settings (schemes, algebraic stacks)
Generalize the concept of topological spaces to abstract categories
Comparison with classical topologies
Classical topologies defined by open sets, Grothendieck topologies use coverings in categories
Grothendieck topologies allow for "local" properties in categories without a notion of points
Provide a more general framework for studying sheaves and cohomology
Include classical topologies as special cases (small site of a topological space)
Categories and sieves
Categories form the underlying structure for Grothendieck topologies
Sieves generalize the notion of open coverings in classical topology
Understanding categories and sieves essential for grasping Grothendieck topologies in arithmetic geometry
Category theory prerequisites
Categories consist of objects and morphisms between them
Functors map between categories, preserving structure
Natural transformations compare functors
Limits and colimits generalize products and coproducts (pullbacks, pushouts)
Sieve definition and properties
Sieve on an object X consists of morphisms with codomain X
Closed under composition with arbitrary morphisms
Represent potential "coverings" of X in a Grothendieck topology
Form a complete lattice under inclusion for each object X
Pullback of sieves
Pullback of a sieve S along a morphism f: Y → X defined as f∗(S)={g:Z→Y∣f∘g∈S}
Preserves sieve structure and inclusion relations
Essential for defining the stability axiom in Grothendieck topologies
Allows for "localizing" coverings to different objects in the category
Grothendieck topology axioms
Axioms formalize the properties expected of a "covering" in a category
Generalize the behavior of open coverings in classical topology
Provide a consistent framework for defining sheaves and cohomology theories
Identity axiom
The maximal sieve on any object X (all morphisms with codomain X) is a covering
Ensures every object is "covered by itself"
Analogous to the entire space being an open cover in classical topology
Formally stated as: For all X, the sieve {f:Y→X∣f is any morphism} is a covering sieve
Stability axiom
Coverings are stable under pullbacks
If S is a covering sieve on X and f: Y → X is any morphism, then f*(S) is a covering sieve on Y
Ensures "local" nature of coverings persists under change of base object
Allows for consistent definition of sheaf properties across different objects
Transitivity axiom
Composition of coverings yields a covering
If S is a covering sieve on X and R is a sieve on X such that f*(R) is a covering sieve for all f in S, then R is a covering sieve
Ensures coverings can be "refined" consistently
Analogous to the transitivity of open coverings in classical topology
Examples of Grothendieck topologies
Grothendieck topologies provide various "geometric" perspectives on schemes and other algebraic objects
Different topologies capture distinct aspects of arithmetic and algebraic geometry
Understanding these examples crucial for applying Grothendieck topologies in arithmetic geometry
Zariski topology
Defined on the category of schemes or rings
Coverings given by open immersions that jointly surject onto the target
Corresponds to the classical on affine schemes
Useful for studying local properties of schemes (regular, normal, Cohen-Macaulay)
Étale topology
Defined on the category of schemes
Coverings given by étale morphisms that jointly surject onto the target
Finer than the Zariski topology, allows for studying "infinitesimal" properties
Crucial for defining étale cohomology, with applications to the Weil conjectures
Flat topology
Defined on the category of schemes
Coverings given by flat morphisms that jointly surject onto the target
Includes both Zariski and étale topologies as special cases
Useful for studying descent problems and moduli spaces
Crystalline topology
Defined on the category of schemes in characteristic p
Coverings given by certain divided power thickenings
Used to define crystalline cohomology, a p-adic cohomology theory
Important for studying deformations and p-adic periods
Sheaves on Grothendieck topologies
Sheaves generalize the notion of locally defined functions to arbitrary categories
Provide a framework for studying global objects from local data
Essential for defining cohomology theories in arithmetic geometry
Sheaf definition
F on a site (C, J) assigns objects F(X) to objects X in C and morphisms F(f): F(Y) → F(X) to morphisms f: X → Y in C
: For any covering sieve S on X, the diagram F(X)→∏f∈SF(dom(f))⇉∏f,g∈SF(dom(f)×Xdom(g)) is an equalizer
Ensures local data can be uniquely glued to form
Generalizes the classical sheaf condition for topological spaces
Sheafification process
Transforms a presheaf into a sheaf while preserving its local properties
