10.3 Robust estimation and hypothesis testing
5 min read•august 13, 2024
Robust estimation and hypothesis testing are crucial tools in statistics, helping us handle data that doesn't play by the rules. These methods give reliable results even when our data has outliers or doesn't follow a normal distribution.
In this section, we'll look at robust estimators like trimmed means and M-estimators, as well as robust tests like Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney. We'll also explore the trade-off between efficiency and robustness in statistical methods.
Robustness in Statistical Inference
Robustness and its Importance
Top images from around the web for Robustness and its Importance
Sensitivity and specificity - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Visual contrast of two robust regression methods View original
Is this image relevant?
Robust statistics - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Sensitivity and specificity - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Visual contrast of two robust regression methods View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Robustness and its Importance
Sensitivity and specificity - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Visual contrast of two robust regression methods View original
Is this image relevant?
Robust statistics - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Sensitivity and specificity - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Visual contrast of two robust regression methods View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Robustness in statistics refers to the ability of a method to perform well under deviations from the assumed model or distribution (presence of outliers or non-)
- Robust methods aim to provide reliable and stable results even when the assumptions of the model are not fully met
- Less sensitive to violations of assumptions compared to classical methods
- The breakdown point is a measure of robustness that quantifies the proportion of outliers or contamination a method can handle before producing arbitrarily large or misleading results
- Influence functions and sensitivity curves are tools used to assess the robustness of an estimator
- Measure the impact of individual observations on the estimate
Efficiency and Robustness Trade-off
- The efficiency of a robust method refers to its precision or variability compared to the optimal method under the assumed model
- A trade-off often exists between robustness and efficiency
- More robust methods may sacrifice some efficiency to gain resistance to violations of assumptions
- The choice between efficient and robust methods depends on the nature of the data, the validity of the assumptions, and the goals of the analysis
- If assumptions are well-justified and data are clean, efficient methods may be preferred for their precision and power
- If assumptions are questionable or data contain outliers, robust methods can provide safeguards against misleading conclusions
- Adaptive estimators and tests (adaptive trimmed means or adaptive M-estimators) aim to strike a balance between efficiency and robustness
- Automatically adjust their behavior based on the observed data
- Downweight outliers when present while maintaining high efficiency when assumptions are met
- Sensitivity analyses (comparing results of classical and robust methods or assessing the impact of outliers on conclusions) can help evaluate the robustness of the findings and inform the choice of appropriate statistical methods
Robust Estimators
Trimmed and Winsorized Means
- Trimmed means are robust measures of central tendency that exclude a specified percentage of the smallest and largest observations before calculating the average of the remaining data
- The trimming percentage, typically denoted as α, determines the proportion of observations removed from each end of the ordered data
- The 20% trimmed mean, for example, removes the lowest and highest 20% of the data before computing the mean of the remaining 60%
- Winsorized means are another robust measure of central tendency that replaces a specified percentage of the smallest and largest observations with the nearest remaining values before calculating the average
- Winsorization reduces the impact of outliers by pulling them towards the center of the distribution without completely removing them
- The Winsorization percentage, typically denoted as γ, determines the proportion of observations replaced at each end of the ordered data
M-Estimators
- M-estimators are a class of robust estimators that minimize a chosen objective function (Huber's loss function or function) to downweight the influence of outliers
- The objective function is designed to give less weight to observations that deviate significantly from the bulk of the data, reducing their impact on the estimate
- The choice of the objective function and its tuning parameters controls the trade-off between robustness and efficiency of the M-estimator
- Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) is a common algorithm used to compute M-estimators
- Solves a weighted least squares problem at each iteration
- Weights are updated based on the residuals from the previous iteration, giving less weight to observations with large residuals
Robust Hypothesis Tests
Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test
- The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, also known as the Mann-Whitney U test, is a non-parametric test for comparing the locations of two independent samples
- Based on the ranks of the observations rather than their actual values, making it robust to outliers and non-normality
- The null hypothesis is that the two samples come from the same population or have equal medians, while the alternative hypothesis is that they differ in location
- The test statistic, U, is calculated based on the ranks of the observations in the combined sample
