Glossary

Non-probability sampling is a crucial tool in communication research, allowing researchers to study specific groups or phenomena that may be hard to access through random sampling. This approach offers flexibility in participant selection, enabling focused studies on particular characteristics or experiences relevant to communication research.

Understanding various non-probability sampling techniques helps researchers choose the most appropriate method for their specific research questions and target populations. These methods include , , , and , each with its own strengths and limitations in communication studies.

Types of non-probability sampling

  • Non-probability sampling plays a crucial role in Advanced Communication Research Methods by allowing researchers to study specific groups or phenomena that may be difficult to access through random sampling
  • This approach offers flexibility in participant selection, enabling researchers to focus on particular characteristics or experiences relevant to their communication studies
  • Understanding various non-probability sampling techniques helps researchers choose the most appropriate method for their specific research questions and target populations

Convenience sampling

Top images from around the web for Convenience sampling

  • Sampling Techniques | OER Commons View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Understand Bias - Atlantis School of Communication View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Sampling Techniques | OER Commons View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Convenience sampling

  • Sampling Techniques | OER Commons View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Understand Bias - Atlantis School of Communication View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Sampling Techniques | OER Commons View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3
  • Involves selecting participants based on their accessibility and proximity to the researcher
  • Often used in pilot studies or exploratory research in communication fields
  • Can include surveying students on a university campus about their social media habits
  • Limitations include potential bias and lack of representativeness of the broader population

Purposive sampling

  • Researchers deliberately choose participants based on specific criteria or characteristics
  • Useful for studying niche communication phenomena or specialized groups
  • Involves selecting participants with expertise in a particular area of communication (public relations professionals)
  • Allows for in-depth exploration of targeted experiences or perspectives in communication research

Snowball sampling

  • Begins with a small group of initial participants who then recruit others from their networks
  • Particularly effective for studying hidden or in communication research
  • Used to investigate communication patterns within closed communities or subcultures
  • Can lead to a rapid increase in sample size but may result in homogeneous samples

Quota sampling

  • Involves setting quotas for different subgroups within a population to ensure representation
  • Used in communication research to study diverse demographic groups or media consumption habits
  • Researchers might set quotas for age, gender, or education levels when studying news consumption patterns
  • Helps ensure inclusion of various perspectives but may not accurately reflect population proportions

Advantages of non-probability sampling

  • Non-probability sampling techniques offer several benefits for communication researchers, particularly when dealing with specific research contexts or constraints
  • These methods can be especially useful in exploratory stages of research or when studying hard-to-reach populations in communication studies
  • Understanding these advantages helps researchers make informed decisions about sampling strategies in their communication research projects

Cost-effectiveness

  • Reduces expenses associated with creating comprehensive sampling frames
  • Eliminates need for extensive random selection processes
  • Allows for focused allocation of resources on specific target groups
  • Particularly beneficial for studies with limited funding or

Time efficiency

  • Enables rapid data collection compared to probability sampling methods
  • Facilitates quick pilot studies or preliminary research in communication fields
  • Allows researchers to gather initial insights for refining research questions
  • Supports timely completion of projects with tight deadlines or time constraints

Access to specific populations

  • Facilitates research on hard-to-reach or marginalized groups in communication studies
  • Enables in-depth exploration of niche communication phenomena or specialized communities
  • Supports studies focusing on rare experiences or unique perspectives in media consumption
  • Allows for targeted recruitment of participants with specific characteristics or expertise

Disadvantages of non-probability sampling

  • While non-probability sampling offers advantages in certain research contexts, it also comes with significant limitations that communication researchers must consider
  • Understanding these disadvantages is crucial for accurately interpreting and reporting research findings in Advanced Communication Research Methods
  • Researchers must weigh these limitations against the benefits when deciding on sampling strategies for their studies

Limited generalizability

  • Results may not be representative of the broader population
  • Findings often cannot be extrapolated beyond the specific sample studied
  • Restricts the ability to make broad claims about communication phenomena across diverse groups
  • May lead to challenges in applying research outcomes to wider contexts or populations

Potential for bias

  • Selection procedures can introduce systematic errors in the sample
  • Overrepresentation of certain groups or perspectives may skew results
  • Researcher's personal networks or accessibility issues can influence participant selection
  • May lead to incomplete or distorted understanding of communication processes or effects