Involves two steps: separation (making the presheaf separated) and
Separated presheaf satisfies the uniqueness part of the sheaf condition
Sheafification adds missing "local" sections to satisfy the existence part of the sheaf condition
Sheaf cohomology
Measures obstructions to extending local sections to global ones
Defined using injective resolutions or Čech cohomology
Generalizes classical cohomology theories (singular, de Rham) to arbitrary Grothendieck topologies
Applications include studying Galois cohomology, class field theory, and motivic cohomology
Grothendieck topoi
Generalize the on a topological space
Provide a categorical framework for studying "generalized spaces"
Essential for understanding the geometric aspects of Grothendieck topologies
Definition and properties
Grothendieck topos defined as a category equivalent to the category of sheaves on a site
Satisfies axioms including: having all small limits and colimits, being locally small, and having a small generating set
Possesses an internal logic, allowing for intuitionistic reasoning within the topos
Examples include the category of sets, sheaves on a topological space, and étale sheaves on a
Comparison with classical topoi
Classical based on the category of sheaves on a topological space
Grothendieck topoi generalize this concept to arbitrary sites
Both types of topoi share many properties (existence of subobject classifier, internal logic)
Grothendieck topoi allow for studying "spaces" without underlying point-set topology
Geometric morphisms
Functors between topoi that preserve the geometric structure
Consist of an adjoint pair of functors (f*, f_) with f preserving finite limits
Generalize continuous maps between topological spaces
Examples include morphisms of schemes inducing geometric morphisms between their étale topoi
Applications in arithmetic geometry
Grothendieck topologies provide powerful tools for studying arithmetic properties of schemes and varieties
Enable the development of cohomology theories beyond classical settings
Crucial for understanding deep connections between number theory and algebraic geometry
Étale cohomology
Cohomology theory for schemes based on the
Provides a good cohomology theory for varieties over finite fields
Key to the proof of the Weil conjectures by Deligne
Applications in studying zeta functions, L-functions, and Galois representations
Motivic cohomology
Universal cohomology theory for algebraic varieties
Based on algebraic cycles and motivic complexes
Conjectured to unify various cohomology theories (Betti, de Rham, l-adic)
Applications in studying special values of L-functions and algebraic K-theory
Derived categories
Categorical framework for studying complexes of sheaves up to quasi-isomorphism
Allows for a unified treatment of various cohomology theories
Applications in perverse sheaves, intersection cohomology, and the geometric Langlands program
Provides a setting for studying derived algebraic geometry and higher categorical structures
Generalizations and variations
Extend the ideas of Grothendieck topologies to more abstract or higher-dimensional settings
Provide new frameworks for studying arithmetic and algebraic geometry
Explore connections between different areas of mathematics (topology, algebra, category theory)
Higher Grothendieck topologies
Generalize Grothendieck topologies to higher categories
Allow for studying higher stacks and derived algebraic geometry
Provide a framework for defining higher topoi and ∞-topoi
Applications in homotopy theory and higher categorical structures
Condensed mathematics
Developed by Clausen and Scholze as a foundation for p-adic geometry
Based on sheaves on a category of profinite sets with the "condensed" topology
Unifies various approaches to topological vector spaces and adic spaces
Applications in p-adic Hodge theory and perfectoid spaces
∞-topoi
Generalize Grothendieck topoi to the setting of ∞-categories
Provide a framework for homotopy-coherent sheaf theory
Allow for studying higher stacks and derived algebraic geometry
Applications in homotopy theory, higher category theory, and derived algebraic geometry
Computational aspects
Develop algorithms and software tools for working with Grothendieck topologies
Enable practical applications of Grothendieck topologies in arithmetic geometry
Facilitate exploration and verification of conjectures involving Grothendieck topologies
Algorithms for sieve calculations
Implement efficient methods for computing and manipulating sieves in various categories
Develop algorithms for checking covering properties in specific Grothendieck topologies
Optimize calculations of pullbacks and compositions of sieves
Implement methods for computing cohomology groups using Čech or derived functor approaches
