10.2 Executive Compensation
6 min read•august 13, 2024
Executive compensation is a hot-button issue in corporate governance. It's all about how companies pay their top dogs and why. From base salaries to , the goal is to keep execs happy while also making sure they're working hard for shareholders.
But it's not just about the money. There's a whole science behind executive pay, with theories like and trying to explain it. Compensation committees and shareholder votes also play a big role in keeping things fair and transparent.
Executive Compensation Components
Pay Components and Their Purposes
Top images from around the web for Pay Components and Their Purposes
The determinants and effects of CEO-employee pay ratios - Journalist's Resource View original
Is this image relevant?
CEO pay-performance sensitivity in the South African context View original
Is this image relevant?
Securities Management | Boundless Finance View original
Is this image relevant?
The determinants and effects of CEO-employee pay ratios - Journalist's Resource View original
Is this image relevant?
CEO pay-performance sensitivity in the South African context View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Pay Components and Their Purposes
The determinants and effects of CEO-employee pay ratios - Journalist's Resource View original
Is this image relevant?
CEO pay-performance sensitivity in the South African context View original
Is this image relevant?
Securities Management | Boundless Finance View original
Is this image relevant?
The determinants and effects of CEO-employee pay ratios - Journalist's Resource View original
Is this image relevant?
CEO pay-performance sensitivity in the South African context View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Executive compensation packages include , annual bonus, stock options, restricted stock, and other (LTIPs)
- Base salary is the fixed portion of compensation, providing a stable income
- Bonuses and LTIPs are variable and often tied to performance metrics, incentivizing executives to meet specific targets
- The mix of fixed and variable pay influences executive risk-taking and decision-making (higher variable pay encourages more risk-taking)
- Stock options give executives the right to purchase company stock at a predetermined price (strike price), aligning their interests with stock price appreciation
- Options have value only if the stock price rises above the strike price, encouraging executives to focus on long-term stock performance
- Restricted stock grants provide executives with actual shares of company stock, subject to vesting conditions (time-based or performance-based vesting)
- Restricted stock aligns executive wealth with shareholder returns, as the value of the stock grants fluctuates with the company's stock price
Non-Monetary Benefits and Employment Agreements
- (perks) are non-monetary benefits provided to executives (company cars, private jet usage, country club memberships)
- Perks can be a significant portion of total compensation and are often used to attract and retain top talent
- However, excessive perks can be seen as a sign of poor corporate governance and may draw criticism from shareholders and the public
- outline the terms of an executive's employment, including compensation, benefits, and termination provisions
- Contracts provide executives with job security and clarity on their compensation and benefits
- specify the benefits an executive receives upon termination (cash payments, accelerated vesting of equity awards)
- Golden parachutes provide substantial benefits to executives in the event of a change in control (merger, acquisition) or termination
- These provisions can help align executive interests with shareholders during a takeover, encouraging them to negotiate the best deal
- However, excessive golden parachutes can also incentivize executives to pursue deals that may not be in the best interest of shareholders
Executive Pay Alignment with Shareholders
Addressing the Principal-Agent Problem
- The principal-agent problem arises when the interests of executives (agents) diverge from those of shareholders (principals), leading to potential conflicts and agency costs
- Executives may prioritize short-term gains over long-term value creation or engage in excessive risk-taking
- Executive compensation should be designed to minimize these conflicts and align interests, encouraging actions that benefit shareholders
- ties executive pay to specific performance metrics (stock price, , return on equity)
- This aligns executive incentives with shareholder value creation, as executives are rewarded for meeting or exceeding performance targets
- However, poorly designed performance metrics can lead to unintended consequences, such as short-term thinking or manipulation of results
Equity Ownership and Clawback Provisions
- and encourage executives to maintain a significant equity stake in the company
- Executives with substantial stock ownership have their personal wealth tied to the company's performance, aligning their interests with shareholders
- Holding requirements prevent executives from selling shares immediately after vesting, promoting long-term thinking
- allow the company to recoup compensation from executives in the event of financial restatements or misconduct
- These provisions discourage short-term manipulation and promote accountability, as executives face financial consequences for improper actions
- Clawbacks help maintain the integrity of the compensation system and protect shareholder interests
Shareholder Involvement in Executive Pay