Lack of statistical inference

  • Cannot calculate sampling error or confidence intervals
  • Limits ability to conduct certain statistical analyses common in quantitative communication research
  • Challenges in determining the precision of estimates or effect sizes
  • Restricts capacity to make probabilistic statements about the population based on sample data

Applications in communication research

  • Non-probability sampling techniques find diverse applications across various domains of communication research
  • These methods are particularly valuable when studying specific phenomena, exploring new research areas, or accessing unique populations in communication studies
  • Understanding these applications helps researchers align their sampling strategies with their and contexts

Exploratory studies

  • Used in preliminary investigations of new communication phenomena or emerging media platforms
  • Facilitates rapid gathering of initial insights to guide more extensive research
  • Supports development of hypotheses for future studies in communication research
  • Allows researchers to identify key variables or themes for in-depth examination

Hard-to-reach populations

  • Enables research on marginalized groups or communities with limited visibility
  • Facilitates studies on sensitive topics in communication (online harassment, whistleblowing)
  • Supports investigation of niche communication practices or subcultures
  • Allows access to participants with rare experiences or specialized knowledge in media and communication

Qualitative research designs

  • Aligns well with in-depth interview studies exploring individual experiences in communication
  • Supports ethnographic research on communication practices within specific cultural contexts
  • Facilitates focus group studies examining shared meanings and interpretations of media content
  • Enables case study research on unique communication phenomena or organizational practices

Sampling frame considerations

  • In non-probability sampling, the concept of a sampling frame takes on a different meaning compared to probability sampling methods
  • Understanding sampling frame considerations is crucial for defining the scope and boundaries of communication research studies
  • These considerations help researchers clarify their target population and identify appropriate sampling units for their studies

Defining target population

  • Involves clearly specifying the group or community of interest for the communication study
  • Requires establishing inclusion and exclusion criteria for potential participants
  • May focus on demographic characteristics, communication behaviors, or media consumption patterns
  • Helps researchers align their sampling strategy with research objectives and theoretical frameworks

Identifying sampling units

  • Determines the basic units of analysis for the communication research study
  • Can include individuals, groups, organizations, or media content depending on research focus
  • Requires consideration of how units relate to the broader target population
  • Influences data collection methods and analysis strategies in communication research

Accessibility issues

  • Addresses challenges in reaching or engaging with potential participants
  • May involve geographical, cultural, or technological barriers to accessing the target population
  • Requires strategies for overcoming access limitations (online recruitment, community partnerships)
  • Influences choice of sampling technique and potential biases in the resulting sample

Sample size determination

  • Determining appropriate sample size in non-probability sampling differs from probability sampling approaches
  • Sample size considerations in non-probability sampling are often guided by qualitative research principles and practical constraints
  • Understanding these factors helps researchers balance depth of insight with resource limitations in communication studies

Saturation in qualitative research

  • Involves collecting data until no new themes or insights emerge
  • Requires ongoing analysis during data collection to identify point of diminishing returns
  • Sample size may vary depending on complexity of the communication phenomenon studied
  • Typically results in smaller sample sizes compared to quantitative probability sampling approaches

Resource constraints

  • Considers limitations in time, budget, and personnel available for the study
  • Influences decisions on number of participants that can be feasibly included
  • May require balancing depth of individual data collection with breadth of sample
  • Impacts choice of data collection methods (in-depth interviews vs. focus groups)

Research objectives

  • Aligns sample size with specific goals and research questions of the communication study
  • Considers need for diversity or representation of different perspectives within the sample
  • May require larger samples for studies aiming to compare subgroups or identify patterns
  • Smaller samples may suffice for in-depth exploration of individual experiences or case studies

Bias in non-probability sampling

  • Bias presents a significant challenge in non-probability sampling methods used in communication research
  • Understanding potential sources of bias is crucial for researchers to mitigate their impact and interpret findings accurately
  • Recognizing these biases helps in designing more robust studies and transparently reporting limitations in communication research

Selection bias

  • Occurs when certain groups or individuals are more likely to be included in the sample
  • Can result from convenience sampling or reliance on researcher's networks
  • May lead to overrepresentation of easily accessible or cooperative participants
  • Strategies to mitigate include diversifying recruitment methods and explicitly acknowledging sample limitations