- Its distribution under the null hypothesis is used to compute the p-value
- Smaller p-values indicate stronger evidence against the null hypothesis of equal locations
Kruskal-Wallis Test
- The Kruskal-Wallis test is a non-parametric alternative to the one-way ANOVA for comparing the locations of three or more independent samples
- Based on the ranks of the observations and is robust to outliers and non-normality
- The null hypothesis is that all samples come from the same population or have equal medians, while the alternative hypothesis is that at least one sample differs in location
- The test statistic, H, is calculated based on the ranks of the observations within each sample and the overall ranks
- Its distribution under the null hypothesis is approximated by a chi-square distribution
- Larger values of H indicate stronger evidence against the null hypothesis of equal locations
- Post-hoc pairwise comparisons (Dunn's test or Conover-Iman test) can be used to identify which specific pairs of samples differ significantly in location after a significant Kruskal-Wallis test result
Efficiency vs Robustness
Understanding Efficiency and Robustness
- The efficiency of a statistical method refers to its ability to produce precise estimates or powerful tests under the assumed model
- Often measured by the variance of the estimator or the power of the test
- Classical methods (sample mean or t-test) are typically the most efficient under the assumed model (normality)
- Robustness refers to the method's ability to maintain good performance and provide reliable results even when the assumptions of the model are violated
- Robust methods (trimmed means or non-parametric tests) sacrifice some efficiency under the assumed model to gain robustness against deviations from the assumptions
- Provide more stable and reliable results in the presence of outliers or non-normality
Balancing Efficiency and Robustness
- The choice between efficient and robust methods depends on the nature of the data, the validity of the assumptions, and the goals of the analysis
- If assumptions are well-justified and data are clean, efficient methods may be preferred for their precision and power
- If assumptions are questionable or data contain outliers, robust methods can provide safeguards against misleading conclusions
- Adaptive estimators and tests (adaptive trimmed means or adaptive M-estimators) aim to strike a balance between efficiency and robustness
- Automatically adjust their behavior based on the observed data
- Downweight outliers when present while maintaining high efficiency when assumptions are met
- Sensitivity analyses (comparing results of classical and robust methods or assessing the impact of outliers on conclusions) can help evaluate the robustness of the findings
- Inform the choice of appropriate statistical methods based on the sensitivity of the results to assumptions and outliers
Key Terms to Review (18)
AIC: AIC, or Akaike Information Criterion, is a measure used for model selection that evaluates how well a model fits the data while penalizing for complexity. It helps in comparing different statistical models, where a lower AIC value indicates a better fit with fewer parameters. This criterion is widely used in various regression techniques, including logistic regression, robust estimation, mixed-effects models, and regression diagnostics.
BIC: BIC, or Bayesian Information Criterion, is a statistical measure used for model selection among a finite set of models. It balances model fit with complexity, penalizing models that are too complex while rewarding those that explain the data well. The goal is to identify the model that best describes the underlying data structure while avoiding overfitting.
Bonferroni Correction: The Bonferroni Correction is a statistical method used to address the problem of multiple comparisons by adjusting the significance level to reduce the chances of obtaining false-positive results. This technique involves dividing the desired alpha level (typically 0.05) by the number of tests being conducted, which helps to control the overall Type I error rate. By doing so, it ensures that findings from parametric or non-parametric tests remain reliable, especially when multiple comparison procedures are involved, such as in one-way ANOVA and repeated measures ANOVA scenarios.
Cohen's d: Cohen's d is a statistical measure used to quantify the effect size, or the magnitude of difference, between two groups. It expresses the difference in means between the groups in terms of standard deviations, making it a useful tool for comparing results across different studies and tests, whether parametric or non-parametric. By providing a standardized measure of effect size, Cohen's d can help interpret results in multiple comparison situations, as well as within more complex analyses such as ANCOVA and MANOVA, while also fitting into the framework of robust estimation and hypothesis testing.
False Discovery Rate: False discovery rate (FDR) is a statistical method used to estimate the proportion of false positives among the significant findings in multiple hypothesis testing. It provides a way to control for Type I errors, which occur when a null hypothesis is incorrectly rejected. This concept is crucial in settings where many comparisons are made simultaneously, ensuring that the discoveries are not only statistically significant but also practically relevant.
Frank E. Harrell Jr.: Frank E. Harrell Jr. is a prominent statistician known for his contributions to statistical modeling and methodologies, particularly in the fields of survival analysis and clinical research. His work emphasizes the importance of robust estimation and hypothesis testing, which are crucial for making accurate inferences in data analysis and addressing the limitations of traditional statistical methods.
