13.2 Impeachment Processes and Outcomes
3 min read•august 7, 2024
Impeachment is a powerful tool for holding federal officials accountable. The process involves formal charges in the House, followed by a . While rare, impeachments have significant political consequences, even without removal from office.
Presidents Johnson, Clinton, and Trump faced impeachment, but none were removed. The high bar for ensures impeachment isn't used lightly, requiring broad consensus for such a drastic measure.
Impeachment Process
Initiation and Charges
Top images from around the web for Initiation and Charges
Impeachment of Donald Trump - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Chapter 9: American Politics and Public Policy/Administration – Politics, Power, and Purpose: An ... View original
Is this image relevant?
First impeachment of Donald Trump - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Impeachment of Donald Trump - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Chapter 9: American Politics and Public Policy/Administration – Politics, Power, and Purpose: An ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Initiation and Charges
Impeachment of Donald Trump - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Chapter 9: American Politics and Public Policy/Administration – Politics, Power, and Purpose: An ... View original
Is this image relevant?
First impeachment of Donald Trump - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Impeachment of Donald Trump - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Chapter 9: American Politics and Public Policy/Administration – Politics, Power, and Purpose: An ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- are formal written allegations of wrongdoing against a federal official
- Specify the charges and provide evidence to support the accusations
- Drafted and approved by the
- are the constitutional grounds for impeachment
- Includes abuse of power, violation of public trust, and other serious offenses
- Interpretation has evolved over time to encompass a wide range of
- House of Representatives' role is to investigate and vote on articles of impeachment
- Simple majority vote in the House is required to approve the articles
- If approved, the official is considered impeached but not yet removed from office
Trial and Conviction
- Senate trial is presided over by the of the Supreme Court
- Senators serve as jurors and hear evidence presented by House managers (prosecutors)
- Accused official has the right to legal counsel and can present a defense
- Chief Justice's role is to ensure a fair and impartial trial
- Makes rulings on procedural matters and admissibility of evidence
- Does not have a vote in the final verdict
- Two-thirds majority (67 out of 100 senators) is required to convict and remove the official from office
- High threshold ensures that removal is reserved for serious offenses with broad consensus
- Prevents impeachment from being used as a partisan political tool
Consequences of Impeachment
Removal and Disqualification
- Removal from office is the immediate consequence of a conviction in the Senate trial
- Official is stripped of their position and must vacate the office
- Vice President or next-in-line assumes the vacant role (in case of presidential impeachment)
- Disqualification from future office is an additional penalty that the Senate may impose
- Prevents the convicted official from holding any federal office in the future
- Requires a separate vote and only a simple majority to approve
Impeachment in Practice
Historical Cases
- Historical impeachments have been rare, with only three U.S. presidents facing formal impeachment inquiries
- (1868) was impeached but acquitted in the Senate trial
- (1998) was impeached but acquitted in the Senate trial
- (2019 and 2021) was impeached twice but acquitted in both Senate trials
- Other federal officials, such as judges, have also faced impeachment proceedings
- Samuel Chase (1804), a Supreme Court Justice, was impeached but acquitted
- William Belknap (1876), a Secretary of War, resigned before his Senate trial
Political Implications
- Political implications of impeachment can be significant, even if the official is not ultimately removed
- Impeachment proceedings can damage an official's reputation and public trust
- Partisan divisions often become more pronounced during impeachment inquiries
- Impeachment can also have electoral consequences for the parties involved
- may shift in favor of or against the impeached official's party
- Impeachment proceedings can energize or demoralize each party's base voters
Key Terms to Review (18)
Acquittal: Acquittal refers to a legal judgment that officially and conclusively clears an individual of criminal charges, indicating that they are not guilty. In the context of impeachment processes, acquittal can be understood as the outcome when the Senate votes to exonerate an impeached president, allowing them to remain in office. This decision holds significant political implications and reflects the balance of power within the government.
Andrew Johnson: Andrew Johnson was the 17th President of the United States, who served from 1865 to 1869 following the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. His presidency is most notable for his impeachment by the House of Representatives, which stemmed from his controversial policies during the Reconstruction era and his violation of the Tenure of Office Act.
Article II, Section 4: Article II, Section 4 of the United States Constitution outlines the grounds for impeachment of the President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States. It specifically states that these officials can be impeached for 'treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors,' setting a legal framework for accountability and checks on executive power.
Articles of impeachment: Articles of impeachment are formal charges brought against a sitting president or other federal officials, initiating the impeachment process. These articles outline the specific allegations of wrongdoing, such as treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors, which can lead to removal from office. The articles serve as the foundation for the impeachment trial, where the Senate evaluates the evidence and decides whether to convict or acquit the official.