Volunteer bias

  • Arises when participants self-select into the study, potentially skewing the sample
  • Can result in overrepresentation of individuals with strong opinions or interests in the topic
  • May lead to exclusion of perspectives from less engaged or motivated individuals
  • Researchers can address by considering motivations for participation and potential impact on findings

Researcher bias

  • Stems from the researcher's own preferences, expectations, or preconceptions
  • Can influence participant selection, data collection, and interpretation of results
  • May lead to confirmation bias or overlooking contradictory evidence
  • Mitigation strategies include reflexivity, peer debriefing, and transparent reporting of researcher positionality

Validity and reliability concerns

  • Validity and reliability are crucial considerations in non-probability sampling approaches used in communication research
  • Understanding these concerns helps researchers design more robust studies and accurately interpret their findings
  • Addressing validity and reliability issues is essential for enhancing the credibility and trustworthiness of research outcomes

External validity limitations

  • Challenges in generalizing findings beyond the specific sample studied
  • Restricted ability to make broad claims about communication phenomena in wider populations
  • May limit applicability of research outcomes to different contexts or groups
  • Researchers should clearly articulate the scope and boundaries of their findings

Internal validity considerations

  • Focuses on the accuracy of conclusions drawn from the non-probability sample
  • Requires careful consideration of potential confounding variables or alternative explanations
  • May be strengthened through triangulation of data sources or methods
  • Researchers should explicitly address how sampling approach may impact causal inferences

Strategies for improving reliability

  • Implement consistent data collection procedures across all participants
  • Develop clear coding schemes for qualitative data analysis
  • Use multiple coders and calculate inter-coder reliability in content analysis studies
  • Conduct member checks or follow-up interviews to verify interpretations with participants

Ethical considerations

  • Ethical considerations are paramount in non-probability sampling approaches used in communication research
  • Researchers must navigate various ethical challenges to protect participants and maintain the integrity of their studies
  • Understanding these considerations helps ensure responsible and ethical conduct throughout the research process
  • Requires clear communication of study purpose, procedures, and potential risks to participants
  • May present challenges in snowball sampling where initial participants recruit others
  • Involves ensuring voluntary participation without coercion or undue influence
  • Researchers should develop appropriate consent processes for different sampling contexts (online surveys, interviews)

Confidentiality and anonymity

  • Crucial for protecting participants' privacy and preventing potential harm
  • Presents challenges in small or closely-knit communities where participants may be identifiable
  • Requires careful data management and reporting practices to maintain confidentiality
  • Researchers should consider use of pseudonyms or aggregating data to protect individual identities

Vulnerable populations

  • Demands extra care when sampling from groups with reduced autonomy or increased risk
  • May require additional safeguards or modified consent procedures (children, individuals with cognitive impairments)
  • Involves balancing need for research with potential risks to vulnerable participants
  • Researchers should consult ethical guidelines and seek appropriate approvals for studies involving

Reporting non-probability samples

  • Transparent and comprehensive reporting of non-probability sampling methods is essential in communication research
  • Proper reporting enables readers to assess the quality and limitations of the research
  • Understanding reporting requirements helps researchers communicate their findings more effectively and ethically

Transparency in methodology

  • Provide detailed descriptions of sampling procedures and participant selection criteria
  • Clearly articulate rationale for choosing non-probability sampling approach
  • Disclose any challenges or limitations encountered during participant recruitment
  • Include information on sample size determination and data saturation (if applicable)

Limitations acknowledgment

  • Explicitly state limitations of due to non-probability sampling
  • Discuss potential biases introduced by the sampling method
  • Address how sampling approach may impact interpretation of findings
  • Suggest caution in applying results to broader populations or contexts

Contextualizing findings

  • Situate results within the specific context of the sample studied
  • Discuss how sample characteristics may influence observed patterns or relationships
  • Compare findings to existing literature, noting similarities and differences
  • Suggest potential directions for future research to address limitations of current study

Non-probability vs probability sampling

  • Understanding the differences between non-probability and probability sampling is crucial for communication researchers
  • This comparison helps researchers make informed decisions about appropriate sampling strategies for their studies
  • Recognizing the strengths and weaknesses of each approach enables more effective research design and interpretation of results

Strengths and weaknesses

  • Non-probability sampling offers flexibility and but limits generalizability
  • Probability sampling provides statistical representativeness but can be resource-intensive and time-consuming
  • Non-probability methods excel in exploratory research and studying hard-to-reach populations
  • Probability sampling allows for statistical inference and broader generalization of findings