Software tools for Grothendieck topologies
Computer algebra systems with support for category theory and Grothendieck topologies (SageMath, Macaulay2)
Specialized libraries for working with sheaves and topoi (PARI/GP, GAP)
Visualization tools for exploring the structure of Grothendieck topologies and sheaves
Interfaces for defining custom Grothendieck topologies and performing calculations
Open problems and current research
Active areas of investigation in arithmetic geometry involving Grothendieck topologies
Ongoing efforts to extend and apply Grothendieck topologies to new domains
Connections between Grothendieck topologies and other areas of mathematics
Conjectures involving Grothendieck topologies
Grothendieck's standard conjectures on algebraic cycles and motives
Tate conjecture relating algebraic cycles to Galois representations
Hodge conjecture and its variants in different cohomology theories
Conjectures on the behavior of motivic cohomology and its relation to other cohomology theories
Recent developments in the field
Advances in derived algebraic geometry using higher Grothendieck topologies
Applications of condensed mathematics to p-adic Hodge theory and perfectoid spaces
Progress on the Langlands program using geometric methods and Grothendieck topologies
Developments in motivic homotopy theory and its applications to algebraic K-theory
Key Terms to Review (19)
Alexander Grothendieck: Alexander Grothendieck was a groundbreaking mathematician known for his profound contributions to algebraic geometry, particularly in developing the modern foundations of the field. His work introduced key concepts such as schemes, sheaves, and cohomology, reshaping how mathematicians approach geometric problems and their algebraic underpinnings.
Category of sheaves: The category of sheaves is a mathematical framework that organizes and formalizes the concept of sheaves over a topological space or a site, allowing for the systematic study of local properties and global sections. It plays a vital role in algebraic geometry and homological algebra, providing a way to handle the relationships between various types of functions, spaces, and structures through the lens of categories. This framework utilizes Grothendieck topologies to define how sheaves are constructed and analyzed, facilitating the exploration of cohomological methods.
Continuous Morphism: A continuous morphism is a function between topological spaces that preserves the notion of closeness, meaning the preimage of every open set is open. This concept is essential in the study of algebraic geometry and topological spaces, linking geometric intuition with algebraic structures. It plays a crucial role in understanding how different spaces relate to each other within the framework of Grothendieck topologies.
Covering Families: Covering families are collections of morphisms in a category that can be used to define a Grothendieck topology. They help identify what 'covers' a given object in the category, thus establishing how we can 'glue' local data to study global properties. Understanding covering families is crucial for working with sheaves and schemes, as they allow us to determine when local data can be patched together to form a global object.
Descent Theory: Descent theory is a method in algebraic geometry that studies the properties of schemes by relating them to simpler schemes through a process known as descent. It connects local properties of varieties over various base fields to global properties, allowing for a better understanding of rational points and morphisms, which are crucial in different contexts such as the study of abelian varieties, surfaces, and higher-dimensional varieties.
étale topology: Étale topology is a framework in algebraic geometry that allows for the study of schemes using a notion of 'local' properties that are preserved under étale morphisms, which are morphisms that resemble local isomorphisms. This concept extends the classical notion of topology to algebraic varieties and provides a way to work with both geometric and arithmetic aspects. It connects with Berkovich spaces through the idea of valuative criteria and non-Archimedean geometry, while it relates to Grothendieck topologies by establishing a foundation for sheaf theory in algebraic geometry.
Global Sections: Global sections refer to the morphisms from a structure sheaf on a space to the base field, essentially capturing 'global' information about functions defined over the entire space. This concept is central in algebraic geometry, particularly in the context of schemes and their associated sheaves, where global sections can be thought of as functions or sections that are defined everywhere on the scheme.
