🌿Algebraic Geometry Unit 6 Review
6.4 Canonical and terminal singularities
6.4 Canonical and terminal singularities
Unit & Topic Study Guides
Introduction to Algebraic Geometry
Commutative Algebra Foundations
Sheaves and Schemes
Divisors and Line Bundles
Cohomology and Intersection Theory
Singularities and Resolution
Curves and Surfaces
Moduli Spaces and Invariants
Toric Varieties and Polyhedra
Algebraic Groups and Lie Algebras
Hodge Theory and Complex Geometry
Canonical and terminal singularities are the mildest types of singularities in algebraic geometry. They're crucial for understanding the structure of varieties and play a key role in the Minimal Model Program, which aims to find simpler representations of complex geometric objects.
These singularities are defined by their discrepancies, which measure how far a variety is from being smooth. Canonical singularities have non-negative discrepancies, while terminal ones have strictly positive discrepancies. This classification helps simplify the study of varieties with singularities.
Canonical vs Terminal Singularities
Defining Canonical and Terminal Singularities
- Let be a normal variety and be a resolution of singularities
- The canonical divisor on can be written as , where:
- are the exceptional divisors
- are the discrepancies
- A singularity is called canonical if all discrepancies for every resolution of singularities
- A singularity is called terminal if all discrepancies for every resolution of singularities
Computing Discrepancies
- The discrepancy can be computed using the adjunction formula:
- is the arithmetic genus of the exceptional divisor
- The definition of canonical and terminal singularities is independent of the choice of resolution
- This allows for a well-defined classification of singularities
- Different resolutions will yield the same discrepancies for a given singularity
Classifying Singularities
Smooth Points and Quotient Singularities
- Smooth points are always terminal singularities
- The discrepancies are strictly positive for any resolution
- Smooth varieties have no exceptional divisors in their resolutions
- Quotient singularities arising from finite group actions on smooth varieties can be classified as canonical or terminal
- The classification depends on the group action and the discrepancies of the exceptional divisors in the resolution
- Examples of quotient singularities include orbifold points (cyclic quotient singularities) and simple surface singularities (Du Val singularities)
Surface and Higher-Dimensional Singularities
- Surface singularities can be classified using the minimal resolution and the self-intersection numbers of the exceptional curves
- Du Val singularities (ADE singularities) are canonical singularities
- The minimal resolution of a Du Val singularity has exceptional curves with self-intersection numbers
- Higher-dimensional singularities can be more challenging to classify
- Often requires the computation of discrepancies for specific resolutions
- Toric varieties provide a rich source of examples of canonical and terminal singularities in higher dimensions
- The classification of higher-dimensional singularities is an active area of research
Significance of Singularities in Birational Geometry
Minimal Model Program (MMP)
- Canonical and terminal singularities are the mildest types of singularities in the MMP
- The MMP aims to find a birational model with mild singularities and nef canonical divisor
- Varieties with canonical or terminal singularities are the natural generalizations of smooth varieties in birational geometry
- The existence of minimal models (varieties with nef canonical divisor) is expected for varieties with canonical or terminal singularities
- The existence may fail for worse singularities (log canonical or log terminal singularities)
- The Minimal Model Conjecture predicts the existence of minimal models for varieties with canonical or terminal singularities
Birational Invariance and Finite Generation
- Canonical and terminal singularities are preserved under certain birational operations
- Flips and divisorial contractions are key steps in the MMP
- These operations modify the variety while preserving the type of singularities
- The canonical ring is finitely generated for varieties with canonical or terminal singularities
- Finite generation is a crucial property in the study of birational geometry
- It allows for the construction of canonical models and the study of the pluricanonical systems
Minimal Models for Varieties with Singularities
Minimal Model Program Techniques
- The proof of the existence of minimal models relies on the techniques of the MMP
- The Cone Theorem describes the structure of the nef cone and the existence of extremal rays
- Extremal rays can be contracted to obtain a birational model with milder singularities (divisorial contractions or flips)
- The termination of the MMP is a key step in the proof
- The MMP terminates after finitely many steps, leading to a minimal model or a Mori fiber space
- The termination of flips is a crucial and challenging step, established in dimension 3 by Mori and in dimension 4 by Shokurov
Surface Case and Higher Dimensions
- For surfaces, the existence of minimal models for varieties with canonical or terminal singularities follows from:
- The classification of surface singularities
- The fact that the MMP terminates for surfaces
- In higher dimensions, the proof is more involved
- Requires the Cone Theorem, the existence of divisorial contractions and flips, and the termination of the MMP
- The existence of minimal models in arbitrary dimension for varieties with canonical or terminal singularities is still an open problem (the Minimal Model Conjecture)
- The proof has been established in dimensions 3 and 4, but remains open in higher dimensions