Appropriateness for research questions

  • Non-probability sampling suits qualitative studies exploring in-depth experiences or perspectives
  • Probability sampling aligns with quantitative research aiming to estimate population parameters
  • Choice depends on research objectives, target population, and available resources
  • Some studies may benefit from combining both approaches to leverage their respective strengths

Combining approaches

  • Mixed-methods designs can incorporate both non-probability and probability sampling techniques
  • Sequential designs may use non-probability sampling for exploratory phase followed by probability sampling
  • Nested sampling approaches can embed non-probability subsamples within larger probability samples
  • Combining approaches can enhance comprehensiveness and address limitations of individual methods

Technology in non-probability sampling

  • Technological advancements have significantly impacted non-probability sampling methods in communication research
  • Understanding these technological applications helps researchers leverage new tools and platforms for participant recruitment and data collection
  • Consideration of technological approaches is crucial for adapting sampling strategies to changing communication landscapes

Online surveys

  • Facilitates rapid distribution of questionnaires to large numbers of potential participants
  • Allows for targeting specific online communities or interest groups
  • Enables use of skip logic and interactive elements to enhance survey experience
  • Presents challenges in verifying participant identities and controlling for multiple submissions

Social media recruitment

  • Leverages social media platforms for participant outreach and snowball sampling
  • Allows access to niche communities or demographic groups active on specific platforms
  • Enables targeted advertising to reach potential participants based on interests or characteristics
  • Raises concerns about representativeness and potential biases in social media user populations

Mobile data collection

  • Utilizes smartphone apps or SMS for real-time data gathering from participants
  • Enables collection of location-based data or ecological momentary assessments
  • Facilitates longitudinal studies with frequent, brief interactions with participants
  • Presents challenges in ensuring data privacy and managing varying levels of technological access among participants

Analysis techniques for non-probability samples

  • Analyzing data from non-probability samples requires careful consideration of appropriate techniques
  • Understanding these analysis approaches helps researchers extract meaningful insights while acknowledging limitations of their sampling method
  • Proper analysis techniques are crucial for drawing valid conclusions and accurately reporting findings in communication research

Qualitative data analysis

  • Involves thematic analysis, coding, and interpretation of textual or visual data
  • Focuses on identifying patterns, themes, and meanings within the non-probability sample
  • May employ computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) for large datasets
  • Requires reflexivity and transparency in researcher's interpretative process

Descriptive statistics

  • Summarizes characteristics and patterns within the non-probability sample
  • Includes measures of central tendency, dispersion, and frequency distributions
  • Useful for describing sample composition and key variables of interest
  • Should be reported with clear acknowledgment of limitations in generalizability

Limitations of inferential statistics

  • Traditional inferential techniques may not be appropriate due to non-random selection
  • Caution required when applying tests of statistical significance to non-probability samples
  • Alternative approaches (bootstrapping, Bayesian methods) may be considered with caveats
  • Researchers should clearly communicate limitations and potential biases in statistical analyses

Key Terms to Review (31)