- Shareholder "" votes provide a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation
- These votes allow shareholders to express their approval or disapproval of pay practices, sending a signal to the board and management
- While non-binding, negative say on pay votes can lead to changes in compensation practices and increased shareholder engagement
- (Institutional Shareholder Services, Glass Lewis) provide recommendations to institutional investors on how to vote on executive pay
- These firms analyze compensation practices and assess their alignment with shareholder interests
- Their recommendations can influence the outcome of say on pay votes and pressure companies to reform their pay practices
Executive Compensation and Firm Performance
Empirical Evidence and Theories
- Empirical studies have yielded mixed results on the relationship between executive pay and firm performance
- Some studies find a positive correlation, suggesting that higher pay is associated with better performance
- Others find weak or no significant relationship, indicating that factors other than compensation may drive firm performance
- The measures the change in executive wealth for a given change in firm value
- Higher sensitivity suggests a stronger alignment between pay and performance, as executive wealth is more closely tied to company success
- However, measuring pay-performance sensitivity can be challenging due to the complexity of compensation packages and the time horizon of incentives
Tournament Theory and Managerial Power
- Tournament theory suggests that the large pay gap between CEO and other executives creates a tournament-like competition for the top job
- The prospect of a significant pay increase motivates executives to perform better and vie for promotion to CEO
- However, excessive pay disparity can also lead to negative consequences (reduced cooperation, increased risk-taking, internal politics)
- argues that powerful CEOs can influence their own pay, leading to compensation that is more a function of CEO power than firm performance
- CEOs with greater tenure, control over the board, or personal relationships with directors may be able to extract higher pay
- This can result in rent extraction and suboptimal pay practices that do not align with shareholder interests
Efficiency Wage Theory
- The efficiency wage theory suggests that paying executives above-market wages can attract and retain top talent, leading to better firm performance
- Higher pay can help companies secure the best managerial talent, which is scarce and highly sought after
- Retaining top executives can provide stability and continuity in leadership, supporting long-term strategy implementation
- However, this theory assumes that the labor market for executives is efficient and competitive
- In reality, the executive labor market may be influenced by factors such as social networks, reputation, and asymmetric information
- Paying above-market wages may not always result in better performance if the executive's skills do not match the company's needs or if other factors limit their effectiveness
Compensation Committees and Executive Pay
Committee Composition and Responsibilities
- The is a subcommittee of the board of directors responsible for overseeing and determining executive compensation
- The committee should be composed of independent directors to minimize conflicts of interest and ensure objective decision-making
- Independence requirements vary by country and stock exchange, but generally exclude directors with material relationships to the company or its executives
- Compensation committees set performance goals and metrics for , ensuring alignment with the company's strategy and shareholder interests
- They determine the target pay levels and mix of compensation components (salary, bonus, equity, etc.) for each executive
- Committees also review and approve employment contracts, severance agreements, and change-in-control provisions
Compensation Consultants and Disclosure
- Compensation committees typically engage to provide market data, benchmarking analysis, and advice on pay practices
- Consultants help committees understand market trends, design competitive pay packages, and assess the appropriateness of compensation levels
- However, the use of consultants can also lead to potential conflicts of interest if the consultant provides other services (e.g., employee compensation, benefits consulting) to the company
- Compensation committees are responsible for drafting the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) section of the company's proxy statement
- The CD&A discloses and explains the company's executive compensation philosophy, practices, and decision-making process to shareholders
- It provides transparency on pay levels, performance metrics, and the rationale behind compensation decisions
- Shareholders can use the CD&A to assess the alignment of executive pay with company performance and shareholder interests
Key Terms to Review (33)
Agency Theory: Agency theory is a framework that examines the relationship between principals, such as shareholders, and agents, such as company executives, focusing on the conflicts that can arise when the interests of these two parties diverge. This theory highlights the importance of aligning the goals of executives with those of shareholders to reduce agency costs and ensure efficient management of the firm. Understanding this dynamic is crucial for making informed decisions related to executive compensation and the overall role of financial managers.