Homoscedasticity: Homoscedasticity refers to the property of a dataset in which the variance of the residuals, or errors, is constant across all levels of the independent variable(s). This characteristic is crucial for valid inference in regression analysis, as it ensures that the model's predictions are reliable. When homoscedasticity holds, the spread of the residuals is uniform, leading to better model fit and accurate hypothesis testing. Violation of this assumption can impact the results, causing inefficiencies and biased estimates.
Huber Estimator: The Huber estimator is a robust statistical method used for estimating the parameters of a model, particularly in the presence of outliers. It combines the principles of least squares and absolute errors, providing a balance between sensitivity to outliers and efficiency in parameter estimation. By employing a loss function that transitions from quadratic to linear, it maintains robustness, making it a preferred choice in robust estimation and hypothesis testing.
Influence Measures: Influence measures are statistical tools used to assess the impact of individual data points on the overall results of a regression analysis or other statistical models. These measures help identify outliers or leverage points that could disproportionately affect the model’s estimates and conclusions, ensuring that results are robust and reliable. By evaluating influence measures, analysts can make informed decisions about whether to include or exclude certain observations in their analyses.
Likelihood ratio test: A likelihood ratio test is a statistical method used to compare the fit of two competing models to determine which model better explains the data. It is based on the ratio of the maximum likelihoods of the two models, allowing researchers to assess the strength of evidence against a null hypothesis. This test is particularly useful in scenarios where robust estimation and mixed-effects models are employed, as it provides a way to make inferences about parameters while considering model complexity and data variability.
Normality: Normality refers to a statistical concept where data is distributed in a symmetrical, bell-shaped pattern known as a normal distribution. This property is crucial for many statistical methods, as it underpins the assumptions made for parametric tests and confidence intervals, ensuring that results are valid and reliable.
Outlier Detection: Outlier detection refers to the process of identifying data points that deviate significantly from the overall pattern of a dataset. These anomalous values can skew results, affect statistical analyses, and lead to misleading interpretations, making it crucial to detect them for robust estimation and accurate hypothesis testing, as well as for reliable multiple linear regression models.
Peter J. Huber: Peter J. Huber is a prominent statistician known for his contributions to robust statistics, particularly in the development of methods that provide reliable results even in the presence of outliers or deviations from standard statistical assumptions. His work emphasizes the importance of robustness in estimation and hypothesis testing, which allows researchers to draw valid conclusions from data that may not adhere to traditional assumptions like normality or homoscedasticity.
Power Analysis: Power analysis is a statistical method used to determine the likelihood that a study will detect an effect when there is an effect to be detected. It helps researchers understand how many participants are needed to achieve a desired level of statistical power, which is the probability of correctly rejecting a false null hypothesis. This concept is crucial for designing studies, as it directly influences the validity of hypothesis testing and can affect both the types of errors made and the selection of appropriate tests.
Tukey's Biweight: Tukey's Biweight is a robust statistical method used for estimating the location and scale of data while minimizing the influence of outliers. It achieves this by applying a weight function that reduces the contribution of observations that are far from the center, leading to more reliable estimates in datasets that may not follow normal distribution. This technique is particularly valuable in robust estimation and hypothesis testing, where the goal is to maintain accuracy despite the presence of anomalous data points.
Type I Error: A Type I error occurs when a null hypothesis is incorrectly rejected, indicating that there is a significant effect or difference when, in reality, none exists. This error is crucial in understanding the reliability of hypothesis testing, as it directly relates to the alpha level, which sets the threshold for determining significance.
Type II Error: A Type II error occurs when a statistical test fails to reject a false null hypothesis, meaning that it concludes there is no effect or difference when, in reality, one exists. This type of error highlights the risk of not detecting a true effect, which can lead to missed opportunities or incorrect conclusions in research.
Wald Test: The Wald test is a statistical test used to assess the significance of individual coefficients in a statistical model. It evaluates whether the estimated parameters significantly differ from a hypothesized value, typically zero, by comparing the squared ratio of the estimated parameter to its standard error. This test is crucial in robust estimation and hypothesis testing as it provides insights into the influence of individual predictors within models that may not adhere to strict assumptions of normality.