Access to specific populations: Access to specific populations refers to the ability of researchers to reach and engage particular groups of individuals that may have unique characteristics or experiences. This concept is crucial in non-probability sampling, where researchers intentionally select certain segments of the population, often due to their relevance to the study's objectives, to gather insights that might not be captured through random sampling methods.
Confidentiality and Anonymity: Confidentiality refers to the ethical principle of keeping information private and secure, ensuring that personal data collected during research is not disclosed without consent. Anonymity means that the identity of participants is not known to researchers or anyone else, allowing individuals to provide information without fear of identification. Both concepts are crucial in research to protect participants' rights and encourage honest responses.
Convenience sampling: Convenience sampling is a non-probability sampling technique where researchers select participants based on their easy availability and proximity. This method relies on a sample that is readily accessible rather than randomly chosen, making it quick and inexpensive to implement. However, it may lead to biased results because the sample may not represent the larger population accurately.
Cost-effectiveness: Cost-effectiveness refers to a method of comparing the relative expenses and outcomes of different research strategies or interventions to determine the best option for achieving desired results with minimal resources. This concept emphasizes the importance of maximizing results while minimizing costs, making it essential for researchers to assess not just the financial implications, but also the quality and effectiveness of their approaches. Understanding cost-effectiveness can lead to more informed decision-making regarding resource allocation in various research contexts.
Earl Babbie: Earl Babbie is a prominent scholar in the field of research methods, best known for his contributions to social research and the development of methodologies in the social sciences. His work emphasizes the importance of systematic inquiry and the application of rigorous methods in research design, making him a key figure in understanding both qualitative and quantitative approaches to research.
Exploratory studies: Exploratory studies are research approaches aimed at gaining insights into a phenomenon that is not well understood, often used to identify variables, generate hypotheses, and explore new ideas. These studies prioritize flexibility and openness, allowing researchers to adapt their methods as they uncover new information. By using exploratory studies, researchers can lay the groundwork for more structured research designs in the future.
External validity limitations: External validity limitations refer to the constraints that affect the generalizability of research findings beyond the specific context in which the study was conducted. This concept is crucial for understanding whether results obtained from a sample can be applied to a broader population or different settings. Factors such as the sample selection method, the environment of the study, and the timing of data collection can all impact external validity, making it essential for researchers to consider how their findings relate to real-world scenarios.
Generalizability: Generalizability refers to the extent to which research findings can be applied beyond the specific context of a study to broader populations or settings. It is a crucial concept that ensures research results are relevant and can inform practices, policies, and further studies across different environments. Understanding generalizability helps researchers assess whether their conclusions can be reliably extended to other situations or groups, which is vital for the robustness of scientific knowledge.
Hard-to-reach populations: Hard-to-reach populations refer to groups of individuals who are difficult to access or engage in research or surveys due to various factors such as socio-economic status, geographical location, cultural differences, or stigmatization. Understanding these populations is crucial in research, as their underrepresentation can lead to biased findings and missed opportunities for valuable insights.
Howard S. Becker: Howard S. Becker is a prominent sociologist known for his work on deviance and the sociology of art. He developed the labeling theory, which suggests that deviance is not inherent in an act but is instead a consequence of social labels assigned by society. His perspectives contribute significantly to understanding non-probability sampling, particularly how sample selection can be influenced by societal perceptions and biases.
Informed Consent: Informed consent is a process through which researchers provide potential participants with comprehensive information about a study, ensuring they understand the risks, benefits, and their rights before agreeing to participate. This concept emphasizes the importance of voluntary participation and ethical responsibility in research, fostering trust between researchers and participants while protecting individuals' autonomy.
Internal Validity Considerations: Internal validity considerations refer to the extent to which a study can establish a cause-and-effect relationship between variables, without the influence of confounding factors. These considerations are crucial in assessing whether the results of a study truly reflect the impact of the independent variable on the dependent variable, rather than being skewed by external influences or biases that could affect the outcome.
Lack of statistical inference: Lack of statistical inference refers to the inability to make generalizations or draw conclusions about a population based on a sample because the sampling method does not allow for randomization. This situation often arises in non-probability sampling, where selections are made based on subjective criteria, leading to potential biases that prevent accurate extrapolation to a larger group.
Limited external validity: Limited external validity refers to the degree to which research findings can be generalized to settings, populations, or times beyond the specific conditions of the study. It highlights the constraints in applying results from a sample to a broader context, particularly when non-probability sampling methods are used, which often result in a sample that may not accurately represent the larger population.
Limited generalizability: Limited generalizability refers to the extent to which findings from a specific study can be applied to larger populations or different contexts. It highlights the constraints in drawing broader conclusions from research, especially when using non-probability sampling methods that do not ensure every member of a population has a chance to be selected. Understanding limited generalizability is crucial for evaluating the applicability and relevance of research findings in real-world scenarios.