Bill Clinton: Bill Clinton was the 42nd President of the United States, serving from 1993 to 2001, known for his policies on economic growth and welfare reform, as well as his impeachment trial. His presidency showcased a balance between enumerated powers like vetoing legislation and implied powers that expanded the executive's role in domestic policy. Clinton’s administration also highlighted how presidential powers could be challenged, particularly during the impeachment process.
Checks and balances: Checks and balances is a system that ensures no one branch of government becomes too powerful by providing each branch with the ability to limit the powers of the others. This framework promotes accountability and prevents abuse of power, ensuring that the executive, legislative, and judicial branches work within their designated authorities.
Chief Justice: The Chief Justice is the head of the United States Supreme Court, responsible for presiding over court sessions, leading the administration of the court, and representing the judiciary branch of government. This role is crucial during presidential transitions, especially when interpreting constitutional issues or resolving disputes that arise during these periods. Additionally, the Chief Justice plays a significant role in impeachment processes, overseeing trials and ensuring that proceedings follow legal protocols.
Conviction: In the context of impeachment, conviction refers to the formal declaration that an official, such as the President, is guilty of the charges brought against them during an impeachment trial. This process involves a vote by the Senate following a trial where evidence is presented, and witnesses may testify, determining whether the official should be removed from office. A conviction requires a two-thirds majority in the Senate, making it a significant and challenging hurdle to overcome in the impeachment process.
Donald Trump: Donald Trump is the 45th president of the United States, serving from January 20, 2017, to January 20, 2021. His presidency is marked by significant controversies, including two impeachment proceedings and an unprecedented use of social media as a primary means of communication with the public. Trump's approach to governance and communication fundamentally altered the landscape of the modern presidency, making him a pivotal figure in American political history.
Executive accountability: Executive accountability refers to the responsibility of the executive branch, particularly the president, to be answerable for their actions and decisions while in office. This concept ensures that the president operates within the law and is subject to checks and balances, which are essential for maintaining democratic governance. It involves mechanisms such as impeachment, adherence to court rulings, and the limits of executive privilege, all of which aim to hold the executive branch accountable to the public and other branches of government.
High crimes and misdemeanors: High crimes and misdemeanors refers to the constitutional standard for impeachment of a sitting president or other federal officials in the United States. This phrase encompasses serious breaches of trust, abuse of power, or conduct that undermines the integrity of the office, extending beyond mere criminal offenses to include acts that are deemed fundamentally incompatible with the role of a public official.
House Judiciary Committee: The House Judiciary Committee is a key committee in the U.S. House of Representatives responsible for overseeing the administration of justice and the enforcement of federal laws. This committee plays a crucial role in the impeachment process, as it investigates allegations against federal officials, including the President, and drafts articles of impeachment when necessary.
Impeachment clauses: Impeachment clauses refer to the constitutional provisions that outline the process by which federal officials, including the President, can be removed from office for committing 'high crimes and misdemeanors.' These clauses are crucial as they establish a legal framework for accountability and serve as a check on executive power, highlighting the balance between legislative oversight and the independence of the executive branch.
Misconduct: Misconduct refers to inappropriate or unethical behavior, often involving violation of laws, regulations, or established norms. In the context of impeachment processes and outcomes, misconduct is a central charge against public officials, particularly the president, and can lead to serious consequences, including removal from office. Understanding misconduct is vital because it shapes the political landscape and influences the legal framework surrounding accountability for leaders.
Partisan politics: Partisan politics refers to the strong allegiance to a particular political party, which often leads to the prioritization of party goals over broader national interests. This division can create significant polarization, especially during processes like impeachment, where party loyalty can influence decisions regarding accountability and governance. The impact of partisan politics is particularly evident in legislative activities, where collaboration is often hindered by conflicting party agendas.
Public opinion: Public opinion refers to the collective attitudes and beliefs of individuals on various issues, policies, and political figures. It plays a crucial role in shaping the actions and decisions of government officials, particularly the president, who often seek to align their initiatives with the views of the populace. Understanding public opinion is essential for effective governance, as it can influence everything from executive orders to legislative success and even impeachment processes.
Senate Trial: A Senate trial is the formal process held in the U.S. Senate to determine whether a government official, typically the President, should be removed from office following impeachment by the House of Representatives. During this trial, Senators act as jurors and listen to evidence presented by both sides, including the House managers and the accused official's defense team, before voting on whether to convict or acquit.
Vote of no confidence: A vote of no confidence is a parliamentary procedure through which members of a legislature express their lack of confidence in the government's ability to govern effectively. This type of vote can lead to the resignation of the government or trigger new elections if the government fails to secure a majority in favor of their leadership. It serves as a critical mechanism for accountability, allowing elected officials to hold the executive branch responsible for its actions and policies.