1. A university academic success center is evaluating the effectiveness of a new peer-tutoring program for first-year calculus students.
Summary Statistics for Final Exam Scores
Minimum | First Quartile () | Median | Third Quartile () | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|
32 | 66 | 75 | 84 | 99 |
The center initially proposes the following investigative question: "Do students like the new tutoring program?"
Explain why this is not an appropriate investigative question for evaluating the program's academic effectiveness, and provide a refined investigative question that focuses on a quantitative variable.
To gather initial feedback, the center sets up a table outside the library on a Friday afternoon and asks the first first-year calculus students who walk by to report their current course grade.
Identify the sampling method used. Describe a potential source of bias in this method and explain how this bias could affect the estimate of the average course grade for all first-year calculus students.
Recognizing the flaw in their initial plan, the center obtains a simple random sample of first-year calculus students. The summary statistics for the final exam scores of these students are shown in Table 1.
Determine if there are any potential outliers in the sample. Justify your answer using an appropriate statistical calculation.
In a separate study, the center recruited first-year calculus students who volunteered to participate in an experiment. The researchers randomly assigned students to attend the new peer-tutoring program twice a week and students to use a standard independent study module. At the end of the semester, the peer-tutoring group had a significantly higher mean final exam score.
To what population can the results of this experiment be generalized? Justify your answer.
00:00