Potential for bias: Potential for bias refers to the likelihood that a research study may produce results that are systematically skewed or unrepresentative of the true population due to various influences. In the context of non-probability sampling, this potential arises because participants are not selected randomly, which can lead to overrepresentation or underrepresentation of certain groups. Understanding this concept is crucial as it affects the reliability and validity of research findings, as well as how generalizable those findings are to the larger population.
Purposive sampling: Purposive sampling is a non-probability sampling technique where researchers select participants based on specific characteristics or criteria relevant to the study. This method is particularly useful for obtaining in-depth insights from a targeted group, ensuring that the sample aligns closely with the research objectives and questions.
Qualitative Research Designs: Qualitative research designs refer to research approaches that focus on understanding human behavior, experiences, and social phenomena through in-depth exploration and interpretation. These designs prioritize the collection of non-numerical data, such as interviews, observations, and open-ended survey responses, which provide rich contextual insights. This approach is often used to uncover meanings and motivations behind actions, making it distinct from quantitative methods that emphasize statistical analysis.
Quota Sampling: Quota sampling is a non-probability sampling technique where researchers create a sample that reflects certain characteristics of a population, ensuring specific subgroups are represented in predetermined quantities. This method allows researchers to gather data from diverse segments without needing to randomly select participants, making it quicker and easier to conduct studies.
Research objectives: Research objectives are specific, measurable goals that guide a research study by outlining what the researcher aims to achieve. They help to focus the study on particular questions or problems, ensuring that the research stays on track and is relevant to the field. Clearly defined research objectives also help in selecting appropriate methodologies and in interpreting the results effectively.
Researcher bias: Researcher bias refers to the tendency for researchers' personal beliefs, preferences, or experiences to unintentionally influence the design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation of their research findings. This bias can compromise the objectivity and validity of the research, affecting how results are perceived and understood. It is crucial to recognize and mitigate researcher bias to ensure accurate representation and reliability in qualitative and quantitative studies.
Resource constraints: Resource constraints refer to the limitations on the availability of resources, such as time, money, and manpower, that affect decision-making and research design. These constraints can significantly impact the choice of methods and the overall feasibility of conducting a study, particularly in non-probability sampling where accessibility and budgetary limitations may lead to biased or less representative samples.
Rich qualitative data: Rich qualitative data refers to detailed and nuanced information that provides deep insights into people's thoughts, feelings, experiences, and behaviors. This type of data is often gathered through methods like interviews, focus groups, and open-ended survey questions, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter beyond mere statistics.
Sampling bias: Sampling bias occurs when the sample selected for a study is not representative of the population intended to be analyzed, leading to skewed results. This bias can arise from the methods used to select participants, which may favor certain groups over others, ultimately distorting the findings and conclusions drawn from the research.
Saturation in qualitative research: Saturation in qualitative research refers to the point at which no new information or themes emerge from data collection. It indicates that researchers have thoroughly explored the topic and gathered enough data to understand the nuances of the phenomenon being studied, often leading to a robust understanding of participants' perspectives.
Selection Bias: Selection bias occurs when individuals included in a study or experiment are not representative of the larger population from which they were drawn. This can skew results and lead to erroneous conclusions about relationships or effects, ultimately impacting the validity and generalizability of research findings.
Snowball sampling: Snowball sampling is a non-probability sampling technique where existing study subjects recruit future subjects from among their acquaintances. This method is particularly useful for researching populations that are hard to access, as it relies on social networks to build a sample group. As individuals refer others, the sample grows like a snowball, which is fitting given the name of the method.
Strategies for improving reliability: Strategies for improving reliability refer to the systematic approaches and methods used to enhance the consistency and accuracy of research findings. These strategies are crucial in ensuring that the results obtained from non-probability sampling are dependable and can be replicated in future studies, which ultimately strengthens the validity of research outcomes.
Time efficiency: Time efficiency refers to the ability to maximize productivity and minimize wasted time in the research process. This concept is particularly important in non-probability sampling, where researchers often seek quick and accessible ways to gather data without the rigorous protocols required in probability sampling methods. Time efficiency allows researchers to achieve their objectives more rapidly, which can be crucial in fast-paced environments or when working with limited resources.
Volunteer Bias: Volunteer bias occurs when individuals who choose to participate in a study differ systematically from those who do not, which can skew the research results. This bias often leads to a non-representative sample, affecting the generalizability of the findings. Volunteer bias is particularly relevant in non-probability sampling methods, where participants are selected based on their willingness to volunteer rather than through random selection.
Vulnerable populations: Vulnerable populations refer to groups of individuals who are at a higher risk of experiencing harm, discrimination, or barriers to resources due to various factors such as socioeconomic status, health conditions, age, or minority status. These populations often require special consideration in research practices to ensure their safety and well-being. Understanding the unique challenges faced by these groups is essential for ethical research design and implementation.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Back
Practice QuizGlossary
Practice QuizGlossary
Next guide