Base Salary: Base salary is the initial fixed compensation an employee receives, not including bonuses, benefits, or any other incentives. It serves as the foundation of an executive's total compensation package and is typically determined by various factors such as industry standards, the executive's experience, and the company's size. A well-structured base salary can significantly impact employee satisfaction and retention, especially among executives who often compare their compensation with peers in similar roles.
Clawback provision: A clawback provision is a contractual clause that allows a company to reclaim money or benefits that have already been paid to executives under certain conditions, such as financial restatements or misconduct. This mechanism serves as a form of protection for shareholders by ensuring that executives are held accountable for their actions and the financial outcomes of the company. Clawback provisions are often included in executive compensation agreements to deter risky behavior and promote responsible management practices.
Clawback provisions: Clawback provisions are contractual clauses that allow companies to reclaim previously awarded compensation from executives under specific circumstances, often related to misconduct or financial restatements. These provisions aim to align executive incentives with long-term performance and accountability, ensuring that executives do not benefit from short-term gains that may be unsustainable or result from unethical behavior.
Compensation committee: A compensation committee is a subcommittee of a company's board of directors responsible for determining and overseeing the executive compensation policies and practices. This committee plays a crucial role in ensuring that executive pay aligns with company performance and shareholder interests, while also adhering to legal and regulatory standards. The decisions made by this committee can significantly influence executive retention, motivation, and overall organizational performance.
Compensation consultants: Compensation consultants are experts who provide guidance and recommendations on executive compensation strategies, helping organizations design and implement competitive pay structures that align with their business goals. They analyze market data, evaluate job roles, and assess company performance to create tailored compensation packages that attract and retain top talent while ensuring compliance with regulations. Their role is crucial in establishing fair and effective compensation systems within firms.
Dodd-Frank Act: The Dodd-Frank Act is a comprehensive piece of legislation passed in 2010 aimed at reducing risks in the financial system following the 2008 financial crisis. It established new regulations and oversight mechanisms for financial institutions, promoting transparency, accountability, and consumer protection, while also addressing issues related to risk management, capital budgeting, and executive compensation.
Earnings Per Share: Earnings per share (EPS) is a financial metric that represents the portion of a company's profit allocated to each outstanding share of common stock. It serves as an important indicator of a company's profitability and is often used by investors to assess financial health and performance over time. EPS can influence executive compensation, as many incentive plans tie bonuses and stock options to EPS growth, aligning the interests of management with those of shareholders.
Efficiency Wage Theory: Efficiency wage theory posits that employers can increase productivity and reduce turnover by paying wages above the market equilibrium level. This approach suggests that higher wages can lead to a more motivated and loyal workforce, ultimately enhancing overall efficiency within a firm. The theory highlights the relationship between wage levels and employee performance, emphasizing that paying employees well can lead to greater output and lower costs associated with hiring and training new staff.
Employment contracts: Employment contracts are legally binding agreements between employers and employees that outline the terms and conditions of employment. These contracts typically specify job responsibilities, compensation, benefits, and the duration of employment, establishing clear expectations for both parties. They play a crucial role in executive compensation by defining how and when compensation is paid, as well as performance metrics that may influence bonuses or stock options.
Golden parachute: A golden parachute is a financial arrangement that provides significant benefits to executives in the event of termination or a merger, often including large severance packages and stock options. These arrangements are designed to ensure that top executives are compensated fairly and protected from sudden job loss, encouraging them to make bold business decisions without fear of losing their income. While they can help attract talent, they are also scrutinized for potentially rewarding executives excessively.