Gluing Lemma: The Gluing Lemma is a fundamental concept in the realm of sheaf theory and algebraic geometry that allows one to construct global sections from local data. It states that if you have a sheaf over an open cover of a space and you have compatible local sections on each piece of the cover, then there exists a global section that agrees with these local sections. This concept is crucial for understanding how local properties can be pieced together to derive global results.
Grothendieck topology: A Grothendieck topology is a way of defining 'open sets' on a category, allowing for the generalization of the notion of open sets in topology to more abstract contexts in mathematics. This concept is foundational in the field of algebraic geometry, as it helps to define sheaves and cohomology theories by specifying how one can cover an object with sub-objects. Grothendieck topologies enable mathematicians to work with different types of geometric structures in a coherent manner, thus bridging algebraic and topological ideas.
Jean-Pierre Serre: Jean-Pierre Serre is a prominent French mathematician known for his significant contributions to algebraic geometry, topology, and number theory. His work has deeply influenced various fields within mathematics, particularly in relation to the development of modern concepts and conjectures surrounding arithmetic geometry.
Local property: A local property refers to a characteristic of a mathematical object that can be verified by examining the object in small neighborhoods around points, rather than requiring global information. This concept is crucial in various branches of mathematics, including algebraic geometry and topology, as it allows for a more manageable understanding of complex structures by focusing on their local behavior.
Morphism of schemes: A morphism of schemes is a structured way of relating two schemes, encapsulating how the underlying topological spaces and their associated sheaves interact. It combines both the geometric and algebraic aspects of schemes, allowing us to understand how one scheme can be transformed into another through a continuous and compatible process. This concept is foundational in the study of algebraic geometry as it enables the formulation of various geometric properties and relationships between schemes.
Presheaf: A presheaf is a mathematical structure that assigns a set or algebraic object to each open subset of a topological space, along with restriction maps that connect these objects over smaller open sets. This concept plays a crucial role in sheaf theory, allowing for the local-to-global principles that are fundamental in various areas of mathematics, including algebraic geometry and topology.
Pullback topology: Pullback topology is a method of defining a new topology on a space by pulling back the open sets from another topological space via a continuous map. This concept is essential for understanding how to relate different topological spaces through functions, particularly in the context of sheaves and Grothendieck topologies, as it allows the construction of new topological structures that respect the original mappings.
Scheme: A scheme is a mathematical structure that generalizes the notion of algebraic varieties by incorporating both geometric and algebraic information. It consists of a topological space equipped with a sheaf of rings, allowing for the study of solutions to polynomial equations in a more flexible way. This concept plays a vital role in various advanced areas, including the understanding of Grothendieck topologies and the formulation of cycle class maps.
Sheaf condition: The sheaf condition is a crucial property that a presheaf must satisfy to be considered a sheaf. It essentially requires that local data on an open cover can be uniquely glued together to form global data, ensuring that the sections over overlapping open sets agree on their intersections. This concept is key in understanding how structures can be built from local information in the context of Grothendieck topologies.
Sheafification: Sheafification is the process of taking a presheaf on a topological space and turning it into a sheaf, which satisfies the sheaf condition. This process ensures that local data can be uniquely glued together to create global sections, making it essential for the study of sheaves and their cohomology. In this context, sheafification helps establish the necessary framework to work with Grothendieck topologies and analyze the behavior of cohomology groups associated with sheaves.
Topoi: Topoi are categories that arise in the context of topos theory, which is a branch of mathematics that deals with the study of 'spaces' that behave like sets and the relationships between them. These categories, or topoi, provide a framework for interpreting and generalizing concepts from set theory and algebraic geometry, allowing mathematicians to work in a more abstract environment.
Zariski topology: Zariski topology is a type of topology used in algebraic geometry that defines the open sets of a space by using the vanishing sets of polynomials. It provides a way to study geometric objects algebraically, where closed sets are defined as the zero sets of collections of polynomials. This framework is crucial for understanding properties such as weak approximation, reciprocity laws in number theory, and the foundation of Grothendieck's more general topological concepts.