Holding Requirements: Holding requirements refer to the mandatory conditions imposed on executives and directors regarding the retention of company shares or stock options for a specified period. These requirements are designed to align the interests of executives with those of shareholders, encouraging long-term decision-making and reducing the incentive for short-term profit maximization at the expense of sustainable growth.
Human Capital Theory: Human capital theory suggests that individuals' skills, knowledge, and experiences are valuable assets that contribute to their economic productivity and earning potential. This theory emphasizes the importance of investing in education and training as a means to enhance human capital, which in turn can lead to improved outcomes in the labor market, including higher wages and better job opportunities. It is particularly relevant in discussions about how organizations reward executives based on their perceived value and contributions to the company's success.
Incentive compensation: Incentive compensation refers to a performance-based pay structure designed to motivate employees, particularly executives, by linking their compensation to specific performance goals or outcomes. This type of compensation can take various forms, such as bonuses, stock options, or profit-sharing, and is intended to align the interests of the employees with those of the company and its shareholders. By creating a direct connection between performance and rewards, incentive compensation aims to drive organizational success and improve overall performance.
KPMG Report: A KPMG report refers to a comprehensive analysis or assessment produced by KPMG, one of the largest professional services firms globally, known for its audit, tax, and advisory services. These reports often focus on areas like corporate governance, risk management, and executive compensation, providing valuable insights for organizations looking to enhance their financial practices and strategic decision-making.
Long-term incentive plans: Long-term incentive plans (LTIPs) are compensation programs designed to reward executives and key employees for achieving specific performance goals over an extended period, typically three to five years. These plans often align the interests of executives with those of shareholders, as they usually involve equity-based awards such as stock options or performance shares that appreciate in value with the company's success. LTIPs are a crucial aspect of executive compensation strategies aimed at promoting sustained company performance and enhancing overall shareholder value.
Managerial power theory: Managerial power theory is the concept that suggests executives have significant influence over their own compensation packages due to their control over the corporate governance structures that set these pay levels. This theory highlights how managers can leverage their power to negotiate compensation that may not necessarily align with the company’s performance, often resulting in higher pay regardless of shareholder returns. It sheds light on the dynamics between executives and boards, illustrating the potential misalignment of incentives.
Market Surveys: Market surveys are systematic tools used to collect data about consumer preferences, behaviors, and attitudes within a specific market. These surveys play a crucial role in understanding the competitive landscape and determining appropriate executive compensation strategies, as they provide insights into how top executives are compensated relative to their peers and industry standards.
Pay ratio disclosure rule: The pay ratio disclosure rule is a regulation that requires publicly traded companies to disclose the ratio of their CEO's total compensation to the median compensation of their employees. This rule aims to provide transparency in executive compensation practices, allowing stakeholders to assess how well companies are aligning their pay structures with overall employee compensation.
Pay-for-performance compensation: Pay-for-performance compensation is a financial incentive system where employees are rewarded based on their individual or organizational performance outcomes. This approach aligns the interests of employees with the goals of the organization, motivating them to enhance productivity and drive results. By tying compensation directly to performance metrics, organizations aim to foster a high-performance culture that promotes accountability and encourages employees to exceed expectations.
Pay-performance sensitivity: Pay-performance sensitivity refers to the degree to which an executive's compensation is linked to the company's performance outcomes, such as stock price and earnings. This concept highlights the alignment of interests between executives and shareholders, as higher performance leads to greater rewards for executives, thereby incentivizing them to enhance company value. Understanding pay-performance sensitivity helps in evaluating how effectively a compensation structure can motivate executives to achieve the goals of the organization.
Peer group analysis: Peer group analysis is a method used to evaluate a company's performance and compensation by comparing it with similar firms within the same industry or sector. This analysis provides insights into how a company's executives are compensated relative to their peers, helping to determine competitive salary structures and align incentives with industry standards.
Performance shares: Performance shares are a form of equity compensation awarded to executives, contingent upon meeting specific performance criteria over a set period. They align the interests of executives with those of shareholders by tying the value of the shares to the company’s financial performance or stock price, encouraging executives to drive long-term growth.
Perquisites: Perquisites, often referred to as 'perks,' are additional benefits or privileges that executives receive as part of their compensation package, beyond their regular salary and bonuses. These perks can include items like company cars, private jets, club memberships, and health benefits, which are intended to enhance the overall compensation experience for top management. The purpose of these perquisites is to attract and retain high-level talent while also aligning executive interests with the company’s goals.
Phantom stock: Phantom stock is a form of employee compensation that provides the benefits of stock ownership without actually giving employees real shares. This type of plan allows employees to receive a cash payout based on the value of the company's stock at a future date, thus aligning their interests with the company's performance while avoiding dilution of existing shareholders' equity. Phantom stock plans can serve as a retention tool, motivating employees to contribute to the company's success and stay with the firm longer.
Proxy advisory firms: Proxy advisory firms are specialized organizations that provide advice and recommendations to shareholders on how to vote on corporate matters, including executive compensation, mergers, and board appointments. These firms analyze various aspects of a company's governance practices and offer insights that can significantly influence shareholder votes, helping investors make informed decisions about their investments.
Restricted stock units: Restricted stock units (RSUs) are a form of compensation given to employees in the form of company shares, which are subject to vesting conditions. These units are typically granted as part of an employee's compensation package and are designed to align the interests of employees with those of shareholders by incentivizing long-term commitment to the company. RSUs become actual shares once certain conditions, often related to time or performance, are met, allowing employees to realize their value.
Say on Pay: Say on Pay is a corporate governance provision that gives shareholders the right to vote on the compensation packages of top executives. This concept aims to enhance transparency and accountability in executive pay practices, allowing shareholders to express their approval or disapproval through a non-binding vote. By empowering shareholders in this way, Say on Pay aligns executive compensation with company performance and shareholder interests, potentially reducing excessive pay and promoting better alignment between management and stakeholders.
Severance Agreements: Severance agreements are contracts between an employer and an employee that outline the terms of employment termination, often including compensation, benefits, and other considerations. These agreements serve to clarify the expectations of both parties and can provide legal protections for the employer while offering financial support to the employee during their transition. They are commonly used in executive compensation packages and can vary widely in their terms and conditions.
Stock options: Stock options are contracts that give employees the right to buy a company's stock at a predetermined price, usually within a specific time frame. They are a popular form of compensation used by companies to incentivize and retain key employees, aligning their interests with those of shareholders. By offering stock options, companies aim to motivate employees to work towards increasing the company's stock price, as the value of their options rises with it.
Stock Ownership Guidelines: Stock ownership guidelines are policies established by companies that dictate the minimum amount of stock that executives and board members must hold in the organization. These guidelines are intended to align the interests of management with those of shareholders, encouraging executives to focus on long-term performance and company success. By requiring executives to invest in their own company’s stock, it helps foster a culture of accountability and commitment.
Total Shareholder Return: Total shareholder return (TSR) measures the total return to shareholders from their investment in a company, encompassing both capital gains and dividends received over a specific period. This metric is crucial as it reflects the company's performance from the investor's perspective, helping to align executive compensation with shareholder interests and long-term value creation.
Tournament theory: Tournament theory is a concept in economics and organizational behavior that suggests competition among individuals can drive performance and motivation, particularly in the context of compensation structures. It posits that when individuals are rewarded based on their relative performance rather than absolute performance, it can lead to increased effort and productivity. This theory is particularly relevant in executive compensation, as it highlights how performance-based incentives can align the interests of executives with those of shareholders.